• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of procbhomepageaboutsubmitalertseditorial board
Proc Biol Sci. Jan 22, 2003; 270(1511): 121–127.
PMCID: PMC1691228

The construction and analysis of epidemic trees with reference to the 2001 UK foot-and-mouth outbreak.

Abstract

The case-reproduction ratio for the spread of an infectious disease is a critically important concept for understanding dynamics of epidemics and for evaluating impact of control measures on spread of infection. Reliable estimation of this ratio is a problem central to epidemiology and is most often accomplished by fitting dynamic models to data and estimating combinations of parameters that equate to the case-reproduction ratio. Here, we develop a novel parameter-free method that permits direct estimation of the history of transmission events recoverable from detailed observation of a particular epidemic. From these reconstructed 'epidemic trees', case-reproduction ratios can be estimated directly. We develop a bootstrap algorithm that generates percentile intervals for these estimates that shows the procedure to be both precise and robust to possible uncertainties in the historical reconstruction. Identifying and 'pruning' branches from these trees whose occurrence might have been prevented by implementation of more stringent control measures permits estimation of the possible efficacy of these alternative measures. Examination of the cladistic structure of these trees as a function of the distance of each case from its infection source reveals useful insights about the relationship between long-distance transmission events and epidemic size. We demonstrate the utility of these methods by applying them to data from the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in the UK.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (695K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Donaldson AI, Alexandersen S, Sørensen JH, Mikkelsen T. Relative risks of the uncontrollable (airborne) spread of FMD by different species. Vet Rec. 2001 May 12;148(19):602–604. [PubMed]
  • Ferguson NM, Donnelly CA, Anderson RM. The foot-and-mouth epidemic in Great Britain: pattern of spread and impact of interventions. Science. 2001 May 11;292(5519):1155–1160. [PubMed]
  • Ferguson NM, Donnelly CA, Anderson RM. Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain. Nature. 2001 Oct 4;413(6855):542–548. [PubMed]
  • Gibbens JC, Sharpe CE, Wilesmith JW, Mansley LM, Michalopoulou E, Ryan JB, Hudson M. Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months. Vet Rec. 2001 Dec 15;149(24):729–743. [PubMed]
  • Haydon DT, Woolhouse ME, Kitching RP. An analysis of foot-and-mouth-disease epidemics in the UK. IMA J Math Appl Med Biol. 1997 Mar;14(1):1–9. [PubMed]
  • Howard SC, Donnelly CA. The importance of immediate destruction in epidemics of foot and mouth disease. Res Vet Sci. 2000 Oct;69(2):189–196. [PubMed]
  • Hugh-Jones ME. Epidemiological studies on the 1967-68 foot and mouth epidemic: attack rates and cattle density. Res Vet Sci. 1972 Sep;13(5):411–417. [PubMed]
  • Hugh-Jones ME, Tinline RR. Studies on the 1967--68 foot and mouth disease epidemic: incubation period and herd serial interval. J Hyg (Lond) 1976 Oct;77(2):141–153. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Keeling MJ, Woolhouse ME, Shaw DJ, Matthews L, Chase-Topping M, Haydon DT, Cornell SJ, Kappey J, Wilesmith J, Grenfell BT. Dynamics of the 2001 UK foot and mouth epidemic: stochastic dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. Science. 2001 Oct 26;294(5543):813–817. [PubMed]
  • Lloyd AL. The dependence of viral parameter estimates on the assumed viral life cycle: limitations of studies of viral load data. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Apr 22;268(1469):847–854. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • May RM, Anderson RM. Transmission dynamics of HIV infection. Nature. 1987 Mar 12;326(6109):137–142. [PubMed]
  • Morris RS, Wilesmith JW, Stern MW, Sanson RL, Stevenson MA. Predictive spatial modelling of alternative control strategies for the foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain, 2001. Vet Rec. 2001 Aug 4;149(5):137–144. [PubMed]
  • Stegeman A, Elbers AR, Smak J, de Jong MC. Quantification of the transmission of classical swine fever virus between herds during the 1997-1998 epidemic in The Netherlands. Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):219–234. [PubMed]
  • Woolhouse ME, Anderson RM. Understanding the epidemiology of BSE. Trends Microbiol. 1997 Nov;5(11):421–424. [PubMed]
  • Woolhouse ME, Dye C, Etard JF, Smith T, Charlwood JD, Garnett GP, Hagan P, Hii JL, Ndhlovu PD, Quinnell RJ, et al. Heterogeneities in the transmission of infectious agents: implications for the design of control programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 7;94(1):338–342. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Woolhouse M, Chase-Topping M, Haydon D, Friar J, Matthews L, Hughes G, Shaw D, Wilesmith J, Donaldson A, Cornell S, et al. Epidemiology. Foot-and-mouth disease under control in the UK. Nature. 2001 May 17;411(6835):258–259. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...