pmc logo image
Logo of jnnpsycJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and PsychiatryCurrent TOCInstructions for authors

Formats:

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 May; 66(5): 591–599.
PMCID: PMC1736358
Intraoperative monitoring during surgery for acoustic neuroma: benefits of an extratympanic intrameatal electrode
N Mullatti, H Coakham, A Maw, S Butler, and M Morgan
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol BS16 1LE, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES—To assess the utility of an extratympanic intrameatal electrode for intraoperative monitoring during acoustic neuroma and other cerebellopontine angle tumour surgery and to define the neurophysiological and surgical factors which influence hearing preservation.
METHODS—Twenty two patients, 18 with acoustic neuromas and four with other cerebellopontine angle tumours, underwent intraoperative monitoring during tumour excision. The extratympanic intrameatal electrode (IME) was used to record the electrocochleogram (ECoG) and surface electrodes to record the brainstem auditory evoked response (ABR).
RESULTS—The compound action potential (CAP) of the ECoG was two and a half times greater in amplitude than wave I of the ABR and was easily monitored. Virtually instant information was available as minimal averaging was required. Continuous monitoring was possible from the commencement of anaesthesia to skin closure. The IME was easy to place, non-invasive, and did not interfere with the operative field. Operative procedures which affected CAP or wave V latency or amplitude were drilling around the internal auditory meatus, tumour dissection, nerve section, and brainstem and cerebellar retraction. Hearing was achieved in 59% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS—The IME had significant benefits in comparison with other methods of monitoring. The technique provided information beneficial to preservation of hearing.

Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (174K).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Torrens M, Maw R, Coakham H, Butler S, Morgan H. Facial and acoustic nerve preservation during excision of extracanalicular acoustic neuromas using the suboccipital approach. Br J Neurosurg. 1994;8(6):655–665. [PubMed]
  • Samii M, Matthies C. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): hearing function in 1000 tumor resections. Neurosurgery. 1997 Feb;40(2):248–262. [PubMed]
  • Symon L, Bordi LT, Compton JS, Sabin IH, Sayin E. Acoustic neuroma: a review of 392 cases. Br J Neurosurg. 1989;3(3):343–347. [PubMed]
  • Matthies C, Samii M. Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the value of neurophysiology for intraoperative monitoring of auditory function in 200 cases. Neurosurgery. 1997 Mar;40(3):459–468. [PubMed]
  • Harper CM, Harner SG, Slavit DH, Litchy WJ, Daube JR, Beatty CW, Ebersold MJ. Effect of BAEP monitoring on hearing preservation during acoustic neuroma resection. Neurology. 1992 Aug;42(8):1551–1553. [PubMed]
  • Friedman WA, Kaplan BJ, Gravenstein D, Rhoton AL., Jr Intraoperative brain-stem auditory evoked potentials during posterior fossa microvascular decompression. J Neurosurg. 1985 Apr;62(4):552–557. [PubMed]
  • Raudzens PA, Shetter AG. Intraoperative monitoring of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. J Neurosurg. 1982 Sep;57(3):341–348. [PubMed]
  • Grundy BL, Jannetta PJ, Procopio PT, Lina A, Boston JR, Doyle E. Intraoperative monitoring of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. J Neurosurg. 1982 Nov;57(5):674–681. [PubMed]
  • Møller AR, Jannetta PJ. Monitoring auditory functions during cranial nerve microvascular decompression operations by direct recording from the eighth nerve. J Neurosurg. 1983 Sep;59(3):493–499. [PubMed]
  • Møller AR, Jho HD, Jannetta PJ. Preservation of hearing in operations on acoustic tumors: an alternative to recording brain stem auditory evoked potentials. Neurosurgery. 1994 Apr;34(4):688–693. [PubMed]
  • Symon L, Sabin HI, Bentivoglio P, Cheesman AD, Prasher D, Barratt H. Intraoperative monitoring of the electrocochleogram and the preservation of hearing during acoustic neuroma excision. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1988;42:27–30. [PubMed]
  • Ojemann RG, Levine RA, Montgomery WM, McGaffigan P. Use of intraoperative auditory evoked potentials to preserve hearing in unilateral acoustic neuroma removal. J Neurosurg. 1984 Nov;61(5):938–948. [PubMed]
  • Coats AC. On electrocochleographic electrode design. J Acoust Soc Am. 1974 Aug;56(2):708–711. [PubMed]
  • Ruth RA, Lambert PR. Comparison of tympanic membrane to promontory electrode recordings of electrocochleographic responses in patients with Menière's disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989 Jun;100(6):546–552. [PubMed]
  • Roland PS, Yellin MW, Meyerhoff WL, Frank T. Simultaneous comparison between transtympanic and extratympanic electrocochleography. Am J Otol. 1995 Jul;16(4):444–450. [PubMed]
  • Winzenburg SM, Margolis RH, Levine SC, Haines SJ, Fournier EM. Tympanic and transtympanic electrocochleography in acoustic neuroma and vestibular nerve section surgery. Am J Otol. 1993 Jan;14(1):63–69. [PubMed]
  • Cane MA, O'Donoghue GM, Lutman ME. The feasibility of using oto-acoustic emissions to monitor cochlear function during acoustic neuroma surgery. Scand Audiol. 1992;21(3):173–176. [PubMed]
  • Møller AR. Auditory neurophysiology. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 May;11(3):284–308. [PubMed]
  • Nadol JB, Jr, Levine R, Ojemann RG, Martuza RL, Montgomery WW, de Sandoval PK. Preservation of hearing in surgical removal of acoustic neuromas of the internal auditory canal and cerebellar pontine angle. Laryngoscope. 1987 Nov;97(11):1287–1294. [PubMed]
  • Lenarz T, Ernst A. Intraoperative monitoring by transtympanic electrocochleography and brainstem electrical response audiometry in acoustic neuroma surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1992;249(5):257–262. [PubMed]
  • Colletti V, Bricolo A, Fiorino FG, Bruni L. Changes in directly recorded cochlear nerve compound action potentials during acoustic tumor surgery. Skull Base Surg. 1994;4(1):1–9. [PubMed]
  • Umezu H, Aiba T. Preservation of hearing after surgery for acoustic schwannomas: correlation between cochlear nerve function and operative findings. J Neurosurg. 1994 May;80(5):844–848. [PubMed]
  • Sanna M, Karmarkar S, Landolfi M. Hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery: fact or fantasy? J Laryngol Otol. 1995 May;109(5):374–380. [PubMed]
  • Baldwin DL, King TT, Morrison AW. Hearing conservation in acoustic neuroma surgery via the posterior fossa. J Laryngol Otol. 1990 Jun;104(6):463–467. [PubMed]
  • Butler S, Coakham H, Maw R, Morgan H. Physiological identification of the auditory nerve during surgery for acoustic neuroma. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1995 Aug;20(4):312–317. [PubMed]