• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of qualsafetyQuality and Safety in Health CareCurrent TOCInstructions for authors
Qual Saf Health Care. Aug 2004; 13(4): 260–264.
PMCID: PMC1743867

Developing quality indicators for older adults: transfer from the USA to the UK is feasible

Abstract

Background: Measurement of the quality of health care is essential for quality improvement, and patients are an underused source of data about quality of care. We describe the adaptation of a set of USA quality indicators for use in patient interview surveys in England, to measure the extent to which older patients receive a broad range of effective healthcare interventions in both primary and secondary care.

Method: One hundred and nineteen quality indicators covering 16 clinical areas, based on a set of indicators for the care of vulnerable elderly patients in the USA, were reviewed by a panel of 10 clinical experts in England. A modified version of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used and panel members were supplied with literature reviews summarising the evidence base for each quality indicator. The indicators were sent for comment before the panel meeting to UK charitable organisations for older people.

Results: The panel rated 102 of the 119 indicators (86%) as valid for use in England; 17 (14%) were rejected as invalid. All 58 indicators about treatment or continuity and follow up were rated as valid compared with just over half (13 of 24) of the indicators about screening.

Conclusions: These 102 indicators are suitable for use in patient interview surveys, including the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). The systematic measurement of quality of care at the population level and identification of gaps in quality is essential for quality improvement. There is potential for transfer of quality indicators between countries, at least for the health care of older people.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (79K).

Supplementary Material

[Web-only Appendices]

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Wennberg JE. Understanding geographic variations in health care delivery. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 7;340(1):52–53. [PubMed]
  • Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A, Solomon DH, Kosecoff J, Park RE. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;2(1):53–63. [PubMed]
  • Shekelle Paul. The appropriateness method. Med Decis Making. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):228–231. [PubMed]
  • McGlynn Elizabeth A, Asch Steven M, Adams John, Keesey Joan, Hicks Jennifer, DeCristofaro Alison, Kerr Eve A. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635–2645. [PubMed]
  • Wenger Neil S, Solomon David H, Roth Carol P, MacLean Catherine H, Saliba Debra, Kamberg Caren J, Rubenstein Laurence Z, Young Roy T, Sloss Elizabeth M, Louie Rachel, et al. The quality of medical care provided to vulnerable community-dwelling older patients. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Nov 4;139(9):740–747. [PubMed]
  • Seddon ME, Marshall MN, Campbell SM, Roland MO. Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10(3):152–158. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mant J, Hicks N. Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarction. BMJ. 1995 Sep 23;311(7008):793–796. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Shekelle PG, MacLean CH, Morton SC, Wenger NS. Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Oct 16;135(8 Pt 2):647–652. [PubMed]
  • Jha Ashish K, Perlin Jonathan B, Kizer Kenneth W, Dudley R Adams. Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 29;348(22):2218–2227. [PubMed]
  • McColl A, Roderick P, Gabbay J, Smith H, Moore M. Performance indicators for primary care groups: an evidence based approach. BMJ. 1998 Nov 14;317(7169):1354–1360. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Starfield B. New paradigms for quality in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Apr;51(465):303–309. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kirk SA, Campbell SM, Kennell-Webb S, Reeves D, Roland MO, Marshall MN. Assessing the quality of care of multiple conditions in general practice: practical and methodological problems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12(6):421–427. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, McGlynn EA, Campbell S, Brook RH, Roland MO. Can health care quality indicators be transferred between countries? Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(1):8–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):358–364. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Campbell SM, Roland MO, Shekelle PG, Cantrill JA, Buetow SA, Cragg DK. Development of review criteria for assessing the quality of management of stable angina, adult asthma, and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in general practice. Qual Health Care. 1999 Mar;8(1):6–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Quality & Safety in Health Care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...