![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Copyright © 2005 The Royal Society Early history of European domestic cattle as revealed by ancient DNA 1Molecular Archaeology Mainz, Institut für Anthropologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Saarstrasse 21, 55099 Mainz, Germany 2Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland *Author for correspondence (Email: dbradley/at/tcd.ie) Received September 16, 2005; Accepted October 6, 2005. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract We present an extensive ancient DNA analysis of mainly Neolithic cattle bones sampled from archaeological sites along the route of Neolithic expansion, from Turkey to North-Central Europe and Britain. We place this first reasonable population sample of Neolithic cattle mitochondrial DNA sequence diversity in context to illustrate the continuity of haplotype variation patterns from the first European domestic cattle to the present. Interestingly, the dominant Central European pattern, a starburst phylogeny around the modal sequence, T3, has a Neolithic origin, and the reduced diversity within this cluster in the ancient samples accords with their shorter history of post-domestic accumulation of mutation. Keywords: ancient DNA, Bos taurus, Neolithic, domestication, mitochondrial haplotypes, starburst network 1. Introduction During the Neolithic ca 10 000 BP, the crucial development of domestication of wild plants and animals accompanied substantial changes in human culture, and it was during this time that the foundation was laid for our way of life today. Archaeological evidence indicates that the Neolithic culture expanded out of the Near East into the Balkans, Greece and into Northern Central Europe after 6400 BP. It is known that the wild ancestor of cattle, the aurochs (Bos primigenius), ranged widely throughout Europe. However, inference from mtDNA data suggests that bovine maternal lineages (at least) have a Near Eastern rather than local origin.Mitochondrial data from modern populations show a high diversity in Anatolia and the Middle East, supporting a Near-Eastern matrilineal centre of origin (Troy et al. 2001). Interestingly, partial control region sequence variation in Europe is strongly dominated by a single family of haplotypes that coalesce to a single, numerically predominant sequence, T3 (figure 1
Here, we present mtDNA partial control region sequence from 33 Neolithic and six Bronze Age European B. taurus samples. This enables a population genetic approach partitioned by time, in addition to geography. We show that modern northern European phylogeography has Neolithic roots, rather than being a legacy of recent restricted breeding practices, and that calibrations of mtDNA mutation rates are consistent with a domestication scale of time depth for the origins of the dominant expansion signature. 2. Material and methods (a) Samples Archaeological bone and tooth material were collected from Central Europe, the Balkans and the Near East. The covered time periods were Late Mesolithic, all periods of Neolithic and Bronze Age. Details are given in the electronic supplementary information; morphometric classification undertaken by archaeologists was available for some bones. In this study, we present 38 samples that can be addressed genetically as domestic cattle, including extended sequences from three previously analysed samples (Edwards et al. 2004). (b) Sample extraction and amplification Extraction, contamination control and amplification reactions were as described previously by Burger et al. (2004), Mainz, and by Edwards et al. (2004), Dublin, and followed standard ancient DNA good practice, including the replication of five (ca 13%) analyses in both locations (including sample preparation, extraction and PCR). (c) Data analyses mtDNA sequences were aligned by eye, and reduced median networks constructed using the algorithm of Bandelt et al. (1995), using comparison of the 240 bp used by Troy et al. (2001). Analyses of inter-population genetic distances between extant and ancient populations were performed using published modern regional data (Cymbron et al. 1999; Troy et al. 2001; Mannen et al. 2004). Pairwise Fst values were generated according to Slatkin (1995), using the Arlequin computer program (v. 2.000; Schneider et al. 1997). Population affinities were visualized using multidimensional scaling (MDS) implemented by the SPSS package (v. 11.0.1). The ρ statistic (Forster et al. 1996) was used as an unbiased estimator of the coalescence time depth within each haplogroup and was calculated, along with 95% central credible region, using the program CRED (Macaulay 1998).3. Results and discussion (a) Authenticity of ancient sequences and success rate Ancient DNA is affected by post-mortem alterations of bases, which may result in incorrect sequence determination. The data from Mainz were analysed for type 2 (G/C→A/T) transitions, which have been found to comprise the majority of base alterations (Hofreiter et al. 2001). Although 10 deamination hotspots were discovered (see table S4 of the electronic supplementary material), the low deamination rate (1.6% without using Uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG), which cleaves false incorporated deoxyuridines, or deaminated cytosines, to uracil) indicates that when sequences are reproduced, and UNG is used, post-mortem damage can be effectively discounted. The strict system of contamination prevention in both Mainz and Dublin proved to be successful as all extraction- and PCR-blank controls were negative. Human contamination was excluded by specific primer design and was never observed in any amplification. In both laboratories, the extended reproduction of results underlines the feasibility of the sequences. Approximately 48% (39 out of 81) of all samples generated reproducible DNA. (b) Sequence results All data from archaeological finds recorded as B. taurus gave sequences similar to those encountered in modern European cattle, except for one sample from the Late Neolithic site of Svodin, Slovakia, which yielded a sequence identical to two of the six B. primigenius sequences previously described from British wild oxen remains (Bailey et al. 1996; Troy et al. 2001). This single outlier is unlikely to be the result of contamination (possessing a haplotype only encountered thus far in ancient material) and could be either the product of a local hybridization between a female aurochs and a male domestic bull, or might credibly be a consequence of the error associated with morphometric distinction. Distinguishing between these alternatives will require a wider description of the frequency of B. primigenius sequences across a range of morphologically and temporally variable samples; we note also that mtDNA is only a marker for maternal introgression and more extensive male-mediated input may have occurred. Table 1 shows variable positions of aligned sequence haplotypes recovered from ancient samples. The dominant feature among ancient haplotypes is the numerical and topological predominance of the European modal sequence T3. Thirty samples show identity over at least the most variable 240 bp of the control region, four samples exhibit 1 bp difference and four samples two or more mismatches. T3, and its one or two base pair derivatives, has predominated in every modern European regional group studied thus far (Cymbron et al. 1999; Troy et al. 2001). Thus, this most basic element in the pattern of European bovine mtDNA diversity is one with a time depth stretching back at least to the Neolithic and cannot be ascribed to more recent aspects of breed or population history.
Whereas individual haplotypes may be shared between multiple populations and show limited geographical restriction, the affinities between regional samples may be illustrated by treating these as populations. Here, we calculated genetic distances (pairwise FST) among 10 B. taurus population groupings from European regions, Africa, the Near and Far East, plus the two ancient European sample groups. These were graphed in two dimensions using multidimensional scaling (figure 2 bp), is placed adjacent with modern British, mainland European and Scandinavian samples, suggesting regional continuity of mtDNA phylogeography within the continent. The positioning of the Bronze Age sample is insecure due to small sample size (5).
Figure 1 It has been argued that the five clusters within modern B. taurus mtDNA each represent a single domesticated sequence type, with derived haplotypes displaying mutations accumulated since domestication. The networks around these are starlike, suggesting that they are the products of population expansion, which is supported by significantly negative Tajima's (1996) D and Fu's (1996) Fs values (table 2); samples grouped by population display similar values (not shown). A reasonable hypothesis is that the population expansions recorded were induced by domestication. This would predict that the time to the common ancestor within each cluster should be of the order of 10 000 years. This may be calculated using the statistic ρ, the mean number of mutations from the central founder sequence to lineages within each cluster. This gives an unbiased estimate, and a central 95% credible interval may be calculated assuming a true starlike phylogeny and a Poisson distribution for the mutational process (Richards et al. 2000). Calibration of the control region mutation rate is difficult, but has previously been given as 38% per million years (Myr) for this region using a comparison with bison sequence (Troy et al. 2001). This accords well with a recent calibration of bison control region evolution (685 bp fragment, 32% Myr−1, 95% CI of 23–41%), which used a more informed Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of an extensive radiocarbon-dated dataset (Shapiro et al. 2004).
The best-sampled modern clusters are the African T1 (271 chromosomes) and T3 (352 chromosomes). These yield time of most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) approximate estimates of 13 900 years before present (ybp) and 13 000 ybp (Shapiro et al. 2004, calibration) or 11 700 and 10 950 ybp (Troy et al. 2001, calibration), respectively (table 2); all of which are consistent (including error) with a domestication origin for the founder haplotypes. Examination of the diversity around the Neolithic sample supports this, with a markedly reduced T3 ρ value, indicating a time depth of roughly 2200 years. Given that these chromosomes were, in effect, sampled around 6000 years ago, this low value accords (within reasonable error) with a domestication event origin for T3 diversity. This perusal of 6000 years of missing mutational history allows a confirmation that the bulk of bovine mtDNA diversity today derives from only a few Neolithic founder chromosomes.Acknowledgments We thank Jill Bailey, Barbara Bramanti, Detlef Gronenborn, Vincent Macaulay and Christian Pitra for helpful discussions and scientific advice, and Petra Czerwinski and Sabine Möller-Rieker for assistance. We are also especially grateful to the following for provision of archaeological material: R.-M. Arbogast, B. Arndt, L. Bartosiewicz, M. Budja, A. Choyke, K. Dobney, H.-J. Döhle, H. Göldner, H. Hongo, N. Monaghan, B. Öksüz, M. Özdogan, G. Roth, S. Schade-Lindig, E. Stephan, A. Tresset, H.-P. Uerpmann, J.-D. Vigne and I. Vörös. The project in Mainz was funded by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (03BUX1MZ). C.J.E. is supported by Irish Research Council for Science Engineering and Technology Basic Research Grant Scheme (project nos. SC/1999/409 and SC/2002/510). Both laboratories were part-funded from a Eurocores OMLL Programme grant via CNRS, France. Footnotes †These authors contributed equally to this work. Early history of European domestic cattle as revealed by ancient DNA Click here to view.(263K, pdf) References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
Nature. 2001 Apr 26; 410(6832):1088-91.
[Nature. 2001]Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Mar; 30(3):841-9.
[Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004]Genetics. 1995 Oct; 141(2):743-53.
[Genetics. 1995]Nature. 2001 Apr 26; 410(6832):1088-91.
[Nature. 2001]Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Aug; 32(2):539-44.
[Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004]Genetics. 1995 Jan; 139(1):457-62.
[Genetics. 1995]Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Oct; 59(4):935-45.
[Am J Hum Genet. 1996]Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Dec 1; 29(23):4793-9.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2001]Nature. 2001 Apr 26; 410(6832):1088-91.
[Nature. 2001]Nature. 2001 Apr 26; 410(6832):1088-91.
[Nature. 2001]Genetics. 1995 Oct; 141(2):743-53.
[Genetics. 1995]Nature. 2001 Apr 26; 410(6832):1088-91.
[Nature. 2001]Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Aug; 32(2):539-44.
[Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004]Genetics. 1996 Jul; 143(3):1457-65.
[Genetics. 1996]Genetics. 1996 Oct; 144(2):829-38.
[Genetics. 1996]Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Nov; 67(5):1251-76.
[Am J Hum Genet. 2000]Nature. 2001 Apr 26; 410(6832):1088-91.
[Nature. 2001]Science. 2004 Nov 26; 306(5701):1561-5.
[Science. 2004]Science. 2004 Nov 26; 306(5701):1561-5.
[Science. 2004]Nature. 2001 Apr 26; 410(6832):1088-91.
[Nature. 2001]Nature. 2001 Apr 26; 410(6832):1088-91.
[Nature. 2001]Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Aug; 32(2):539-44.
[Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004]Nature. 2001 Apr 26; 410(6832):1088-91.
[Nature. 2001]Science. 2004 Nov 26; 306(5701):1561-5.
[Science. 2004]