• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of transbhomepageaboutsubmitalertseditorial board
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. Apr 29, 1997; 352(1352): 519–529.
PMCID: PMC1691942

Correlated evolution and independent contrasts.

Abstract

The use of the independent contrast method in comparative tests is studied. It is assumed that: (i) the traits under investigation are subject to natural selection; (ii) closely related species are similar because they share many characteristics of their niche, inherited from a common ancestor; and (iii) the current adaptive significance of the traits is the focus of investigation. The main objection to the use of species values in this case is that third variables which are shared by closely related species confound the relationship between the focal traits. In this paper, I argue that third variables are largely not controlled by the contrast methods, which are designed to estimate correlated evolution. To the extent that third variables also show correlated evolution, the true relationship among the traits of interest will remain obscured. Although the independent contrast method does not resolve the influence of third traits it does, in principle, provide a greater resolution than the use of the species mean values. However, its validity depends on the applicability of an evolutionary model which has a substantial stochastic component. To illustrate the consequences of relaxing this assumption I consider an alternative model of an adaptive radiation, where species come to fill a fixed niche space. Under this model, the expected value for the contrast correlation differs from that for the species correlation. The two correlations differ because contrasts reflect the historical pattern of diversification among species, whereas the species values describe the present-day relationships among the species. If the latter is of interest, I suggest that assessing significance based on the species correlations can be justified, providing that attention is paid to the role of potentially confounding third traits. Often, differences between contrast and species correlations may be biologically informative, reflecting changes in correlations between traits as an adaptive radiation proceeds; contrasts may be particularly useful as a means of investigating past history, rather than current utility of traits.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (385K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Briskie JV, Montgomerie R. Sperm size and sperm competition in birds. Proc Biol Sci. 1992 Feb 22;247(1319):89–95. [PubMed]
  • Devoogd TJ, Krebs JR, Healy SD, Purvis A. Relations between song repertoire size and the volume of brain nuclei related to song: comparative evolutionary analyses amongst oscine birds. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Nov 22;254(1340):75–82. [PubMed]
  • Masui T, Mann AM, Macatee TL, Garland EM, Okamura T, Smith RA, Cohen SM. Direct DNA sequencing of the rat neu oncogene transmembrane domain reveals no mutation in urinary bladder carcinomas induced by N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine, N-[4-(5-nitro-2-furyl)-2-thiazolyl]formamide or N-methyl-N-nitrosourea. Carcinogenesis. 1991 Oct;12(10):1975–1978. [PubMed]
  • Gould SJ, Lewontin RC. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):581–598. [PubMed]
  • Grafen A. The phylogenetic regression. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1989 Dec 21;326(1233):119–157. [PubMed]
  • Harvey PH, Purvis A. Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):619–624. [PubMed]
  • Pagel M. Seeking the evolutionary regression coefficient: an analysis of what comparative methods measure. J Theor Biol. 1993 Sep 21;164(2):191–205. [PubMed]
  • Pagel MD, Harvey PH. Taxonomic differences in the scaling of brain on body weight among mammals. Science. 1989 Jun 30;244(4912):1589–1593. [PubMed]
  • Richman AD, Price T. Evolution of ecological differences in the Old World leaf warblers. Nature. 1992 Feb 27;355(6363):817–821. [PubMed]
  • Saether BE, Gordon IJ. The adaptive significance of reproductive strategies in ungulates. Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Jun 22;256(1347):263–268. [PubMed]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...