Logo of jmedethJournal of Medical EthicsVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
J Med Ethics. 2005 Dec; 31(12): 721–726.
PMCID: PMC1734075

Parental preferences for neonatal resuscitation research consent: a pilot study

Abstract

Objective: Obtaining informed consent for resuscitation research, especially in the newborn, is problematic. This study aimed to evaluate parental preferences for hypothetical consent procedures in neonatal resuscitation research.

Design: Mail-out survey questionnaire.

Setting/participants: Randomly selected parents who had received obstetrical or neonatal care at a tertiary perinatal centre.

Main outcome measures: Parental levels of comfort (Likert-type scale 1–6) regarding different methods of obtaining consent in hypothetical resuscitation research scenarios.

Results: The response rate was 34%. The respondents were a group of highly educated women with a higher family income than would be expected in the general population. In terms of results, parents valued the impact the research would have on their baby and the importance of a positive interaction with the physicians conducting the research study. Parents felt most comfortable with prospective consent in the setting of prenatal classes or prenatal visits with a physician, but they were somewhat uncomfortable with prospective consent upon admission to hospital after labour had begun. Parents were uncomfortable with waived consent, deferred consent, and opting out, no matter when during the pregnancy consent was requested.

Conclusion: This pilot study reports parental preferences for prenatal information and consent for such research trials of neonatal resuscitation. A low response rate and potentially skewed demographics of the respondents prevent generalisability of this result. Interview studies should be performed to better determine parental preferences for informed consent in a more representative population.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (67K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Mason SA, Allmark PJ. Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study. Lancet. 2000 Dec 16;356(9247):2045–2051. [PubMed]
  • Burgess E, Singhal N, Amin H, McMillan DD, Devrome H. Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 Jul;88(4):F280–F286. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Low James A. Determining the contribution of asphyxia to brain damage in the neonate. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Aug;30(4):276–286. [PubMed]
  • Mason S. Obtaining informed consent for neonatal randomised controlled trials--an "elaborate ritual"? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 May;76(3):F143–F145. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Etchells E, Sharpe G, Walsh P, Williams JR, Singer PA. Bioethics for clinicians: 1. Consent. CMAJ. 1996 Jul 15;155(2):177–180. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Abramson NS, Safar P. Deferred consent: use in clinical resuscitation research. Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial II Study Group. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Jul;19(7):781–784. [PubMed]
  • Biros MH, Lewis RJ, Olson CM, Runge JW, Cummins RO, Fost N. Informed consent in emergency research. Consensus statement from the Coalition Conference of Acute Resuscitation and Critical Care Researchers. JAMA. 1995 Apr 26;273(16):1283–1287. [PubMed]
  • Spivey WH, Abramson NS, Iserson KV, MacKay CR, Cohen MP. Informed consent for biomedical research in acute care medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Nov;20(11):1251–1265. [PubMed]
  • Zelen M. Randomized consent designs for clinical trials: an update. Stat Med. 1990 Jun;9(6):645–656. [PubMed]
  • Allmark P. Should Zelen pre-randomised consent designs be used in some neonatal trials? J Med Ethics. 1999 Aug;25(4):325–329. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rogers CG, Tyson JE, Kennedy KA, Broyles RS, Hickman JF. Conventional consent with opting in versus simplified consent with opting out: an exploratory trial for studies that do not increase patient risk. J Pediatr. 1998 Apr;132(4):606–611. [PubMed]
  • Mutch L, King R. Obtaining parental consent--opting in or opting out? Arch Dis Child. 1985 Oct;60(10):979–980. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Manning DJ. Presumed consent in emergency neonatal research. J Med Ethics. 2000 Aug;26(4):249–253. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Save items

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...