• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of thoraxThoraxVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Thorax. Dec 2000; 55(12): 1033–1039.
PMCID: PMC1745648

Treatment of severe nosocomial pneumonia: a prospective randomised comparison of intravenous ciprofloxacin with imipenem/cilastatin

Abstract

BACKGROUND—A prospective multicentre study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of intravenous ciprofloxacin or imipenem in the treatment of severe nosocomial pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation.
METHODS—Patients with a clinical suspicion of pneumonia were randomised to receive either ciprofloxacin (800-1200 mg/day) or imipenem (2-4 g/day) in doses adjusted for renal function and specimens of the lower respiratory tract were taken. Patients were included in the study when specimens showed significant growth for potentially pathogenic microorganisms in quantitative bacterial cultures (n= 75, ciprofloxacin 41/75 (55%); imipenem 34/75 (45%)). The clinical and bacteriological success rates were the primary and secondary efficacy variables. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed for all randomised patients who received at least one dose of the study medication (n = 149, ciprofloxacin 72/149 (48%), imipenem 77/149 (52%)).
RESULTS—The success rates were generally good, but neither the clinical success rates (ciprofloxacin, 29/41 (71%), imipenem, 27/34 (79%); 95% CI -10.8 to 28.1; p = 0.435) nor the bacteriological response rate (ciprofloxacin, 20/41 (49%), imipenem, 17/34 (50%); 95% CI -21.5 to 23.9; p = 1.0) were significantly different between the study arms. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was recovered in 26/75 patients (35%) and clinical (ciprofloxacin, 10/14 (71%), imipenem, 8/12 (67%); 95% CI -40.4 to 30.9; p = 1.0) and bacteriological response rates (ciprofloxacin, 7/14 (50%), imipenem, 3/12 (25%), 95% CI -60.9 to 10.9, p = 0.247) were not significantly different in this subgroup of patients. Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa developed in 5/26 cases (19%), 1/14 (7%) to ciprofloxacin and 4/12 (33%) to imipenem (p = 0.147), and the mortality was 12/75 (16%) with no difference between treatment groups (ciprofloxacin, 8/41(24%), imipenem 4/34 (17%); p = 0.362). The clinical response was evaluable in 109/149 patients (73%) in the intent-to-treat analysis and was successful in 74/109 patients (68%). The clinical response rates were also not significantly different in the intent-to-treat analysis (ciprofloxacin, 34/52 (65%), imipenem, 40/57 (70%); 95% CI -12.8 to 22.3; p = 0.746).
CONCLUSIONS—Treatment with either ciprofloxacin or imipenem was effective in a selected group of patients with microbiologically confirmed, severe nosocomial pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation. Although no differences between the study medication could be documented in this trial, smaller differences between treatment arms may have been missed because of sample size limitations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (159K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Ajani JA, Carrasco CH, Jackson DE, Wallace S. Combination of cisplatin plus fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy effective against liver metastases from carcinoma of the anal canal. Am J Med. 1989 Aug;87(2):221–224. [PubMed]
  • Peloquin CA, Cumbo TJ, Nix DE, Sands MF, Schentag JJ. Evaluation of intravenous ciprofloxacin in patients with nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections. Impact of plasma concentrations, organism, minimum inhibitory concentration, and clinical condition on bacterial eradication. Arch Intern Med. 1989 Oct;149(10):2269–2273. [PubMed]
  • Potgieter PD, Linton DM, Forder AA, Plumb H. Imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of severe nosocomial pneumonia. S Afr Med J. 1988 Oct 15;74(8):390–392. [PubMed]
  • Salata RA, Gebhart RL, Palmer DL, Wade BH, Scheld WM, Groschel DH, Wenzel RP, Mandell GL, Duma RJ. Pneumonia treated with imipenem/cilastatin. Am J Med. 1985 Jun 7;78(6A):104–109. [PubMed]
  • Beasley CR, Humble MW, O'Donnell TV. Treatment of pneumonia with imipenem/cilastatin. N Z Med J. 1985 Jun 26;98(781):494–497. [PubMed]
  • Rapp RP, Young B, Bertch K, Tibbs P, Foster TS. Clinical outcome of nosocomial pneumonia following imipenem/cilastatin therapy. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1987 Mar;21(3):272–276. [PubMed]
  • Ernst JA, Sy ER, Colon-Lucca H, Sandhu N, Rallos T, Lorian V. Ciprofloxacin in the treatment of pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Jun;29(6):1088–1089. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Colardyn F, Faulkner KL. Intravenous meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized patients. Meropenem Serious Infection Study Group. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Sep;38(3):523–537. [PubMed]
  • Cometta A, Baumgartner JD, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Pittet D, Chopart P, Schaad U, Herter C, Eggimann P, Huber O, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem monotherapy with imipenem plus netilmicin for treatment of severe infections in nonneutropenic patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Jun;38(6):1309–1313. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hartenauer U, Weilemann LS, Bodmann KF, Ritzerfeld WW, Asmus S, Koch EM. Comparative clinical trial of ceftazidime and imipenem/cilastatin in patients with severe nosocomial pneumonias and septicaemias. J Hosp Infect. 1990 Apr;15 (Suppl A):61–64. [PubMed]
  • Khan FA, Basir R. Sequential intravenous-oral administration of ciprofloxacin vs ceftazidime in serious bacterial respiratory tract infections. Chest. 1989 Sep;96(3):528–537. [PubMed]
  • Rapp RP, Billeter M, Hatton J, Young AB, Tibbs PA, Dempsey RJ. Intravenous ciprofloxacin versus ceftazidime for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and urinary tract infection. Clin Pharm. 1991 Jan;10(1):49–55. [PubMed]
  • Diaz-Mitoma F, Harding GK, Louie TJ, Thomson M, James M, Ronald AR. Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem/cilastatin and cefotaxime for treatment of lung, soft tissue, and renal infections. Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;7 (Suppl 3):S452–S457. [PubMed]
  • Baumgartner JD, Glauser MP. Comparative study of imipenem in severe infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 Dec;12 (Suppl 500):141–148. [PubMed]
  • Stamboulian D, Argüello EA, Jasovich A, Villar O, Maglio F. Comparative clinical evaluation of imipenem/cilastatin vs. cefotaxime in treatment of severe bacterial infections. Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;7 (Suppl 3):S458–S462. [PubMed]
  • Lode H, Wiley R, Höffken G, Wagner J, Borner K. Prospective randomized controlled study of ciprofloxacin versus imipenem-cilastatin in severe clinical infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Oct;31(10):1491–1496. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Polk HC, Jr, Livingston DH, Fry DE, Malangoni MA, Fabian T, Trachtenberg LS, Gardner SA, Kesterson L, Cheadle WG. Treatment of pneumonia in mechanically ventilated trauma patients. Results of a prospective trial. Arch Surg. 1997 Oct;132(10):1086–1092. [PubMed]
  • Fink MP, Snydman DR, Niederman MS, Leeper KV, Jr, Johnson RH, Heard SO, Wunderink RG, Caldwell JW, Schentag JJ, Siami GA, et al. Treatment of severe pneumonia in hospitalized patients: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing intravenous ciprofloxacin with imipenem-cilastatin. The Severe Pneumonia Study Group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Mar;38(3):547–557. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • el-Ebiary M, Torres A, González J, de la Bellacasa JP, García C, Jiménez de Anta MT, Ferrer M, Rodriguez-Roisin R. Quantitative cultures of endotracheal aspirates for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Dec;148(6 Pt 1):1552–1557. [PubMed]
  • Craven DE, Steger KA, Barber TW. Preventing nosocomial pneumonia: state of the art and perspectives for the 1990s. Am J Med. 1991 Sep 16;91(3B):44S–53S. [PubMed]
  • Torres A, Aznar R, Gatell JM, Jiménez P, González J, Ferrer A, Celis R, Rodriguez-Roisin R. Incidence, risk, and prognosis factors of nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Sep;142(3):523–528. [PubMed]
  • Trouillet JL, Chastre J, Vuagnat A, Joly-Guillou ML, Combaux D, Dombret MC, Gibert C. Ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by potentially drug-resistant bacteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;157(2):531–539. [PubMed]
  • Arbo MD, Snydman DR. Monotherapy is appropriate for nosocomial pneumonia in the intensive care unit. Semin Respir Infect. 1993 Dec;8(4):259–267. [PubMed]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...