![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © American Society for Investigative Pathology Amyloid-β Peptide Remnants in AN-1792-Immunized Alzheimer’s Disease Patients A Biochemical Analysis From The Longtine Center for Molecular Biology and Genetics,* and the W.H. Civin Laboratory for Neuropathology,** Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, Arizona; the Department of Microbiology,† Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona; the Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy,‡ National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,§ Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; the Institut de Neuropatologia,¶ Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; the Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; and the Fundacion Instituto Leloir,†† Buenos Aires, ArgentinaAccepted June 14, 2006. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Experiments with amyloid-β (Aβ)-42-immunized transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease have revealed amyloid plaque disruption and apparent cognitive function recovery. Neuropathological examination of patients vaccinated against purified Aβ-42 (AN-1792) has demonstrated that senile plaque disruption occurred in immunized humans as well. Here, we examined tissue histology and quantified and biochemically characterized the remnant amyloid peptides in the gray and white matter and leptomeningeal/cortical vessels of two AN-1792-vaccinated patients, one of whom developed meningoencephalitis. Compact core and diffuse amyloid deposits in both vaccinated individuals were focally absent in some regions. Although parenchymal amyloid was focally disaggregated, vascular deposits were relatively preserved or even increased. Immunoassay revealed that total soluble amyloid levels were sharply elevated in vaccinated patient gray and white matter compared with Alzheimer’s disease cases. Our experiments suggest that although immunization disrupted amyloid deposits, vascular capture prevented large-scale egress of Aβ peptides. Trapped, solubilized amyloid peptides may ultimately have cascading toxic effects on cerebrovascular, gray and white matter tissues. Anti-amyloid immunization may be most effective not as therapeutic or mitigating measures but as a prophylactic measure when Aβ deposition is still minimal. This may allow Aβ mobilization under conditions in which drainage and degradation of these toxic peptides is efficient. Sporadic Alzheimer’s disease (AD) affects the aged with a prevalence approaching 40 to 50% by age 80. At present, 4 million Americans are affected with AD at an estimated annual care cost of almost 100 billion dollars. Because the number of individuals 65 years or older is growing rapidly due to a general average life expectancy increase, it is estimated that the total incidence of AD will quadruple by the year 2050.1 Therefore, it is urgent to find a means of preventing, delaying the onset, or reversing the course of AD. Alzheimer’s disease is characterized by the massive accumulation of extracellular amyloid fibrils in both the brain parenchyma and in the walls of cerebral blood vessels. The deposited fibrillar amyloid is mainly composed of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides, 40/42 amino acid-residue molecules derived by proteolytic processing of larger amyloid precursor proteins (APPs) by the concerted actions of the β- and γ-secretases. The relevance of Aβ peptides to sporadic AD pathogenesis is strongly supported by the fact that mutations in the APP and presenilin genes both result in early-onset familial AD. Moreover, a formally similar suite of pathophysiological and cognitive changes is observed in multiple strains of transgenic (Tg) mice that overexpress APP and/or other APP processing genes. The fibrillar and soluble forms of Aβ interfere with the normal brain architecture and function, resulting in profound neuroinflammation, gliosis, severe neuronal injury, and vascular damage and in the induction of neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) and protracted dementia development. The clearly preeminent role of Aβ in AD provides strong experimental support to the amyloid cascade hypothesis as a mechanism central to AD pathogenesis. Among the multiple remedial avenues so far explored, immunotherapy promises to be one of the most effective interventions. Several single (APP) and double Tg (APP/presenilin) mouse strains have been generated that produce amyloid structures similar to those observed in AD. Active and passive anti-Aβ immunization therapies were tested in Tg animals and resulted in amyloid deposit disaggregation and the reversal of cognitive deficits.2–4 Immunotherapy has also been successful in reducing amyloid levels in the brains of aging Caribbean Vervet monkeys.5 Encouraged by the impressive results observed in animal models, active Aβ vaccination clinical trials were initiated in humans. Three hundred individuals were vaccinated with the AN-1792/QS-21 antigen/adjuvant complex, and 72 subjects received placebo treatment. Of the 300 vaccinated subjects, 18 (6%) developed aseptic meningoencephalitis, whereas no placebo group subjects developed this condition during the same time frame. In the immunized cohort, a total of 59 individuals had desirable plasma antibody titers ≥1:2200. Thirteen patients from this vaccine-responsive subgroup developed meningoencephalitis (22%), whereas only 5 (2%) of a total pool of 241 “nonresponders” evidenced this adverse outcome. No significant differences were observed between vaccinated and placebo-treated subjects with respect to a battery of individual psychometric tests, although neuropsychological test battery z-scores demonstrated differences favoring the antibody responders. In addition, significant cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-tau decreases were evident in the antibody-responsive patient group.6,7 Intriguingly, 45 of the high anti-amyloid antibody titer responding individuals had, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging, a greater brain volume reduction with an enhanced ventricular enlargement for which there is presently no certain explanation.8 It has been suggested that this reduction may be attributed to amyloid deposit removal. It is also possible that the reduction of brain volume is due to hydrodynamic changes in CSF and brain interstitial fluid. In addition, cognitive functions showed a slower decline in 20 AD patients who generated acceptable levels of antibodies after receiving primer and a booster of aggregated Aβ.9 There is also evidence that the administration of intravenous immunoglobulins, a complex mixture of IgG that contains antibodies against Aβ, results in an amelioration of dementia symptoms in AD patients, supporting the tenet that amyloid deposits are subject to immunological therapy.10,11 However, larger scale longitudinal studies with complete neuropathological analyses are required to rigorously confirm the results of the pilot studies. The initial AD patient vaccination study was terminated because of an unanticipated adverse event: the emergence of vaccination-associated meningoencephalitis. So far, there are three published complete neuropathological reports concerning AN-1792/QS-21-immunized individuals.12–14 Two of these reports describe subjects who developed meningoencephalitis, whereas the third concerns a vaccinated subject who died without meningoencephalitis development. We isolated, characterized, and compared the amyloid species present in the gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) as well as cortical and leptomeningeal vessels of two AN-1792/QS-21-vaccinated AD patients, one of whom developed meningoencephalitis. Our analyses reveal that parenchymal amyloid plaque deposits regressed to a remarkable extent in both patients, suggesting that simple differences in ultimate antibody titers or activity alone do not account for the adverse outcome of meningoencephalitis in some patients. A full understanding of the direct and emergent effects of amyloid vaccination on the AD patient brain necessitates a larger sample of the AN-1792 experimental cohort undergoing comprehensive biochemical assessments and comparisons. Materials and Methods Human Subjects Case 1 Male, age 76, with mild to moderate cognitive impairment [mini mental state examination (MMSE) = 18], received two intramuscular doses of 225 μg of AN-1792. Nine months after the last immunization, the patient developed cerebral edema and neurological symptoms of meningoencephalitis. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed lesions in the WM. Two months later, the patient evidenced serious global cognitive deterioration and a greatly decreased MMSE score of 7. On neuropathological examination, the brain weight was 1130 g. There was softening of WM, signs of demyelination, enlarged ventricles, and multiple hemorrhages in the GM, uncommon in AD (the patient did not have a history of cardiovascular disease). Amyloid plaques were distributed nonuniformly and were mostly of the diffuse type with a lesser amount of compact amyloid core plaques presenting multinucleated cells loaded with dense aggregates of Aβ. Many apparently disaggregated senile plaques with amyloid deposits were observed in this patient. These apparent senile plaque debris structures, referred to as “collapsed plaques” by Ferrer et al,13 consisted of extracellular plaques depleted of amyloid. These structures probably represent the complex nonamyloid glycoproteins and glycolipids that account for 30% of the AD plaque composition. In addition, severe cerebrovascular amyloidosis, abundant NFT deposits, marked inflammatory T-lymphocyte infiltration and severe small vessel disease (lipohyalinosis) were present. The apolipoprotein E (Apo E) genotype for this patient was ε3/ε4. A comprehensive account of the neuropathological changes and detailed immunocytochemical profile of this patient are given by Ferrer et al.13 Case 2 Male, age 71, with moderate to severe cognitive impairment (MMSE = 12). This individual received three intramuscular doses of 225 μg each of AN-1792 and died 1 year after the first immunization. The cause of death was recorded as “failure to thrive.” The brain weighed 1100 g and exhibited a normal macroscopic appearance. White matter and ventricles looked normal, and frontal lobes were almost free of extracellular amyloid deposits and neuritic plaques. Aβ immunoassay, performed by Masliah et al,14 demonstrated low cortical Aβ levels. Aggregates of Aβ were observed within microglial/macrophage cells, and there was severe cerebrovascular amyloidosis in the frontal lobe but less apparent in the parietal and temporal lobes. In addition, there were abundant NFTs distributed in the cerebral cortex.14 The Apo E genotype of this individual was ε3/ε4. Biochemical Analyses The biochemical analyses of Aβ peptides were performed on GM from temporal lobe including the entorhinal cortex (case 1) and on parietal and temporal cortex (case 2). The postmortem delay time before freezing of the tissue was approximately 4 hours for case 1 and 12 hours for case 2. Brain sections were subjected to Campbell-Switzer silver stain15 and 1.0% aqueous thioflavine-S for 10 minutes. To assess the distribution and relative number of senile and diffuse plaques in the cerebral cortex, brain sections were immunocytochemically stained. This step also permitted the estimation of the amount of tissue required to perform subsequent biochemical experiments. Briefly, brain sections were deparaffinized and treated with 80% formic acid for 20 minutes. Sections were incubated overnight with anti-Aβ antibodies 6E10 and 4G8 diluted 1:1000 (Signet Laboratories, Dedham, MA). Anti-mouse IgG was used as a secondary antibody (1:10,000), and then developed with diaminobenzidine in 0.5% nickel ammonium sulfate. Hematoxylin was used as a counterstain. Water-Soluble Amyloid The water-soluble material represents soluble interstitial fluid Aβ, Aβ monomers and low molecular weight oligomers loosely attached to amyloid plaques, and soluble Aβ free in the cytosol.16 The leptomeninges covering the cerebral cortex were separated and stored at −80°C. Twenty grams of cerebral cortex was finely minced with a razor blade, suspended in 150 ml of ammonium bicarbonate buffer (0.1 mol/L NH4HCO3, 5 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, and 0.01% sodium azide), with three tablets of complete enzyme inhibitors (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), and allowed to stand at 4°C for 48 hours. The brain cortex was homogenized with a 40-ml capacity Tenbroeck glass homogenizer (six manual gentle strokes) and centrifuged at 150,000 × g for 3 hours (Beckman SW28 rotor) in a Beckman Optima LE-80K ultracentrifuge (Beckman, Fullerton, CA). The water-soluble fraction was lyophilized and analyzed by fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Thermo Separation Products, Schaumburg, IL). Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS)-Insoluble Amyloid The water-insoluble pellets were dispersed and stirred for 12 hours in 50 ml of 0.1 mol/L NH4HCO3. Fifty milliliters of 30% SDS was added (final SDS concentration 15%) and stirred for an additional 14 hours at room temperature. To remove the SDS-insoluble tufts of parenchymal blood vessels, the suspension was filtered through a series of 300-, 45-, and 25-μm nylon meshes. The SDS-containing filtrate was centrifuged at 300,000 × g for 5 hours at 20°C in an SW41 Ti Beckman rotor. The resulting pellets were suspended in 60 ml of 0.1 mol/L ammonium bicarbonate, pH 10.0 (titrated with NH4OH), and after 24 hours of continuous stirring, centrifuged at 300,000 × g for 5 hours at 20°C. The pellets were stored, and the supernatant was lyophilized and analyzed by FPLC and HPLC. Leptomeningeal Vascular Amyloid The leptomeninges were washed 10 times with 500 ml of cold water to remove blood cells by hypotonic shock. Vessels larger than 600 μm in diameter were eliminated, and the smaller vessels were finely minced and washed three times (5 minutes at 1500 × g) with 0.1 mol/L Tris-HCl and 3 mmol/L CaCl2, pH 8.0. Vessels were suspended in the wash buffer amended with 0.3 mg/ml Clostridium histolyticum collagenase CL3 (Worthington Biochemicals Corp., Lakewood, NJ), and 10 μg/ml DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was added to create a final suspension of 100 ml, which was incubated in a shaker at 37°C for 3 hours. The preparation was then filtered through a 150-μm nylon mesh, and the filtrate was centrifuged at 3000 × g for 10 minutes. The supernatant was eliminated, and the pellet was washed with water, suspended in water, and centrifuged at 3000 × g. The pellet, containing sheets of leptomeningeal vascular amyloid, was dissolved in 4 ml of glass distilled formic acid (GDFA) with the aid of a glass homogenizer, left at room temperature for 30 minutes, and centrifuged at 500,000 × g for 10 minutes in a TL 100 rotor (Beckman Optima TLX ultracentrifuge). The supernatant was lyophilized and analyzed by FPLC and HPLC. Cortico-Vascular Amyloid The 300-, 45-, and 25-μm nylon mesh-retained vessel tufts from the cortical SDS-insoluble amyloid preparation were immediately shaken in 500 ml of distilled water to suspend the retained vessels. The material was allowed to settle, and the clarified liquid was decanted with the remaining volume centrifuged at 1500 × g for 10 minutes. The pellets containing the cortical blood vessels were washed twice with distilled water to remove remaining SDS and were suspended in 0.1 mol/L Tris-HCl and 3 mmol/L CaCl2, pH 8.0. Next, 0.3 mg/ml collagenase CL3 (Worthington) and 10 μg/ml DNase I (Sigma) were added, and samples were incubated in a shaker at 37°C for 3 hours. The preparation was filtered through a 40-μm nylon mesh, and the filtrate fraction was centrifuged at 3000 × g. The pellet was treated with 4 ml of GDFA, spun at 500,000 × g as described above, and analyzed by FPLC and HPLC. Diffuse Amyloid (P3) This fraction represents the most insoluble of the amyloid aggregates and is composed primarily of Aβ 17–42 peptides recovered after high-speed centrifugation of the SDS/alkaline insoluble pellets. This material was dissolved in 80% GDFA with the aid of a glass homogenizer, allowed to stand at room temperature for 1 hour, parceled into 0.7-ml aliquots in thick-walled polyallomer tubes, and centrifuged at 500,000 × g for 15 minutes in a Beckman Optima TLA-ultracentrifuge using a 120.2 rotor. The dark brown pellets containing formic acid-insoluble material mostly composed of lipofuscin remnants were discarded, and the clear supernatant was submitted to FPLC-GDFA chromatography. Column eluate samples containing amyloid fraction P3 were pooled, reduced in volume by Speed-Vac centrifugation, and subjected to size-exclusion HPLC chromatography on a GPC-100 column, equilibrated, and developed with 80% GDFA. The GPC-100 column fraction containing the P3 was refined further by chromatography on a reverse-phase Zorbax SB-C8 column as described below. White Matter Aβ The WM was separated from the adjacent GM to avoid contamination from cortical amyloid. The WM (3 g) was finely minced and thoroughly homogenized in 18 ml of 80% GDFA. The homogenate was centrifuged at 250,000 × g for 1 hour using 11-ml polyallomer tubes in a Beckman SW41 rotor. The fatty material collected at the top of the tube and the minute bottom pellets were discarded. The transparent supernatant was brought to 20 ml by the addition of GDFA and centrifuged under the same conditions. The clear supernatant was submitted to FPLC, and further purification of Aβ peptides was achieved by reverse-phase chromatography on a C8 column Zorbax RX-C8 (Mac-Mod, Chadds Ford, PA) (see below). Separation of Amyloid Peptides by FPLC The lyophilized water-soluble fraction, the SDS-insoluble fraction, leptomeningeal-vascular amyloid and cortico-vascular Aβ, the P3 fraction, and the WM Aβ were all independently submitted to size-exclusion chromatography using a Superose 12 column (1 × 30 cm; General Electric, Uppsala, Sweden) equilibrated with 80% GDFA. In the case of the water-soluble and SDS-insoluble fractions, aliquots of 40 mg each of the lyophilized material were dissolved in 500 μl of 80% GDFA and chromatographed at 15 ml/h with column output monitored by UV absorbance at 280 nm. The 2- to 8-kd fraction was collected, acid was removed, and volume was reduced to 50 μl by Speed-Vac centrifugation and stored in a ultra-low freezer (−80°C). In some instances to further refine the separation of the Aβ peptides from higher and lower molecular mass flanking contaminants, the FPLC Superose 12 chromatographic step was repeated twice. HPLC Purification of Aβ Peptides The FPLC fractions containing 2- to 8-kd molecules were further purified by reverse-phase HPLC. Five FPLC runs were pooled and concentrated to 50 μl, 200 μl of 90% GDFA was added, and the final volume was adjusted to 500 μl with distilled water. The specimens were loaded onto a reverse-phase Zorbax SB-C8 column (4.6 × 250 mm; Mac-Mod) equilibrated with 20% acetonitrile/water and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). Separations were performed using a linear (20 to 40%) acetonitrile gradient developed for a period of 60 minutes at 80°C at 1 ml/minute flow rate. The column eluate was monitored at 214-nm UV absorbance. Alternatively, the Aβ peptides were further purified in a semipreparative reverse-phase column Zorbax RX-C8 (9.4 × 250 mm; Mac-Mod). The chromatography was developed with a linear gradient formed by 20% acetonitrile/water, 0.1% TFA and 60% acetonitrile/water, 0.1% TFA, at 1.5 ml/minute at room temperature. The chromatography was monitored at 214 nm. The FPLC-enriched diffuse plaque Aβ-related peptides were purified by size-exclusion chromatography on a silica-based Syncropack GPC-100 column (5-μm particle; 100-Å pore; 500 × 7.8 mm; Synchrom, Inc., Lafayette, IN), equilibrated, and developed at room temperature with 80% GDFA at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/minute. The chromatography was monitored at 280 nm. All HPLC columns were calibrated to establish the retention times for Aβ tetramer, Aβ trimer, Aβ dimer, Aβ monomer, and Aβ-P3 (residues 17–42 species). The Aβ monomers were synthesized by California Peptide Research, Inc. (Napa, CA) and further purified in our laboratory by size-exclusion FPLC (Superdex 75) and reverse-phase HPLC (C8). The Aβ oligomers were generated by dialyzing synthetic monomer Aβ 1–42, dissolved in 80% GDFA (3 mg/ml SpectraPor 6, 1000 d cut-off) against 4 L of 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, followed by incubation at 37°C for a period of 8 weeks. Before the opening of the dialysis bag, the Aβ was dialyzed for 24 hours against 0.1 mol/L ammonium bicarbonate followed by lyophilization.17 Automatic Peptide Sequencing The HPLC-purified Aβ peptides were dissolved in 50 μl of 50% (v/v) acetonitrile and 0.1% TFA. Approximately 30 μl of the sample was dried on a fiberglass disk (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Sequencing was performed on a Porton 2090E gas-phase protein sequencer (Beckman Coulter) attached to an on-line Hewlett-Packard 1090L HPLC. Aβ 40 and 42 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAs) All preparations were performed at 4°C. One hundred milligrams of tissue was homogenized in 800 μl of 5 mol/L guanidine HCl and 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, with an electric grinder. The homogenates were shaken for 3 hours and then centrifuged in a 50.4-Ti rotor (Beckman) for 30 minutes at 60,000 × g. The supernatants were collected and stored at −80°C. Tissue extractions were also performed in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, following the above protocol. The ELISA Aβ 40 (Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Minneapolis, MN) and Aβ 42 (Innogenetics, Belgium, Germany) kits were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Mass Spectrometry of Aβ Peptides Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) was performed as described in detail by Esh et al.18 The complete mass spectrometry data are presented as Supplemental Tables 1 to 4 (http://ajp.amjpathol.org). Western Blot Analysis A detailed description of the methods used is provided by Esh et al.18 Briefly, formic acid or acetonitrile was removed by drying with vacuum centrifugation and replaced with 200 μl of distilled water. This procedure was repeated three times. The pellets were then suspended in NuPage LDS sample buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing 50 mmol/L dithiothreitol, heated for 10 minutes at 80°C, and loaded onto 4 to 12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen) with NuPage MES running buffer. Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Invitrogen), and the membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk in phosphate-buffered saline and 0.5% (v/v) Tween 20 (Fluka, St. Louis, MO). Aβ peptides were detected with anti-Aβ40 and anti-Aβ42 (Biosource, Camarillo, CA) as primary antibodies and goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase conjugated as a secondary antibody (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The blots were developed with SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate and CL-Xpose film (Pierce) and Kodak GBX developer (Sigma). The films were scanned with a GS-800 calibrated densitometer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and analyzed with Quantity One software (Bio-Rad). Results The histopathological studies, immunoassays, chemical extractions, and FPLC and HPLC purification procedures were conducted on the brain tissue of case 1 and case 2. However, because of limitations in time and resources and because of the remarkable similarities in chromatographic profiles, mass spectrometry analyses were performed on case 1 only. Morphological Features It is evident that the amyloid deposits in the cerebral cortex of AN-1792-vaccinated human cases focally disappeared, suggesting that polyclonal anti-Aβ antibodies crossed the blood-brain barrier. These antibodies were induced using synthetic fibrillar Aβ 1–42 as an antigen, and the resulting antibodies apparently disassembled fibrillar amyloid plaques. In case 1, there were patchy areas in which the diffuse and compact amyloid deposits were totally absent, although abundant accumulations of amyloid were present in the cortical vessels (Figure 1, C, D, E, and H)
Immunoassay Quantification of Aβ Peptides Before the general analytical preparations to separate the soluble and insoluble fractions, the amount of Aβ peptides present in the GM and WM of case 1 and case 2 and those in sporadic AD and age-matched non-demented (ND) subjects were quantified by ELISA (Table 1). Homogenization of the brain tissue with 5 mol/L guanidine hydrochloride (GHCl) yielded 868 and 186 μg/g total Aβ for cases 1 and 2, respectively. In comparison, the average amount of Aβ for neuropathologically confirmed AD cases (n = 31) was 406 μg/g tissue and for age-matched ND controls (n = 22) was 221 μg/g tissue. Interestingly, the water-soluble Aβ obtained after a gentle homogenization of finely minced cerebral cortex in aqueous buffer was 61 μg/g for case 1 and 13.5 μg/g for case 2. These values were in sharp contrast with those obtained from AD (n = 7) and ND (n = 4), which both amounted to 3.9 μg/g tissue. In both vaccinated cases, the levels of Aβ in the WM, extracted by 5 mol/L GHCl, were 96.8 μg/g for case 1 and 16.9 μg/g for case 2. In the GM and WM of case 1, Aβ n-40 and n-42 were equally represented in the GHCl extract. In case 2, the Aβ n-40-to-n-42 ratio differed, being 2.8:1 in the GM and 1.8:1 in the WM. Most of the water-soluble Aβ corresponded to the n-40 isoform in both of the cases.
Leptomeningeal and Cortico-Vascular Aβ Peptides We developed techniques that permitted the independent separation and purification of the Aβ peptides present in the walls of leptomeningeal vessels and the cortico-vascular vessels. This result was achieved by the combined use of collagenase digestion of the extracellular matrix and GDFA extraction/solubilization of Aβ. Both tissue fractions were independently submitted to FPLC for Aβ enrichment (Figure 3, A and B)
Water-Soluble Cortical Aβ Peptides The 2- to 8-kd water-soluble fractions separated by FPLC/GDFA (Figure 3C)
SDS-Insoluble Cortical Aβ Peptides In both Aβ-vaccinated cases under study, there was a remarkable reduction in the number of SDS-insoluble amyloid cores, which are abundant in the SDS-insoluble fraction obtained from the cerebral cortex in the vast majority of neuropathologically severe sporadic AD cases.24 However, in addition to the scarce amyloid cores, this fraction must have contained a substantial quantity of fibrillar water-insoluble Aβ, which originated from disassembled cortical amyloid cores that were solubilized by the alkaline treatment and remained in the supernatant after ultracentrifugation. After FPLC separation (Figure 3D) Diffuse Plaque (P3) Aβ Peptides This material represents the most insoluble of all Aβ brain parenchymal peptides and is recovered by high-speed centrifugation as the insoluble pellet that remains after water, SDS, and alkaline extractions. Staining by thioflavine-S revealed homogeneous amorphous conglomerates that resemble a flock of cotton wool (Figure 2G) White Matter Aβ Peptides Overall, Aβ40 and Aβ42 were equally represented in the WM with a ratio of 46:54 for case 1. Case 2 had almost two times more Aβ 40 than Aβ42 in the WM (Table 1). To increase the Aβ yield, four of the initial FPLC/GDFA runs were pooled and re-chromatographed under the same conditions (Figure 3E) Discussion AN-1792 immunization dramatically altered several facets of Aβ distribution and deposition considered characteristic of AD. Despite remarkable senile plaque regression in some regions, the total ELISA-detectable Aβ levels present in brain tissue did not decrease commensurately. In addition to a greatly increased soluble amyloid level in the GM, the Aβ levels present in vaccinated patient WM were elevated to amounts far higher than any observed previously in AD patients. Although senile plaques were disaggregated, both diffuse and vascular amyloid deposits remained unaffected by vaccination. The implications of each of these findings will be considered in turn. Senile Plaque Disruption: Amyloid Deposit Mobilization without Clearance Near complete disaggregation of senile plaques was evident in some regions of the vaccinated patient brains. Although promising, this result must be balanced with the possibility that amyloid plaques rich in fibrillar Aβ may represent a defense mechanism that removes potentially neurotoxic soluble amyloid from the neuropil and insulates it with a layer of glial cells.17,27,28 This suggests that plaque disruption in the absence of removal of the solubilized amyloid or in situations in which removal is inefficient may inadvertently produce a destructive side effect. Dissolution of fibrillar amyloid plaque cores by immunoglobulins or complement is followed by microglia/macrophage receptor-mediated uptake, limited degradation of Aβ and eventual discharge of soluble Aβ into the neuropil.29,30 The Aβ HHQK domain, amino acid residues 13 to 16, is capable of unleashing neuroinflammation via activation of microglia,31,32 and low molecular weight Aβ oligomers are recognized to kill neurons and impair cognitive function.17,33 The oligomerization of Aβ-protein begins intracellularly in cells derived from human brain,16 and intraneuronal Aβ accumulation causes early cognitive impairment before the extracellular Aβ deposition in triple Tg mice.34 Whether the antibody-solubilized amyloid species constrained within the cortex and WM are toxic and can eventually be eliminated remains to be established. In addition to Aβ n-40 and n-42 residue length species and their multimers, AD patients have large quantities of soluble Aβ molecules present that are posttranslationally modified and difficult for proteolytic enzymes to degrade.35 In both vaccinated patients, the amount of soluble amyloid was substantially increased compared with sporadic AD patients (Table 1). Compared with the levels observed in the GM of nonimmunized sporadic AD patient pools, case 1 demonstrated a 2.1-fold increase in total Aβ (extracted by 5 mol/L guanidine HCl buffer), whereas case 2 showed a reduction (2.2-fold less) (Table 1). Case 1 developed meningoencephalitis, and it is possible that the added pathology associated with this adverse event increased Aβ levels above the typical mean for uncomplicated AD. In addition, AD pathology is known to exhibit great variation among individuals, and perhaps case 2 simply harbored a comparatively low amount of senile plaques, vascular amyloid deposits, and soluble Aβ before vaccination. However, it is remarkable that the total amounts of GM soluble amyloid (extracted with Tris buffer) are substantially increased in both vaccinated cases. Cases 1 and 2 demonstrated 15- and 3.5-fold higher levels of total soluble Aβ compared with AD and ND individuals, respectively (Table 1). Despite a marked focal reduction in the number of amyloid plaques, there was no commensurate decrease in total brain tissue Aβ levels (measured by ELISA), similar to previous results obtained with immunized APP Tg animals. Although plaques were disrupted in vaccinated Tg mice, formic acid-extractable Aβ levels representing the combined pools of soluble and insoluble plaque and vascular-associated fibrillar Aβ fractions did not differ between Aβ immunized TgCRND8, PDAPP, and tg2576 Tg mice and nonimmunized rodents.36–39 These observations suggest that the removal of Aβ from the brain by immunization is not complete or occurs at substantially slower rates than senile plaque disruption. Comprehending the ultimate effects of plaque amyloid dispersal on brain vascular function is vital. Soluble intra- and extracellular Aβ may exert deleterious effects on vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell metabolism. Soluble Aβ is a potent vasoconstrictor capable of altering regional cerebral blood flow,40,41 and Aβ peptides are also powerful angiogenesis inhibitors.42,43 These activities may impact blood-brain barrier selectivity and vascular repair. In addition, Aβ interferes with the production of vascular relaxing factors and disturbs the balance between cerebral energy requirements and cerebral blood flow.44 The soluble and insoluble Aβ effects on vascular homeostasis may be the most aggressive pathology in AD, and it is possible that increased levels of soluble Aβ peptides could have important vascular pathophysiological consequences in immunized individuals. Vascular and Diffuse Amyloid Deposits Resist AN-1792 Vaccine-Induced Disruption A feature shared by both Tg mice and human AD patients is the firm recalcitrance of vascular amyloid deposits to disruption by immunization.4,13,14,36–38,45,46 Also common to both is that focal senile plaque density decreases were accompanied by increased vascular amyloid deposition suggesting an active, antibody-induced remodeling of amyloid accumulation patterns. It is possible that some antibody-solublilized senile plaque amyloid was re-deposited in the microvasculature during egress from the brain through the periarterial spaces. In support of this contention is the observation that the peptide composition of the water-soluble Aβ peptides (Supplemental Table 2) resembled that isolated from the vascular compartments (Supplemental Table 1). Moreover, of the water-soluble fraction extracted from the cerebral cortex, 96 and 100% of the Aβ peptides measured by ELISA were mostly composed of the more soluble Aβ n-40 for cases 1 and 2, respectively (Table 1). However, extractions with water-based buffers do not efficiently isolate the more insoluble Aβ n-42. Therefore, a more stringent analysis using formic acid extraction was used for the water-insoluble pellets. Subsequent MALDI-TOF MS analyses revealed a substantial amount of Aβ peptides ending at residues 42 and 43. Pre-existing impaired brain interstitial fluid drainage or an emerging periarterial occlusion could act to retain a permanent, antibody-dispersed Aβ pool in the cerebral cortex.47–50 In this scenario, the reported cognitive enhancement in Tg mice,4 rats,51 and immunized individuals may be due to the removal of a toxic soluble amyloid pool. Recent investigations have demonstrated that passive immunotherapy against Aβ in aged tg2576 Tg mice reversed cognitive deficits and reduced parenchymal plaque burden but resulted in a concomitant increase in vascular amyloid load and associated microhemorrhages.52 Moreover, in the 21-month-old APP23 Tg mice, passive vaccination with IgG against residues 3 to 6 of human Aβ resulted in a twofold increase in cerebral amyloid angiopathy-associated microhemorrhages.45 The same phenomenon occurred in aged PDAPP Tg mice in which vaccination at high doses of the 3D6 antibody, directed against the N-terminal region of Aβ, resulted in an increased incidence and severity of microhemorrhages.46 Intriguingly, all three human vaccinated cases, neuropathologically characterized,12–14 showed the highest score of 3 (severe) for vascular amyloid deposition in those areas in which the apparent removal of amyloid attained its maximal expression. Additional studies with APP23 mice,53 a Tg mouse model in which there is a remarkable load of vascular amyloid, have confirmed that elevated quantities of soluble amyloid (>50 μg/g) are ultimately accompanied by a prompt and overwhelming global leptomeningeal and cortico-vascular amyloid deposition, a phenomenon that has not been observed in other Tg mice studied.54 Immunization was apparently unable to remove diffuse deposits of Aβ. In case 1, there were large areas in the frontal parietal and temporal regions in which there were numerous diffuse plaques. In case 2, however, there were abundant diffuse plaques present in the temporal and parietal lobes, although they were absent from the frontal lobe, a finding consistent with the results of Masliah et al.14 We were able to isolate from both AN-1792-treated cases substantial quantities of the extremely insoluble nonamyloidogenic P3 peptide, the major peptide in the diffuse plaques,19 mainly composed of the Aβ sequence of residues 17 to 42. Because P3 deposits are not fibrillar and are not associated with activated proinflammatory microglia, it has been concluded that P3 is a “desirable” APP by-product of the α- and γ-secretases, the generation of which precludes amyloid formation. However, this peptide has also been observed in dystrophic neurites associated with amyloid plaques and in pathological cortical vesicular structures.55 Furthermore, the Aβ 17–42 induces apoptosis by activation of c-jun N-terminal kinase and caspases 8 and 3.56 The Tg mice transfected with APP751 cDNA, under the control of the rat neuron-specific enolase promoter, only develop diffuse Aβ deposits that correlate with age-dependent severe learning deficits.57 The C-terminal domain of Aβ has powerful membrane destabilizing properties that alter the permeability of cellular membranes, thus contributing to cytotoxicity.58–60 It has been recently suggested that the retention and accumulation of Aβ in lipid bilayers could induce severe disturbances in cellular metabolism and play a major role in AD pathology.61 These findings suggest that diffuse P3 deposits are not benign. Passive or active immunizations directed exclusively to N-terminal Aβ-42 sequences, such as AN-1792,62 will not remove potentially neurotoxic Aβ P3 peptides. However, a new generation of antibodies specifically directed against the C-terminal domain of Aβ and designed to remove both compact and diffuse plaques are undergoing experimental evaluation.63 Gross Enlargement of the White Matter Amyloid Pool White matter lesions are present in two-thirds of patients with AD. They represent severe alterations in protein, lipid, and cholesterol metabolism; dysmyelination; demyelination; loss of axons and astrogliosis compounded by a reduced number of microvessels; concurrent ischemia/hypoxia; and interstitial fluid retention with dilation of periarterial spaces.49,64 In elderly ND individuals, the WM contains a small pool of soluble Aβ that probably originates in the GM and gradually diffuses into the WM.64 In the absence of visible WM Aβ deposits, such as those observed in the cerebral cortex of AD patients, it can be assumed that the WM Aβ peptides are either soluble oligomers or associated with structural molecules such as myelin sheets that may inhibit Aβ fibrillization. In addition, an amplified Aβ-mediated WM neuroinflammatory response would increase the complement-mediated production of membrane attack complexes that will further destroy myelin and axonal integrity.65 Experimentally, Aβ peptides induce severe oligodendrocyte damage by interfering with the sphingomyelinase-ceramide pathway66 as well as alterations in axonal cytoskeleton manifested by loss of neurofilament immunoreactivity.67 Both guanidine and formic acid extractions recovered a substantial amount of WM Aβ n-40 and Aβ n-42. In sporadic AD WM, the total average soluble Aβ is 2.2 μg/g tissue64 whereas the WM of immunized cases 1 and 2 contained 97 and 17 μg/g tissue of soluble total Aβ, representing 44 and 8 times more Aβ peptide load, respectively. The higher amount of total WM Aβ (~ 5.8-fold) of case 1 over case 2 may be due to the postvaccination aseptic encephalitis that gravely affected the WM or to differences in prevaccination Aβ levels. The substantial increase in WM amyloid burden suggests that this compartment acted as the ultimate “sink” for Aβ released from disrupted senile plaques that could not escape through the vasculature. The ultimate consequences of a shifted amyloid tissue burden are unknown. Amyloid Accumulation Dynamics and Vaccination The cognitive improvement exhibited by vaccinated patients suggests that amyloid plaques play key roles in AD pathophysiology and the development of dementia. In addition, the results suggest that a patient with preclinical stages of AD may have incompletely evolved plaques that have not yet undergone extensive chemical modification, provoked inflammation, or managed to irreversibly damage surrounding neurons. Thus, there may be only a brief window of opportunity to reverse these plaques. The problem is that vascular Aβ deposits in all likelihood are forming concomitantly with senile plaques and may interfere with the complete removal of disrupted amyloid. Even with an antibody specific to Aβ 1–40, the dominant peptide in vascular amyloid, once preclinical AD has progressed to dementia, it may be too late to preserve the architecture and function of the vessels.49,68 These tenets suggest two quite interesting hypotheses: 1) AD plaques might initially be virtually absent but emerge rapidly once mild cognitive impairment appears. 2) Plaques from the early clinical stages of AD are substantially less modified chemically than those of full-blown AD, as in the case of the APP Tg mice where the amyloid does not have time to accumulate chemical modifications and thereby becomes more resistant to disruption. In support of these contentions is the early prophylactic immunization of several strains of Tg mice that results in minimal amyloid deposits.4,69 As the Tg mice age, the efficient removal of plaques by vaccination decreases.69–71 Arresting Aβ production in the Tg APP mice carrying the Swedish/Indiana mutations by doxycycline-controlled expression demonstrated that pre-existing amyloid deposits become very stable and difficult to clear as the animals age.72 Therefore, although “young” and comparatively unmodified amyloid in Tg mice and possibly in preclinical AD is more amenable to disruption, such efforts will be substantially less effective in fully developed AD, where modified Aβ is too abundant and difficult to eliminate. In addition, immunotherapy cannot remove the vascular amyloid because it is enmeshed with the extracellular matrix to too great an extent. We also hypothesize that impaired regional brain perfusion due to damaged microvasculature might explain the patchy plaque removal patterns observed in immunized individuals. These assumptions suggest that early intervention, well before vascular amyloid deposition is extensive and circulatory compromise is severe, may be a key feature of successful mitigation approaches. In summary, examination of two AN-1792 immunized individuals revealed areas of the cerebral cortex in which the compact amyloid plaques were removed in some regions, leaving behind diffuse Aβ deposits. A remarkable increase in the soluble Aβ pool was evident in both cases and may have contributed to a more severe amyloid angiopathy and sharply elevated WM-soluble Aβ levels. In addition, the increasing deposits of amyloid in the brain vasculature may intensify blood-brain barrier distress and hamper brain perfusion. The elevated pool of soluble amyloid in GM and WM may further impair neuronal function and neural transmission and additionally promote neuroinflammation. Despite these potential pitfalls, the morphological and biochemical evidence supports immunization programs in humans by providing direct and substantial evidence that amyloid plaque deposits of mild cognitive impairment patients are amenable to disassembly by antibody therapies. However, more cases will need to be studied to verify these preliminary conclusions and to determine whether immunization may have deleterious consequences for AD patients or patients with non-AD dementias. Earlier anti-Aβ immunizations, combined with treatment strategies that are more preventative than therapeutic, may be needed to facilitate drainage and efficient degradation of the brain’s Aβ peptides and prevent the accumulation of toxic soluble and insoluble Aβ and subsequent deleterious neuronal and vascular damage. Supplemental Material
Acknowledgments We express our gratitude to Dr. Douglas Walker (Sun Health Research Institute) for performing Apo E genotyping. Footnotes Address reprint requests to Alex E. Roher, M.D. Ph.D., Sun Health Research Institute, 10515 W. Santa Fe Dr., Sun City, AZ 85351. E-mail: alex.roher/at/sunhealth.org. Supported by National Institute on Aging grant RO1 AG-19795, by Arizona Alzheimer’s Disease Core Center grant P30 AG-19610, and by grants from the State of Arizona to the Arizona Alzheimer’s Research Consortium. Brain tissue from case 2 was obtained from University of California at San Diego Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center grant NIA AG-05131 and grant RO1 AG-18440. Supplemental material for this article appears on http://ajp.amjpathol.org. Related Commentary on page 738 References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Am J Public Health. 1998 Sep; 88(9):1337-42.
[Am J Public Health. 1998]Curr Opin Immunol. 2004 Oct; 16(5):599-606.
[Curr Opin Immunol. 2004]Curr Alzheimer Res. 2004 Aug; 1(3):149-63.
[Curr Alzheimer Res. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 5; 101 Suppl 2():14657-62.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Am J Pathol. 2004 Jul; 165(1):283-97.
[Am J Pathol. 2004]Neurology. 2003 Jul 8; 61(1):46-54.
[Neurology. 2003]Neurology. 2005 May 10; 64(9):1553-62.
[Neurology. 2005]Neurology. 2005 May 10; 64(9):1563-72.
[Neurology. 2005]Neuron. 2003 May 22; 38(4):547-54.
[Neuron. 2003]Immunol Rev. 2005 Jun; 205():244-56.
[Immunol Rev. 2005]Nat Med. 2003 Apr; 9(4):448-52.
[Nat Med. 2003]Brain Pathol. 2004 Jan; 14(1):11-20.
[Brain Pathol. 2004]Neurology. 2005 Jan 11; 64(1):129-31.
[Neurology. 2005]Brain Pathol. 2004 Jan; 14(1):11-20.
[Brain Pathol. 2004]Neurology. 2005 Jan 11; 64(1):129-31.
[Neurology. 2005]Brain Pathol. 1991 Apr; 1(3):213-6.
[Brain Pathol. 1991]Biochemistry. 2000 Sep 5; 39(35):10831-9.
[Biochemistry. 2000]J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 23; 271(34):20631-5.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]Biochemistry. 2005 Oct 25; 44(42):13807-19.
[Biochemistry. 2005]Biochemistry. 2005 Oct 25; 44(42):13807-19.
[Biochemistry. 2005]Brain Pathol. 2004 Jan; 14(1):11-20.
[Brain Pathol. 2004]Neurology. 2005 Jan 11; 64(1):129-31.
[Neurology. 2005]J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 15; 269(15):10987-90.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]Neurology. 2005 Jan 11; 64(1):129-31.
[Neurology. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Nov 15; 90(22):10836-40.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993]J Biol Chem. 1993 Feb 15; 268(5):3072-83.
[J Biol Chem. 1993]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997 Aug 8; 237(1):188-91.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997]Nat Med. 2003 Apr; 9(4):448-52.
[Nat Med. 2003]Brain Pathol. 2004 Jan; 14(1):11-20.
[Brain Pathol. 2004]J Cell Biol. 1988 Dec; 107(6 Pt 2):2703-16.
[J Cell Biol. 1988]J Biol Chem. 1993 Feb 15; 268(5):3072-83.
[J Biol Chem. 1993]J Biol Chem. 1993 Feb 15; 268(5):3072-83.
[J Biol Chem. 1993]Methods Enzymol. 1999; 309():89-105.
[Methods Enzymol. 1999]Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000 Sep 15; 381(2):225-34.
[Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000]J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 23; 271(34):20631-5.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]Neurol Res. 2005 Dec; 27(8):869-81.
[Neurol Res. 2005]Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun; 1019():1-4.
[Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2000 Jun 2; 275(22):16941-7.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Biol Chem. 1999 Nov 5; 274(45):32301-8.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Nature. 2000 Dec 21-28; 408(6815):979-82.
[Nature. 2000]Nat Neurosci. 2002 May; 5(5):452-7.
[Nat Neurosci. 2002]J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 1; 22(15):6331-5.
[J Neurosci. 2002]J Neurosci. 2004 Jul 14; 24(28):6277-82.
[J Neurosci. 2004]Nature. 1996 Mar 14; 380(6570):168-71.
[Nature. 1996]Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Sep 26; 826():35-46.
[Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997]Angiogenesis. 2004; 7(1):75-85.
[Angiogenesis. 2004]Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000 Apr; 903():97-109.
[Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000]Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2003 Oct; 23(4-5):681-9.
[Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 5; 101 Suppl 2():14657-62.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Brain Pathol. 2004 Jan; 14(1):11-20.
[Brain Pathol. 2004]Neurology. 2005 Jan 11; 64(1):129-31.
[Neurology. 2005]Nature. 2000 Dec 21-28; 408(6815):979-82.
[Nature. 2000]Nat Neurosci. 2002 May; 5(5):452-7.
[Nat Neurosci. 2002]Neurology. 2005 Jan 11; 64(1):129-31.
[Neurology. 2005]J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 15; 269(15):10987-90.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]Am J Pathol. 1996 Aug; 149(2):585-96.
[Am J Pathol. 1996]Brain. 2002 Sep; 125(Pt 9):2036-43.
[Brain. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Dec 4; 98(25):14675-80.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Mol Med. 2003 Mar-Apr; 9(3-4):112-22.
[Mol Med. 2003]Biochemistry. 2002 Sep 17; 41(37):11080-90.
[Biochemistry. 2002]Biochemistry. 2002 Sep 17; 41(37):11080-90.
[Biochemistry. 2002]Neurobiol Aging. 1997 Jul-Aug; 18(4):415-21.
[Neurobiol Aging. 1997]J Cell Biol. 2004 Jan 5; 164(1):123-31.
[J Cell Biol. 2004]Mol Med. 2003 Mar-Apr; 9(3-4):112-22.
[Mol Med. 2003]Neurobiol Aging. 2004 May-Jun; 25(5):589-97; discussion 603-4.
[Neurobiol Aging. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 5; 101 Suppl 2():14657-62.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]J Clin Invest. 2006 Jan; 116(1):193-201.
[J Clin Invest. 2006]J Clin Invest. 2006 Jan; 116(1):193-201.
[J Clin Invest. 2006]Biochemistry. 2000 Sep 5; 39(35):10831-9.
[Biochemistry. 2000]J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 23; 271(34):20631-5.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]Protein Eng. 1998 Sep; 11(9):761-7.
[Protein Eng. 1998]