![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2006 Berges et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. HIV-1 infection and CD4 T cell depletion in the humanized Rag2-/-γc-/- (RAG-hu) mouse model 1Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA 2Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA 3Division of Infectious Disease, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA Corresponding author.Bradford K Berges: bberges/at/colostate.edu; William H Wheat: wheatw/at/colostate.edu; Brent E Palmer: brent.palmer/at/uchsc.edu; Elizabeth Connick: liz.connick/at/uchsc.edu; Ramesh Akkina: akkina/at/colostate.edu Received September 20, 2006; Accepted November 1, 2006. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Background The currently well-established humanized mouse models, namely the hu-PBL-SCID and SCID-hu systems played an important role in HIV pathogenesis studies. However, despite many notable successes, several limitations still exist. They lack multi-lineage human hematopoiesis and a functional human immune system. These models primarily reflect an acute HIV infection with rapid CD4 T cell loss thus limiting pathogenesis studies to a short-term period. The new humanized Rag2-/-γc-/- mouse model (RAG-hu) created by intrahepatic injection of CD34 hematopoietic stem cells sustains long-term multi-lineage human hematopoiesis and is capable of mounting immune responses. Thus, this model shows considerable promise to study long-term in vivo HIV infection and pathogenesis. Results Here we demonstrate that RAG-hu mice produce human cell types permissive to HIV-1 infection and that they can be productively infected by HIV-1 ex vivo. To assess the capacity of these mice to sustain long-term infection in vivo, they were infected by either X4-tropic or R5-tropic HIV-1. Viral infection was assessed by PCR, co-culture, and in situ hybridization. Our results show that both X4 and R5 viruses are capable of infecting RAG-hu mice and that viremia lasts for at least 30 weeks. Moreover, HIV-1 infection leads to CD4 T cell depletion in peripheral blood and thymus, thus mimicking key aspects of HIV-1 pathogenesis. Additionally, a chimeric HIV-1 NL4-3 virus expressing a GFP reporter, although capable of causing viremia, failed to show CD4 T cell depletion possibly due to attenuation. Conclusion The humanized RAG-hu mouse model, characterized by its capacity for sustained multi-lineage human hematopoiesis and immune response, can support productive HIV-1 infection. Both T cell and macrophage tropic HIV-1 strains can cause persistent infection of RAG-hu mice resulting in CD4 T cell loss. Prolonged viremia in the context of CD4 T cell depletion seen in this model mirrors the main features of HIV infection in the human. Thus, the RAG-hu mouse model of HIV-1 infection shows great promise for future in vivo pathogenesis studies, evaluation of new drug treatments, vaccines and novel gene therapy strategies. Background Animal models played an important role in the understanding of HIV pathogenesis and in preclinical evaluation of therapeutic strategies [1-4]. In this regard, the severe combined immunodeficient C.B.-17 SCID/SCID (SCID) mouse model initially provided an in vivo system to study murine hemato-lymphoid differentiation and subsequently was further developed to investigate HIV pathogenesis [1,3,5-9]. Since these mice are immunodeficient, human cells and tissues can be transplanted without rejection. Two well-established mouse models have been used in various studies through the years, namely the hu-PBL-SCID and SCID-hu mouse models. The hu-PBL-SCID mouse model is created by injecting human peripheral blood mononuclear cells intraperitonially. Many elegant studies on HIV pathogenesis and passive immunity using monoclonal antibodies were conducted by Mosier and colleagues [3,5,6]. However, due to the lack of de novo development of continuously differentiating human cells, long-term studies on HIV pathogenesis are not possible in this system. The second model, the SCID-hu mouse, is created by surgical engraftment of human fetal hematopoietic tissue, namely thymus and liver, under the kidney capsule of the SCID mouse [1,4]. Four to six months post-implantation, a conjoint organ (thy/liv) that resembles human thymus develops. For as long as one year, these grafts sustain T cell lymphopoiesis as a predominant feature. Since the SCID-hu mouse provides an in vivo setting for normal thymopoiesis and HIV preferentially infects CD4 T cells, this model has been extensively used to investigate AIDS pathogenesis in the context of a human lymphoid organ. Many pioneering studies were conducted by McCune and Zack's groups [7-9]. Early experiments have shown that infection kinetics follow a dose- and time-dependent course. Studies with drugs like AZT demonstrated the feasibility of in vivo drug testing and paved the way for other novel approaches [10,11]. Later investigations elaborated the detrimental effects of the infection on the various subpopulations of thymocytes as well as thymic non-T-cell elements like thymic epithelial cells [8,12]. Viral strain-specific differences were documented; additionally, the roles of HIV accessory proteins such as nef in virulence were ascertained [13,14]. Viral latency could be established in this model, thus further expanding its utility [15,16]. Although the kinetics of CD4 T cell loss differ, both the SCID-hu and hu-PBL-SCID mouse models support infection with either of the R5 and X4 HIV-1 viral strains [14]. In addition to pathogenesis studies, another innovative exploitation of the SCID-hu mouse model has been in gene therapy studies [17-20]. Despite these notable successes with the above in vivo humanized mouse models, several limitations still exist. Chief among these are that the scope of these models is primarily limited to the study of an acute HIV infection lasting only a few weeks due to the rapid decline of susceptible cell populations and a lack of continual multi-lineage hematopoiesis providing a constant supply of a wide spectrum of hematopoietic cells that HIV infects in the human. Furthermore, there is no functional human immune system operating in these models, thus limiting the study of viral pathogenic effects in the absence of an immune response and precluding immunity studies. Newer humanized mouse models have recently emerged that can rectify the above limitations [21-25]. Prominent among these is the humanized Rag2-/-γc-/- mouse model (hereafter referred to as RAG-hu) [26-31]. This consists of a double mutant mouse of an alymphoid phenotype with defects in the genes encoding recombinase activating gene 2 (Rag2) and common cytokine receptor gamma chain. The Rag mutation prevents normal maturation of T and B lymphocytes. Absence of functional receptors for IL-2, IL-7 and other cytokines prevents the expansion of lymphocytes, including that of NK cells which function to reject foreign grafts. Intravenous administration of human hematopoietic stem cells together with exogenous administration of human cytokines leads to a better engraftment rate. A recent breakthrough of even more extensive engraftment without exogenous cytokine administration has been achieved by Manz and colleagues [28]. Intrahepatic injection of human CD34 hematopoietic stem cells into conditioned neonatal mice led to superior and sustained engraftment resulting in de novo multi-lineage human hematopoiesis with the production of T cells, B cells and dendritic cells. Formation of structured primary and secondary lymphoid organs was seen with human cells engrafting in thymus, bone marrow, spleen and lymph nodes. Importantly, productive human immune responses were seen when engrafted mice were immunized with tetanus toxoid and infected with Epstein-Barr virus. Thus, this model is distinguished from the previous humanized mouse models by its capacity for multi-lineage human hematopoiesis and the presence of a functional human immune system. Therefore, the RAG-hu mouse model offers several advantages for HIV research. Due to these unique features, we evaluated this new humanized mouse model for its susceptibility to HIV-1 infection and its utility for pathogenesis studies. In these proof-of-concept studies we show that RAG-hu mice are permissive to infection with both R5 and X4 tropic HIV-1, displaying prolonged viremia and CD4 T cell depletion characteristic of HIV infection and disease in the human. Results and discussion Hematopoietic cells differentiated in vivo in humanized Rag2-/-γc-/- mice (RAG-hu mice) are susceptible to HIV-1 infection Previous studies of Traggiai et al established the multi-lineage human hematopoiesis in CD34 cell reconstituted Rag2-/-γc-/- mice [28]. To systematically evaluate the utility of the RAG-hu mouse for HIV-1 infection studies, we first constructed RAG-hu mice by intrahepatic injection of human fetal liver-derived CD34+ cells into conditioned neonatal BALB/c-Rag2-/-γc-/- mice. Our initial experiments evaluated the transplanted mice to verify the levels of human cell engraftment, duration of their persistence, tissue distribution, and the presence of HIV-1 susceptible T cells and monocytes. Human cell engraftment was determined by FACS analysis of peripheral blood cells after staining with the human panleukocyte marker CD45 beginning 12 weeks post-injection. Over 150 mice have been evaluated to date. Of the mice showing detectable levels of engraftment (97%), the human cell levels ranged from 5–89%. Over 50% of mice showed >30% engraftment. A representative FACS plot depicting levels of engrafted CD45 cells is shown in Fig. Fig.1A.1A
To verify the presence of HIV-1 susceptible cells as well as human immune cells in the engrafted mice, we FACS analyzed peripheral blood cells to detect T cells and monocytes after staining with appropriate antibodies. T cell lineage populations staining positive for CD45/CD3+/+ and CD45/CD3/CD4+/+/+ T lymphocytes were detected in peripheral blood (Fig. (Fig.1B)1B To further verify the presence of human T cells in lymphoid organs, an engrafted mouse was sacrificed and thymus, spleen, and lymph node sections were stained to detect the human T cell markers CD3, CD4, and CD8 (Fig. (Fig.2).2
Before embarking on in vivo infections of these humanized mice, we first determined if the human cells matured in vivo were susceptible to HIV-1 infection ex vivo. Accordingly, cells obtained from lymphoid organs of RAG-hu mice, namely thymus, spleen and lymph nodes, were cultured in vitro and infected with a NL4-3 (X4-tropic) HIV-1 reporter virus that expresses the murine CD24 heat stable antigen (HSA). Our results showed productive infection of these cells as shown by increasing levels of HIV-1 p24 production at different days post-infection (Fig. (Fig.3).3
RAG-hu mice are permissive for chronic HIV-1 infection After establishing that RAG-hu mice generate differentiated human cells susceptible to HIV-1 infection, we next proceeded to evaluate if these mice can be productively infected in vivo. Mice were infected intraperitoneally with either HIV-1 X4 tropic NL4-3 (n = 9) or R5 tropic BaL (n = 5) viruses. In some experiments a HIV-1 strain with a GFP reporter gene (NLENG1-IRES) was used either alone (n = 2) or in combination with NL4-3 virus (n = 5) for infection to facilitate detection of infected cells in peripheral blood samples via FACS analysis. Blood samples were drawn roughly at weekly intervals, and the cellular and plasma fractions were separated. DNA PCR was used to detect integrated provirus and RT-PCR was performed to detect the circulating cell-free virus. A summary of both types of PCR analyses for viral detection is presented in Table 1 and a representative agarose gel showing the amplified PCR products is shown in Fig Fig4.4
Evidence of virus could be detected by DNA- or RT-PCR in HIV-1 infected mice (n = 16) for up to 30 weeks post-infection, the longest time point examined. As expected, no PCR signal could be detected in either uninfected mice (n = 4), or unengrafted mice infected with HIV-1 BaL (n = 5). Weekly data was not collected for all the infected mice as some were sacrificed at an early time point. Similarly, 30 week data is not available for all the mice at this time as some mice were infected at a later date than the initial set. Although considerable variability was present in the level of human cell engraftment in individual mice at the time of infection, surprisingly, mice with as low as 5% engraftment (n = 3) were still able to support viremia. This indicates that infection could be sustained even in the context of modest human cell reconstitution. The in vivo presence of virus in blood up to 30 weeks post-infection is suggestive of prolonged viremia, which is typical of the chronic HIV-1 infection seen in the human. In contrast, in the SCID-hu-PBL model of HIV-1 infection with the X4-tropic virus, viremia only lasted up to 3 weeks post-infection in most mice [34]. Persistent viremia in RAG-hu mice is most likely due to the continual generation and replenishment of target CD4 T cells from the engrafted hematopoietic stem cells, in contrast with that seen in SCID-hu-PBL mice in which virus-depleted cells are not replenished by endogenous production of T cells. We also determined whether RAG-hu mice support infection by R5 tropic HIV-1. Our results have shown productive infection in all the R5 BaL virus-injected mice. Thus, either X4 or R5 tropic HIV-1 can establish productive infection of RAG-hu mice akin to both the SCID-hu and SCID-hu-PBL mouse models. Although data was not generated for all time points, the available viral load data is indicative of high level of R5 virus replication. To further confirm the PCR-based viremia data, virus re-isolation from some of the infected animals was performed. Peripheral blood cells obtained from three X4-infected mice (up to 20 weeks post-infection) and thymocytes and splenocytes from one X4-infected mouse (12 weeks post-infection) were co-cultured with susceptible SupT1 cells to amplify the virus. The co-cultures were positive for viral p24 production, thus confirming the presence of viable infectious virus in infected animals (data not shown). As mentioned previously, in some experiments mice were infected with a GFP reporter HIV-1 to facilitate FACS-based identification of infected cells biopsied from virus-injected mice as described above. However, few GFP+ cells were detected by FACS analysis in either peripheral blood or lymphoid organs of sacrificed mice (data not shown). Nevertheless, the GFP virus-infected mice were consistently viremic, thus indicating its replicative capacity in vivo. Failure to detect large numbers of GFP-positive cells in infected mice is possibly due to attenuation of this modified reporter virus as compared to the wild-type strain (see below). To further confirm active HIV-1 replication in vivo, infected mice were sacrificed and lymphoid organs were analyzed for viral presence in histological sections. In situ hybridization using an HIV-specific probe was performed on tissue sections of spleen and thymus (Fig. (Fig.5).5
HIV-1 infection leads to CD4 T cell depletion in RAG-hu mice A central hallmark of HIV infection is the gradual depletion of CD4 T lymphocytes, which are primary targets of HIV infection. To investigate if this phenomenon is recapitulated in HIV-1 infected RAG-hu mice, the levels of CD4 T cells in peripheral blood at different times post-infection were determined. Cells were stained for the pan-T cell marker CD3 as well as CD4, and the ratio of CD3+CD4+ to CD3+CD4- was used to measure depletion of CD4+ T cells as described previously in hu-PBL-SCID mice HIV infection studies [35]. Baseline ratios in each mouse were established in pre-bleeds before infection (mean 70% CD4:CD3 ratio, range 50–85%, n = 24). Five of seven infected mice exhibited depletion of CD4 T cells for at least 9 weeks (Fig. 6B–D
To further investigate CD4 T cell depletion at the infected tissue level, thymus from an uninfected control and infected mouse (same tissues as detailed above for HIV in situ hybridization) were evaluated by immuno-staining with CD4 antibodies (Fig. (Fig.7).7
In a recent report Watanabe et al also demonstrated productive HIV-1 infection in a humanized mouse system (hNOG) capable of de novo multilineage human hematopoiesis using a different immunodeficient knock-out mouse on a NOD-SCID genetic background (NOD/SCID/IL2-R gamma chain knock-out mouse) [36]. Although only single time points for viral detection were shown in this report, high level viremia was seen in conjunction with CD4 T cell loss reflecting the results we have shown here. Humoral immune responses to HIV-1 antigens were also detected in some infected mice. Thus, these data from hNOG and RAG-hu mice corroborate that CD34 progenitor cell reconstituted mice with multilineage hematopoiesis are susceptible to HIV-1 infection. However, a number of parameters distinguish and differentiate between the hNOG and our present RAG-hu mouse models of HIV-1 infection. First, since the hNOG model uses mice with a NOD genetic background, this limits their experimental life span as these mice are prone to a high incidence of lymphomas and early death. On the contrary, the RAG-hu mouse has a normal life span, and sustains human hematopoiesis for more than a year. Second, in the hNOG model, HIV-1 infection could only be followed until 40 days (presumably due to their short life span) and thus the results obtained depict essentially an acute HIV-1 infection as seen in the previous SCID-hu and hu-PBL-SCID mouse models whereas in the RAG-hu system, the infection is more chronic, lasting 30 weeks (the latest time point analyzed to date, and likely to extend for more weeks pending further analysis). Third, although both X4 and R5 HIV-1 strains caused productive infection in hNOG mice, only the X4 virus infection resulted in CD4 T cell loss, whereas in the RAG-hu system both the viral strains caused CD4 T cell depletion. It is unclear why this difference exists given both the models are capable of multilineage hematopoiesis. Possible reasons could be due to the differences in mouse strains used, or alternatively, the R5 strains could also have displayed CD4 T cell depletion in hNOG mice if the infection was followed beyond 40 days. Overall, based on the comparisons above, the RAG-hu mouse model with its capacity for long-range hematopoiesis and chronic HIV-1 infection lasting beyond 30 weeks clearly offers several advantages over the hNOG model for long-term pathogenesis studies. In summary, we have presented multiple lines of evidence demonstrating that RAG-hu mice support chronic HIV-1 infection with prolonged viremia when infected with either X4 or R5-tropic HIV-1 viral strains. The above proof-of-concept data also showed that viral infection leads to CD4 T cell depletion. Since prolonged viremia in the context of CD4 T cell depletion is seen in this model, many novel experiments are now possible. Different viral strains from the field can be evaluated for virulence and newer drugs can be tested for their long-term efficacy. In addition, the generation of drug resistant escape mutants can be evaluated during long-term treatment. Since the RAG-hu mice are shown to be immunocompetent, a thorough evaluation of their ability to generate HIV-specific humoral and cellular immune responses will be the next step to exploit this system for vaccine/immunity studies. Substantiating the potential for immune response to other antigens, recent results from our laboratory demonstrated Dengue virus infection and production of neutralizing antibody in RAG-hu mice (R. Troyer, J. Kuruvilla and R. Akkina; unpublished results to be reported elsewhere). Such experiments are currently underway to detect HIV immune responses. Furthermore, this model also permits systematic evaluation of anti-HIV gene therapeutic constructs expressed in differentiated T cells and macrophages originating from gene-transduced CD34 hematopoietic stem cells [18,37,38]. However, since this promising humanized mouse model is relatively new, many additional basic parameters of HIV-1 infection need to be vigorously established to realize its full potential in various future studies. Conclusion RAG-hu mice reconstituted with human hematopoietic stem cells provide the unique features of multi-lineage human hematopoiesis and a functional human immune system which are ideal to study HIV pathogenesis in vivo. Here we showed that both T cell- and macrophage-tropic HIV-1 strains can cause persistent infection of RAG-hu mice resulting in CD4 T cell loss. Prolonged viremia in the context of CD4 T cell depletion seen in this model mirrors the main features of HIV infection in the human. The failure of a chimeric virus containing a reporter gene to cause CD4 T cell loss indicates possible attenuation in vivo. Thus, this new humanized mouse model of HIV-1 infection shows great promise as an in vivo experimental tool for the evaluation of new drug treatments, vaccines and gene therapies. Materials and methods Generation of humanized Rag2-/-γc-/- mice (RAG-hu mice) Humanized BALB/c-Rag2-/-γc-/- mice were prepared essentially as described by Traggiai et al [28] with the exception that human fetal liver-derived CD34+ cells were used for engraftment [17]. After irradiation at 350 rads, 2–3 day old neonatal mice were injected intrahepatically with 1 × 106 CD34+ cells. Transplanted mice were screened for human cell engraftment at 12+ weeks post-reconstitution. Peripheral blood was collected by tail bleed, and red blood cells were lysed using the Whole Blood Erythrocyte Lysing Kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) per the manufacturer's protocol. The white cell fraction was stained with antibodies against the human pan-leukocyte marker CD45 and FACS analyzed to verify engraftment. CD34 cells and cell culture Human fetal liver-derived CD34 cells were purified and cultured in cytokine media containing IL-3, IL-4 and SCF as described previously [17]. The SupT1 human lymphoid cell line was grown in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% FBS. RAG-hu mouse-derived differentiated human hematopoietic cells were grown in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% FBS, PHA and IL-2. HIV-1 infection of primary cells in vitro, viral co-culture and quantitation Human cell reconstituted control or infected mice were sacrificed at different times post-reconstitution/infection. Tissues, namely bone marrow, thymus, liver, spleen, and mesenteric lymph nodes were collected and single suspensions were made followed by RBC lysis. Mononuclear cells (3 × 106) were seeded and cultured as above. After 3 days, cells were infected with HIV-1 strain NL-r-HSAS (an X4-tropic strain expressing the murine heat stable antigen CD24) [9] at an MOI of 3. At 0, 2, and 6 days post-infection, supernatants were taken and assayed for productive infection by p24 ELISA (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). To isolate virus from infected mice by co-culture, 150 μl heparinized blood was taken by tail-bleed and red blood cells were lysed. The white blood cells were added to HIV-1 susceptible SupT1 cells in the presence of IL-2 and PHA, and supernatants were assayed for the presence of HIV p24 by ELISA (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). HIV-1 infection of humanized Rag2-/-γc-/- mice To infect human cell reconstituted RAG-hu mice, HIV-1 in a 100 μl volume was injected intraperitoneally at least 12 weeks after cell engraftment. Mice received either HIV-1 NL4-3 alone (1.2 × 105 i.u.), HIV-1 BaL alone (0.9 × 105 i.u.), HIV-1 NLENG1-IRES (NL4-3 engineered to express eGFP) [39] (1.6 × 105 i.u.), or a 1:1 mixture of HIV-1 NL4-3 and HIV-1 NLENG1-IRES at the same concentrations above. Mice were monitored daily. PCR analysis To detect integrated HIV by PCR, DNA was extracted from a 25 μl cell pellet from peripheral blood using the QIAamp DNA Blood Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). PCR was performed using Taq polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) using a primer set to amplify a HIV-1 pol gene fragment as described previously [40]. PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel to resolve an expected 199-bp fragment. To detect cell-free HIV by RT-PCR, RNA was extracted from 10–70 μl of plasma using the QIAamp Viral RNA kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). cDNAs were produced with Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and PCR amplified using HIV-1 pol primers [40]. Viral load in plasma samples was initially determined with the Amplicor test (Roche Diagnostics). Inadvertent use of heparin as an anticoagulant resulted in some Q-PCR inhibition. Later samples were collected without heparin and Q-RT-PCR was performed with another primer set towards the HIV-1 LTR [41]. Flow cytometry FACS analysis was used to assess human cell engraftment in peripheral blood and to detect various human hematopoietic cell populations in different lymphoid tissues. Whole blood was collected in heparinized capillary tubes then centrifuged to separate plasma from cells, and red blood cells were lysed as above. To analyze human cells in different lymphoid organs, single cell preparations were made followed by RBC lysis. Cell suspensions were stained with the following antibodies: hCD45-PE, (eBioscience), hCD4-PECy5, hCD3-PE, hCD14-PE (Caltag) and hCCR5 (BD Pharmingen). Stained cells were analyzed using a Coulter EPICS XL-MCL FACS analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). To measure CD4 T cell depletion in HIV-1 infected mice, they were tail-bled periodically. Blood cells were stained for CD3 and CD4 markers to determine CD3:CD4 cell ratios. CD4 T cell levels were calculated as a ratio of the entire CD3 population (CD4+CD3+:CD4-CD3+). To establish baseline CD4 T cell levels, all mice were analyzed twice before infection. In situ hybridization for HIV-1 RNA In situ hybridization for HIV-1 RNA and quantification of frequencies of virus-producing cells was performed on 4-μm tissue sections from thymus and spleen previously frozen in OCT compound (VWR, Denver, CO) of one HIV-1-infected and one uninfected RAG-hu mouse, as previously described for human lymphoid tissues [42]. Three sections were evaluated from each tissue. In situ hybridization was performed using digoxigenin-labeled antisense riboprobes for env, gag, and nef, and detected using nitro blue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl phosphate (NBT/BCIP). Sections were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin to enable visualization of nuclei. The number of virus-producing cells was determined by visual inspection and manually counting the positively stained cells on each section. The sum of the total number of virus-producing cells was divided by the total area of the tissue sections inspected, as quantified by a computerized image analysis system (Leica Q5001W Image Analysis, Leica, Cambridge, UK) to determine the number of HIV-1-producing cells per mm2 tissue. Immuno-staining for lymphocyte and macrophage markers Immuno-staining for human CD3 (Clone UCHT1, BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), CD4 (Clone RPA-T4, BD Pharmingen), and CD8 (Clone HIT8a, BD Pharmingen) was performed on 4-μm tissue sections from a RAG-hu mouse thymus, spleen, and lymph node previously frozen in OCT compound. Sections were initially fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde for 20 min., washed in Tris Buffered Saline (TBS; 0.05 M Tris hydrochloride, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.6) and treated with 1% hydrogen peroxide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in TBS to block endogenous peroxidase activity. Sections were further blocked for 15 min. with Avidin (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), washed in TBS, followed by Biotin (Vector Labs). Sections were stained using Vector Laboratories' Mouse on Mouse™ staining kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Color detection was performed with horseradish peroxidase streptavidin (Vector Laboratories) with NovaRed (Vector Laboratories) added as a substrate producing a red-brown color. Sections were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin like above to enable visualization of nuclei. Control sections were treated with antibody diluent and processed in parallel. Abbreviations Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) FACS (fluorescence activated cell sorting) γc (common gamma chain receptor) GFP (green fluorescent protein) HLA (human leukocyte antigen) HSA (heat stable antigen) HSC (hematopoietic stem cell) Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) NK (natural killer) PBL (peripheral blood leukocytes) PCR (polymerase chain reaction) PHA (phytohaemagglutinin) Q-PCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction) Q-RT-PCR (quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction) R5 (CCR5) Rag2 (recombinase activating gene 2) RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction) X4 (CXCR4) SCID (severe combined immunodeficiency) Competing interests The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions BB and WW prepared RAG-hu mice, performed HIV infections and FACS analysis. BB was also responsible for PCR assays. BP performed the multiparametric FACS analysis. EC contributed to immuno-histology and in situ hybridizations. RA was responsible for the conception, overall experimental design and implementation of the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements Work reported here was supported by NIH grants AI50492 and AI057066 to R.A. This work has also been facilitated by the infrastructure and resources provided by the Colorado Center for AIDS Research Grant P30 AI054907. We are grateful to Irving Weissman at Stanford University for his generous gift of Rag2-/-γc-/- mice used in these studies. We thank Leila Remling, Ryan Troyer and Jes Kuruvilla for assistance in RAG-hu mice production and Sarah Akkina for monitoring the Rag mice colony. We thank Joy Folkvord for histology work. We thank Tom Campbell, Russell Young and Lori Brewster for assistance with viral load PCR assays. We thank NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagents Program for HIV-1 related reagents used in this work. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Science. 1988 Sep 23; 241(4873):1632-9.
[Science. 1988]Adv Immunol. 1996; 63():79-125.
[Adv Immunol. 1996]J Virol. 1998 Aug; 72(8):6520-6.
[J Virol. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Mar 15; 90(6):2443-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993]Science. 1988 Sep 23; 241(4873):1632-9.
[Science. 1988]Nature. 1993 Jun 24; 363(6431):728-32.
[Nature. 1993]J Virol. 1998 Aug; 72(8):6520-6.
[J Virol. 1998]Science. 1990 Feb 2; 247(4942):564-6.
[Science. 1990]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Mar; 44(3):783-6.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000]Br J Haematol. 1998 Nov; 103(2):335-42.
[Br J Haematol. 1998]Blood. 2003 Aug 1; 102(3):873-80.
[Blood. 2003]J Exp Med. 1997 Oct 20; 186(8):1269-75.
[J Exp Med. 1997]Blood. 2002 Apr 15; 99(8):2752-9.
[Blood. 2002]Science. 2004 Apr 2; 304(5667):104-7.
[Science. 2004]Science. 2004 Apr 2; 304(5667):104-7.
[Science. 2004]Retrovirology. 2006 Apr 19; 3():24.
[Retrovirology. 2006]Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1994 Feb; 70(2):152-8.
[Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1994]J Virol. 1998 Mar; 72(3):2002-9.
[J Virol. 1998]J Virol. 1996 Jun; 70(6):4184-7.
[J Virol. 1996]J Virol. 1996 Jun; 70(6):4184-7.
[J Virol. 1996]Mol Ther. 2003 Jul; 8(1):62-71.
[Mol Ther. 2003]Anticancer Res. 2003 May-Jun; 23(3A):1997-2005.
[Anticancer Res. 2003]Oligonucleotides. 2003; 13(5):303-12.
[Oligonucleotides. 2003]Science. 2004 Apr 2; 304(5667):104-7.
[Science. 2004]Blood. 1994 Sep 1; 84(5):1393-8.
[Blood. 1994]Blood. 1994 Sep 1; 84(5):1393-8.
[Blood. 1994]J Virol. 1998 Aug; 72(8):6520-6.
[J Virol. 1998]J Virol. 2002 Sep; 76(17):8776-86.
[J Virol. 2002]J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Apr; 39(4):1303-10.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2001]J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jun; 43(6):2709-17.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2005]AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2005 May; 21(5):363-70.
[AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2005]