• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of procbhomepageaboutsubmitalertseditorial board
Proc Biol Sci. May 22, 2000; 267(1447): 1011–1019.
PMCID: PMC1690640

Phylogenetic analysis of arthropods using two nuclear protein-encoding genes supports a crustacean + hexapod clade.

Abstract

Recent phylogenetic analyses using molecular data suggest that hexapods are more closely related to crustaceans than to myriapods, a result that conflicts with long-held morphology-based hypotheses. Here we contribute additional information to this debate by conducting phylogenetic analyses on two nuclear protein-encoding genes, elongation factor-1 alpha (EF-1 alpha) and the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (Pol II), from an extensive sample of arthropod taxa. Results were obtained from two data sets. One data set comprised 1092 nucleotides (364 amino acids) of EF-1 alpha and 372 nucleotides (124 amino acids) of Pol II from 30 arthropods and three lobopods. The other data set contained the same EF-1 alpha fragment and an expanded 1038-nucleotide (346-amino-acid) sample of Pol II from 17 arthropod taxa. Results from maximum-parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses strongly supported the existence of a Crustacea + Hexapoda clade (Pancrustacea) over a Myriapoda + Hexapoda clade (Atelocerata). The apparent incompatibility between the molecule-based Pancrustacea hypothesis and morphology-based Atelocerata hypothesis is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (242K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Boore JL, Lavrov DV, Brown WM. Gene translocation links insects and crustaceans. Nature. 1998 Apr 16;392(6677):667–668. [PubMed]
  • Brower AV, DeSalle R. Patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA sequence divergence among nymphalid butterflies: the utility of wingless as a source of characters for phylogenetic inference. Insect Mol Biol. 1998 Feb;7(1):73–82. [PubMed]
  • Cannatella DC, Hillis DM, Chippindale PT, Weigt L, Rand AS, Ryan MJ. Phylogeny of frogs of the Physalaemus pustulosus species group, with an examination of data incongruence. Syst Biol. 1998 Jun;47(2):311–335. [PubMed]
  • Cisne JL. Trilobites and the origin of arthropods. Science. 1974 Oct 4;186(4158):13–18. [PubMed]
  • Cunningham CW. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Syst Biol. 1997 Sep;46(3):464–478. [PubMed]
  • Dear S, Staden R. A sequence assembly and editing program for efficient management of large projects. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Jul 25;19(14):3907–3911. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Felsenstein J. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:521–565. [PubMed]
  • Field KG, Olsen GJ, Lane DJ, Giovannoni SJ, Ghiselin MT, Raff EC, Pace NR, Raff RA. Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science. 1988 Feb 12;239(4841 Pt 1):748–753. [PubMed]
  • Friedrich M, Tautz D. Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods. Nature. 1995 Jul 13;376(6536):165–167. [PubMed]
  • Graybeal A. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst Biol. 1998 Mar;47(1):9–17. [PubMed]
  • Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 1985;22(2):160–174. [PubMed]
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Rannala B. Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. Science. 1997 Apr 11;276(5310):227–232. [PubMed]
  • Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 1992 Jun;8(3):275–282. [PubMed]
  • Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111–120. [PubMed]
  • Kishino H, Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in hominoidea. J Mol Evol. 1989 Aug;29(2):170–179. [PubMed]
  • Regier JC, Shultz JW. Molecular phylogeny of the major arthropod groups indicates polyphyly of crustaceans and a new hypothesis for the origin of hexapods. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Sep;14(9):902–913. [PubMed]
  • Rodríguez F, Oliver JL, Marín A, Medina JR. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J Theor Biol. 1990 Feb 22;142(4):485–501. [PubMed]
  • Smith SW, Overbeek R, Woese CR, Gilbert W, Gillevet PM. The genetic data environment an expandable GUI for multiple sequence analysis. Comput Appl Biosci. 1994 Dec;10(6):671–675. [PubMed]
  • Turbeville JM, Pfeifer DM, Field KG, Raff RA. The phylogenetic status of arthropods, as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 1991 Sep;8(5):669–686. [PubMed]
  • Zharkikh A. Estimation of evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1994 Sep;39(3):315–329. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links