|
|
Postgrad Med J. 2005 September; 81(959): 599–603. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.030148. | PMCID: PMC1743358 |
The laparoscopic nephrectomy learning curve: a single centre's development of a de novo practice J Phillips, J Catto, V Lavin, D Doyle, D Smith, K Hastie, and N Oakley Department of Urological Surgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK. Email: J.Phillips/at/sheffield.ac.uk Objective: There has been a dramatic increase in the interest and practice of laparoscopic urology, with nephrectomy having become the commonest laparoscopic urological procedure. Compared with open nephrectomy, it results in reduced morbidity and shorter convalescence times while maintaining oncological safety. However, while these results predominately stem from institutions with well developed laparoscopic programmes, little is known about the results in centres that have newly adopted this technique. The introduction of a laparoscopic urological service at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital provided an opportunity to study these factors. Methods: Since the appointment in October 2000 of a urological surgeon (N Oakley) to develop the laparoscopic service, there have been over 200 laparoscopic procedures including 121 nephrectomies performed at this centre. Full details were collected for each of these cases, and in addition, compared with retrospective data for 50 open nephrectomies performed during the same time period. Results: With increased operator experience the median operative duration, complication, transfusion, and conversion rates significantly improved. While a learning curve was evident, the overall operative complication (9%) and conversion rates (6%) were low, in addition to patient morbidity (16.5%) and mortality (0%) rates, showing that this learning curve had no deleterious effects upon patient care. The median hospital stay was four days, which reduced to three with experience and was significantly shorter than for open nephrectomy at this institution (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The development of a successful laparoscopic programme can be achieved with a comparatively short learning curve and without detriment to the patient provided the necessary steps are observed. The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (74K). These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article. - Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, Roemer FD, Pingleton ED, Thomson PG, Long SR. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol. 1991 Aug;146(2):278–282. [PubMed]
- Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol. 2000 Jun;163(6):1643–1649. [PubMed]
- Siqueira Tibério M, Jr, Kuo Ramsay L, Gardner Thomas A, Paterson Ryan F, Stevens Larry H, Lingeman James E, Koch Michael O, Shalhav Arieh L. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience. J Urol. 2002 Oct;168(4 Pt 1):1361–1365. [PubMed]
- Fornara P, Doehn C, Friedrich HJ, Jocham D. Nonrandomized comparison of open flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy in 249 patients with benign renal disease. Eur Urol. 2001 Jul;40(1):24–31. [PubMed]
- Gill IS, Clayman RV, McDougall EM. Advances in urological laparoscopy. J Urol. 1995 Oct;154(4):1275–1294. [PubMed]
- Meraney Anoop M, Gill Inderbir S. Financial analysis of open versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy. J Urol. 2002 Apr;167(4):1757–1762. [PubMed]
- Cicco A, Salomon L, Hoznek H, Alame W, Saint F, Bralet MP, Antiphon P, Chopin DK, Abbou CC. Carcinological risks and retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Eur Urol. 2000 Nov;38(5):606–612. [PubMed]
- Rassweiler Jens, Tsivian Alexander, Kumar A V Ravi, Lymberakis Christos, Schulze Micheal, Seeman Othmar, Frede Thomas. Oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery for urological malignancy: experience with more than 1,000 operations. J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2072–2075. [PubMed]
- Lam John S, Shvarts Oleg, Pantuck Allan J. Changing concepts in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2004 Jun;45(6):692–705. [PubMed]
- El Fettouh Hazem Abou, Rassweiler Jens J, Schulze Michael, Salomon Laurent, Allan James, Ramakumar Sanjay, Jarrett Thomas, Abbou Claude C, Tolley David A, Kavoussi Louis R, Gill Inderbir S. Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy: results of an international multicenter study. Eur Urol. 2002 Nov;42(5):447–452. [PubMed]
- Higashihara E, Baba S, Nakagawa K, Murai M, Go H, Takeda M, Takahashi K, Suzuki K, Fujita K, Ono Y, Ohshima S, Matsuda T, Terachi T, Yoshida O. Learning curve and conversion to open surgery in cases of laparoscopic adrenalectomy and nephrectomy. J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):650–653. [PubMed]
- Rassweiler JJ, Henkel TO, Stoch C, Greschner M, Becker P, Preminger GM, Schulman CC, Frede T, Alken P. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy and other procedures in the upper retroperitoneum using a balloon dissection technique. Eur Urol. 1994;25(3):229–236. [PubMed]
- Vögeli Thomas A, Burchardt Martin, Fornara Paolo, Rassweiler Jens, Sulser Tullio. Current laparoscopic practice patterns in urology: results of a survey among urologists in Germany and Switzerland. Eur Urol. 2002 Nov;42(5):441–446. [PubMed]
- McNeill SA, Tolley DA. Laparoscopy in urology: indications and training. BJU Int. 2002 Feb;89(3):169–173. [PubMed]
- Fabrizio Michael D, Tuerk Ingolf, Schellhammer Paul F. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: decreasing the learning curve using a mentor initiated approach. J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2063–2065. [PubMed]
- Farhat W, Khoury A, Bagli D, McLorie G, El-Ghoneimi A. Mentored retroperitoneal laparoscopic renal surgery in children: a safe approach to learning. BJU Int. 2003 Oct;92(6):617–620. [PubMed]
- Gettman Matthew T, Kondraske George V, Traxer Olivier, Ogan Ken, Napper Cheryl, Jones Daniel B, Pearle Margaret S, Cadeddu Jeffrey A. Assessment of basic human performance resources predicts operative performance of laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Sep;197(3):489–496. [PubMed]
- Fahlenkamp D, Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Frede T, Loening SA. Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2,407 procedures at 4 German centers. J Urol. 1999 Sep;162(3 Pt 1):765–771. [PubMed]
- Soulié M, Salomon L, Seguin P, Mervant C, Mouly P, Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Plante P, Abbou CC. Multi-institutional study of complications in 1085 laparoscopic urologic procedures. Urology. 2001 Dec;58(6):899–903. [PubMed]
- Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Doublet JD, Guillonneau B. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: review of 1,311 procedures at a single center. J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):23–26. [PubMed]
- Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Ehrlich R, Evans R, Fuchs G, Gersham A, Hulbert JC, McDougall EM, Rosenthal T, et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: a multi-institutional review. J Urol. 1995 Aug;154(2 Pt 1):479–483. [PubMed]
- Gill IS, Meraney AM, Schweizer DK, Savage SS, Hobart MG, Sung GT, Nelson D, Novick AC. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States. Cancer. 2001 Oct 1;92(7):1843–1855. [PubMed]
- Gill IS, Sung GT, Hobart MG, Savage SJ, Meraney AM, Schweizer DK, Klein EA, Novick AC. Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma: the Cleveland Clinic experience. J Urol. 2000 Nov;164(5):1513–1522. [PubMed]
- Breda G, Nakada SY, Rassweiler JJ. Future developments and perspectives in laparoscopy. Eur Urol. 2001 Jul;40(1):84–91. [PubMed]
|
