• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of heartHeartCurrent TOCInstructions to authors
Heart. Jun 1999; 81(6): 586–592.
PMCID: PMC1729055

Waiting times and prioritisation for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To review the New Zealand coronary artery bypass priority score instituted in May 1996, and specifically to determine whether it prioritises patients at high risk of cardiac events while waiting. The New Zealand score is compared with the Ontario urgency rating score, and waiting times for surgery are compared with the maximum times recommended by the Ontario consensus panel.
DESIGN—Retrospective review of patients accepted for isolated coronary artery bypass surgery between 1 January 1993 and 31 January 1996.
SETTING—Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Waiting time, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and cardiac readmission.
RESULTS—The median waiting times were five days for hospital cases (n = 721) and 146 days for out of hospital cases (n = 701). Of the latter group, 28% waited more than a year, 33% had their surgery expedited because of worsening symptoms, and 19% failed to meet the cut off point set by the New Zealand score for acceptance onto the list. Twenty two patients died, 18 on the outpatient waiting list (waiting list mortality 2.6%, risk 0.28% per month of waiting), and 132 were readmitted, 12% with myocardial infarction and 76% with unstable angina. Risk factors for a composite end point of death or myocardial infarction and/or cardiac readmission were: previous coronary artery bypass surgery (p = 0.001), class III or IV angina (p = 0.002), and hypertension (p = 0.005). The New Zealand score did not identify those at risk. Excluding hospital cases, 32% had surgery within the time recommended by the Ontario consensus panel.
CONCLUSIONS—Waiting times for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand are considerably longer than those in Ontario, Canada. By using a numerical cut off point, implementation of the New Zealand priority scoring system has restricted access to coronary surgery on the basis of funding constraints rather than clinical appropriateness. The score does not add greatly to the clinicians' prioritisation in predicting those patients who will suffer events while waiting.


Keywords: coronary artery bypass surgery; prioritisation

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (135K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Schwartz WB, Aaron HJ. Rationing hospital care. Lessons from Britain. N Engl J Med. 1984 Jan 5;310(1):52–56. [PubMed]
  • Bowling A. Health care rationing: the public's debate. BMJ. 1996 Mar 16;312(7032):670–674. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview. BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):131–134. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Naylor CD, Baigrie RS, Goldman BS, Basinski A. Assessment of priority for coronary revascularisation procedures. Revascularisation Panel and Consensus Methods Group. Lancet. 1990 May 5;335(8697):1070–1073. [PubMed]
  • Brook RH, Kosecoff JB, Park RE, Chassin MR, Winslow CM, Hampton JR. Diagnosis and treatment of coronary disease: comparison of doctors' attitudes in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 1988 Apr 2;1(8588):750–753. [PubMed]
  • Naylor CD, Baigrie RS, Goldman BS, Cairns JA, Beanlands DS, Berman N, Borts D, Fitchett DH, Haq A, Hess A, et al. Assigning priority to patients requiring coronary revascularization: consensus principles from a panel of cardiologists and cardiac surgeons. Can J Cardiol. 1991 Jun;7(5):207–213. [PubMed]
  • Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 2: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery. BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):135–138. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mark DB, Nelson CL, Califf RM, Harrell FE, Jr, Lee KL, Jones RH, Fortin DF, Stack RS, Glower DD, Smith LR, et al. Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1994 May;89(5):2015–2025. [PubMed]
  • Califf RM, Phillips HR, 3rd, Hindman MC, Mark DB, Lee KL, Behar VS, Johnson RA, Pryor DB, Rosati RA, Wagner GS, et al. Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 May;5(5):1055–1063. [PubMed]
  • Naylor CD, Sykora K, Jaglal SB, Jefferson S. Waiting for coronary artery bypass surgery: population-based study of 8517 consecutive patients in Ontario, Canada. The Steering Committee of the Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. Lancet. 1995 Dec 16;346(8990):1605–1609. [PubMed]
  • Billing JS, Arifi AA, Sharples LD, Tsui SS, Nashef SA. Heart surgery in UK patients: planned care or crisis management? Lancet. 1996 Feb 24;347(9000):540–541. [PubMed]
  • Carroll RJ, Horn SD, Soderfeldt B, James BC, Malmberg L. International comparison of waiting times for selected cardiovascular procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Mar 1;25(3):557–563. [PubMed]
  • Naylor CD, Levinton CM, Baigrie RS, Goldman BS. Placing patients in the queue for coronary surgery: do age and work status alter Canadian specialists' decisions? J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Sep-Oct;7(5):492–498. [PubMed]
  • Suttorp MJ, Kingma JH, Vos J, Koomen EM, Tijssen JG, Vermeulen FE, Ascoop CA, Ernst JM. Determinants for early mortality in patients awaiting coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a case-control study. Eur Heart J. 1992 Feb;13(2):238–242. [PubMed]
  • Hamer AW, Takayama M, Abraham KA, Roche AH, Kerr AR, Williams BF, Ramage MC, White HD. End-systolic volume and long-term survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Circulation. 1994 Dec;90(6):2899–2904. [PubMed]
  • Naylor CD. A different view of queues in Ontario. Health Aff (Millwood) 1991 Fall;10(3):110–128. [PubMed]

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
Distribution of patients according to (A) the New Zealand score and (B) the Ontario score.

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...