• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of heartHeartVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Heart. Dec 2001; 86(6): 626–631.
PMCID: PMC1729994

Risks of elective cardiac surgery: what do patients want to know?


OBJECTIVE—To examine patients' individual requirements for risk disclosure before surgery.
DESIGN—Structured interview and questionnaire.
SETTING—50 patients interviewed following coronary artery bypass grafting or valve replacement or repair.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Patient assessment of the nature and probability of risks they would have wished to be informed of from a pool comprising death and 13 postoperative complications.
RESULTS—Out of 50 patients, 21 (42%) wanted no risk information at all, 25 (50%) did not want to be advised of the risk of death, and 27 (54%) did not want information about the risk of permanent stroke. This contrasts with standard practice of routinely informing patients of the risk of death and stroke. However, there were pronounced individual patient preferences. Three groups of patients emerged: those requiring little or no risk information, those requiring information about major risks, and those requiring full risk disclosure. Patients were not generally concerned about the specific probabilities of any risk.
CONCLUSIONS—Clinicians counselling patients before operation should routinely discuss patient preferences before risk disclosure, distinguishing among a preference for "no risk information", "all potentially relevant risks", and "those risks considered significant or likely to occur". The fact of individual patient preferences may undermine the concept of the "reasonable patient" in determination of the legal requirements for risk disclosure. Future studies, in addition to replicating the present findings, should examine the reasons underlying individual patient preferences and the long term implications of degrees of risk disclosure, particularly when adverse outcomes occur.

Keywords: cardiac surgery; risk; patient information

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (146K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bogardus ST, Jr, Holmboe E, Jekel JF. Perils, pitfalls, and possibilities in talking about medical risk. JAMA. 1999 Mar 17;281(11):1037–1041. [PubMed]
  • Edwards MH. Satisfying patients' needs for surgical information. Br J Surg. 1990 Apr;77(4):463–465. [PubMed]
  • Bridgewater B, Neve H, Moat N, Hooper T, Jones M. Predicting operative risk for coronary artery surgery in the United Kingdom: a comparison of various risk prediction algorithms. Heart. 1998 Apr;79(4):350–355. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Turner S, Maher EJ, Young T, Young J, Vaughan Hudson G. What are the information priorities for cancer patients involved in treatment decisions? An experienced surrogate study in Hodgkin's disease. Br J Cancer. 1996 Jan;73(2):222–227. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • White DR, Muss HB, Michielutte R, Cooper MR, Jackson DV, Richards F, 2nd, Stuart JJ, Spurr CL. Informed consent: patient information forms in chemotherapy trials. Am J Clin Oncol. 1984 Apr;7(2):183–190. [PubMed]
  • Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Hayter C, Groome P, Nickel JC, Downes H, Mackillop WJ. What questions do patients with curable prostate cancer want answered? Med Decis Making. 2000 Jan-Mar;20(1):7–19. [PubMed]
  • Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Aug;47(3):329–339. [PubMed]
  • Lidz CW, Meisel A, Osterweis M, Holden JL, Marx JH, Munetz MR. Barriers to informed consent. Ann Intern Med. 1983 Oct;99(4):539–543. [PubMed]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...