• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of aemPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalAEM ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
Appl Environ Microbiol. Feb 1996; 62(2): 316–322.
PMCID: PMC167800

DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition.


A simple, rapid method for bacterial lysis and direct extraction of DNA from soils with minimal shearing was developed to address the risk of chimera formation from small template DNA during subsequent PCR. The method was based on lysis with a high-salt extraction buffer (1.5 M NaCl) and extended heating (2 to 3 h) of the soil suspension in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, and proteinase K. The extraction method required 6 h and was tested on eight soils differing in organic carbon, clay content, and pH, including ones from which DNA extraction is difficult. The DNA fragment size in crude extracts from all soils was > 23 kb. Preliminary trials indicated that DNA recovery from two soils seeded with gram-negative bacteria was 92 to 99%. When the method was tested on all eight unseeded soils, microscopic examination of indigenous bacteria in soil pellets before and after extraction showed variable cell lysis efficiency (26 to 92%). Crude DNA yields from the eight soils ranged from 2.5 to 26.9 micrograms of DNA g-1, and these were positively correlated with the organic carbon content in the soil (r = 0.73). DNA yields from gram-positive bacteria from pure cultures were two to six times higher when the high-salt-SDS-heat method was combined with mortar-and-pestle grinding and freeze-thawing, and most DNA recovered was of high molecular weight. Four methods for purifying crude DNA were also evaluated for percent recovery, fragment size, speed, enzyme restriction, PCR amplification, and DNA-DNA hybridization. In general, all methods produced DNA pure enough for PCR amplification. Since soil type and microbial community characteristics will influence DNA recovery, this study provides guidance for choosing appropriate extraction and purification methods on the basis of experimental goals.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (384K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Dorn E, Hellwig M, Reineke W, Knackmuss HJ. Isolation and characterization of a 3-chlorobenzoate degrading pseudomonad. Arch Microbiol. 1974;99(1):61–70. [PubMed]
  • Erb RW, Wagner-Döbler I. Detection of polychlorinated biphenyl degradation genes in polluted sediments by direct DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Dec;59(12):4065–4073. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Holben William E, Jansson Janet K, Chelm Barry K, Tiedje James M. DNA Probe Method for the Detection of Specific Microorganisms in the Soil Bacterial Community. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Mar;54(3):703–711. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Liesack W, Stackebrandt E. Occurrence of novel groups of the domain Bacteria as revealed by analysis of genetic material isolated from an Australian terrestrial environment. J Bacteriol. 1992 Aug;174(15):5072–5078. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Moré MI, Herrick JB, Silva MC, Ghiorse WC, Madsen EL. Quantitative cell lysis of indigenous microorganisms and rapid extraction of microbial DNA from sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 May;60(5):1572–1580. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sherr BF, Sherr EB, Fallon RD. Use of monodispersed, fluorescently labeled bacteria to estimate in situ protozoan bacterivory. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 May;53(5):958–965. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Simonet P, Grosjean MC, Misra AK, Nazaret S, Cournoyer B, Normand P. Frankia genus-specific characterization by polymerase chain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Nov;57(11):3278–3286. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Steffan RJ, Atlas RM. DNA amplification to enhance detection of genetically engineered bacteria in environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Sep;54(9):2185–2191. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Steffan RJ, Goksøyr J, Bej AK, Atlas RM. Recovery of DNA from soils and sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Dec;54(12):2908–2915. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tebbe CC, Vahjen W. Interference of humic acids and DNA extracted directly from soil in detection and transformation of recombinant DNA from bacteria and a yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Aug;59(8):2657–2665. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Torsvik V, Goksøyr J, Daae FL. High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Mar;56(3):782–787. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tsai YL, Olson BH. Rapid method for separation of bacterial DNA from humic substances in sediments for polymerase chain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Jul;58(7):2292–2295. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Viles CL, Sieracki ME. Measurement of marine picoplankton cell size by using a cooled, charge-coupled device camera with image-analyzed fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Feb;58(2):584–592. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ward DM, Weller R, Bateson MM. 16S rRNA sequences reveal numerous uncultured microorganisms in a natural community. Nature. 1990 May 3;345(6270):63–65. [PubMed]
  • Zhou J, Fries MR, Chee-Sanford JC, Tiedje JM. Phylogenetic analyses of a new group of denitrifiers capable of anaerobic growth of toluene and description of Azoarcus tolulyticus sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995 Jul;45(3):500–506. [PubMed]
  • Zhou JZ, Tiedje JM. Gene transfer from a bacterium injected into an aquifer to an indigenous bacterium. Mol Ecol. 1995 Oct;4(5):613–618. [PubMed]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • Compound
    PubChem Compound links
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...