Logo of qualhcLink to Publisher's site
Qual Health Care. Dec 2001; 10(4): 224–228.
PMCID: PMC1743447

Feedback of patients' evaluations of general practice care: a randomised trial


Objective—To assess the effects of feedback of patients' evaluations of care to general practitioners.

Design—Randomised trial.

Setting—General practice in the Netherlands.

Subjects—55 GPs and samples of 3691 and 3595 adult patients before and after the intervention, respectively.

Interventions—GPs in the intervention group were given an individualised structured feedback report concerning evaluations of care provided by their own patients. Reference figures referring to other GPs were added as well as suggestions for interpretation of this feedback, an evidence-based overview of factors determining patients' evaluations of care, and methods to discuss and plan improvements.

Main outcome measures—Patients' evaluations of nine dimensions of general practice measured with the CEP, a previously validated questionnaire consisting of 64 questions, using a six point answering scale (1=poor, 6=very good).

Results—Mean scores per CEP dimension varied from 3.88 to 4.77. Multilevel regression analysis showed that, after correction for baseline scores, patients' evaluations of continuity and medical care were less positive after the intervention in the intervention group (4.60 v 4.77, p<0.05 and 4.68 v 4.71, p<0.05, respectively). No differences were found in the remaining seven CEP dimensions.

Conclusions—Providing feedback on patients' evaluations of care to GPs did not result in changes in their evaluation of the care received. This conclusion challenges the relevance of feedback on patients' evaluations of care for quality improvement.

Key Words: patient feedback; general practice; quality improvement

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Lewis JR. Patient views on quality care in general practice: literature review. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Sep;39(5):655–670. [PubMed]
  • Scott A, Smith RD. Keeping the customer satisfied: issues in the interpretation and use of patient satisfaction surveys. Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Dec;6(4):353–359. [PubMed]
  • Hall JA, Milburn MA, Epstein AM. A causal model of health status and satisfaction with medical care. Med Care. 1993 Jan;31(1):84–94. [PubMed]
  • Wensing M, Grol R, Asberg J, van Montfort P, van Weel C, Felling A. Does the health status of chronically ill patients predict their judgements of the quality of general practice care? Qual Life Res. 1997 May;6(4):293–299. [PubMed]
  • Cleary PD. The increasing importance of patient surveys. Now that sound methods exist, patient surveys can facilitate improvement. BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):720–721. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tasa K, Baker GR, Murray M. Using patient feedback for quality improvement. Qual Manag Health Care. 1996 Winter;4(2):55–67. [PubMed]
  • Fitzpatrick R. Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations. BMJ. 1991 Apr 13;302(6781):887–889. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hearnshaw H, Baker R, Cooper A, Eccles M, Soper J. The costs and benefits of asking patients for their opinions about general practice. Fam Pract. 1996 Feb;13(1):52–58. [PubMed]
  • Brody DS. Feedback from patients as a means of teaching nontechnological aspects of medical care. J Med Educ. 1980 Jan;55(1):34–41. [PubMed]
  • Cope DW, Linn LS, Leake BD, Barrett PA. Modification of residents' behavior by preceptor feedback of patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 1986 Nov-Dec;1(6):394–398. [PubMed]
  • Falvo D. Patient perception as a tool for evaluation and feedback in family practice resident training. J Fam Pract. 1980 Mar;10(3):471–474. [PubMed]
  • Greco MJ, Brownlea AA, McGovern JM. Utilising patient feedback in the RACGP training program. An exploratory study. Aust Fam Physician. 1995 Jun;24(6):1077–1081. [PubMed]
  • Niles N, Tarbox G, Schults W, Swartz W, Wolf E, Robb J, Plume S, Nelson EC, Nugent W. Using qualitative and quantitative patient satisfaction data to improve the quality of cardiac care. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1996 May;22(5):323–335. [PubMed]
  • Stillman PL, Burpeau-Di Gregorio MY, Nicholson GI, Sabers DL, Stillman AE. Six years of experience using patient instructors to teach interviewing skills. J Med Educ. 1983 Dec;58(12):941–946. [PubMed]
  • Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):465–468. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Greenhalgh J, Meadows K. The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Nov;5(4):401–416. [PubMed]
  • Mugford M, Banfield P, O'Hanlon M. Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review. BMJ. 1991 Aug 17;303(6799):398–402. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wensing M, van der Weijden T, Grol R. Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective? Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Feb;48(427):991–997. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wensing M. Evidence-based patient empowerment. Qual Health Care. 2000 Dec;9(4):200–201. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...