• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jepicomhInstructions for authorsCurrent TOCJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health
J Epidemiol Community Health. Mar 2004; 58(3): 250–257.
PMCID: PMC1732697

The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2000 and accessibility effects on health

Abstract

Study objective: To investigate whether the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2000 (IMD) is more strongly related to inequalities in health in rural areas than traditional deprivation indices. To explore the contribution of the IMD domain "geographical access to services" to understanding rural health variations.

Design: A geographically based cross sectional study.

Setting: Nine counties in the south west region of England.

Participants: All those aged below 65 who reported a limiting long term illness in the 1991 census, and all those who died during 1991–96, aged less than 65 years.

Main results: The IMD is comparable with the Townsend score in its overall correlation with premature mortality (r2 = 0.44 v 0.53) and morbidity (r2 = 0.79 v 0.76). Correlation between the Townsend score and population health is weak in rural areas but the IMD maintains a strong correlation with rates of morbidity (r2 = 0.70). The "geographical access to services" domain of the IMD is not strongly correlated with rates of morbidity in rural areas (r2 = 0.04), and in urban areas displays a negative correlation (r2 = -0.47).

Conclusions: The IMD has a strong relation with health in both rural and urban areas. This is likely to be the result of the inclusion of data in the IMD on the numbers of people claiming benefits related to ill health and disability. The domain "geographical access to services" is not associated with health in rural areas, although it displays some association in urban areas. This domain is potentially important but, as yet, inadequately specified in the IMD for the purposes of health research.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (533K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Barnett S, Roderick P, Martin D, Diamond I. A multilevel analysis of the effects of rurality and social deprivation on premature limiting long term illness. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Jan;55(1):44–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Phillimore P, Reading R. A rural advantage? Urban-rural health differences in northern England. J Public Health Med. 1992 Sep;14(3):290–299. [PubMed]
  • Haynes R, Gale S. Deprivation and poor health in rural areas: inequalities hidden by averages. Health Place. 2000 Dec;6(4):275–285. [PubMed]
  • Cox J. Poverty in rural areas. BMJ. 1998 Mar 7;316(7133):722–722. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wallace M, Charlton J, Denham C. The new OPCS area classifications. Popul Trends. 1995 Spring;(79):15–30. [PubMed]
  • Martin D, Wrigley H, Barnett S, Roderick P. Increasing the sophistication of access measurement in a rural healthcare study. Health Place. 2002 Mar;8(1):3–13. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...