![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology Symbiotic Bacteria Associated with Stomach Discs of Human Lice † Institute for Biological Resources and Functions, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba 305-8566,1 Division of Natural Sciences, University of the Air, Chiba 261-8586,2 Department of Ecology and Systematics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589,3 Department of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo 162-8640,4 Department of Environmental Biology, Japan Environmental Sanitation Center, Kawasaki 210-0828, Japan5 *Corresponding author. Mailing address: National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba 305-8566, Japan. Phone: 81-29-861-6087. Fax: 81-29-861-6080. E-mail: t-fukatsu/at/aist.go.jp. Received June 21, 2006; Accepted August 16, 2006. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract The symbiotic bacteria associated with the stomach disc, a large aggregate of bacteriocytes on the ventral side of the midgut, of human body and head lice were characterized. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that the symbionts formed a distinct and well-defined clade in the Gammaproteobacteria. The sequences exhibited AT-biased nucleotide composition and accelerated molecular evolution. In situ hybridization revealed that in nymphs and adult males, the symbiont was localized in the stomach disc, while in adult females, the symbiont was not in the stomach disc but in the lateral oviducts and the posterior pole of the oocytes due to female-specific symbiont migration. We propose the designation “Candidatus Riesia pediculicola” for the louse symbionts. Sucking lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera: Anoplura), embracing over 500 described species in the world, are ectoparasitic insects that feed exclusively on mammalian blood (9). There are two closely related species of human lice: the body louse, Pediculus humanus, lives in clothes and feeds from the body, and the head louse, Pediculus capitis, lives in the hair and feeds from the scalp. The head louse and the body louse are morphologically and genetically very similar, and some researchers regard them as subspecies or ecotypes of the same species (7, 16, 22). Vertebrate blood is certainly nutritious, but it is deficient in some nutritional components, such as B vitamins, which is probably the reason why insects exclusively living on vertebrate blood throughout their lives, including tsetse flies, louse flies, bedbugs, assassin bugs, and lice, are generally in close association with endosymbiotic microorganisms (6). In the 1920s, human lice were first reported to possess a large aggregate of bacteriocytes, called the stomach disc, on the ventral side of the midgut, in which rod-shaped symbiotic bacteria are harbored (5, 23). Since then, a number of histological (11, 20), embryonic (4, 20), experimental (1, 2, 3, 10), and nutritional (18, 19) studies have been conducted on the endosymbiotic system of human lice. These studies demonstrated that the symbiont is vertically transmitted from the maternal stomach disc to developing oocytes through a peculiar passage (11, 20), is essential for the survival and growth of the host (3), and provides the host with B vitamins that are lacking in the blood meal (19). Despite the substantial body of early work on louse endosymbiosis, the microbial nature of the symbionts is still unknown. Hence, we characterized the symbiotic bacteria of human lice by using molecular phylogenetic and histological approaches. We mainly used a long-established inbred line of the human body louse, strain NIID, which has been maintained in the laboratory since 1954 (26). The insects were kept in an evaporating dish with pieces of felt sealed in a plastic container with silica gel, reared at 30°C in constant darkness, and fed with human blood once a day on the arm of one of the authors (M.M.). The insects at different developmental stages were sampled and preserved in acetone until molecular and histological analyses were performed (13). Samples of body lice from 12 different sources and head lice from 4 different sources were also collected in either Japan or Nepal. DNA was individually extracted from adult females of strain NIID by using a QIAamp DNA minikit (QIAGEN). A 1.5-kb segment of the eubacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the primers 16SA1 (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 16SB1 (5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) and subjected to cloning, restriction fragment length polymorphism genotyping, and DNA sequencing as previously described (14). More than 10 clones of the 16S rRNA gene segment from each of the samples exhibited identical restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns (data not shown), suggesting that a single bacterial species is dominant in the insects. The nucleotide sequences of some of these clones, which were 1,482 bp in size and identical to each other, were determined. A BLAST search clearly showed that the sequence belongs to the Gammaproteobacteria in the family Enterobacteriaceae. No closely related sequences were identified in the DNA databases: the highest hits were Providencia stuartii (AF008581; 89.6% [1,141/1,274] sequence identity) and Enterobacter hormaechei (AJ853889; 89.0% [1,119/1,258] sequence identity). In order to confirm whether the 16S rRNA gene sequence was derived from the symbiotic bacteria in the stomach disc, we designed an oligonucleotide probe specific to the sequence, Cy3-Lice1255R (5′-Cy3-TTGGCTCGCTCTTACGAGT-3′), for whole-mount fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). After their legs were removed to facilitate infiltration of reagents, the insects, preserved in acetone, were fixed in Carnoy's solution (chloroform-ethanol-acetic acid [6:3:1]) overnight and incubated with 6% H2O2 overnight to quench the autofluorescence of the insect tissues. The insects were thoroughly washed and equilibrated with a hybridization buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 0.9 M NaCl, 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 30% formamide), and the Cy3-Lice1255R probe and SYTOX green were added at final concentrations of 100 nM and 0.5 μM, respectively. After overnight incubation, the samples were thoroughly washed in washing buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 0.9 M NaCl, 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulfate) and were observed under an epifluorescent microscope (Axiophot; Carl Zeiss) and a laser confocal microscope (PASCAL5; Carl Zeiss). In nymphal insects, the probe specifically hybridized with a round stomach disc located in the ventral abdomen (Fig. (Fig.1A).1A
In adult males, the signals were localized in the stomach disc (Fig. (Fig.1C).1C We also cloned and sequenced the eubacterial 16S rRNA gene segments from four body lice and two head lice from different sources. All of the sequences were very similar to each other, 1,482 bp in size, with sequence identities ranging from 99.1% to 99.9%. The nucleotide compositions of the sequences were remarkably AT biased, ranging from 50.6% to 51.0%. These AT content values were higher than those of related free-living bacteria, such as P. stuartii (AF008581; 46.9%) and E. hormaechei (AJ853889; 44.9%), and were equivalent to those of obligate endosymbiotic bacteria of other insects, such as Buchnera spp. of aphids (e.g., AJ296751; 51.3%) and Wigglesworthia spp. of tsetse flies (e.g., AB063521; 51.5%). These 16S rRNA gene sequences were subjected to molecular phylogenetic analysis, together with the sequences of related gammaproteobacteria that exhibited high BLAST scores in the DNA database search. A multiple alignment of the sequences was generated by using the program package Clustal W (24). Aligned nucleotide sites containing a gap were removed from the data set, and the final alignment was inspected and corrected manually. A neighbor-joining tree, with 1,000 bootstrap resamplings, was also constructed by the program package Clustal W (24). Figure Figure22
In comparison with the related free-living bacteria, the louse symbionts exhibited remarkably elongated branches on the phylogenetic tree (Fig. (Fig.2),2 Recent molecular evolutionary analyses revealed that the lifestyle of obligate insect endosymbionts has strongly affected their genome evolution, causing an AT-biased nucleotide composition, an accelerated rate of molecular evolution, and significant genome reduction. These peculiar genetic traits are hypothesized to be the consequences of attenuated purifying selection due to small population size and a strong bottleneck associated with the endosymbiotic lifestyle (17, 25). The AT bias and the accelerated evolution in the 16S rRNA gene sequences are also suggestive of a stable and intimate host-symbiont association in human lice over evolutionary time. How prevalent is the symbiont in the louse populations? We examined 57 body lice from 12 different sources and 9 head lice from 4 sources for symbiont infection. For confirmation of successful DNA preparation from each of the samples, the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene of the host insect was amplified with the primers MtrA1 (5′-AAWAAACTAGGATTAGATACCCTA-3′) and MtrB3 (5′-ACACTTTCCAGTACAYTTACTTTGT-3′) under a temperature profile of 95°C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 48°C for 30 s, and 65°C for 3 min. Diagnostic PCR of the symbiont was performed with the primers 16SA3 (5′-TGCATGGYTGTCGTCAGCTCG-3′) and Lice1255R under a temperature profile of 95°C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s, and 70°C for 1 min. The diagnostic PCR analysis identified the symbiont in all the louse samples examined. Thus, it was strongly suggested that the symbiont infection is fixed in the louse populations, corroborating the essential biological roles of the symbiont for the host insect (3, 19). From all these results taken together, it was concluded that the symbiotic bacteria associated with the stomach disc of the human louse constitute a phylogenetically distinct and coherent bacterial group in the Gammaproteobacteria. Hence, we propose the designation “Candidatus Riesia pediculicola” for the symbiont of human lice. The generic name honors Erich Ries, who first comprehensively investigated the endosymbiotic system in lice (20). The specific name indicates the association with lice. Human lice are notorious as medical and hygienic pests. The body louse is the vector of the epidemic typhus pathogen Rickettsia prowazekii, the relapsing fever pathogen Borrelia recurrentis, and the trench fever pathogen Bartonella quintana (12). The head louse has recently been reemerging even in advanced countries, particularly among school children, and its resistance to insecticides is increasing (8). Considering the essential roles of the symbiont for the host (3, 19), microbiological studies of the louse symbionts would lead to new means of control for the pests. Other than human lice, a number of lice are known from a wide variety of mammals, and it has been histologically reported that the localizations, morphologies, and life cycles of symbiotic bacteria in animal lice are distinct from those of human lice in many respects (6, 20). Whether the symbionts of animal lice are phylogenetically related to the symbionts of human lice is of evolutionary interest. [Supplemental material]
Acknowledgments We thank Noboru Yaguchi, Naomi Seki, Madan Shrestha, Harufumi Yui, and Akio Kobayashi for louse samples. Footnotes Published ahead of print on 1 September 2006.†Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/. REFERENCES 1. Aschner, M. 1932. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Symbiose der Kleiderlaus. Naturwissenscheften 27:501-505. 2. Aschner, M. 1934. Studies on the symbiosis of the body louse. 1: Elimination of the symbionts by centrifugation of the eggs. Parasitology 26:309-314. 3. Aschner, M., and E. Ries. 1933. Das Verhalten der Kleiderlaus beim Ausschalten der Symbionten. Z. Morphol. Ökol. Tiere. 26:529-590. 4. Baudisch, K. 1958. Beiträge zur Zytologie und Embryologie einiger Insektensymbiosen. Z. Morphol. Ökol. Tiere. 47:436-488. 5. Buchner, P. 1920. Zur Kenntnis der Symbiose niederer pflanzlicher Organismen mit Pedikuliden. Biol. Zentbl. 39:535-540. 6. Buchner, P. 1965. Endosymbiosis of animals with plant microorganisms. Interscience, New York, N.Y. 7. Busvine, J. R. 1978. Evidence from double infestations for the specific status of human head and body lice (Anoplura). Syst. Entomol. 3:1-8. 8. Downs, A. M. R. 2004. Managing head lice in an era of increasing resistance to insecticides. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 5:169-177. [PubMed] 9. Durden, L. A., and G. G. Musser. 1994. The sucking lice (Insecta: Anoplura) of the world: a taxonomic checklist with records of mammalian hosts and geographical distributions. Bull. Am. Mus. Natl. Hist. 218:1-90. 10. Eberle, M. W., and D. L. McLean. 1982. Initiation and orientation of the symbiote migration in the human body louse Pediculus humanus L. J. Insect Physiol. 28:417-422. 11. Eberle, M. W., and D. L. McLean. 1983. Observation of symbiote migration in human body lice with scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Can. J. Microbiol. 29:755-762. [PubMed] 12. Fournier, P.-E., J.-B. Ndihokubwayo, J. Guidran, P. J. Kelly, and D. Raoult. 2002. Human pathogens in body and head lice. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8:1515-1518. [PubMed] 13. Fukatsu, T. 1999. Acetone preservation: a practical technique for molecular analysis. Mol. Ecol. 8:1935-1945. [PubMed] 14. Fukatsu, T., and N. Nikoh. 1998. Two intracellular symbiotic bacteria of the mulberry psyllid Anomoneura mori (Insecta, Homoptera). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:3599-3606. [PubMed] 15. Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120. [PubMed] 16. Leo, N. P., N. J. H. Campbell, X. Yang, K. Mumcuoglu, and S. C. Barker. 2002. Evidence from mitochondrial DNA that head lice and body lice of humans (Phthiraptera: Pediculidae) are conspecific. J. Med. Entomol. 39:662-666. [PubMed] 17. Mira, A., H. Ochman, and N. A. Moran. 2001. Deletional bias and the evolution of bacterial genomes. Trends Genet. 17:596-598. 18. Puchta, O. 1954. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Symbiose der Kleiderlaus Pediculus vestimenti Burm. Naturwissenschaften 41:71-72. 19. Puchta, O. 1955. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Bedeutung der Symbiose der Kleiderlaus Pediculus vestimenti Burm. Z. Parasitenkd. 17:1-40. [PubMed] 20. Ries, E. 1931. Die Symbiose der Laüse und Federlinge. Z. Morphol. Ökol. Tiere. 20:233-367. 21. Robinson-Rechavi, M., and D. Huchon. 2000. RRTree: relative-rate tests between groups of sequences on a phylogenetic tree. Bioinformatics 16:296-297. [PubMed] 22. Schaefer, C. W. 1978. Ecological separation of the human head and body lice (Anoplura: Pediculidae). Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 72:669. [PubMed] 23. Sikora, H. 1919. Vorläufige Mitteilungen über Mycetome bei Pediculiden. Biol. Zentr. 39:287-288. 24. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and J. J. Gibson. 1994. Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680. [PubMed] 25. Wernegreen, J. J. 2002. Genome evolution in bacterial endosymbionts of insects. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:850-861. [PubMed] 26. Yasutomi, K. 1956. Studies on the insect-resistance to insecticides. IV: Relative toxicity of pp′-DDT and related materials (I). Jpn. J. Sanit. Zool. 7:87-93. |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||
J Med Entomol. 2002 Jul; 39(4):662-6.
[J Med Entomol. 2002]Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1978; 72(6):669-70.
[Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1978]Can J Microbiol. 1983 Jul; 29(7):755-62.
[Can J Microbiol. 1983]Z Parasitenkd. 1955; 17(1):1-40.
[Z Parasitenkd. 1955]Mol Ecol. 1999 Nov; 8(11):1935-45.
[Mol Ecol. 1999]Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Oct; 64(10):3599-606.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998]Can J Microbiol. 1983 Jul; 29(7):755-62.
[Can J Microbiol. 1983]Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Oct; 64(10):3599-606.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998]Can J Microbiol. 1983 Jul; 29(7):755-62.
[Can J Microbiol. 1983]Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11; 22(22):4673-80.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1994]J Med Entomol. 2002 Jul; 39(4):662-6.
[J Med Entomol. 2002]Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1978; 72(6):669-70.
[Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1978]J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec; 16(2):111-20.
[J Mol Evol. 1980]Bioinformatics. 2000 Mar; 16(3):296-7.
[Bioinformatics. 2000]Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Nov; 3(11):850-61.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2002]Z Parasitenkd. 1955; 17(1):1-40.
[Z Parasitenkd. 1955]Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Dec; 8(12):1515-8.
[Emerg Infect Dis. 2002]Am J Clin Dermatol. 2004; 5(3):169-77.
[Am J Clin Dermatol. 2004]Z Parasitenkd. 1955; 17(1):1-40.
[Z Parasitenkd. 1955]