• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of transbhomepageaboutsubmitalertseditorial board
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. Feb 28, 1998; 353(1366): 187–198.
PMCID: PMC1692210

Levels of genetic polymorphism: marker loci versus quantitative traits.

Abstract

Species are the units used to measure ecological diversity and alleles are the units of genetic diversity. Genetic variation within and among species has been documented most extensively using allozyme electrophoresis. This reveals wide differences in genetic variability within, and genetic distances among, species, demonstrating that species are not equivalent units of diversity. The extent to which the pattern observed for allozymes can be used to infer patterns of genetic variation in quantitative traits depends on the forces generating and maintaining variability. Allozyme variation is probably not strictly neutral but, nevertheless, heterozygosity is expected to be influenced by population size and genetic distance will be affected by time since divergence. The same is true for quantitative traits influenced by many genes and under weak stabilizing selection. However, the limited data available suggest that allozyme variability is a poor predictor of genetic variation in quantitative traits within populations. It is a better predictor of general phenotypic divergence and of postzygotic isolation between populations or species, but is only weakly correlated with prezygotic isolation. Studies of grasshopper and planthopper mating signal variation and assortative mating illustrate how these characters evolve independently of general genetic and morphological variation. The role of such traits in prezygotic isolation, and hence speciation, means that they will contribute significantly to the diversity of levels of genetic variation within and among species.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (238K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Barton NH, Turelli M. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? Annu Rev Genet. 1989;23:337–370. [PubMed]
  • Cooper SJ, Hewitt GM. Nuclear DNA sequence divergence between parapatric subspecies of the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus. Insect Mol Biol. 1993;2(3):185–194. [PubMed]
  • Cooper SJ, Ibrahim KM, Hewitt GM. Postglacial expansion and genome subdivision in the European grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus. Mol Ecol. 1995 Feb;4(1):49–60. [PubMed]
  • Hoelzel AR, Halley J, O'Brien SJ, Campagna C, Arnbom T, Le Boeuf B, Ralls K, Dover GA. Elephant seal genetic variation and the use of simulation models to investigate historical population bottlenecks. J Hered. 1993 Nov-Dec;84(6):443–449. [PubMed]
  • Houle D. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):195–204. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hudson RR, Kreitman M, Aguadé M. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):153–159. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lande R. The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet Res. 1975 Dec;26(3):221–235. [PubMed]
  • Lande R. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics. 1981 Nov-Dec;99(3-4):541–553. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lande R. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science. 1988 Sep 16;241(4872):1455–1460. [PubMed]
  • Li WH, Sadler LA. Low nucleotide diversity in man. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):513–523. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McDonald JH, Kreitman M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652–654. [PubMed]
  • Meyer J, Elsner N. How well are FREQUENCY SENSITIVITIES OF grasshopper ears tuned to species-specific song spectra? J Exp Biol. 1996;199(Pt 7):1631–1642. [PubMed]
  • Roff DA, Mousseau TA. Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 1987 Feb;58(Pt 1):103–118. [PubMed]
  • Skibinski DO, Woodwark M, Ward RD. A quantitative test of the neutral theory using pooled allozyme data. Genetics. 1993 Sep;135(1):233–248. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tilley SG, Verrell PA, Arnold SJ. Correspondence between sexual isolation and allozyme differentiation: a test in the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(7):2715–2719. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Watt WB. Allozymes in evolutionary genetics: self-imposed burden or extraordinary tool? Genetics. 1994 Jan;136(1):11–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wu CI, Palopoli MF. Genetics of postmating reproductive isolation in animals. Annu Rev Genet. 1994;28:283–308. [PubMed]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...