![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © American Society for Investigative Pathology Activin A in the Regulation of Corneal Neovascularization and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression From the Department of Ophthalmology,* Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, and the Dana Faber Cancer Institute,† Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Ophthalmology,‡ University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; and the Department of Vitreoretinal Surgery,§ Center of Ophthalmology, and the Center for Molecular Medicine, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany Accepted December 22, 2003. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Activin A, a dimeric glycoprotein that belongs to the transforming growth factor-β superfamily, governs cellular differentiation in a wide variety of models and has been implicated in the regulation of angiogenesis. We examined the role of activin A and its downstream signaling pathway in a murine model of inflammatory corneal neovascularization induced by mechanical injury (debridement), and in vitro in corneal epithelial cells. Activin A expression increased steadily from day 2 until day 8 after mechanical debridement in vivo, paralleling vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression. Administration of recombinant activin A in mice increased the area of neovascularization, VEGF expression, and the kinase activities of p38 and p42/44 MAPKs after mechanical debridement. Systemic inhibition of activin A in vivo with a neutralizing antibody reduced the area of neovascularization, VEGF expression, and p38 and p42/44 MAPK activity, whereas administration of an isotype-matched control antibody had no effect. In vitro treatment with activin A increased VEGF secretion, as well as p38 and p42/44 MAPK activity in corneal epithelial cells, whereas concurrent administration of specific inhibitors of p38 or p42/44 MAPK abolished the stimulatory effect of activin A on VEGF production. We conclude that activin A stimulates inflammatory corneal angiogenesis by increasing VEGF levels through a p38 and p42/44 MAPK-dependent mechanism. Corneal neovascularization is a disabling condition that results in loss of the immunological privilege of the cornea and ultimately in visual impairment. It is a common manifestation of inflammatory, infectious, and traumatic diseases of the cornea and the limbal stem cell barrier. Although laser treatment and surgical intervention offer potential therapeutic options, corneal neovascularization still remains a therapeutic puzzle because, in many occasions, cornea avascularity and transparency are not restored. The potential benefits of controlling angiogenesis have been demonstrated in experimental models for various untreatable ocular conditions that involve neovascularization.1–3 These studies have highlighted the pivotal role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in regulating endothelial cell growth and neovascularization. VEGF refers to a family of angiogenic and vascular permeability-enhancing peptides derived from alternatively spliced mRNAs.4 VEGF bioactivity is primarily mediated via two high-affinity cognate receptors, KDR/Flk-1 and Flt-1.5,6 Recently, it was suggested that VEGF plays an important role in corneal neovascularization because exogenous VEGF stimulates this process7 and a neutralizing anti-VEGF antibody inhibits it.8 We have previously reported that VEGF expression is up-regulated in scraped corneas during the course of corneal neovascularization. Understanding the molecular mechanisms regulating this forced expression will help identify potential therapeutic candidates for the treatment or even prevention of corneal neovascularization. Activins represent a distinct group of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β superfamily, that comprise one α and three β chains (βA, βB, and βC).9,10 The bioactive molecule activin A consists of two monomeric βA chains linked by disulfide bonds.10 The biological effects of activins are mediated via signaling through two families (type I and II) of transmembranous serine-threonine kinase receptors.11–15 After ligand binding, a heterodimeric complex is formed by a type I and a type II receptor that initiates phosphorylation of the type I receptor and activation of downstream signaling cascades involving the Sma and Mad (mothers against decapentaplegic)-related protein (Smad).16 One of the most important functions of activin A is the regulation of cell differentiation. Activin A controls several aspects of hematopoiesis17,18,19 and regulates cell differentiation in the ovary, placenta, prostate, and testis.10,20 During embryogenesis, it is instrumental for axis development and organogenesis in a variety of species.21 In adults, activins function as hormone-like feedback regulators in the reproductive system.22 Furthermore, the presence of activin has been related to wound healing. In the eye, members of the activin family have been discovered in retinal pigment epithelium.23 Activin A and its receptors were recently described in preretinal membranes from eyes with ischemic and nonischemic vitreoretinal proliferative diseases, a result that agrees with a role of activin A in neovascularization.24 We have recently found that VEGF and activin A expression is co-ordinated in fibrovascular membranes from patients with age-related macular degeneration (manuscript submitted). Because we have also shown that genes encoding for the βA chain as well as several activin receptors are transcribed in the cornea,25 we investigated the role of activin A in corneal angiogenesis and the regulation of VEGF expression. Materials and Methods Cell Culture Human corneal epithelial cells (passage 2; Cascade Biologics, Portland, OR) were maintained in tissue culture media according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were plated into six-well plastic dishes and used for experiments when they reached 80% confluence. Fresh serum-free media were placed on the cells 12 hours before experiments. The p38 kinase inhibitor SB 202190 or the MAPK inhibitor PD 098059 (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) or vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide), were added to the cells at a concentration of 50 μmol/L, followed 1 hour later by activin A (100 nmol/L) for an additional 12 hours. Each experimental condition was prepared in triplicate, and the experiments were performed at least three times with reproducible results. Representative experiments are shown in the figures. Animals C57 BL/6 mice, weighting 20 to 25 g were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). All animal experiments followed the guidelines of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology and were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Cologne, Germany. All surgical procedures were performed under general anesthesia [xylazine hydrochloride (5 mg/kg) and ketamine hydrochloride (35 mg/kg) i.m.]. To monitor systemic side effects of the treatment, body weight and temperature were measured on every observation day. Animals were kept in groups of 10 and fed regular lab chow and water ad libitum. A 12-hour day and night cycle was maintained. Induction of Corneal Neovascularization Under intramuscular general anesthesia with xylazine (10 mg/kg; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) and ketamine hydrochloride (150 mg/kg; Phoenix, MO) and additional topical application of lidocaine (Alcon, CA), inflammatory neovascularization was induced by application of 2 μl of 0.15 mmol/L NaOH to the central cornea of each mouse. The mice were randomly divided into three groups that received treatment with vehicle, systemic treatment with a neutralizing polyclonal antibody against activin A, an isotype-matched control antibody, or with recombinant activin A (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Each group consisted of 10 animals unless otherwise specified (20 corneas per group in total). The corneal epithelium was subsequently scraped off with a blunt von Graefe’s knife. The limbal areas were gently massaged over 360° for 3 minutes. To prevent infection, eyes were treated with antibiotic ointment (neomycin sulfate, 3.5 I.E./mg; bacitracin, 0.3 I.E./mg; and polymyxine B sulfate, 7.5 I.E./mg, Polyspectran; Alcon, Germany) after surgery. Each set of experiments was repeated three times. Visualization and Quantification of Corneal Neovascularization For visualization of endothelial cells and pericytes, immunostaining for CD31 was performed. Corneas were carefully dissected and rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). To allow penetration of the antibodies and flattening of the tissue, the corneal epithelium and endothelium were whipped off and four peripheral incisions were made. Corneas were then fixed in ice-cold acetone for 20 minutes and after subsequent washes in PBS transferred to the antibody solution and incubated overnight at 4°C. Phycoerythrin-coupled anti-mouse CD31 (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) was used in a dilution of 1:500. After further washing on PBS, corneas were mounted with anti-fading agent and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Quantification of Corneal Neovascularization Images of the CD31-stained corneas were captured using a CD-330 charge-coupled device camera (Dage-MIT; Improvision, Inc., Heidelberg, Germany) attached to a Zeiss microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochem, Germany). The images were captured on an Apple G4 Computer (Apple, Cupertino, CA) and analyzed using Openlab software (Improvision Inc.). The images were resolved at 624 × 480 pixels and converted to tagged information file format (.tiff) files. The neovascularization was quantified by setting a threshold level of fluorescence, above which only vessels were captured. The entire mounted cornea was analyzed to minimize sampling bias. The total corneal surface was outlined using the innermost vessel of the limbal arcade as the border. The total vascularized area was then normalized to the total corneal area and the percentage of the cornea covered by vessels was calculated. All quantifications and calculations were performed in a masked manner. Implantation of Osmotic Pumps The delivery of the drug with osmotic pumps, instead of simple intraperitoneal injections, is necessary to achieve steady levels of each drug in the circulation, avoid peak levels caused by every day injections, and limit the chance of toxicities. One week after the scraping of their corneas, the mice were deeply anesthetized, and osmotic pumps (Alzet, Salt Lake City, UT) containing either the vehicle (PBS), or 20 μg of a neutralizing rat/human/mouse polyclonal antibody against activin A (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), or 20 μg of isotype-matched control antibody (R&D Systems), or 250 μg of recombinant activin A (R&D Systems), each diluted in 200 μl of PBS, were inserted into the peritoneal space. In detail, the abdominal skin was shaved, scrubbed with betadine, and wiped with alcohol. A small incision of 15-mm in length was made within the midline, through the skin and muscles, to enter the peritoneal cavity. Then the pumps were inserted into the peritoneal space floating freely without attachment to a certain structure. Each pump was 1.3 cm long and 6 mm in diameter. The wound was closed with separate suturing of the muscle layer and the skin. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for VEGF and Activin A Mice were scraped as described above and treated with recombinant activin A, or the neutralizing antibody against activin A (seven animals in each group), or the isotype-matched control antibody, or vehicle (eight animals), and sacrificed on days 2, 4, or 8 after treatment. Corneas were dissected and placed in 60 μl of lysis buffer (20 mmol/L imidazole HCl, 10 mmol/L KCl, 1 mmol/L MgCl2, 10 mmol/L EGTA, 1% Triton, 10 mmol/L NaF, 1 mmol/L Na molybdate, 1 mmol/L EDTA, pH 6.8) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) followed by mechanical homogenization. The lysate was cleared of debris by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 15 minutes (4°C), and the supernatant was collected. Total protein was determined using a commercial assay (bicinchoninic acid kit; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). VEGF and activin A levels were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems) and normalized to total protein. Analysis of p38 MAPK Kinase Activity P38 MAP kinase activity was analyzed in whole retinal tissue using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based method (Assay Designs, Inc.). Briefly, retinal tissue was homogenized in lysis buffer containing 20 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 1 mmol/L EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mmol/L sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mmol/L β-glycerolphosphate, 1 mmol/L Na3O4, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 mmol/L phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation and protein was quantified with the bicinchoninic acid assay (Biorad). Corneal lysates, or recombinant phopsho-p38 MAPK standards (provided by the manufacturer), were subsequently incubated with a monoclonal antibody against the phosphorylated (activated) form of p38 MAPK (Assay Designs), immobilized on a microtiter 96-well plate for 1 hour at room temperature on a plate shaker at 500 rpm. After washes with a Tris-buffered saline-based solution (provided by the manufacturer), the plate was incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against phopsho-p38 for 1 hour at room temperature on a plate shaker at 500 rpm. This antibody binds to the phopsho-p38 bound on the plate. After the incubation, the excess antibody was removed with repetitive washes with the Tris-buffered saline-based solution and the plate was incubated with a donkey anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase that binds to the polyclonal phospho-p38 antibody. After a short incubation for 1 hour at room temperature as above, and subsequent washes, the peroxidase reaction was developed and measured at 450 nmol/L with a reference wavelength at 570 nmol/L. The measured optical density is directly proportional to the concentration of phospho-p38 in either the standards or the samples. A standard curve was plotted for the standards and the concentration of phopsho-p38 of each of the samples was determined by interpolation. Analysis of p42/44 MAPK Kinase Activity P42/44 MAP kinase activity was analyzed in whole retinal tissue using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based method (Assay Designs, Inc.). Briefly, retinal tissue was homogenized in lysis buffer containing 20 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 1 mmol/L EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mmol/L sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mmol/L β-glycerolphosphate, 1 mmol/L Na3O4, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 mmol/L phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation and protein was quantified with the bicinchoninic acid assay (Biorad). Corneal lysates, or recombinant phopsho-p42/44 MAPK standards (provided by the manufacturer), were subsequently incubated with a monoclonal antibody against the phosphorylated (activated) form of p42/44 MAPK (Assay Designs), immobilized on a microtiter 96-well plate, for 1 hour at room temperature on a plate shaker at 500 rpm. After washes with a Tris-buffered saline-based solution (provided by the manufacturer), the plate was incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against phopsho-p42/44 for 1 hour at room temperature on a plate shaker at 500 rpm. This antibody binds to the phopsho-p42/44 bound on the plate. After the incubation, the excess antibody was removed with repetitive washes with the Tris-buffered saline-based solution and the plate was incubated with a goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase that binds to the polyclonal phospho-p42/44 antibody. After a short incubation for 1 hour at room temperature as above, and subsequent washes, the peroxidase reaction was developed and measured at 450 nmol/L with a reference wavelength at 570 nmol/L. The measured optical density is directly proportional to the concentration of phospho-p42/44 in either the standards or the samples. A standard curve was plotted for the standards and the concentration of phopsho-p42/44 of each of the samples was determined by interpolation. Statistical Analysis To analyze the differences between treated and control eyes, as well as within the treatment groups, an unpaired t-test with two-tailed P value or analysis of variance (for multiple comparisons) was used. Results are presented as mean ± SD. Results Recombinant Activin A Increases VEGF Expression on Corneal Epithelial Cells via p38 and MAPK in Vitro We have previously shown that activin A expression correlates with VEGF expression in fibrovascular epiretinal membranes from patients with age-related macular degeneration (AM Jaussen and V Poulaki, submitted). To investigate the role of activin A in the regulation of VEGF expression, we used corneal epithelial cells in vitro. Treatment of corneal epithelial cells with activin A up-regulated VEGF levels (1.58 ± 0.099 versus 0.62 ± 0.046 pg/mg of total protein in vehicle-treated cells, P < 0.001; Figure 1
Levels of Activin A Increase During the Course of Corneal Neovascularization and the Increase Parallels that of VEGF We have previously shown that VEGF levels increase during the course of neovascularization in the cornea scrape model. Because recombinant activin A increases production of VEGF in our in vitro model, we investigated whether systemic activin A levels increase during the course of neovascularization in vivo. In agreement with our previous findings, VEGF levels increased from 3.36 ± 0.74 pg/mg of total protein on day 0, to 9.05 ± 0.92 pg/mg of total protein on day 2 (P < 0.005), to 12.162 ± 0.93 pg/mg of total protein on day 4 (P < 0.005), to 14.34 ± 0.65 pg/mg of total protein on day 8 (P < 0.005) after the scraping (Figure 3A)
Activin A Modulates VEGF Levels in the Cornea Scrape Model Administration of recombinant activin A increased VEGF levels (13.93 ± 2.46 versus 7.74 ± 1.39 pg/mg of total protein on day 2, P < 0.001, 15.36 ± 1.62 versus 12.67 ± 1.45 pg/mg of total protein on day 4, P < 0.05 and 16.31 ± 1.22 versus 14.44 ± 1.21 pg/mg of total protein on day 8, P < 0.02 in the animals treated with the recombinant activin A, versus the vehicle, respectively) in the cornea scrape model. Inhibition of endogenous activin A via the administration of a neutralizing antibody against activin A reduced VEGF levels (5.31 ± 0.92 versus 8.03 ± 1.99 pg/mg of total protein on day 2, P < 0.001; 7.2 ± 2.4 versus 12.87 ± 1.86 pg/mg of total protein, P < 0.05 on day 4; and 8.24 ± 0.67 versus 13.7 ± 1.37 pg/mg of total protein on day 8, P < 0.01) (Figure 4
Activin A Modulates Corneal Neovascularization in the Cornea Scrape Model In agreement with our previous report,27 the percentage of vascularized corneal surface increased on day 12 after the scraping to 32.16 ± 6.79%, whereas unscraped corneas are not vascularized (therefore the percentage of vascularized corneal area is ~0). Administration of recombinant activin A significantly enhanced neovascularization (increase to 50.22 ± 4.76%, versus 32.16 ± 6.79% in the vehicle-treated mice P < 0.0001) (Figure 5)
P42/44 and p38 MAPK Activity Increases During the Course of Corneal Neovascularization and Is Modulated by Activin A We have previously demonstrated that p42/44 and p38 MAPK regulate VEGF expression during the course of diabetes.26 To investigate the role of the MAPK signaling pathway during corneal neovascularization and the effect of activin A on their enzymatic activity, we measured the activity of p38 and p42/44. P42/44 activity increased during neovascularization (22.96 ± 4.25 μg/mg of total protein on day 8 versus 7.53 ± 3.3 μg/mg of total protein on day 0, P < 0.005; Figure 5A Administration of recombinant activin A significantly increased both p42/44 MAPK activity (32.5 ± 4.8 μg/mg of total protein on day 7 in mice treated with recombinant activin A versus 22.96 ± 4.25 μg/mg of total protein, in the vehicle-treated mice, P < 0.001; Figure 5A
Administration of activin A-neutralizing antibody and not the isotype-matched control antibody, reduced both p42/44 MAPK (11.22 ± 2.35 μg/mg of total protein on day 8 in mice treated with the neutralizing anti-activin A antibody versus 26.27 ± 5.38 in the isotype-matched control antibody-treated mice, P < 0.001, Figure 5A Discussion Corneal neovascularization is a sight-threatening complication of severe insults to the cornea, such as chemical burns and corneal infections. It is characterized by an ingrowth of neovessels originating from the limbus and is often accompanied by an inflammatory response. VEGF is an important factor in this process because it stimulates corneal neovascularization7 and a neutralizing anti-VEGF antibody inhibits it.8 We have previously demonstrated that VEGF expression is up-regulated during corneal neovascularization.7,27 We now report that activin A up-regulates VEGF expression and activates MAPK family members p38 and p42/44 in vitro in corneal epithelial cells. Activin A expression parallels that of VEGF during the course of neovascularization and stimulates it through the MAPK signal transduction pathway. Inhibition of endogenous activin A down-regulates VEGF expression and neovascularization, whereas administration of recombinant activin A up-regulates p38 and p42/44 activity, VEGF expression, and neovascularization. The activation of the kinases p38 and p42/44 during the course of neovascularization in our murine scrape model can be attributed to a variety of growth factors that are up-regulated during the course of inflammatory corneal angiogenesis, such as VEGF, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and basic fibroblast growth factor.28,29 We have previously shown that VEGF is up-regulated early in this model with a peak on day 2 after scraping.7 TNF-α is produced by various cells in the inflammatory site30 and induces angiogenic cytokines, including interleukin-8, VEGF, and basic fibroblast growth factor, which are involved in neovascularization.31 These cytokines have been shown to up-regulate p38 and MAPK activity in various settings32,33 and can contribute to the observed activation in our model. Interestingly, activation of the p38 and p42/44 MAPK is shown to up-regulate VEGF, TNF-α, and various proinflammatory cytokines,26 thus creating a positive autoregulatory loop for the sustained increase of these cytokines. In our murine scrape model, activin A is up-regulated during the course of corneal neovascularization. In support, enhanced corneal expression of activin A is observed in various models of corneal wound healing both in vivo and in vitro.34,35 In the cornea, three cell types may produce activin A: resident cells, such as epithelial or stromal cells; infiltrating inflammatory cells; and endothelial cells of newly formed blood vessels. We have recently shown that mRNA for activin A and its receptors (ActR-IA, ActR-IB, and ActR-II) is transcribed in human corneal fibroblasts and regulates the expression of various markers for myofibroblastic differentiation.25 Our in vitro experiments suggest that murine corneal epithelial and endothelial cells are capable of producing activin A (data not shown). Alternatively, activated circulating monocytes and tissue macrophages, as well as bone marrow stromal cells are capable of synthesizing and releasing activin A in response to inflammatory stimuli.36,37 A variety of proinflammatory stimuli, including TNF-α, interleukin-1, or interleukin-6, up-regulate activin A production by endothelial cells, that may be an important source of activin A during systemic inflammation.36 These cytokines are operative in the murine scrape model and can contribute to the increased levels of activin A. Our findings of increased VEGF expression in activin A-treated corneal epithelial cells in vitro, and reduced VEGF expression in scraped murine corneas on inhibition of activin A, support a direct stimulatory effect of activin A on VEGF expression, probably via a MAPK signaling pathway. The type I activin receptors phosphorylate Smad 2 and Smad3, the same signal transduction proteins involved in TGF-β signaling.38 The observation that both activins and inhibins as well as TGF-βs elicit a whole pleotropia of effects but signal through the same signal transduction proteins has been explained by both the existence of co-factors modulating Smads and interactions with other signal transduction pathways. In this respect, there is growing evidence for interaction of the Smad pathway with the p38 kinase pathways, a notion that is supported by the present study.38 Recently, activin A was demonstrated to activate p38 MAPK in T47D breast cancer cells,39 although, contrary to our model, inhibition of p44/42 did not inhibit the anti-proliferative effect of activin A. On the other hand, activin A modulates osteoclast differentiation through both p44/42 and p38 kinases via the Smad2 signaling pathway.40 Some of the downstream events of activin-induced MAPK signal transduction cascade have also been characterized, such as the activation of the transcription factor ATF-241 that creates a positive feedback loop by activating p38.39,42,43 A link between receptors and MEK kinases has been established with the discovery of the MAPK kinase kinase homolog TGF-β activated kinase 1 (TAK-1) that leads to activation of p38 by phosphorylating MEK enzymes.44,45 In TGF-β signaling, TAK-1 interacts with a binding protein (TAK-binding protein 1) and is activated by the hematopoietic progenitor kinase-1 that functions as MAPKKKK.45 Finally, inhibition of activin A binding to its receptor by the inhibitor SB431542 blocks activation of ERK and p38 MAPK in various models.46 Recent studies have suggested a crosstalk between tyrosine kinase receptors, such as basic fibroblast growth factor receptor, and the serine threonine kinases such as activin A receptors, an effect in which MAPK and Smad 2 activation plays a role at an upstream and downstream level, respectively.47,48 Basic fibroblast growth factor is known to be up-regulated in the murine scrape cornea model and can collaborate with activin A on the observed activation of p38 and MAPK and, through them, on VEGF up-regulation. Alternatively, activin A has been shown to stimulate prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane B2, as well as activate the nitric oxide pathway,49 which, as we have previously shown, is central in the adhesion of the leukocytes to the endothelium27,50 and the up-regulation of VEGF. The role of activin A in the regulation of neovascularization is controversial. Many investigators argue in favor of an anti-angiogenic role for activin A, by demonstrating that it can inhibit endothelial cell proliferation51,52 in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo.53 In contrast, activin A and its receptors were detected in the vascular endothelial cells, fibroblast-like cells, and round-shaped macrophage-like cells in preretinal proliferative membranes and seem to be involved in the proliferative membrane formation in both ischemic and nonischemic vitreoretinal proliferative diseases.24 In addition, other TGF-β family members, such as growth and differentiation factor-5, have been shown to induce angiogenesis in the rabbit corneal pocket model.54 We found that inhibition of endogenous activin A decreases VEGF expression and neovascularization in the murine scrape model. This leads to the conclusion that activin A regulates neovascularization by increasing VEGF levels during inflammatory angiogenesis. The angiogenic role of activin A in our model correlates with its established proinflammatory role in several settings. Activin A has been implicated in several immune process.55 Activin A increases on lipopolysaccharide treatment, showing a biphasic response that correlates closely with the biphasic fever response, as well as TNF-α levels in the animals. (KL Jones, JN Brauman, DJ Phillips: personal communication). Activin A has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of localized inflammatory syndromes, specifically inflammatory bowel diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, and gout.7 Activin A was also detected in the mucosa and the submucosa of inflamed intestine, especially fibroblasts and inflammatory cells in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease and its expression is up-regulated by interleukin-1.56 Activin A is also detected in the synovial fluid from patients with rheumatoid arthritis but not osteoarthritis, a noninflammatory degenerative condition.57 An intriguing aspect of activin’s role in inflammatory processes is the dichotomy between pro- and anti-inflammatory actions. This behavior is reminiscent of that of TGF-β, which although mainly anti-inflammatory, does exhibit some proinflammatory aspects.58 It has been suggested that the local tissue concentration of activin A may dictate whether it has a pro- or anti-inflammatory effect.47 This can explain the dichotomy between the pro- and anti-angiogenic role of activin A in different models. In conclusion, we have established an angiogenic role for activin A in our model of inflammatory angiogenesis. We have found that activin A levels increase in our murine scrape model and up-regulate VEGF through p38 and p42/44 MAPK. Inhibition of endogenous activin A decreases VEGF expression and neovascularization. Agents that inhibit activin A may, therefore, become clinically useful for a variety of ocular diseases involving neovascularization, such as wound- and inflammation-related corneal angiogenesis with limbal insufficiency, which is still pharmacologically untreatable. Footnotes Address reprint requests to Antonia M. Joussen, Department of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Center of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, 50931 Köln, Germany. E-mail: joussena/at/aol.com. Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grants DFG Jo-324/4-1 to A.M.J., V.P., and B.K., and DFG Jo-324 6-1 to A.M.J.), the Kämpgen Stiftung Köln (to A.M.J. and B.K.), and the Foundation Fighting Blindness (to V.P.). References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Clin Cancer Res. 1997 Feb; 3(2):265-72.
[Clin Cancer Res. 1997]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Apr 1; 90(7):2690-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993]Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999 Nov; 237(11):920-7.
[Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999]J Biol Chem. 1991 Jun 25; 266(18):11947-54.
[J Biol Chem. 1991]Science. 1983 Feb 25; 219(4587):983-5.
[Science. 1983]Endocr Rev. 1992 Feb; 13(1):18-32.
[Endocr Rev. 1992]Am J Pathol. 2000 Oct; 157(4):1277-81.
[Am J Pathol. 2000]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998 Jan; 39(1):18-22.
[Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998]Recent Prog Horm Res. 1988; 44():1-34.
[Recent Prog Horm Res. 1988]Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1997 Jul; 215(3):209-22.
[Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1997]Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1997 Jul; 215(3):209-22.
[Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1997]Cell. 1992 Jan 10; 68(1):97-108.
[Cell. 1992]Mol Reprod Dev. 1992 Jun; 32(2):99-104.
[Mol Reprod Dev. 1992]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1987 Feb 13; 142(3):1095-103.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1987]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1988 Feb 29; 151(1):230-5.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1988]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998 Jan 26; 242(3):631-5.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998]Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1997 Jul; 215(3):209-22.
[Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1997]Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1992 Oct; 201(1):1-15.
[Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1992]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Jan; 43(1):72-81.
[Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002]J Clin Invest. 2002 Mar; 109(6):805-15.
[J Clin Invest. 2002]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Oct; 42(11):2510-6.
[Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001]J Clin Invest. 2002 Mar; 109(6):805-15.
[J Clin Invest. 2002]Am J Pathol. 2000 Oct; 157(4):1277-81.
[Am J Pathol. 2000]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998 Jan; 39(1):18-22.
[Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998]Am J Pathol. 2000 Oct; 157(4):1277-81.
[Am J Pathol. 2000]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Oct; 42(11):2510-6.
[Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001]Infect Immun. 2000 Oct; 68(10):5991-7.
[Infect Immun. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug; 84(15):5277-81.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987]Am J Pathol. 2000 Oct; 157(4):1277-81.
[Am J Pathol. 2000]Infect Immun. 1990 Aug; 58(8):2429-37.
[Infect Immun. 1990]Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jul; 17(7):4015-23.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1997]Dev Biol. 1996 Feb 1; 173(2):490-8.
[Dev Biol. 1996]FEBS Lett. 1996 Nov 25; 398(1):120-4.
[FEBS Lett. 1996]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Jan; 43(1):72-81.
[Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002]Endocrinology. 2000 May; 141(5):1905-8.
[Endocrinology. 2000]Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001 Jun 30; 180(1-2):155-62.
[Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001]Genes Dev. 2000 Mar 15; 14(6):627-44.
[Genes Dev. 2000]J Biol Chem. 2001 May 25; 276(21):18430-6.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000 Feb 5; 268(1):2-7.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000]J Biol Chem. 1995 Mar 31; 270(13):7420-6.
[J Biol Chem. 1995]J Biol Chem. 2001 May 25; 276(21):18430-6.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]J Biol Chem. 1999 Mar 26; 274(13):8949-57.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Nat Med. 2000 Jul; 6(7):812-5.
[Nat Med. 2000]Genes Dev. 1998 Jun 1; 12(11):1587-92.
[Genes Dev. 1998]Br J Pharmacol. 1999 Jun; 127(4):919-26.
[Br J Pharmacol. 1999]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Oct; 42(11):2510-6.
[Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001]Am J Pathol. 2001 Jan; 158(1):147-52.
[Am J Pathol. 2001]J Biol Chem. 1993 Nov 5; 268(31):23066-71.
[J Biol Chem. 1993]Cancer Res. 2000 Aug 15; 60(16):4596-601.
[Cancer Res. 2000]Anat Histol Embryol. 2000 Oct; 29(5):257-66.
[Anat Histol Embryol. 2000]Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000 May-Jun; 44(3):221-6.
[Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000]Exp Cell Res. 1997 Aug 25; 235(1):218-26.
[Exp Cell Res. 1997]Biochem Pharmacol. 1998 Apr 1; 55(7):953-63.
[Biochem Pharmacol. 1998]Am J Pathol. 2000 Oct; 157(4):1277-81.
[Am J Pathol. 2000]Lab Invest. 1997 Oct; 77(4):311-8.
[Lab Invest. 1997]Clin Exp Immunol. 1998 Apr; 112(1):126-32.
[Clin Exp Immunol. 1998]Annu Rev Immunol. 1998; 16():137-61.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 1998]