![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © American Society for Investigative Pathology Involvement of Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity in Hormone-Induced Mammary Tumor Regression From the Laboratorio de Carcinogénesis Hormonal, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina Accepted July 21, 2005. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Proteolytic activity and remodeling of the extracellular matrix are important players in tumor progression. However, to date the role of the extracellular matrix in tumor regression remains unresolved. To address this, we used a progesterone-dependent in vivo mouse mammary tumor line, C4-HD, which regresses in response to hormone therapy. Within the first 72 hours of treatment, massive apoptosis was accompanied by changes in the staining patterns of laminin and collagens I, III, and IV. We thus hypothesized that an increase in matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity could be involved in this process. This indeed was the case as the activities of MMP-2, -9, and -3 increased in regressing tumors, coinciding with the peak of apoptosis. Moreover, cell-cell interactions were disrupted during early hours of regression with E-cadherin levels reduced and fragmentation products detected during regression. Analysis of β-catenin revealed that although total levels within the tissue did not change, this molecule switched from being involved in cell-cell adhesion in the growing tumor to being expressed in the reactive stroma during regression. Our data provide a novel role for proteolytic activity in tumor regression and question the underlying principle for using MMP inhibitors in cancer treatment. Breast cancer is by far the most frequent cancer in women (22% of all cancers) in industrialized countries1 and is the second leading cause of cancer death.2 With the aim of developing rational treatments, great effort has been focused on studying the mechanisms involved in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. A thorough understanding of the events that lead to tumor regression and its regulation is particularly important given that, once the tumor has disseminated to various body sites, surgery is no longer an option and that current treatments are based on the assumption of inducing tumor shrinkage. The extracellular matrix (ECM) provides information that is essential for embryonic development, morphogenesis, and differentiation of organs and wound healing.3 Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are capable of digesting various components of the ECM and other molecules such as growth factors, cell surface receptors, and cell adhesion molecules and thus play a critical role in the regulation of these physiological processes.4 MMPs have been implicated in tumor progression as playing a key role in invasion and metastasis.5 Analysis of the levels of MMPs in both human and experimental tumors has revealed that they are expressed at elevated levels, and in situ hybridization studies have shown that they are mainly produced by the host stroma and not by cancer cells.6 The generation and analysis of transgenic and knockout mice for both MMPs and TIMPs (tissue inhibitors of MMPs) have revealed that MMPs also play a key role in the process of carcinogenesis.7 All this information has led to the development of synthetic MMP inhibitors that have been tested in several phase I and III clinical trials. The rationale is that if MMPs are involved in tumor growth and invasion, then inhibition of MMP activity should interfere with these processes and thus lead to tumor shrinkage. To date, however, the results have not been promising.8 We have developed a tumor model in which long-term administration of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) to BALB/c mice induces ductal metastatic progestin-dependent mammary gland carcinomas that express high levels of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER, PR).9,10 Because estrogens and anti-progestins induce complete tumor regression,11,12 our model system is very useful for studying not only the biology of hormone-dependent tumor growth but also its remission. The fact that this phenomenon implies a loss of tissue mass in response to a change in signaling led us to hypothesize that mechanisms similar to those implicated in postlactation mammary gland involution could play a role in mammary tumor regression. Involution is a process that involves a high level of tissue remodeling, including an increase in proteolytic activity and induction of massive apoptosis.13,14 These experiments showed that the increase in proteolytic activity in the early hours of involution is responsible for the induction of apoptosis. Furthermore, the loss of contact with the basement membrane has been shown to induce apoptosis,15 a process referred to as anoikis. Although a role for proteolytic activity seems intuitive in any event that leads to tissue remodeling, the association between tumor shrinkage and proteolysis has not been investigated, perhaps because of the current paradigm linking proteolysis to tumor progression. The aim of the present study was to analyze the events that occur at the tissue level in relation to apoptosis, ECM composition, and cell-cell interactions within the first 72 hours of treatment. Our results show a role for proteolytic activity in tumor regression and question the use of MMP inhibitors as a treatment for cancer. Materials and Methods Animals Two-month-old virgin female BALB/c mice (Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental Animal Facility) were used. The animals were housed in groups of four per cage in an air-conditioned room at 20°C ± 2°C under a 12-hour light/dark cycle with access to food and tap water ad libitum. Animal care and manipulation were in agreement with institutional guidelines and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.16 Tumors The progestin-dependent C4-HD tumor line was selected for this study. This tumor line is a mammary ductal carcinoma induced by MPA in BALB/c mice, expresses ER and PR,17 and is maintained by syngeneic transplants in MPA-treated mice. Hormones and Anti-Hormones Used in Treatments MPA (Medrosterona; Gador Laboratories, Buenos Aires, Argentina) was administered subcutaneously as pre-viously described.18 17-β-Estradiol (E2) (Sigma Co., St. Louis, MO) in 5-mg silastic pellets were implanted subcutaneously as previously described.11,19 RU486, or mifepristone, (Sigma Co.) is a type II anti-progestin that forms complexes with PR that bind DNA but are unable to induce transcription. It also has anti-glucocorticoid effects.20 RU486 was administered subcutaneously in daily doses of 6.5 mg/kg body weight in saline as previously described.19 Experimental Design Tumors were transplanted subcutaneously by trocar (1 to 2 mm2) in the right inguinal flank of 10-week-old virgin female BALB/c mice treated with 20 mg of MPA depot. Tumor size was measured every other day with a Vernier caliper (length and width). The treatments were started when the tumors reached a size of 100 to 150 mm2. MPA was removed from selected groups of two to three mice that were subsequently treated with RU486 or E2 or blank silastic pellets for 6 to 7, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Control animals were treated with saline or implanted with blank silastic pellets; no signs of regression were ever detected in control MPA-treated animals. Experiments were performed at least three independent times for each time point. Tumors were collected and cut into pieces to be either quick frozen for immunofluorescence and protein extraction or fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin for histological studies. Morphological Studies and Apoptosis The morphological features of both tumor parenchyma and stroma were evaluated in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides. Apoptosis was assessed as previously described.19 Briefly, apoptosis was counted in 5-μm H&E-stained sections by direct evaluation of 10 high-power fields in at least three independent tumors for each time point. Apoptosis was identified by cell shrinkage and condensation, peripheral clumping or fragmentation of nuclear chromatin, and the presence of apoptotic bodies.21 Apoptosis was expressed as (total number of cells in apoptosis × high-power field)/(total number of cells × high-power field). The TUNEL (terminal dUTP nick-end labeling) technique (Apoptag Plus; Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) was performed to corroborate the morphological studies. Zymography Tumor samples were homogenized on ice in RIPA buffer (50 mmol/L Tris, pH 8.0, containing 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.5% deoxycholate, and 1% Nonidet P-40). The homogenates were centrifuged for 15 minutes at 4°C, and the supernatants were subjected to electrophoresis on gelatin substrate gels [8.8% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide slab gels containing 1 mg/ml of gelatin or 1.6 mg/ml of α-casein (both from Sigma)], as described previously.22,23 Seventy μg of protein were loaded in each well. Subsequently, the gels were treated with 2.5% Triton X-100 for 30 minutes, followed by incubation for 24 hours at 37°C in a buffer containing 100 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 15 mmol/L CaCl2. The gels were stained with Coomassie Blue R-250 and destained with water until clear zones indicative of proteolytic activity emerged against a blue background. Bands were quantified using a densitometer (Molecular Analyst GS 700; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Western Blot Extracts were prepared by homogenizing tumor samples in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4), 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholate, and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate containing protease inhibitors (40 μmol/L phenyl-methyl sulfonyl fluoride, 5 μg/ml leupeptin, 50 μg/ml aprotinin, and 200 μmol/L orthovanadate). Protein concentration was measured using the Lowry method. Samples were mixed with 4× sample buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol and boiled for 2 minutes. Seventy μg of each sample were then separated in 6%, 8%, and 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis mini gels (Bio-Rad) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-ECL; Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). The membranes were blocked overnight in 5% fat-free milk and 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS at 4°C. Primary antibodies were used at a 1:500 dilution in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (PBST) and 2.5% fat-free milk and were incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. After washing with PBST, membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies at a 1:1000 dilution for 1 hour at room temperature. Signals were detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Super Signal; Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). Immunofluorescence Frozen tumor samples were cut using a cryostat to obtain 10- to 12-μm thick sections. They were air-dried and fixed for 20 minutes in 10% formalin in PBS. Subsequently, nonspecific binding sites were blocked by incubation in blocking buffer (PBS containing 2% fetal calf serum) for 1 hour at room temperature. Sections were then treated with primary antibodies dissolved in blocking buffer at a 1:100 dilution overnight at 4°C. After three washes in PBS, sections were incubated with fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:100 dilution) for 1 hour at room temperature in blocking buffer. Slides were then washed with PBS, nuclei were stained with either propidium iodide or 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (Sigma), and slides were mounted with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Sections were analyzed under a Nikon laser confocal microscope. Antibodies The following primary antibodies were used for immunofluorescence studies: rabbit anti-laminin (E.Y. Laboratories, San Mateo, CA; a kind gift of Dr. Mina J. Bissell), rabbit anti-collagen IV (a kind gift of Dr. Mina J. Bissell), goat anti-collagen I (Pierce Biotechnology; a kind gift of Dr. Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff), rabbit anti-E-cadherin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and mouse anti-β-catenin (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA). The following secondary antibodies were used: fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (Zymed, San Francisco, CA), FITC-conjugated rabbit anti-goat (Pierce Biotechnology, a kind gift of Dr. Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff), and FITC-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse (Zymed). In experiments using the mouse anti-β-catenin antibody, tissues were incubated with mouse-on-mouse reagent (M.O.M., Vector Laboratories) to block any endogenous mouse antibodies, as indicated by the manufacturer. For Western blots the following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-E-cadherin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-E-cadherin (BD Biosciences), and mouse anti-β-catenin (Becton-Dickinson Laboratories, Mountain View, CA). Secondary antibodies were peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (Amersham) and rabbit anti-mouse (Amersham). Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed using Graph Pad software. Two-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s post test was applied, with P ≤ 0.05 considered significant. Results Apoptosis and Tissue Remodeling during Mammary Tumor Regression To study the events involved in hormone-dependent mammary tumor regression, we used the hormone-dependent C4-HD tumor model that is composed of roughly rounded cohesive groups of atypical glandular cells that occasionally show signs of tubular differentiation separated by scanty fibroblastic stroma (Figure 1A)
ECM Remodeling and Proteolytic Activity Increase during Mammary Tumor Regression In H&E-stained sections we found a high degree of tissue remodeling during regression. To confirm that ECM components were actually being modified, we analyzed the immunolocalization of the basement membrane components collagen IV and laminin together with the stromal collagens I and III by immunofluorescence. Figure 4
The loss of collagens I and III and the increase in the staining for basement membrane components strongly suggested that myoepithelial cells could be responsible for the fibrotic reaction observed during regression. To investigate if this was indeed the case, we performed staining for K14, a myoepithelial cell marker. Unexpectedly, we found that a subpopulation of cells within the parenchyma of the growing tumor was positive for this cell marker (Figure 5)
The remodeling of basement membrane components (laminin and collagen IV) and the loss of the stromal collagens strongly suggested that proteolytic activity could be up-regulated during the process of tumor regression. To investigate whether this was the case, MMP activity was analyzed by gelatin and casein zymography in tissue extracts of the C4-HD tumor during growth and regression. Gelatin zymography revealed bands corresponding to the previously described molecular weights of mouse mammary gland latent MMP-9 (LMMP-9) as well as active and latent MMP-2 (AMMP-2 and LMMP-2, respectively) (Figure 6A)
Fragmentation and Loss of E-Cadherin during Tumor Regression MMPs do not act only as regulators of ECM integrity but are also key players in modulating cell behavior. In particular MMP-2 and MMP-3 are capable of cleaving E-cadherin, thus affecting cell-cell interactions.24 Because the C4-HD tumor expresses E-cadherin in the epithelial compartment, we investigated whether this molecule was lost or fragmented during regression. Figure 7
β-Catenin Is Involved in the Stromal Reaction that Accompanies Tumor Regression Given the loss observed in E-cadherin during tumor regression, we next investigated the immunolocalization of β-catenin. As expected, in the growing tumor β-catenin was localized to the cell membrane in the epithelial compartment (Figure 9A)
Discussion The goal of the present study was to define the events involved in the early hours of mammary tumor regression related to changes in the ECM, proteolytic activity, and cell-cell interactions. Our study is the first, to our knowledge, to show that during tumor regression the increase in cell death is accompanied by an increase in proteolytic activity and ECM remodeling. Moreover, the fragmentation and loss of E-cadherin strongly suggest that the increase in proteolytic activity could be responsible not only for altering cell-matrix interactions but also cell-cell adhesion. Both events could thus lead to apoptosis and loss of tumor mass. Proteolytic activity has traditionally been linked to tumor progression and invasion in cancer biology. However, the concept that tumor shrinkage is associated with an increase in proteolytic activity is not surprising considering that proteolysis has already been shown to play a role in mammary gland involution, a process in which apoptosis is followed by a loss of tissue mass. Our work does not contradict previous findings but rather questions the rationale for the development of MMP inhibitors with the aim of reducing tumor burden. We had previously shown that hormone-induced regression is characterized by an increase in apoptosis.19 Likewise, analysis of the C4-HD tumors revealed that as early as 6 hours there was a statistically significant increase in the percentage of apoptotic cells. The highest levels of apoptosis were detected at 48 hours for all treatments, with values ranging ~90% for the RU486-treated group and 70% for the −MPA- and E2-treated groups. This phenomenon was characterized by evident changes in the stromal compartment in the form of fibrosis, which has previously been shown in experimental and human tumors to accompany reductions in tumor size.19,25 The results concerning the changes in the stromal compartment prompted us to analyze the composition of the ECM in samples derived from untreated and treated mice. We found that laminin and collagen IV had a thick basement membrane-like distribution in the growing tumors, localized to the stromal-cancer epithelial interface, as previously shown by others for laminin-1 in human breast tumors.26 On 72 hours of treatment, this organization was completely lost, and a disorganized lattice of laminin and collagen IV now covered the tissue sections. On the other hand, the stromal collagens I and III were less abundant in the growing tumor, and the staining for both was lost on regression. This result was puzzling given that we expected to find similarities with the process of wound healing, during which fibrosis is characterized by deposition of the stromal collagens I and III.27 The finding that collagen IV and laminin were very abundant in the samples derived from treated mice raised the issue of the lineage of the tumor and stromal cells. Basement membrane components such as collagen IV and laminin are indicative of the presence of myoepithelial cells in the mouse mammary gland.28 We thus performed stainings to pankeratins, K14, α-smooth muscle actin, and vimentin. In the epithelial compartment of the growing tumor, there was a subpopulation of K14-positive cells that were α-smooth muscle actin-negative, thus ruling out a myoepithelial identity. The fibroblastic cells were positive for vimentin and α-smooth muscle actin in both growing and regressing tissues. We do not know the origin of these fibroblastic cells or whether they were truly responsible for the synthesis and deposition of the basement membrane components. Future studies aimed at establishing their molecular identity may answer if they have originated within the tumor or in the bone marrow. The discovery that most epithelial cells present in the 72-hour-treated samples were K14-positive suggests that this particular cell population may be more resistant to apoptosis. The finding that there is a change in the organization of the basement membrane during regression strongly supported the involvement of proteolytic activity in the process of tumor regression. Deposition of ECM components does not require proteolytic activity, but the change in their arrangement does because three-dimensional structures must be replaced. Accordingly, during regression there was an increase in the levels of LMMP-9, LMMP-2, and AMMP-2 and latent stromelysin-1. Our findings show that in our model system tumor regression is reminiscent of mammary gland lactational involution. MMPs have been shown to be up-regulated during postlactational involution and to play a key role in the process of apoptosis that enables the shrinkage of the tissue and the re-establishment of the nonlactating mammary structure.13,14 The finding that certain groups of apoptotic cells localized adjacent to the basement membrane-like structures in the tumor as regression progressed strongly suggested an important role for anoikis in the response of the tumor to the hormone treatment. We believe that in this tumor model in particular, the primary target of the treatments is the epithelium, given that the malignant cells express ER and PR.17 However, a secondary stromal reaction as a consequence of epithelial-stromal interactions may determine the effectiveness of the hormone therapy. The peak in apoptosis for all three treatments coincided with the time point at which MMP activity raised significantly from controls. The fact that apoptosis levels began to increase significantly from controls before the rise in proteolytic activity may suggest two phases of apoptosis: one early and independent of proteolytic activity and a second phase that is dependent on proteolysis, as has been shown for mammary gland involution.14 In view of our results, and given the fact that to date clinical trials using synthetic MMP inhibitors have failed,8 we believe that proteolytic activity may have a key role in tumor shrinkage just as in tumor development. We are currently performing experiments to test whether the inhibition of MMP activity hampers tumor regression in our model system. If our hypothesis is correct, it would give a rational explanation to the lack of positive results in the clinic. MMPs have been previously shown to affect cell-cell interactions by degrading E-cadherin;24 we thus investigated whether this molecule was degraded during regression. As identified by an antibody recognizing the extracellular domain, E-cadherin was practically lost by 72 hours of treatment in our model. This correlated with a steady increase of lower molecular weight isoforms of the protein, a phenomenon that could be the result of cleavage by proteolytic activity or alterations in the synthesis and/or processing of the molecule, as has been previously described for prostate cancer epithelial cells.29,30 Rios-Doria and colleagues31 reported cleavage of the 35-kd intracellular β-catenin binding site of E-cadherin in the early hours of involution, which was actually performed by calpain. Using the same antibody we used in our studies, they showed that the 35-kd fragment increased as involution progressed. We believe that tumor regression and mammary gland involution, although mechanistically different, lead to a loss of function of E-cadherin that could be responsible not only for affecting tissue structure but also for induction of apoptosis, as shown in other model systems.32 Having found that E-cadherin levels were radically diminished during regression, we expected to find a loss of β-catenin as well. This, however, was not the case. A closer analysis revealed that although the epithelial compartment of the tumor was lost during regression and β-catenin was no longer localized at sites of epithelial cell-cell junctions, there was a dramatic increase in the expression of this molecule in the stromal cells. Thus, our results suggest that β-catenin could have a role in the stromal reaction that accompanies loss of the epithelial compartment of the tumor. This is further supported by the fact that β-catenin has been found by others to play a key role in the proliferative phase of wound healing.33 Cheon and collaborators33 further showed that the overexpression of β-catenin in mesenchymal cells leads to aggressive fibromatoses and hyperplastic cutaneous wounds. The cytoplasmatic accumulation of β-catenin in the stromal cells during regression could reflect a positive regulation of Wnt expression in the tissue, as has been shown for Wnt 4 in early wound healing.34 Alternatively, other factors involved in the early hours of regression could be involved in the stabilization of β-catenin. Either way, we hypothesize that, like during wound healing, the early phases of tumor regression may be characterized by an increase in Tcf-dependent transcription that likely regulates the expression of genes important in the remodeling phase described in this article. It is interesting to point out that, although the results concerning ECM composition during regression seemed to imply a mechanism different to the one described for wound healing, our findings regarding β-catenin suggest that there could be similarities in the signaling pathways responsible for the stromal reaction. Finally, all three treatments yielded similar results concerning proteolytic activity, ECM composition, and cell-cell interactions. The groups treated by only removing MPA usually took more time to regress completely. This coincided with the fact that the induction of apoptosis in this group was statistically different from the controls at 12 hours and the RU486 and E2 groups, which showed differences as early as 6 hours. We have not yet analyzed the signaling pathways in this particular tumor in response to these three treatments, but we suspect that RU486 and E2 additionally block the PR signaling pathway. This pathway may not be completely shut down by only removing MPA, because the mice we work with are not ovariectomized and thus endogenous levels of progesterone persist. Our results show a novel role for proteolytic activity in tumor regression in an in vivo model of mouse mammary cancer. We believe that the changes observed in the ECM and in the stromal cells themselves are as important to tumor shrinkage as the death of the neoplastic cells. Moreover, they suggest that stromal-epithelial interactions are key to the outcome of tumor therapy, raising doubts as to the use of MMP inhibitors for the treatment of cancer. Acknowledgments We thank Julieta Bolado for technical support and Gador Laboratories for providing MPA. Footnotes Address reprint requests to Marina Simian, Research Area, Instituto de Oncología Angel Roffo, Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: marina.simian/at/galuzzi.com. Supported by grants from Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología (BID1201/OC-AR, PICT 02 05 12276) and by the Sales Foundation. M.S. is a postdoctoral fellow of Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; A.M. is associate researcher at IBYME-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Fundación Sales; and C.L. is a member of the Research Career, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Current address of M.S.: Research Area, Instituto de Oncología Angel Roffo, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Current address of A.M.: Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-4340. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Oncogene. 2004 Aug 23; 23(38):6329-40.
[Oncogene. 2004]Environ Mol Mutagen. 2002; 39(2-3):82-8.
[Environ Mol Mutagen. 2002]Cell. 1997 Nov 14; 91(4):439-42.
[Cell. 1997]Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001; 17():463-516.
[Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001]Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Mar; 2(3):161-74.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2002]Nature. 2001 May 17; 411(6835):375-9.
[Nature. 2001]Cell. 2000 Oct 27; 103(3):481-90.
[Cell. 2000]Cancer Lett. 1986 Nov; 33(2):215-23.
[Cancer Lett. 1986]J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987 Dec; 79(6):1341-50.
[J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987]Int J Cancer. 1991 Dec 2; 49(6):900-5.
[Int J Cancer. 1991]Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999 Mar; 54(2):93-9.
[Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999]J Cell Biol. 1992 Sep; 118(5):1271-82.
[J Cell Biol. 1992]Cancer Res. 2001 Jan 1; 61(1):293-302.
[Cancer Res. 2001]Medicina (B Aires). 1997; 57 Suppl 2():55-69.
[Medicina (B Aires). 1997]Int J Cancer. 1991 Dec 2; 49(6):900-5.
[Int J Cancer. 1991]Carcinogenesis. 2002 May; 23(5):749-58.
[Carcinogenesis. 2002]Carcinogenesis. 2002 May; 23(5):749-58.
[Carcinogenesis. 2002]Carcinogenesis. 2002 May; 23(5):749-58.
[Carcinogenesis. 2002]Br J Cancer. 1972 Aug; 26(4):239-57.
[Br J Cancer. 1972]Development. 1991 Jun; 112(2):439-49.
[Development. 1991]Development. 2001 Aug; 128(16):3117-31.
[Development. 2001]Development. 1991 Jun; 112(2):439-49.
[Development. 1991]Development. 2001 Aug; 128(16):3117-31.
[Development. 2001]J Cell Biol. 1997 Dec 29; 139(7):1861-72.
[J Cell Biol. 1997]Carcinogenesis. 2002 May; 23(5):749-58.
[Carcinogenesis. 2002]Carcinogenesis. 2002 May; 23(5):749-58.
[Carcinogenesis. 2002]Eur J Cancer. 2003 Mar; 39(4):462-8.
[Eur J Cancer. 2003]J Cell Sci. 2002 Jan 1; 115(Pt 1):39-50.
[J Cell Sci. 2002]Laryngorhinootologie. 2003 Jan; 82(1):31-5.
[Laryngorhinootologie. 2003]Am J Pathol. 2003 Feb; 162(2):391-402.
[Am J Pathol. 2003]J Cell Biol. 1992 Sep; 118(5):1271-82.
[J Cell Biol. 1992]Development. 1996 Jan; 122(1):181-93.
[Development. 1996]Cancer Res. 2001 Jan 1; 61(1):293-302.
[Cancer Res. 2001]Development. 1996 Jan; 122(1):181-93.
[Development. 1996]Science. 2002 Mar 29; 295(5564):2387-92.
[Science. 2002]J Cell Biol. 1997 Dec 29; 139(7):1861-72.
[J Cell Biol. 1997]Cancer Res. 2001 Jan 15; 61(2):489-92.
[Cancer Res. 2001]Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Dec 15; 9(17):6447-52.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2003 Jan 10; 278(2):1372-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]J Biol Chem. 1999 Apr 2; 274(14):9656-64.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Exp Cell Res. 2004 Feb 15; 293(2):267-74.
[Exp Cell Res. 2004]Wound Repair Regen. 1998 Jan-Feb; 6(1):58-64.
[Wound Repair Regen. 1998]Exp Cell Res. 2004 Feb 15; 293(2):267-74.
[Exp Cell Res. 2004]