|
|
Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 September; 81(9): 726–731. | PMCID: PMC1722312 |
Survival analysis and visual outcome in a large series of corneal transplants in India L. Dandona, T. Naduvilath, M Janarthanan, K. Ragu, and G. Rao Public Health Ophthalmology Service, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India. AIM/BACKGROUND—The public health significance of corneal transplantation in dealing with corneal blindness in the developing world would depend upon the survival rate of transplants. This study was done to analyse the survival rate of corneal transplants in a large series in India, and to evaluate the influence of various risk factors on transplant survival. METHODS—The records of a series of 1725 cases of corneal transplants carried out during 1987-95 at a tertiary eye care institution in India were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine 5 year survival rates of corneal transplants performed for the various categories of preoperative diagnosis. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess how preoperative diagnosis, socioeconomic status, age, sex, vascularisation of host cornea, quality of donor cornea, and training status of surgeon influenced transplant survival. The effect of these variables on visual outcome was assessed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS—The survival rates at 1, 2, and 5 years for all corneal transplants performed for the first time in 1389 cases were 79.6% (95% confidence interval = 77.3-81.9%), 68.7% (65.7-71.7%) and 46.5% (41.7-51.3%). The 5 year survival rate was highest if the corneal transplant was done for keratoconus (95.1% (84.8-100%)) and lowest if carried out for previous transplant failure (21.2% (13.8-28.6%)). The relative risk of transplant failure was higher if the preoperative diagnosis was previous transplant failure (2.04 (1.62-2.55)), aphakic bullous keratopathy (1.78 (1.38-2.28)), corneal clouding due to miscellaneous causes including congenital conditions and glaucoma (1.63 (1.21-2.19)), or adherent leucoma (1.11 (0.81-1.51)) than for the other preoperative diagnoses. Patients with lower socioeconomic status had higher relative risk of transplant failure (1.28 (1.16-1.42)), as did patients <10 years of age (1.42 (1.23-1.64)). Higher relative risk of transplant failure was associated with vascularisation of the host cornea before transplantation (1.15 (1.04-1.27)), and with the use of fair quality donor cornea for transplantation compared with excellent, very good, or good quality donor cornea (1.26 (1.06-1.52)). Before corneal transplant 80.2% of the eyes were blind (visual acuity <3/60), whereas at last follow up 41.8% eyes were blind. The odds of having visual acuity >6/18 were higher if the transplant was done for keratoconus (9.99 (6.10-16.36)) or corneal dystrophies (1.77 (1.21-2.58)) than for the other preoperative diagnoses. CONCLUSION—Reasonable success with corneal transplantation is possible in the developing world if data from this part of the world regarding the different survival rates for the various preoperative diagnoses and the influence of risk factors on transplant survival and visual outcome are taken into account while determining priority for transplant cases in the present situation of limited availability of donor corneas.
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (111K). These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article. - Thylefors B, Négrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, Dadzie KY. Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(1):115–121. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Yorston D, Wood M, Foster A. Penetrating keratoplasty in Africa: graft survival and visual outcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Oct;80(10):890–894. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Rosner B. Statistical methods in ophthalmology: an adjustment for the intraclass correlation between eyes. Biometrics. 1982 Mar;38(1):105–114. [PubMed]
- Ehlers N, Olsen T. Long term results of corneal grafting in keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1983 Oct;61(5):918–926. [PubMed]
- Williams KA, Roder D, Esterman A, Muehlberg SM, Coster DJ. Factors predictive of corneal graft survival. Report from the Australian Corneal Graft Registry. Ophthalmology. 1992 Mar;99(3):403–414. [PubMed]
- Price FW, Jr, Whitson WE, Collins KS, Marks RG. Five-year corneal graft survival. A large, single-center patient cohort. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Jun;111(6):799–805. [PubMed]
- Völker-Dieben HJ, Kok-van Alphen CC, Lansbergen Q, Persijn GG. Different influences on corneal graft survival in 539 transplants. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1982 Apr;60(2):190–202. [PubMed]
- Bishop VL, Robinson LP, Wechsler AW, Billson FA. Corneal graft survival: a retrospective Australian study. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1986 May;14(2):133–138. [PubMed]
- Kirkness CM, Ezra E, Rice NS, Steele AD. The success and survival of repeat corneal grafts. Eye (Lond) 1990;4(Pt 1):58–64. [PubMed]
- Vail A, Gore SM, Bradley BA, Easty DL, Rogers CA. Corneal graft survival and visual outcome. A multicenter Study. Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study Collaborators. Ophthalmology. 1994 Jan;101(1):120–127. [PubMed]
- Stulting RD, Sumers KD, Cavanagh HD, Waring GO, 3rd, Gammon JA. Penetrating keratoplasty in children. Ophthalmology. 1984 Oct;91(10):1222–1230. [PubMed]
- Cowden JW. Penetrating keratoplasty in infants and children. Ophthalmology. 1990 Mar;97(3):324–329. [PubMed]
- Gupta AK, Ellwein LB. The pattern of cataract surgery in India: 1992. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1995 Mar;43(1):3–8. [PubMed]
- Brady SE, Rapuano CJ, Arentsen JJ, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR. Clinical indications for and procedures associated with penetrating keratoplasty, 1983-1988. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 Aug 15;108(2):118–122. [PubMed]
- Vail A, Gore SM, Bradley BA, Easty DL, Rogers CA. Corneal transplantation in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993 Oct;77(10):650–656. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
|