• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jmedethJournal of Medical EthicsCurrent TOCInstructions to authors
J Med Ethics. Aug 2005; 31(8): 457–462.
PMCID: PMC1734205

Acceptability of compulsory powers in the community: the ethical considerations of mental health service users on Supervised Discharge and Guardianship

Abstract

Design: A qualitative study employing in-depth interviews. Participants were asked to respond to hypothetical questions regarding the application of compulsory powers under the Mental Health Act 1983 for people other than themselves.

Setting: Community setting in Southeast England.

Participants: Mental health service users subject to Supervised Discharge/Guardianship.

Results: Participants considered that the use of compulsory powers was justified if there were some ultimate benefit, and if there was evidence of mental health problems, dangerousness, or a lack of insight. However, participants rejected intrusions into their autonomy and privacy.

Conclusions: This paper's participants indicated that the proposed CTO may be unacceptable because it would threaten service users' autonomy. Service users' acceptance of proposed changes is conditional and they emphasised the importance of consent; there is no suggestion that consent will be required for the CTO. The findings also have implications for the exploration of mental health service users' views and how they might contribute to policy, service planning, and research.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (81K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Canvin Krysia, Bartlett Annie, Pinfold Vanessa. A 'bittersweet pill to swallow': learning from mental health service users' responses to compulsory community care in England. Health Soc Care Community. 2002 Sep;10(5):361–369. [PubMed]
  • Sutherby K, Szmukler GI, Halpern A, Alexander M, Thornicroft G, Johnson C, Wright S. A study of 'crisis cards' in a community psychiatric service. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1999 Jul;100(1):56–61. [PubMed]
  • Backlar P, McFarland BH, Swanson JW, Mahler J. Consumer, provider, and informal caregiver opinions on psychiatric advance directives. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2001 Jul;28(6):427–441. [PubMed]
  • Backlar P, McFarland BH. A survey on use of advance directives for mental health treatment in Oregon. Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Dec;47(12):1387–1389. [PubMed]
  • Srebnik DS, La Fond JQ. Advance directives for mental health treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Jul;50(7):919–925. [PubMed]
  • Swanson JW, Tepper MC, Backlar P, Swartz MS. Psychiatric advance directives: an alternative to coercive treatment? Psychiatry. 2000 Summer;63(2):160–172. [PubMed]
  • Mowbray CT, Moxley DP, Collins ME. Consumers as mental health providers: first-person accounts of benefits and limitations. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 Nov;25(4):397–411. [PubMed]
  • van Hoof F, van Weeghel J, Kroon H. Community care: exploring the priorities of clients, mental health professionals and community providers. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2000 Autumn;46(3):208–219. [PubMed]
  • Campbell J. How consumers/survivors are evaluating the quality of psychiatric care. Eval Rev. 1997 Jun;21(3):357–363. [PubMed]
  • Hostick T. Developing user involvement in mental health services. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 1998 Dec;5(6):439–444. [PubMed]
  • Perkins DV, Hudson BL, Gray DM, Stewart M. Decisions and justifications by community mental health providers about hypothetical ethical dilemmas. Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Oct;49(10):1317–1322. [PubMed]
  • Pinfold V, Bindman J, Thornicroft G, Franklin D, Hatfield B. Persuading the persuadable: evaluating compulsory treatment in England using Supervised Discharge Orders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001 May;36(5):260–266. [PubMed]
  • Magnusson A, Lützén K. Intrusion into patient privacy: a moral concern in the home care of persons with chronic mental illness. Nurs Ethics. 1999 Sep;6(5):399–410. [PubMed]
  • Watts Jay, Priebe Stefan. A phenomenological account of users' experiences of assertive community treatment. Bioethics. 2002 Sep;16(5):439–454. [PubMed]
  • Symonds B. The philosophical and sociological context of mental health care legislation. J Adv Nurs. 1998 May;27(5):946–954. [PubMed]
  • Alexius Birgitta, Berg Kerstin, Aberg-Wistedt Anna. Psychiatrists' perception of psychiatric commitment. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2002 Mar-Apr;25(2):109–117. [PubMed]
  • Coid Jeremy, Maden Tony. Should psychiatrists protect the public? BMJ. 2003 Feb 22;326(7386):406–407. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pescosolido BA, Monahan J, Link BG, Stueve A, Kikuzawa S. The public's view of the competence, dangerousness, and need for legal coercion of persons with mental health problems. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1339–1345. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lauber Christoph, Nordt C, Falcato L, Rössler W. Public attitude to compulsory admission of mentally ill people. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002 May;105(5):385–389. [PubMed]
  • Ryan T. Perceived risks associated with mental illness: beyond homicide and suicide. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Jan;46(2):287–297. [PubMed]
  • Davidson Laura. Human rights vs. public protection. English mental health law in crisis? Int J Law Psychiatry. 2002 Sep-Oct;25(5):491–515. [PubMed]
  • Szmukler G, Thornicroft G, Holloway F, Bowden P. Homicides and community care: the evidence. Br J Psychiatry. 1999 Jun;174:564–565. [PubMed]
  • Davis Simon. Autonomy versus coercion: reconciling competing perspectives in community mental health. Community Ment Health J. 2002 Jun;38(3):239–250. [PubMed]
  • Taylor PJ, Gunn J. Homicides by people with mental illness: myth and reality. Br J Psychiatry. 1999 Jan;174:9–14. [PubMed]
  • Faulkner Alison, Thomas Phil. User-led research and evidence-based medicine. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;180:1–3. [PubMed]
  • Breeze J. Can paternalism be justified in mental health care? J Adv Nurs. 1998 Aug;28(2):260–265. [PubMed]
  • Christensen RC. Ethical issues in community mental health: cases and conflicts. Community Ment Health J. 1997 Feb;33(1):5–11. [PubMed]
  • Lefkovitch Y, Weiser M, Levy A. Involuntary outpatient commitment: ethics and problems. Med Law. 1993;12(3-5):213–220. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...