Logo of procbhomepageaboutsubmitalertseditorial board
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Oct 22; 269(1505): 2163–2171.
PMCID: PMC1691143

Responses of butterflies to twentieth century climate warming: implications for future ranges.


We analyse distribution records for 51 British butterfly species to investigate altitudinal and latitudinal responses to twentieth century climate warming. Species with northern and/or montane distributions have disappeared from low elevation sites and colonized sites at higher elevations during the twentieth century, consistent with a climate explanation. We found no evidence for a systematic shift northwards across all species, even though 11 out of 46 southerly distributed species have expanded in the northern part of their distributions. For a subset of 35 species, we model the role of climate in limiting current European distributions and predict potential future distributions for the period 2070-2099. Most northerly distributed species will have little opportunity to expand northwards and will disappear from areas in the south, resulting in reduced range sizes. Southerly distributed species will have the potential to shift northwards, resulting in similar or increased range sizes. However, 30 out of 35 study species have failed to track recent climate changes because of lack of suitable habitat, so we revised our estimates accordingly for these species and predicted 65% and 24% declines in range sizes for northern and southern species, respectively. These revised estimates are likely to be more realistic predictions of future butterfly range sizes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (622K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Simmen MW, Goodhill GJ, Willshaw DJ. Scaling and brain connectivity. Nature. 1994 Jun 9;369(6480):448–450. [PubMed]
  • Hill JK, Thomas CD, Huntley B. Climate and habitat availability determine 20th century changes in a butterfly's range margin. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Jun 22;266(1425):1197–1197. [PMC free article]
  • Hughes I., I Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Feb;15(2):56–61. [PubMed]
  • Peterson A Townsend, Ortega-Huerta Miguel A, Bartley Jeremy, Sánchez-Cordero Victor, Soberón Jorge, Buddemeier Robert H, Stockwell David R B. Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. Nature. 2002 Apr 11;416(6881):626–629. [PubMed]
  • Purvis A, Rambaut A. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Comput Appl Biosci. 1995 Jun;11(3):247–251. [PubMed]
  • Thomas CD, Bodsworth EJ, Wilson RJ, Simmons AD, Davies ZG, Musche M, Conradt L. Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature. 2001 May 31;411(6837):577–581. [PubMed]
  • Walther Gian-Reto, Post Eric, Convey Peter, Menzel Annette, Parmesan Camille, Beebee Trevor J C, Fromentin Jean-Marc, Hoegh-Guldberg Ove, Bairlein Franz. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):389–395. [PubMed]
  • Warren MS, Hill JK, Thomas JA, Asher J, Fox R, Huntley B, Roy DB, Telfer MG, Jeffcoate S, Harding P, et al. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature. 2001 Nov 1;414(6859):65–69. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society


Save items

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...