• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of heartHeartCurrent TOCInstructions to authors
Heart. Jan 2001; 85(1): 37–43.
PMCID: PMC1729574

Comparative accuracy of cardiovascular risk prediction methods in primary care patients

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To compare the relative accuracy of cardiovascular disease risk prediction methods based on equations derived from the Framingham heart study.
DESIGN—Risk factor data were collected prospectively from subjects being evaluated by their primary care physicians for prevention of cardiovascular disease. Projected cardiovascular risks were calculated for each patient with the Framingham equations, and also estimated from the risk tables and charts based on the same equations.
SETTING—12 primary care practices (46 doctors) in Birmingham.
PATIENTS—691 subjects aged 30-70 years.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Framingham based risk tables and charts for treatment thresholds based on projected cardiovascular disease or coronary heart disease risk.
RESULTS—59 subjects (8.5%) had projected 10 year coronary heart disease risks [gt-or-equal, slanted] 30%, and 291 (42.1%) had risks [gt-or-equal, slanted] 15%. At equivalent projected risk levels (10 year coronary heart disease [gt-or-equal, slanted] 30% and five year cardiovascular disease [gt-or-equal, slanted] 20%), the original Sheffield tables and those from New Zealand have the same sensitivities (40.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 26.6% to 57.8% v 41.2%, 95% CI 28.7% to 57.3%) and specificities (98.6%, 95% CI 97.2% to 99.3% v 99.7%, 95% CI 98.8% to 100%). Modifications to the Sheffield tables improve sensitivity (91.4%, 95% CI 81.3% to 96.9%) but reduce specificity (95.8%, 95% CI 93.9% to 97.3%). The revised joint British recommendations' charts have high specificity (98.7%, 95% CI 97.5% to 99.5%) and good sensitivity (84.7%, 95% CI 71.0% to 93.0%).
CONCLUSIONS—The revised joint British recommendations charts appear to have the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for use in primary care patients.


Keywords: Framingham study; cardiovascular risk assessment

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (138K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PW, Kannel WB. Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. Am Heart J. 1991 Jan;121(1 Pt 2):293–298. [PubMed]
  • Ramsay LE, Haq IU, Jackson PR, Yeo WW, Pickin DM, Payne JN. Targeting lipid-lowering drug therapy for primary prevention of coronary disease: an updated Sheffield table. Lancet. 1996 Aug 10;348(9024):387–388. [PubMed]
  • Wallis EJ, Ramsay LE, Ul Haq I, Ghahramani P, Jackson PR, Rowland-Yeo K, Yeo WW. Coronary and cardiovascular risk estimation for primary prevention: validation of a new Sheffield table in the 1995 Scottish health survey population. BMJ. 2000 Mar 11;320(7236):671–676. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McLeod AJ, Armitage M. Use of statins. But New Zealand tables are better. BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):474–474. [PubMed]
  • Jackson R. Updated New Zealand cardiovascular disease risk-benefit prediction guide. BMJ. 2000 Mar 11;320(7236):709–710. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wood D, De Backer G, Faergeman O, Graham I, Mancia G, Pyörälä K. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Coronary Prevention. Atherosclerosis. 1998 Oct;140(2):199–270. [PubMed]
  • McCormack JP, Levine M, Rangno RE. Primary prevention of heart disease and stroke: a simplified approach to estimating risk of events and making drug treatment decisions. CMAJ. 1997 Aug 15;157(4):422–428. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998 May 12;97(18):1837–1847. [PubMed]
  • Bayly GR, Bartlett WA, Davies PH, Husband D, Haddon A, Game FL, Jones AF. Laboratory-based calculation of coronary heart disease risk in a hospital diabetic clinic. Diabet Med. 1999 Aug;16(8):697–701. [PubMed]
  • Jackson R. Guidelines on preventing cardiovascular disease in clinical practice. BMJ. 2000 Mar 11;320(7236):659–661. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jackson RT, Sackett DL. Guidelines for managing raised blood pressure. BMJ. 1996 Jul 13;313(7049):64–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ramsay LE, Williams B, Johnston GD, MacGregor GA, Poston L, Potter JF, Poulter NR, Russell G. British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary. BMJ. 1999 Sep 4;319(7210):630–635. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ramachandran S, French JM, Vanderpump MP, Croft P, Neary RH. Using the Framingham model to predict heart disease in the United Kingdom: retrospective study. BMJ. 2000 Mar 11;320(7236):676–677. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tunstall-Pedoe H. "Absolute" is inappropriate for quantitative risk estimation. BMJ. 2000 Mar 11;320(7236):723–723. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Durrington PN, Prais H, Bhatnagar D, France M, Crowley V, Khan J, Morgan J. Indications for cholesterol-lowering medication: comparison of risk-assessment methods. Lancet. 1999 Jan 23;353(9149):278–281. [PubMed]
  • Ul Haq I, Ramsay LE, Pickin DM, Yeo WW, Jackson PR, Payne JN. Lipid-lowering for prevention of coronary heart disease: what policy now? Clin Sci (Lond) 1996 Oct;91(4):399–413. [PubMed]
  • Jones AF. Statins and hypercholesterolaemia: UK Standing Medical Advisory Committee guidelines. Lancet. 1997 Oct 18;350(9085):1174–1175. [PubMed]
  • Isles CG, Ritchie LD, Murchie P, Norrie J. Risk assessment in primary prevention of coronary heart disease: randomised comparison of three scoring methods. BMJ. 2000 Mar 11;320(7236):690–691. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hingorani AD, Vallance P. A simple computer program for guiding management of cardiovascular risk factors and prescribing. BMJ. 1999 Jan 9;318(7176):101–105. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles