• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of archdischfnLink to Publisher's site
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. May 2002; 86(3): F142–F146.
PMCID: PMC1721397

Socioeconomic status and preterm birth: New Zealand trends, 1980 to 1999

Abstract

Background: While a number of countries have reported rising preterm birth rates over the past two decades, none has examined the effects of socioeconomic status on preterm birth at a national level.

Aim: To document the changing incidence of preterm birth in New Zealand over the past 20 years and to determine whether particular socioeconomic or ethnic subsections of the population have contributed disproportionately to the changes seen.

Methods: Birth registration data routinely available from the New Zealand Health Information Service were analysed for the period 1980–99. Information for a total of 1 079 478 singleton live births was linked by Domicile Code to the New Zealand Deprivation Index, a small area index of deprivation.

Results: Singleton preterm birth rates rose by 37.2% during the 20 year period, from 4.3% in 1980 to 5.9% in 1999. Rates increased by 71.9% among those living in the most affluent areas, but by only 3.5% among those living in the most deprived areas, resulting in the disappearance of a socioeconomic gradient in preterm birth that had existed during the early 1980s.

Conclusions: This study challenges traditional thinking on the associations between socioeconomic status and preterm birth. Further research is necessary if the changes that have occurred in New Zealand over the past 20 years are to be fully understood.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (103K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Joseph KS, Kramer MS, Marcoux S, Ohlsson A, Wen SW, Allen A, Platt R. Determinants of preterm birth rates in Canada from 1981 through 1983 and from 1992 through 1994. N Engl J Med. 1998 Nov 12;339(20):1434–1439. [PubMed]
  • Bréart G, Blondel B, Tuppin P, Grandjean H, Kaminski M. Did preterm deliveries continue to decrease in France in the 1980s? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1995 Jul;9(3):296–306. [PubMed]
  • Kramer MS, Platt R, Yang H, Joseph KS, Wen SW, Morin L, Usher RH. Secular trends in preterm birth: a hospital-based cohort study. JAMA. 1998 Dec 2;280(21):1849–1854. [PubMed]
  • Bange D, Gendall PW. Routine antenatal ultrasound: a retrospective audit. N Z Med J. 1987 May 13;100(823):284–286. [PubMed]
  • Buckenham T, Spears GG, Teele RL. Antenatal ultrasonography in Dunedin: one year's data. N Z Med J. 1991 Mar 27;104(908):117–119. [PubMed]
  • de Sanjose S, Roman E. Low birthweight, preterm, and small for gestational age babies in Scotland, 1981-1984. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Sep;45(3):207–210. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lumley J. How important is social class a factor in preterm birth? Lancet. 1997 Apr 12;349(9058):1040–1041. [PubMed]
  • Lu GC, Goldenberg RL. Current concepts on the pathogenesis and markers of preterm births. Clin Perinatol. 2000 Jun;27(2):263–283. [PubMed]
  • Kramer MS, Séguin L, Lydon J, Goulet L. Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000 Jul;14(3):194–210. [PubMed]
  • Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(5):663–737. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Newman RB, Goldenberg RL, Moawad AH, Iams JD, Meis PJ, Das A, Miodovnik M, Caritis SN, Thurnau GR, Dombrowski MP, et al. Occupational fatigue and preterm premature rupture of membranes. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;184(3):438–446. [PubMed]
  • Mamelle N, Laumon B, Lazar P. Prematurity and occupational activity during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Mar;119(3):309–322. [PubMed]

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
Rates of preterm birth by gestational age group; New Zealand singleton live births 1980–99.
Figure 2
Rates of preterm birth by Deprivation Index; New Zealand singleton live births 1980–99.
Figure 3
Rates of preterm birth by ethnic group; New Zealand singleton live births 1980–94.

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...