Logo of straninfSexually Transmitted InfectionsVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Sex Transm Infect. Jun 2001; 77(3): 194–198.
PMCID: PMC1744322

The acceptability of urinary LCR testing for Chlamydia trachomatis among participants in a probability sample survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles



A table detailing response rates appears on the STI website.


Objectives: To examine the factors that influence respondents' willingness to participate in urinary testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in a general population feasibility survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles.

Methods: 199 sexually experienced, 18–44 year old participants, recruited as part of a larger (n=901) methodological study of sexual attitudes and lifestyles, were invited to provide a urine sample for chlamydial infection testing using ligase chain reaction (LCR) techniques. Analysis of the survey data and in-depth qualitative interviews were undertaken to explore the factors that influenced participants' decisions to participate.

Results: 143/199 (72%) participants agreed to provide a urine sample. The likelihood of providing a urine sample was reduced if other individuals were present in the home at the time of interview (OR 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.20–0.90, p=0.03). Trust and rapport with the interviewer, understanding the aims of the test, sense of obligation, and perceived importance of the test were identified as additional influencing factors in the in-depth interviews.

Conclusions: Survey respondents' uncertainty or embarrassment at participating in urine testing can be overcome if they are well informed, motivated by the potential health gain, and briefed by trained and confident interviewers.

Key Words: screening; chlamydia; sexually transmitted diseases; survey; sexual behaviour

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (102K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Black CM. Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997 Jan;10(1):160–184. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Grun L, Tassano-Smith J, Carder C, Johnson AM, Robinson A, Murray E, Stephenson J, Haines A, Copas A, Ridgway G. Comparison of two methods of screening for genital chlamydial infection in women attending in general practice: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 1997 Jul 26;315(7102):226–230. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ostergaard L, Andersen B, Olesen F, Moller JK. Efficacy of home sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: randomised study. BMJ. 1998 Jul 4;317(7150):26–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Macleod J, Rowsell R, Horner P, Crowley T, Caul EO, Low N, Smith GD. Postal urine specimens: are they a feasible method for genital chlamydial infection screening? Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):455–458. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ku L, Sonenstein FL, Turner CF, Aral SO, Black CM. The promise of integrated representative surveys about sexually transmitted diseases and behavior. Sex Transm Dis. 1997 May;24(5):299–309. [PubMed]
  • Stokes T. Screening for Chlamydia in general practice: a literature review and summary of the evidence. J Public Health Med. 1997 Jun;19(2):222–232. [PubMed]
  • Copas AJ, Johnson AM, Wadsworth J. Assessing participation bias in a sexual behaviour survey: implications for measuring HIV risk. AIDS. 1997 May;11(6):783–790. [PubMed]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...