|
|
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 June; 32(6): 882–885. | PMCID: PMC172300 |
Comparative study of cephalexin hydrochloride and cephalexin monohydrate in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections. A Kumar, D L Murray, C B Hanna, T G Kreindler, K D Jacobson, J M Bundy, K Waxman, E F Finnerty, D W Folan, Jr, W R Drucker , et al.Department of Pediatrics and Human Development, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1317. Abstract In two prospective, randomized multicenter double-blind studies with a dosage of either 250 mg given four times a day (study A) or 500 mg given two times a day (study B), the comparative efficacy and safety of cephalexin hydrochloride (LY061188; Keftab) and cephalexin monohydrate (Keflex) for treatment of skin and soft tissue infections were determined. In study A, 97 patients received cephalexin hydrochloride and 101 patients received cephalexin monohydrate. In study B, 75 patients received cephalexin hydrochloride and 70 patients received cephalexin monohydrate. Diagnoses included abscesses, cellulitis, wound infections, and infected dermatitis, and were comparable in the different treatment groups. Pathogens were isolated from 82% of patients enrolled; the majority of isolates were of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, other staphylococcal species, and a few gram-negative bacteria. In study A, 68 of 71 (95.7%) evaluable patients who received cephalexin hydrochloride responded satisfactorily; 73 of 81 (90%) patients who received cephalexin monohydrate also responded satisfactorily. In study B, 56 of 58 (96.5%) evaluable patients who received cephalexin hydrochloride responded satisfactorily; 47 of 50 (94%) patients who received cephalexin monohydrate also responded satisfactorily. An adverse clinical event leading to discontinuation of the treatment drug developed in 17 of 343 (4.95%) patients in both studies. No differences were noted between the two drugs. Skin eruptions, pruritis, and mild gastrointestinal symptoms were the common adverse effects. These data suggest that cephalexin hydrochloride, a new formulation of cephalexin, is a safe and effective antimicrobial agent for treatment of a variety of skin and subcutaneous infections in a dosage of either 250 mg four times a day or 500 mg twice a day. Full text Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (818K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References. These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article. - Blumer JL, O'Brien CA, Lemon E, Capretta TM. Skin and soft tissue infections: pharmacologic approaches. Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 May–Jun;4(3):336–341. [PubMed]
- Derrick CW, Jr, Reilly K. The role of cephalexin in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections. Postgrad Med J. 1983;59 (Suppl 5):43–46. [PubMed]
- Dillon HC., Jr Treatment of staphylococcal skin infections: a comparison of cephalexin and dicloxacillin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983 Feb;8(2):177–181. [PubMed]
- DiMattia AF, Sexton MJ, Smialowicz CR, Knapp WH., Jr Efficacy of two dosage schedules of cephalexin in dermatologic infections. J Fam Pract. 1981 Apr;12(4):649–652. [PubMed]
- Edlich RF, Kenney JG, Morgan RF, Nichter LS, Friedman HI, Rodeheaver GT. Antimicrobial treatment of minor soft tissue lacerations: a critical review. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1986 Aug;4(3):561–580. [PubMed]
- Feingold DS, Wagner RF., Jr Antibacterial therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986 Apr;14(4):535–548. [PubMed]
- Levine LR. Quantitative comparison of adverse reactions to cefaclor vs. amoxicillin in a surveillance study. Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 Jul–Aug;4(4):358–361. [PubMed]
- Pankey GA, Katner HP, Valainis GT, Clarkson MJ, Cortez LM, Dalovisio JR. Overview of bacterial infections of the skin and soft tissue and clinical experience with ticarcillin plus clavulanate potassium in their treatment. Am J Med. 1985 Nov 29;79(5B):106–115. [PubMed]
- Tunnessen WW., Jr Practical aspects of bacterial skin infections in children. Pediatr Dermatol. 1985 Jul;2(4):255–265. [PubMed]
|