• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of procbhomepageaboutsubmitalertseditorial board
Proc Biol Sci. Dec 7, 2003; 270(1532): 2507–2516.
PMCID: PMC1691537

A supertree of early tetrapods.

Abstract

A genus-level supertree for early tetrapods is built using a matrix representation of 50 source trees. The analysis of all combined trees delivers a long-stemmed topology in which most taxonomic groups are assigned to the tetrapod stem. A second analysis, which excludes source trees superseded by more comprehensive studies, supports a deep phylogenetic split between lissamphibian and amniote total groups. Instances of spurious groups are rare in both analyses. The results of the pruned second analysis are mostly comparable with those of a recent, character-based and large-scale phylogeny of Palaeozoic tetrapods. Outstanding areas of disagreement include the branching sequence of lepospondyls and the content of the amniote crown group, in particular the placement of diadectomorphs as stem diapsids. Supertrees are unsurpassed in their ability to summarize relationship patterns from multiple independent topologies. Therefore, they might be used as a simple test of the degree of corroboration of nodes in the contributory analyses. However, we urge caution in using them as a replacement for character-based cladograms and for inferring macroevolutionary patterns.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (154K).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary data file:

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Anderson JS. The phylogenetic trunk: maximal inclusion of taxa with missing data in an analysis of the lepospondyli (Vertebrata, Tetrapoda). Syst Biol. 2001 Apr;50(2):170–193. [PubMed]
  • Anderson Jason S. Use of well-known names in phylogenetic nomenclature: a reply to Laurin. Syst Biol. 2002 Oct;51(5):822–827. [PubMed]
  • Bininda-Emonds OR, Bryant HN. Properties of matrix representation with parsimony analyses. Syst Biol. 1998 Sep;47(3):497–508. [PubMed]
  • Bininda-Emonds OR, Gittleman JL, Purvis A. Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1999 May;74(2):143–175. [PubMed]
  • Clack JA. An early tetrapod from 'Romer's Gap'. Nature. 2002 Jul 4;418(6893):72–76. [PubMed]
  • Coates MI, Ruta M, Milner AR. Early tetrapod evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Aug;15(8):327–328. [PubMed]
  • Gatesy John, Matthee Conrad, DeSalle Rob, Hayashi Cheryl. Resolution of a supertree/supermatrix paradox. Syst Biol. 2002 Aug;51(4):652–664. [PubMed]
  • Jeffery Jonathan E, Bininda-Emonds Olaf R P, Coates Michael I, Richardson Michael K. Analyzing evolutionary patterns in amniote embryonic development. Evol Dev. 2002 Jul-Aug;4(4):292–302. [PubMed]
  • Jeffery Jonathan E, Richardson Michael K, Coates Michael I, Bininda-Emonds Olaf R P. Analyzing developmental sequences within a phylogenetic framework. Syst Biol. 2002 Jun;51(3):478–491. [PubMed]
  • Laurin Michel. Tetrapod phylogeny, amphibian origins, and the definition of the name tetrapoda. Syst Biol. 2002 Apr;51(2):364–369. [PubMed]
  • Pisani Davide, Wilkinson Mark. Matrix representation with parsimony, taxonomic congruence, and total evidence. Syst Biol. 2002 Feb;51(1):151–155. [PubMed]
  • Pisani Davide, Yates Adam M, Langer Max C, Benton Michael J. A genus-level supertree of the Dinosauria. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 7;269(1494):915–921. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Quicke DL, Taylor J, Purvis A. Changing the landscape: a new strategy for estimating large phylogenies. Syst Biol. 2001 Feb;50(1):60–66. [PubMed]
  • Ragan MA. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1992 Mar;1(1):53–58. [PubMed]
  • Ruta Marcello, Coates Michael I, Quicke Donald L J. Early tetrapod relationships revisited. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 May;78(2):251–345. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...