Drosophila NMNAT Maintains Neural Integrity Independent of Its NAD Synthesis Activity

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040416

Journal List > PLoS Biol > v.4(12); Dec 2006

PLoS Biol. 2006 December; 4(12): e416.

Published online 2006 November 28. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040416.

PMCID: PMC1665629

Copyright : © 2006 Zhai et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Drosophila NMNAT Maintains Neural Integrity Independent of Its NAD Synthesis Activity

R. Grace Zhai,^1,² Yu Cao,² P. Robin Hiesinger,^1,²^¤ Yi Zhou,^1,² Sunil Q Mehta,³ Karen L Schulze,^1,² Patrik Verstreken,^1,² and Hugo J Bellen^1,^2,³^*

¹Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

²Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

³Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

Barry Dickson, Academic Editor

Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austria

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hbellen/at/bcm.edu

Received July 28, 2006; Accepted September 29, 2006.

See "How to Protect Fly Photoreceptors" , e438.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

Wallerian degeneration refers to a loss of the distal part of an axon after nerve injury. Wallerian degeneration slow (Wld^s) mice overexpress a chimeric protein containing the NAD synthase NMNAT (nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase 1) and exhibit a delay in axonal degeneration. Currently, conflicting evidence raises questions as to whether NMNAT is the protecting factor and whether its enzymatic activity is required for such a possible function. Importantly, the link between nmnat and axon degeneration is at present solely based on overexpression studies of enzymatically active protein. Here we use the visual system of Drosophila as a model system to address these issues. We have isolated the first nmnat mutations in a multicellular organism in a forward genetic screen for synapse malfunction in Drosophila. Loss of nmnat causes a rapid and severe neurodegeneration that can be attenuated by blocking neuronal activity. Furthermore, in vivo neuronal expression of mutated nmnat shows that enzymatically inactive NMNAT protein retains strong neuroprotective effects and rescues the degeneration phenotype caused by loss of nmnat. Our data indicate an NAD-independent requirement of NMNAT for maintaining neuronal integrity that can be exploited to protect neurons from neuronal activity-induced degeneration by overexpression of the protein.

Introduction

Following nerve injury, distal axons and synaptic terminals undergo Wallerian degeneration within 48 h [1]. This process occurs in both the central and peripheral nervous systems and has several key features: (1) the distal stump of an injured axon loses its ability to transmit action potentials; (2) the axon and synaptic terminal become fragmented; (3) the cytoskeleton undergoes granular degeneration; and (4) the axonal and nerve terminal debris are removed by Schwann cells and invading macrophages [2]. Recent studies have started to unveil the molecular mechanisms of Wallerian degeneration. Inhibiting ubiquitination delays axon degeneration, suggesting the involvement of ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation in the early stages of Wallerian degeneration [3]. In addition, studies have suggested that Wallerian degeneration is distinct from the apoptosis pathway, because caspases are not involved in Wallerian degeneration, and overexpression of apoptosis-inhibiting factors and mutations that block apoptosis fail to prevent axonal degeneration [4–6].

The discovery of the slow Wallerian degeneration mutant (Wld^s) mouse, in which Wallerian degeneration is delayed by 2–3 wk, has provided a genetic inroad to study the mechanisms of deterioration and protection in axonal degeneration [7–10]. The pronounced delay in degeneration is caused by a tandem triplication of an 85-kilobase (kb) region, resulting in the overexpression of a chimeric Ube4b/Nmnat gene, which contains the amino terminal 70–amino acid fragment of Ube4b (ubiquitination factor E4B), the entire coding sequence of Nmnat1, and a unique 18–amino acid linking region translated from the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of Nmnat1 [11,12]. Overexpression of the fusion protein in transgenic mice and rats reproduces the Wld^S phenotype [12,13], and recent studies show that overexpression of this fusion protein in Drosophila also protects axons from degeneration [14]. However, there are conflicting reports as to whether Nmnat1 alone is the protective factor [15–18], because transgenic mice overexpressing Nmnat1 do not exhibit protection from Wallerian degeneration [15,16]. In contrast, a detailed analysis of Wld^s chimeric protein in the central nervous system (CNS) suggests that the increased level of Nmnat1 is significant in Wld^s mice and that there is no obvious change in ubiquitination. Hence, its protective effects seem to be unrelated to the ubiquitination function of Ube4b [17]. In Drosophila, overexpression of nmnat can delay axonal degeneration [18]. The role of Ube4b remains controversial, however, as transfection of N70-Ube4b in cultured neurons does not produce a protective phenotype [19]. On the other hand, a recent report indicates that N70-Ube4b binds an important proteasomal chaperone (VCP) and relocates it to the nucleus [20]. Hence, it remains to be established whether N70-Ube4b is sufficient and/or necessary for a protective phenotype.

Two in vitro studies pinpoint Nmnat1 as the protective agent and suggest that it acts either in the nucleus [19] or locally in axons [21]. Although both in vitro studies indicate a requirement of NAD for the protective effect, Wld^s mice do not exhibit increased NAD levels [12]. This finding suggests either that local fluctuation of NAD levels is under the detection limit or that the Nmnat1 protein may have additional functions beyond NAD synthesis.

Understanding the normal neuronal function of endogenous Nmnat in vivo is crucial to unveiling the mechanisms of neural degeneration and neural protection offered by Wld^s protein. Here we show that loss of Drosophila nmnat causes severe neuronal and synaptic degeneration without affecting neural development. Importantly, this nmnat-dependent degeneration in photoreceptors can be attenuated by blocking phototransduction. NMNAT therefore functions to protect against activity-induced deterioration under normal conditions, and overexpression of NMNAT protects neurons from excessive activity-induced degeneration. This role is independent of its NAD synthesis activity, because overexpression of NMNAT protein with less than 1% activity can rescue the degeneration caused by loss of nmnat and has strong protective effects. We conclude that NMNAT is required to maintain neuronal integrity independent of its NAD synthesis function.

Results

Drosophila nmnat Is a Homolog of Mouse Nmnat1 Overexpressed in Wld^s

To identify genes that are involved in synapse development and function, we carried out a forward genetic screen using the eyFLP system [22–24]. The eyFLP system allows screening of flies that are homozygous for lethal mutations in the visual system but heterozygous in the rest of the animal [25]. Our primary screen was based on isolating ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)-induced mutants that fail in a phototaxis assay, followed by screening for defects in electroretinograms (ERGs) and assessing morphological defects of photoreceptor axons and terminals [22]. We screened 210,000 flies and isolated 7,500 flies with grossly normal eye morphology that phototax poorly [26]. We next subjected the flies to ERG tests and isolated 450 mutants with abnormal ERG responses. Subsequent complementation tests yielded 64 complementation groups with two or more alleles.

The Drosophila compound eye consists of 800 unit eyes, or ommatidia, each of which contains eight photoreceptors. Photoreceptors 1–6 (R1–R6) project to the first optic neuropil, or lamina, whereas R7 and R8 project deeper into the brain [27]. To isolate genes that specifically regulate synapse assembly and maintenance, we carried out a systematic transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis to uncover mutants with abnormal synapse structure in R1–R6 terminals [28]. Out of 60 mutants analyzed by TEM, two homozygous lethal mutations with abnormal active zone morphology that fail to complement each other (3R4¹ and 3R4²) were isolated. As shown in Figure 1

A, A,1C,1

C, and and1E,1

E, eyes that are mostly homozygous mutant (white areas) for either of the two alleles of complementation group 3R4 are smooth and have a normal external morphology, suggesting that eye development is normal. ERGs, extracellular recordings that measure the response of photoreceptor neurons to a light stimulus, were performed on animals with eyes mutant for either allele. 3R4 mutants exhibit a reduced depolarization and reduced on/off response in young animals (Figure 1

B, B,1D,1

D, and and1F),1

F), suggesting that the mutant photoreceptors have an impaired ability to respond to light and to elicit a postsynaptic response. We next examined the ultrastructure of lamina synapses where the ERG response is generated. As shown in Figure 1

G–1

I, TEM of lamina synapses of 1-d-old flies reveals morphological defects. In contrast to the organized cartridge structure in control lamina with six photoreceptor terminals per cartridge (Figure 1

G), the mutant laminae are disorganized, with various number of terminals (Figure 1

H and and1I).1

I). Within the terminals, we observe a fragmented cytoskeleton and misshapen membrane organelles (Figure 1

K). More interestingly, the mutant synaptic structure exhibits distinct phenotypes. In Drosophila presynaptic terminals, active zones have synaptic ribbon structures called T-bars that each consist of a “platform” and a “pedestal” [29]. In 3R4 mutants, T-bars are amorphous and less electron dense compared to wild type, but they are surrounded by clusters of normally sized synaptic vesicles (Figure 1

K and and1M).1

M). Although the number of synapses per terminal is not altered, the size of the T-bar profile, measured by the width of platforms (Figure 1

L, insert), is significantly reduced compared to the control (Figure 1

N and and11

O).

Figure 1

Mutations in Complementation Group 3R4 Disrupt Synaptic Structures in Photoreceptor Terminals

To identify the molecular lesions of the two alleles of 3R4, we mapped the lethality associated with this complementation group using P element mapping [30]. Fine mapping with five P elements pinpointed a 50-kb region at cytological location 96B11 (Figure 2

A). Sequencing of 25 kb of genomic DNA showed that both alleles have nonsense mutations in gene CG13645 (Figure 2

B). Expression of the cDNA (green) in photoreceptors rescues both the ERG phenotype and the morphology of synaptic terminals (Figure S1, Table S1). Moreover, a genomic transgene containing the CG13645 locus (Figure 2

B; green) fully rescues the lethality, the ERG defects, and the synaptic defects (Figure S1A–S1D). These data show that CG13645 corresponds to the gene that is mutated in the 3R4 alleles and that its loss or partial loss causes the observed defects.

Figure 2

Complementation Group 3R4 Encodes nmnat, an Adenylyltransferase

The nonsense mutations in both alleles map to the C-terminal half of the predicted protein (Figure 2

B), and it is therefore possible that truncated proteins are produced that have residual function. To create null mutations of CG13645, we imprecisely excised a P element (EY4790) [31] inserted 50 nt upstream of the first exon. Two alleles, Δ4790–1 and Δ4790–2, were generated that cause deletions of the first three or four exons (Figure 2

B; blue). These alleles fail to complement the lethality associated with the two EMS-induced alleles, have the same lethal phase (first instar larval stage), display the same ERG defects, and exhibit the same photoreceptor synaptic defects in TEM as the EMS alleles (unpublished data). These data indicate that both EMS-induced alleles are functional null alleles.

CG13645 encodes NMNAT, a nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase, which is a conserved, essential enzyme in most organisms. In humans, three isoforms, NMNAT1, −2, and −3, have been cloned, and their enzymatic properties have been analyzed [32–35]. There are also three predicted genes in the mouse, but only Nmnat1 has been characterized, mostly as part of the chimeric Wld^s protein. Drosophila CG13645 is equally homologous to mouse and human NMNAT1, −2, or −3 with approximately 45% identity over the entire protein (Figure 2

C). Since it is the only NMNAT found in the fly genome, we named it nmnat. As shown in Figure 2

D, the predicted enzyme activity center consists of an N-terminal catalytic domain and two substrate-binding motifs. The sequence conservation between Drosophila NMNAT and other NMNATs within the activity center is greater than 95%. To test whether nmnat encodes an active NMN adenylyltransferase, we produced recombinant protein and measured the enzyme activity using a continuous coupling assay. The fly protein has similar NMNAT activity as the human NMNAT3 control. When a single amino acid in the catalytic motif (“H30A”), or two amino acids in the substrate binding motifs are mutated (W98G/R224A and “WR”), the enzymatic activity is reduced to approximately 1% or less of the wild-type protein (Figure 2

E). These data indicate that nmnat encodes an active NMNAT with a similar enzyme activity center composition as its vertebrate homologs.

Both mouse and human NMNAT1 have been shown to primarily localize to nuclei [17,32], whereas human NMNAT3 is present in the cytoplasm and mitochondria [35]. To characterize the localization of the NMNAT protein, we generated a polyclonal antibody against the full-length protein. The specificity of the antibody was verified in mosaic clones of Δ4790–1 or Δ4790–2 in eye discs (Figure S2). Mutant patches of nmnat¹ or nmnat² also lack antibody staining at a similar level as mutant patches of Δ4790–1 or Δ4790–2 (Figure S2), suggesting nonsense-mediated decay of the transcripts in both EMS alleles, further supporting the genetic data, which indicate that both EMS alleles are null alleles or severe hypomorphs. The antibody enabled us to examine the protein expression pattern by immunohistochemistry in wild-type animals (Figure 3

). In third instar larvae, NMNAT is abundantly expressed in neuronal nuclei in the brain and ventral nerve cord (unpublished data) and in muscle cell nuclei (Figure 3

A–3

C). Relatively low levels of protein are present at the neuromuscular junction where the protein partially co-localizes with the active zone marker monoclonal antibody (mAb) nc82 (Figure 3

A–3

C). In the pupal optic lobe, NMNAT is expressed in the cell bodies of photoreceptors and numerous optic lobe neurons (Figure 3

D–3

F). In the adult optic lobe, NMNAT is expressed in the cell bodies of photoreceptors as well as in the terminals of the lamina neuropil. At synapses, NMNAT labeling appears to be punctate where it co-localizes with the active zone marker nc82, suggesting that NMNAT is present in the photoreceptor terminals (Figure 3

G–3

I). In the adult central brain, the expression persists with high levels in neuronal nuclei and, albeit at substantially lower levels, in synaptic neuropils (Figure 3

J–3

L). In summary, NMNAT is enriched in the nervous system, both in the neuronal nuclei and the nerve terminals, as well as in the muscle cell nuclei. However, expression of NMNAT in the nervous system using the pan-neuronal driver elav-GAL4, in contrast to ubiquitous actin-GAL4–driven expression, cannot rescue the lethality associated with the loss of NMNAT protein (Table S1), indicating that NMNAT function is not confined to the nervous system.

Figure 3

NMNAT Is Highly Enriched in the Nervous System and the Muscle Nuclei

Loss of nmnat Causes Severe Early-Onset Neuronal Degeneration

The reduced capability of nmnat mutant photoreceptors to respond to light, as revealed by ERG, can have several underlying causes: a defect in the phototransduction cascade, or a defect of the structural components of the phototransduction machinery, e.g., in rhabdomeres, the membrane stack in which the phototransduction components reside. We therefore examined the morphology of mutant retinae. The regular organization pattern of ommatidia can be visualized in a retina cross-section (Figure 4

A). As shown in Figure 4

, in 2-d-old mutant retinae, rhabdomeres are reduced in size, and large vacuoles are abundant in individual ommatidia. This phenotype becomes more severe with age, as in 28-d-old retinae, rhabdomeres are barely recognizable (Figure 4

D). Since the exterior morphology of these eyes look normal, we examined the onset of the phenotype and sectioned pupal retinae. At 96 h after puparium formation (APF; P+96%), just prior to eclosion, some defects are already prominent, and the size of rhabdomeres is reduced when compared to those of wild type. However, the phenotype is clearly less severe than in older retinae (Figure 4

B versus versus4D).4

D). TEM of photoreceptor terminals in the lamina (R1–R6 terminals) also reveals defects that follow a similar degenerative profile as that observed at the cell body. At P+96%, synaptic modules, or cartridges, formed by R1–R6 in the lamina are well organized with six photoreceptor terminals per cartridge, and the active zone structures are clearly discernible, indicating that the development of the photoreceptor terminals is mostly normal (Figure 4

G and and4L).4

L). As the mutant photoreceptors age, the number of recognizable terminals per cartridge declines (quantified in Figure 4

P), and the active zone structure becomes smaller and amorphous (Figure 4

H, H,4I,4

I, I,4M,4

M, and and4N).4

N). This phenotype correlates with the progression of the cell body defects. The magnitude of the depolarization and the on/off transients in ERG recordings also decline with age. At 8 d, the ERG response is barely present (Figure 4

Q). A comparison with two of the most severe Drosophila retinal degeneration mutants, rdgA (retinal degeneration A) and trp^P365 (transient receptor potential) [36–39], reveals that nmnat mutant retinae have similar but more severe defects (Figure 4

C and and4E,4

E, and unpublished data). Interestingly, the photoreceptor terminals of both rdgA and trp^P365 show a rather normal morphology, with correctly organized cartridges containing intact T-bars (Figure 4

E, E,4J,4

J, and and4O,4

O, and unpublished data), suggesting that degeneration in these mutants is more restricted to the retina. In summary, in nmnat mutant photoreceptors numerous cellular structures are disrupted throughout the entire neuron, from the rhabdomere to the presynaptic terminal, and the phenotype becomes progressively more severe with age.

Figure 4

Loss of nmnat Causes Severe and Progressive Age-Dependent Degeneration

To assess whether the development of the photoreceptors and accessory cells are affected in nmnat mutant eyes, we compared the morphology of mutant photoreceptors with neighboring wild-type cells by immunofluorescence labeling with several markers. We immunolabeled with antibodies against Actin to reveal rhabdomere structures, Armadillo to reveal the presence and morphology of adherence junctions between photoreceptors, and NMNAT to identify mutant cells. Photoreceptor subtype specification and differentiation are mostly completed by 50% of pupal development [40]. We therefore stained pupal eyes at both 30% and 50% of development and observed no morphological difference between mutant and wild-type tissue (Figure 5

), suggesting that mutant photoreceptors develop normally. In addition, TEM at P+96% reveals normal synapse formation by qualitative as well by quantitative criteria (Figure 4

G and and4L).4

L). We conclude that nmnat is not required for photoreceptor differentiation and development, but rather for the maintenance and integrity of mature neurons. In addition, loss of nmnat causes a general and severe neurodegenerative phenotype that spans all structures of the neuron including rhabdomeres, cell bodies, axons, and active zones. Hence, nmnat is required for neuronal integrity after differentiation.

Figure 5

nmnat Mutant Photoreceptors Develop Normally

Neurodegeneration Caused by Loss of nmnat Is Enhanced by Activity

In an attempt to dissect the mechanisms underlying the neurodegeneration of mutant photoreceptors, we first tested whether the degeneration is light dependent, because a common cause for retinal degeneration is light stimulation [41,42]. Indeed, when flies with nmnat mutant photoreceptors are raised in the dark and sectioned at 1 d of age for TEM, they exhibit an overall normal organization of ommatidia similar to wild-type controls (Figure 6

D and and6E),6

E), a phenotype that is significantly less severe than in flies kept on a 12-h light/dark cycle (Figure 6

B). In addition, the morphology of nmnat mutant photoreceptor terminals in dark-reared flies is comparable to those of wild-type flies (Figure 6

G and and6H),6

H), and is significantly less severe than in flies kept on a 12-h light/dark cycle (Figure 1

H and and1I).1

I). Notably, flies kept in the dark for 10 d exhibit a phenotype that is much less severe than in similarly aged animals kept in a light/dark cycle (Figure 6

C). However, signs of degeneration, such as smaller rhabdomeres, the presence of vacuoles in the cell body, and ultrastructural defects in the photoreceptor terminals, are obvious (Figure 6

F and and6I).6

I). These data show that light dramatically enhances the degenerative process in nmnat mutant cells and indicate that the normal function of NMNAT is to provide a potent protection against light-induced degeneration in adults.

Figure 6

Light Enhances Neurodegeneration in nmnat Mutant Photoreceptors

To further establish whether neuronal activity is mediating the degenerative process, we tested whether mutants that impair the phototransduction cascade partially protect photoreceptors from neurodegeneration induced by the loss of nmnat. norpA (no receptor potential A) encodes a phospholipase C, which is required for phototransduction [43]. In norpA^P24 mutants, phototransduction is blocked [43–45]. We find that in photoreceptors mutant for both norpA^P24 and nmnat, neurodegeneration is partially suppressed (Figure 7

B and and7C).7

C). The overall ommatidial structure is better organized, the vacuoles in the ommatidia are smaller, and the number of rhabdomeres is greater than in nmnat mutants (Figure 7

E). These observations further indicate that photoreceptor degeneration caused by loss of nmnat can be attenuated by reducing neuronal activity.

Figure 7

Loss of NMNAT-Induced Degeneration Can Be Attenuated by Blocking Phototransduction and Is Independent of Apoptosis

Next, we tested whether neural degeneration in nmnat mutant photoreceptors is related to apoptosis. If so, neuronal degeneration should be suppressed by proteins that inhibit apoptosis. We therefore expressed the apoptosis-inhibiting factor P35 [46] in nmnat mutant photoreceptors. We find that P35 expression does not suppress any phenotype associated with the loss of nmnat (Figures 7

C–7

E), suggesting that nmnat-dependent degeneration is independent of the P35-mediated apoptotic pathway.

Enzymatically Inactive NMNAT Rescues Neurodegeneration

In an in vitro culture system, NAD synthesis is required for the Wld^s protein to delay axon degeneration [19], and exogenous local application of NAD can prevent axon degeneration [21]. On the other hand, NAD levels were shown to be unchanged in Wld^s axons that show delayed degeneration [12]. If the protective effect of Wld^s and NMNAT occurs through enzymatic activity and hence NAD production, enzymatically inactive NMNAT should not rescue degeneration. To test this hypothesis, we generated transgenic flies that encode two different versions of enzymatically inactive NMNAT, nmnat-H30A, in which the catalytic center is mutated, and nmnat-WR, in which two key residues required for substrate binding are mutated. Both proteins have approximately 1% or less enzymatic activity of the wild-type protein in vitro (Figure 2

D and and2E).2

E). To our surprise, when the inactive enzymes are expressed in nmnat mutant photoreceptors at similar levels as wild-type protein (Figure S3), synaptic structures are fully rescued and rhabdomere size are rescued to 80%–85% of wild type (Figure 8

and Table S1). Importantly, the magnitude of the ERG depolarization in these rescued photoreceptors is more than 75% of wild type, comparable to the rescue with human NMNAT3 gene (HsNmnat3) (Figure 8

and Table S1), indicating that the inactive enzyme can rescue the neuronal degeneration caused by nmnat loss of function.

Figure 8

Enzymatically Inactive NMNAT Can Rescue the Neurodegeneration Phenotype Caused by Loss of nmnat

Interestingly, when we express wild-type NMNAT or enzymatically inactive NMNAT in the entire mutant animal using a ubiquitous driver (actin-GAL4), only the wild-type NMNAT is able to rescue the mutant animal to adulthood (Table S1). These data strongly suggest that the mutant enzymes lack activity in vivo and in vitro, and that NMNAT is a multifunctional protein that has two independent roles: NAD synthesis, which is required for viability, and a NAD-independent function that protects against neuronal activity-induced degeneration in mature photoreceptors.

Overexpression of nmnat Protects against Excessive Activity-Induced Neurodegeneration

Delayed Wallerian degeneration in Wld^s mice demonstrates the protective effect of the chimeric gene Ube4b/Nmnat [12]. To investigate if overexpression of Drosophila nmnat has protective effects, we tested enzymatically active and inactive forms in hyperactivity-induced neurodegeneration. First, we overexpressed nmnat in the retinal degeneration mutants, rdgA and trp^P365 [36,39,47]. It has been shown that in both rdgA and trp^P365 mutant photoreceptors, retinal degeneration is caused by constitutive activation of Trp channels [38,39,48,49]. The primary phenotypes of both mutants are loss of rhabdomeres, disorganization of ommatidia, and vacuolarization throughout the retina and photoreceptors (Figures 9

A and and9E).9

E). Overexpression of wild-type nmnat or mutant nmnat-WR transgenes partially restores the ommatidial organization (Figure 9

A versus versus9B9

B and and9C;9

C; Figure 9

E versus versus9F9

F and and9G),9

G), significantly reduces vacuole size in rdgA (Figure 9

D), and causes the presence of a higher number of rhabdomeres per ommatidium than in controls that do not overexpress nmnat (Figure 9

D and and99

H).

Figure 9

Overexpression of Enzymatically Active or Inactive NMNAT Can Rescue the Neurodegeneration Phenotype Caused by rdgA, trp^P365, and Constant Light Exposure

In a second paradigm, we induced photoreceptor degeneration by exposing wild-type flies to constant intense light, a strong environmental insult that induces neurodegeneration [50–52]. Thirty days of constant, intense light exposure induces numerous small, as well as very large, vacuoles in wild-type retinae, and a reduced number of rhabdomeres (Figure 9

J). In contrast, retinae overexpressing wild-type nmnat or nmnat-WR have significantly reduced size of vacuoles and a higher number of rhabdomeres per ommatidium (Figure 9

K, K,9L,9

L, and and9M).9

M). These data show that overexpression of nmnat, either wild type or enzymatically inactive, can protect against severe retinal degeneration caused by excessive neuronal activity.

Discussion

Here we report the identification and characterization of Drosophila nmnat and the first mutant analysis of nmnat in any multicellular organism. Our data reveal an essential neuronal protective function for nmnat, which is required for neurons to sustain normal neuronal activity. This function is independent of its enzymatic activity and can be exploited to protect neurons against activity-induced neurodegeneration.

Maintaining Neuronal Integrity

Our mutant analyses provide the first evidence that neuroprotection is a normal function of the endogenous protein, in contrast to previous overexpression reports [16,18]. Several lines of evidence support a role of NMNAT in protecting adult neurons against activity-induced degeneration. First, in the absence of nmnat, darkness delays the degeneration process of photoreceptors significantly. Second, mutations that impair components of the phototransduction cascade partially suppress the degeneration caused by loss of nmnat. Third, mutants in which photoreceptors degenerate due to constitutive phototransduction (rdgA and trp^P365) [38,39,48], are partially protected by overexpression of nmnat. Finally, overexpression of nmnat in flies that are exposed to intense light potently protects against neuronal degeneration. These observations provide evidence that NMNAT functions to maintain the integrity of mature neurons by protecting them from use-dependent degeneration. This protection is likely to be independent of the NAD synthesis activity of NMNAT, because enzymatically inactive NMNAT proteins protect as effectively as the wild-type protein. Hence, our data indicate that a normal neuronal function of nmnat is to protect from activity-induced neurodegeneration. It is possible that the endogenous level of NMNAT is only sufficient to cope with the deterioration caused by normal levels of neuronal activity, but not enough for injury, which would require higher levels of restorative NMNAT. We propose that in the absence of NMNAT, the deterioration caused by normal activity cannot be overcome and is enough to induce degeneration.

Is NAD Required for the Protective Effect?

The normal development of nmnat mutant eyes suggests that nmnat is not required for neuronal specification, differentiation, axon pathfinding, or synapse formation. Given that NAD is required for cell survival, it is likely that NAD production by other enzymes compensates for the NAD synthesis function of nmnat, because NMNAT catalyzes one of the salvage pathways of NAD synthesis [53]. The de novo and alternative synthesis pathways are catalyzed by enzymes including NAase (nicotinamidase), NaPRTase (nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase), and NADS (NAD synthase), and there are predicted genes with each of these enzymatic activities in the fly genome [53] (see Figure S4).

It has been shown in an in vitro culture system that NAD can protect injured axons from degeneration [19,21]. However, this protective effect is not specific to NAD, because pyruvate or EGTA have similar effects in the same studies [21]. It is equally possible that exogenously applied NAD can “free up” NMNAT from its NAD synthesis function and allow more NMNAT to engage in the protective function, thereby delaying degeneration. More puzzlingly, Araki et al. [19] showed that enzymatically inactive NMNAT bearing a mutant substrate binding motif (W170A) cannot delay axon degeneration. Mutation of the equivalent substrate binding motif of the Drosophila homolog in our assay reduced its activity to 10.8% of wild type (Figure 2

E; W98G). Furthermore, mutations of both substrate binding motifs (Figure 2

E; WR) reduce the activity to 0.9% of wild type, which is less than 1/10 that of the single motif mutant, but when expressed in the fly, both mutant enzymes provide an equal level of protection against neurodegeneration. Whether this discrepancy is due to differences in expression levels, or differences between in vitro and in vivo systems, remains to be resolved.

If the neuroprotective effect of MNNAT/Wld^s is independent from its NAD synthesis activity, what might be the underlying molecular mechanism? Studies of several neurodegenerative diseases suggest that ubiquitin-mediated proteasome degradation and chaperone-mediated protein folding may play an important role in these degenerative processes [3,54–61]. Studies of a Drosophila model of Wallerian degeneration also indicate a protective effect by inhibiting ubiquitination [14]. Interestingly, the N-terminal part of the Wld^s fusion protein N70-Ube4b is able to bind an important proteasomal chaperone (VCP) in vitro, and relocates it to the nucleus in cultured cells, suggesting a potential role for chaperones [20].

In conclusion, our genetic and functional analyses present evidence that, in addition to its NAD synthesis activity, a neuronal function of nmnat is to maintain neuronal integrity under normal conditions, and neuronal activity potentiates the degeneration that occurs when Nmnat is lost. By extension, more NMNAT protects neurons from neuronal activity induced degeneration. This activity, which is enzyme independent, indicates that the protein has two independent functions: NAD synthesis and maintenance of neuronal integrity.

Materials and Methods

Drosophila strains and conditions of culture.

Flies were reared at room temperature in ambient light under a normal 12-h light/dark cycle. For dark-rearing experiments, flies were kept in complete darkness from the first instar larval stage onwards. For pupal staging experiments, flies were reared at 25 °C (100% pupal development corresponds to 103 h).

Antibody production.

The full-length cDNA was cloned into the pET28a (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, United States) vector for protein expression (gift of S. Wu). The cDNA fragment was cloned into EcoRI and NotI restriction sites using PCR primers that introduced those sites into the cDNA fragment as described for the cDNA rescue construct. Guinea pig antibodies against this domain were raised by Cocalico Biologicals (Reamstown, Pennsylvania, United States) using the purified recombinant protein. The polyclonal antisera were purified using the Protein A IgG Purification kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, Illinois, United States). Antibody specificity was confirmed by lack of staining in mutant clonal tissue incubated with anti-NMNAT (Figures 4

and S2).

Drosophila strains, mutagenesis, and screen.

y w;; P{ry^+t7.2=neoFRT}82B isogenized flies were used for mutagenesis and as control animals. Mutagenesis, ERGs, and phototaxis assays were performed as described [24]. The eyFLP screen of chromosome arm 3R is described in Mehta et al. [22].

Construction of rescue constructs and transgenic flies.

Our genomic rescue construct consists of the nmnat genomic locus flanked by 0.4 kb of upstream genomic sequence and 0.5 kb of downstream sequence. The following primers were used to amplify this sequence from a clone in P1 phage library containing the CG13645 locus: primer1 5′-accgaattcgagcaggagcccgccacac-3′ and primer 2 5′-ataagaatgcggccgcgtggactcttccaagggaagcaagc-3′. Primer 1 contains an EcoRI site and primer 2 contains a NotI site to facilitate cloning. After sequence verification, the genomic fragment was cloned into the vector pP{CaSpeR-4}, and transgenic flies were generated. For cDNA rescue experiments, we cloned the full coding sequence of cDNA clone AT23490 (Drosophila Gene Collection, http://www.fruitfly.org/DGC/index.html) into pP{UAST} and pP{UAST-HA} (gift from B. Tavsanli), and generated several transgenic lines. The following primers were used to introduce EcoRI and NotI sites at the ends of the nmnat coding sequence for ease of cloning: 5′–CCGGAATTCATGTCAGCATTCATCGAGGAAAC-3′ and 5′–TTTTCCTTTTGCGGCCGCAGAGTCGCATTCGGTCGGAGCCG-3′.

Site-directed mutagenesis and generation of recombinant protein.

Inactive enzyme was created by site-directed mutagenesis of full-length nmnat cDNA in pET28a vector using QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, California, United States). The H30A, W98G, and R224A mutations were made by one round of mutagenesis, and the WR double mutation was made by sequential mutagenesis. The recombinant protein was generated, and the protein concentration was measured by Bradford assay (BioRad, Hercules, California, United States). The mutant cDNAs nmnat-H30A and nmnat-WR were subcloned into pP{UAST}, and transgenic lines were generated.

NMNAT activity assay.

Activity of NMNAT (synthesis of NAD) was measured in a continuous coupled enzyme assay by monitoring the increase in absorbance at 340 nm caused by the reduction of NAD to NADH as described [62]. Briefly, the reaction was performed at 37 °C in 16 nM semicarbacide-HCl, 0.625% (v/v) ethanol, 30 nM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4), 12.25 nM MgCl₂, 1.17 mM ATP, 15 U yeast alcohol dehydrogenase (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, United States), purified recombinant NMNAT, and was initiated by adding NMN to a final concentration of 0.625 mM. The activity is determined from the linear progression curve using the following formula:

A mathematical equation, expression, or formula.
Object name is pbio.0040416.e001.jpg

where Co_β-NADH, the extinction coefficient of β-NADH at 340 nm, is 6.22.

Retina sections and TEM.

Flies of different ages were dissected and fixed at 4 °C in 2% paraformaldehyde; 2% glutaraldehyde; 0.1 M sodium cacodylate; 0.005% CaCl₂ (pH 7.2), and postfixed in 2% OsO₄. The 200 nm–thick sections of retina were stained with 1% toludine blue O, 1% sodium tetraborate (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, Pennsylvania, United States). The 50-nm thin sections were stained with 4% uranyl acetate and 2.5% lead nitrate. Synaptic features of laminae were scored double-blind by several observers. For photoreceptor terminal quantification, photoreceptor terminals were identified by the presence of capitate projections [27]. In all electron microscopy analyses, we analyzed samples from at least four different animals per genotype.

Immunocytochemistry.

Eye discs, third instar larval fillets, and larval, pupal, and adult brains were fixed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 3.5% formaldehyde for 15 min and washed in phosphate buffered saline with 0.4% Triton X-100, or with 0.2% Tween 20 for larval neuromuscular junction preparations. Antibody dilutions used: anti-NMNAT 1:1,000; anti-Armadillo 1:200; mAb nc82 1:100; anti-Actin mAb C4 1:200 (ICN Biomedicals, Costa Mesa, California, United States); and TOTO3 1:2,000 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oregon, United States). Anti-HRP and secondary antibodies conjugated to Cy3, Cy5, or Alexa 488 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, Pennsylvania, United States; and Molecular Probes) were used at 1:250. All antibody incubations were performed at 4 °C overnight in the presence of 5% normal goat serum.

Image acquisition and processing.

Images from fluorescently labeled specimens were taken on a Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and processed using Amira 3.0 (TGS, San Diego, California, United States) and Adobe Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, California, United States).

Mosaic analyses.

We used the MARCM technique [63] to analyze the localization of various proteins in nmnat mutant photoreceptor cells compared to their wild-type neighbors. All eye discs and laminae shown with 50% mutant photoreceptor terminals are from animals of the following genotype: y w eyFLP GMR-lacZ; P{{w⁺=UAS-mCD8::GFP.L}LL4 / GMR-GAL4; FRT82B nmnat/ FRT82B P{w⁺=tub-GAL80}. The negatively marked mutant eye disc clones in Figure S2 are from animals of the following genotype: y w eyFLP GMR-lacZ; FRT82B nmnat/ FRT82B P{w^+mC=Ubi-GFP.nls}.

Supporting Information

Figure S1: Genomic and cDNA Rescue of the Neurodegeneration Phenotypes Caused by Loss of nmnat

(A–F) ERG recordings of mutant photoreceptors (A), photoreceptors expressing the CG13645 genomic DNA (C), or photoreceptors expressing CG13645 cDNA driven by GMR-GAL4 in the nmnat¹ mutant background (E). Both genomic DNA and cDNA expression rescue the magnitude of depolarization and on/off transients. The genotypes are marked at the top of each column. (B), (D), and (F) Retinal structures of each genotype. Both genomic DNA and cDNA expression restore the ommatidial morphology.

(G–I) TEM micrographs of lamina cartridges of each genotype. Both genomic DNA and cDNA expression restore the photoreceptor terminal structure and organization. Demarcating glia are colored blue and photoreceptor terminals green. Scale bar in (G) for (G–I) indicates 1 μm.

(J–O) Individual terminals boxed in (G–I). The active zone structures are well organized with defined platform structures (arrowheads), compared to the amorphous structures in the mutant terminals (arrows in J and K). Scale bar in (J) for (J–N) indicates 200 nm.

(8.8 MB TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(8.6M, tif)}

Figure S2: Polyclonal Antibodies Specifically Recognize NMNAT Protein

Mosaic analysis of third instar larval eye disc. Wild-type control (iso) or Δ4790–1, Δ4790–2, nmnat¹, or nmnat² mutant clones are negatively marked. GFP marks the wild-type patch. Eye discs are labeled with NMNAT antibody and TOTO3 to reveal the nuclei. In Δ4790–1, Δ4790–2, nmnat¹, or nmnat² mutant clones, NMNAT staining is dramatically reduced. The level of reduction in staining in nmnat¹ or nmnat² clones is similar to the level in Δ4790–1 or Δ4790–2 clones, suggesting that nmnat¹ and nmnat² are likely protein null alleles. Scale bars indicate 5 μm.

(8.3 MB TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(8.1M, tif)}

Figure S3

Click here for additional data file.^{(1.2M, tif)}

Figure S4: NAD Synthesis Pathway

NAD can be synthesized through the de novo pathway from L-tryptophan, or two salvage pathways from either nicotinic acid (Na) or nicotinamide (Nam). The fly homologs identified based on sequence homology are shown in red.

(2.6 MB TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(2.6M, tif)}

Table S1: Rescue Loss of nmnat Phenotypes with nmnat cDNA

Both the wild-type and the inactive enzymes can rescue the morphological and physiological phenotypes of nmnat mutant photoreceptors. However, only the wild-type NMNAT, but not the enzymatically inactive NMNAT, can rescue the organismal lethality caused by loss of nmnat.

(33 KB DOC)

Click here for additional data file.^{(34K, doc)}

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Craig Montell, the Bloomington Stock Center, and the University of Iowa Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for reagents. We thank Hui-Chen Lu, Hamed Jafar-Nejad, and Hiroshi Tsuda for critical reading of the manuscript.

Abbreviations


EMS	ethyl methanesulfonate

ERG	electroretinogram

kb	kilobase

NMNAT	nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase

1P+96%	96 h after puparium formation

TEM	transmission electron microscopy

Footnotes

¤ Current address: Department of Physiology and Green Center Division for Systems Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, United States of America

Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Author contributions. RGZ and HJB conceived and designed the experiments. RGZ, YC, PRH, YZ, SQM, KLS, and PV performed the experiments. RGZ, PRH, and HJB analyzed the data. RGZ, PRH, SQM, KLS, and PV contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. RGZ, PRH, KLS, and HJB wrote the paper.

Funding. PRH was supported by a European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) long-term fellowship and PV by a Belgian American Educational Foundation (BAEF) fellowship. RGZ, PRH, KLS, PV, and HJB are supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI). HJB is an HHMI investigator.

References

Waller A. Experiments on the section of the glossopharyngeal and hyoglossal nerves of the frog, and observations of the alterations produced thereby in the structure of their primitive fibres. Philos Trans R Soc. 1850;140:423–429.
Gillingwater TH, Ribchester RR. Compartmental neurodegeneration and synaptic plasticity in the Wld^S mutant mouse. J Physiol. 2001;534:627–639. [PubMed]
Zhai Q, Wang J, Kim A, Liu Q, Watts R, et al. Involvement of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the early stages of wallerian degeneration. Neuron. 2003;39:217–225. [PubMed]
Finn JT, Weil M, Archer F, Siman R, Srinivasan A, et al. Evidence that Wallerian degeneration and localized axon degeneration induced by local neurotrophin deprivation do not involve caspases. J Neurosci. 2000;20:1333–1341. [PubMed]
Sagot Y, Dubois-Dauphin M, Tan SA, de Bilbao F, Aebischer P, et al. Bcl-2 overexpression prevents motoneuron cell body loss but not axonal degeneration in a mouse model of a neurodegenerative disease. J Neurosci. 1995;15:7727–7733. [PubMed]
Whitmore AV, Lindsten T, Raff MC, Thompson CB. The proapoptotic proteins Bax and Bak are not involved in Wallerian degeneration. Cell Death Differ. 2003;10:260–261. [PubMed]
Ludwin SK, Bisby MA. Delayed wallerian degeneration in the central nervous system of Ola mice: an ultrastructural study. J Neurol Sci. 1992;109:140–147. [PubMed]
Lunn ER, Perry VH, Brown MC, Rosen H, Gordon S. Absence of Wallerian degeneration does not hinder regeneration in peripheral nerve. Eur J Neurosci. 1989;1:27–33. [PubMed]
Perry VH, Brown MC, Lunn ER. Very slow retrograde and Wallerian degeneration in the CNS of C57BL/Ola mice. Eur J Neurosci. 1991;3:102–105. [PubMed]
Ribchester RR, Tsao JW, Barry JA, Asgari-Jirhandeh N, Perry VH, et al. Persistence of neuromuscular junctions after axotomy in mice with slow Wallerian degeneration (C57BL/Wld^S). Eur J Neurosci. 1995;7:1641–1650. [PubMed]
Conforti L, Tarlton A, Mack TG, Mi W, Buckmaster EA, et al. A Ufd2/D4Cole1e chimeric protein and overexpression of Rbp7 in the slow Wallerian degeneration (Wld^S) mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:11377–11382. [PubMed]
Mack TG, Reiner M, Beirowski B, Mi W, Emanuelli M, et al. Wallerian degeneration of injured axons and synapses is delayed by a Ube4b/Nmnat chimeric gene. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:1199–1206. [PubMed]
Adalbert R, Gillingwater TH, Haley JE, Bridge K, Beirowski B, et al. A rat model of slow Wallerian degeneration (WldS) with improved preservation of neuromuscular synapses. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:271–277. [PubMed]
Hoopfer ED, McLaughlin T, Watts RJ, Schuldiner O, O'Leary DD, et al. Wld^S protection distinguishes axon degeneration following injury from naturally occurring developmental pruning. Neuron. 2006;50:883–895. [PubMed]
Coleman M. Axon degeneration mechanisms: commonality amid diversity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:889–898. [PubMed]
Conforti L, Fang G, Beirowski B, Wang MS, Sorci L, et al. NAD⁺ and axon degeneration revisited: Nmnat1 cannot substitute for Wld^S to delay Wallerian degeneration. Cell Death Differ. 2006. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401944.
Fang C, Bernardes-Silva M, Coleman MP, Perry VH. The cellular distribution of the Wld^S chimeric protein and its constituent proteins in the CNS. Neuroscience. 2005;135:1107–1118. [PubMed]
MacDonald JM, Beach MG, Porpiglia E, Sheehan AE, Watts RJ, et al. The Drosophila cell corpse engulfment receptor draper mediates glial clearance of severed axons. Neuron. 2006;50:869–881. [PubMed]
Araki T, Sasaki Y, Milbrandt J. Increased nuclear NAD biosynthesis and SIRT1 activation prevent axonal degeneration. Science. 2004;305:1010–1013. [PubMed]
Laser H, Conforti L, Morreale G, Mack TG, Heyer M, et al. The slow Wallerian degeneration protein, WldS, binds directly to VCP/p97 and partially redistributes it within the nucleus. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:1075–1084. [PubMed]
Wang J, Zhai Q, Chen Y, Lin E, Gu W, et al. A local mechanism mediates NAD-dependent protection of axon degeneration. J Cell Biol. 2005;170:349–355. [PubMed]
Mehta SQ, Hiesinger PR, Beronja S, Zhai RG, Schulze KL, et al. Mutations in Drosophila sec15 reveal a function in neuronal targeting for a subset of exocyst components. Neuron. 2005;46:219–232. [PubMed]
Hiesinger PR, Fayyazuddin A, Mehta SQ, Rosenmund T, Schulze KL, et al. The v-ATPase V₀ subunit a1 is required for a late step in synaptic vesicle exocytosis in Drosophila. Cell. 2005;121:607–620. [PubMed]
Verstreken P, Koh TW, Schulze KL, Zhai RG, Hiesinger PR, et al. Synaptojanin is recruited by Endophilin to promote synaptic vesicle uncoating. Neuron. 2003;40:733–748. [PubMed]
Newsome TP, Asling B, Dickson BJ. Analysis of Drosophila photoreceptor axon guidance in eye-specific mosaics. Development. 2000;127:851–860. [PubMed]
Benzer S. Behavioral mutants of Drosophila isolated by countercurrent distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967;58:1112–1119. [PubMed]
Meinertzhagen IA, Hanson TE. The development of the optic lobe. In: Martinez-Arias MBaA., editor. The development of Drosophila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harbor (New York): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1993. pp. 1363–1491.
Hiesinger PR, Zhai RG, Zhou Y, Koh TW, Mehta SQ, et al. Activity-independent pre-specification of synaptic partmers in the visual map of Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1835–1843. [PubMed]
Zhai RG, Bellen HJ. The architecture of the active zone in the presynaptic nerve terminal. Physiology (Bethesda). 2004;19:262–270. [PubMed]
Zhai RG, Hiesinger PR, Koh TW, Verstreken P, Schulze KL, et al. Mapping Drosophila mutations with molecularly defined P element insertions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:10860–10865. [PubMed]
Bellen HJ, Levis RW, Liao G, He Y, Carlson JW, et al. The BDGP gene disruption project: single transposon insertions associated with 40% of Drosophila genes. Genetics. 2004;167:761–781. [PubMed]
Emanuelli M, Carnevali F, Saccucci F, Pierella F, Amici A, et al. Molecular cloning, chromosomal localization, tissue mRNA levels, bacterial expression, and enzymatic properties of human NMN adenylyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:406–412. [PubMed]
Raffaelli N, Sorci L, Amici A, Emanuelli M, Mazzola F, et al. Identification of a novel human nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;297:835–840. [PubMed]
Schweiger M, Hennig K, Lerner F, Niere M, Hirsch-Kauffmann M, et al. Characterization of recombinant human nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyl transferase (NMNAT), a nuclear enzyme essential for NAD synthesis. FEBS Lett. 2001;492:95–100. [PubMed]
Zhang X, Kurnasov OV, Karthikeyan S, Grishin NV, Osterman AL, et al. Structural characterization of a human cytosolic NMN/NaMN adenylyltransferase and implication in human NAD biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:13503–13511. [PubMed]
Hotta Y, Benzer S. Genetic dissection of the Drosophila nervous system by means of mosaics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970;67:1156–1163. [PubMed]
Matsumoto E, Hirosawa K, Takagawa K, Hotta Y. Structure of retinular cells in a Drosophila melanogaster visual mutant, rdgA, at early stages of degeneration. Cell Tissue Res. 1988;252:293–300. [PubMed]
Raghu P, Usher K, Jonas S, Chyb S, Polyanovsky A, et al. Constitutive activity of the light-sensitive channels TRP and TRPL in the Drosophila diacylglycerol kinase mutant, rdgA. Neuron. 2000;26:169–179. [PubMed]
Yoon J, Ben-Ami HC, Hong YS, Park S, Strong LL, et al. Novel mechanism of massive photoreceptor degeneration caused by mutations in the trp gene of Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2000;20:649–659. [PubMed]
Wolff T, Ready DF. Pattern formation in the Drosophila retina. In: Bate M, Martinez-Arias A, editors. The development of Drosophila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harbor (New York): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1993. pp. 1277–1325.
Bentrop J. Rhodopsin mutations as the cause of retinal degeneration. Classification of degeneration phenotypes in the model system Drosophila melanogaster. Acta Anat (Basel). 1998;162:85–94. [PubMed]
Ranganathan R, Malicki DM, Zuker CS. Signal transduction in Drosophila photoreceptors. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:283–317. [PubMed]
Bloomquist BT, Shortridge RD, Schneuwly S, Perdew M, Montell C, et al. Isolation of a putative phospholipase C gene of Drosophila, norpA, and its role in phototransduction. Cell. 1988;54:723–733. [PubMed]
McKay RR, Chen DM, Miller K, Kim S, Stark WS, et al. Phospholipase C rescues visual defect in norpA mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:13271–13276. [PubMed]
Shieh BH, Zhu MY, Lee JK, Kelly IM, Bahiraei F. Association of INAD with NORPA is essential for controlled activation and deactivation of Drosophila phototransduction in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:12682–12687. [PubMed]
Hay BA, Wolff T, Rubin GM. Expression of baculovirus P35 prevents cell death in Drosophila. Development. 1994;120:2121–2129. [PubMed]
Masai I, Okazaki A, Hosoya T, Hotta Y. Drosophila retinal degeneration A gene encodes an eye-specific diacylglycerol kinase with cysteine-rich zinc-finger motifs and ankyrin repeats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:11157–11161. [PubMed]
Georgiev P, Garcia-Murillas I, Ulahannan D, Hardie RC, Raghu P. Functional INAD complexes are required to mediate degeneration in photoreceptors of the Drosophila rdgA mutant. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:1373–1384. [PubMed]
Montell C. TRP channels in Drosophila photoreceptor cells. J Physiol. 2005;567:45–51. [PubMed]
Lee SJ, Montell C. Suppression of constant-light-induced blindness but not retinal degeneration by inhibition of the rhodopsin degradation pathway. Curr Biol. 2004;14:2076–2085. [PubMed]
Jacobson SG, McInnes RR. Blinded by the light. Nat Genet. 2002;32:215–216. [PubMed]
Noell WK, Walker VS, Kang BS, Berman S. Retinal damage by light in rats. Invest Ophthalmol. 1966;5:450–473. [PubMed]
Rongvaux A, Andris F, Van Gool F, Leo O. Reconstructing eukaryotic NAD metabolism. Bioessays. 2003;25:683–690. [PubMed]
Jellinger KA. Cell death mechanisms in Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm. 2000;107:1–29. [PubMed]
Chung KK, Dawson VL, Dawson TM. The role of the ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway in Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24:S7–14. [PubMed]
Imai Y, Soda M, Takahashi R. Parkin suppresses unfolded protein stress-induced cell death through its E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase activity. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:35661–35664. [PubMed]
Saigoh K, Wang YL, Suh JG, Yamanishi T, Sakai Y, et al. Intragenic deletion in the gene encoding ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase in gad mice. Nat Genet. 1999;23:47–51. [PubMed]
Warrick JM, Chan HY, Gray-Board GL, Chai Y, Paulson HL, et al. Suppression of polyglutamine-mediated neurodegeneration in Drosophila by the molecular chaperone HSP70. Nat Genet. 1999;23:425–428. [PubMed]
Cummings CJ, Sun Y, Opal P, Antalffy B, Mestril R, et al. Over-expression of inducible HSP70 chaperone suppresses neuropathology and improves motor function in SCA1 mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:1511–1518. [PubMed]
Bonini NM. Chaperoning brain degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(Suppl 4):16407–16411. [PubMed]
Tsuda H, Jafar-Nejad H, Patel AJ, Sun Y, Chen HK, et al. The AXH domain of Ataxin-1 mediates neurodegeneration through its interaction with Gfi-1/Senseless proteins. Cell. 2005;122:633–644. [PubMed]
Balducci E, Emanuelli M, Raffaelli N, Ruggieri S, Amici A, et al. Assay methods for nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase of wide applicability. Anal Biochem. 1995;228:64–68. [PubMed]
Lee T, Luo L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) for Drosophila neural development. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24:251–254. [PubMed]

Formats:

PubMed articles by these authors

PubMed related articles

Recent Activity

Links

Simple NCBI Directory

Getting Started

Resources

Popular

Featured

NCBI Information