pmc logo image
Logo of archdischArchives of Disease in ChildhoodInstructions for authorsCurrent TOC

Formats:

Arch Dis Child. 2005 February; 90(2): 187–189.
doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.044073.
PMCID: PMC1720275
Can you age bruises accurately in children? A systematic review
S Maguire, M Mann, J Sibert, and A Kemp
Department of Child Health, Cardiff University, Wales College of Medicine, Llandough Hospital, Penarth, Wales, UK.
Abstract
Aims: To investigate whether it is possible to determine the age of a bruise in a child in clinical practice by means of a systematic review.
Methods: An all language literature search up to 2004. Included studies assessed the age of bruises in live children less than 18 years old. Excluded: review articles, expert opinion, and single case reports. Standardised data extraction and critical appraisal forms were used. Two reviewers independently reviewed studies.
Results: Of 167 studies reviewed, three were included: two studies described colour assessment in vivo and one from photographs. Although the Bariciak et al study showed a significant association between red/blue/purple colour and recent bruising and yellow/brown and green with older bruising, both this study and Stephenson and Bialas reported that any colour could be present in fresh, intermediate, and old bruises. Results on yellow colouration were conflicting. Stephenson and Bialas showed yellow colour in 10 bruises only after 24 hours, Carpenter after 48 hours, and Bariciak et al noted yellow/green/brown within 48 hours. Stephenson and Bialas reported that red was only seen in those of one week or less. The accuracy with which clinicians correctly aged a bruise to within 24 hours of its occurrence was less than 40%. The accuracy with which they could identify fresh, intermediate, or old bruises was 55–63%. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was poor.
Conclusion: A bruise cannot accurately be aged from clinical assessment in vivo or on a photograph. At this point in time the practice of estimating the age of a bruise from its colour has no scientific basis and should be avoided in child protection proceedings.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (63K).
Supplementary Material
[Box 1 and Table 1]
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Stephenson T, Bialas Y. Estimation of the age of bruising. Arch Dis Child. 1996 Jan;74(1):53–55. [PubMed]
  • Carpenter RF. The prevalence and distribution of bruising in babies. Arch Dis Child. 1999 Apr;80(4):363–366. [PubMed]
  • Bariciak Erika D, Plint Amy C, Gaboury Isabelle, Bennett Sue. Dating of bruises in children: an assessment of physician accuracy. Pediatrics. 2003 Oct;112(4):804–807. [PubMed]
  • Wilson EF. Estimation of the age of cutaneous contusions in child abuse. Pediatrics. 1977 Nov;60(5):750–752. [PubMed]
  • Langlois NE, Gresham GA. The ageing of bruises: a review and study of the colour changes with time. Forensic Sci Int. 1991 Sep;50(2):227–238. [PubMed]
  • Munang LA, Leonard PA, Mok JYQ. Lack of agreement on colour description between clinicians examining childhood bruising. J Clin Forensic Med. 2002 Dec;9(4):171–174. [PubMed]
  • Bohnert M, Baumgartner R, Pollak S. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the colour of intra- and subcutaneous bruises. Int J Legal Med. 2000;113(6):343–348. [PubMed]
  • Vanezis P. Interpreting bruises at necropsy. J Clin Pathol. 2001 May;54(5):348–355. [PubMed]
  • Hempling SM. The applications of ultraviolet photography in clinical forensic medicine. Med Sci Law. 1981 Jul;21(3):215–222. [PubMed]
  • Barsley RE, West MH, Fair JA. Forensic photography. Ultraviolet imaging of wounds on skin. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1990 Dec;11(4):300–308. [PubMed]