• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of envhperEnvironmental Health PerspectivesBrowse ArticlesAbout EHPGeneral InformationAuthorsMediaProgramsPartnerships
Environ Health Perspect. Dec 1999; 107(Suppl 6): 879–883.
PMCID: PMC1566203
Research Article

Estimating lung cancer risk with exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Abstract

Estimates of lung cancer in nonsmokers due to exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in the workplace or in the home may be developed in several ways. Estimates may be based on (italic)a(/italic)) models developed using the full range of data in smokers; (italic)b(/italic)) models developed using data restricted to smokers with a low smoking rate, for example, (3/4) 10 cigarettes per day; (italic)c(/italic)) models developed using data from studies of residential exposure to ETS of nonsmokers, with exposures based on smoking rates of spouses; and (italic)d(/italic)) models using data from studies of occupational exposure to ETS of nonsmokers. Methods (italic)a(/italic) and (italic)b(/italic) require an estimate of cigarette equivalent exposure for ETS as well as assumptions on the cigarette equivalent dose to target cells from ETS and on the comparability of lung cancer risk per unit dose from smokers and nonsmokers. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from ETS studies of nonsmokers with exposures based on smoking patterns of spouses are 1.24 (1.1, 1.4) for females and 1.34 (1.0, 1.8) for males, whereas the RR estimate for occupational ETS exposure and its 95% CI is 1.39 (1.2, 1.7). Using RR estimates for ETS exposure, cigarette equivalents for ETS range from 0.1 to 1.0, based on a range of descriptive and biologically motivated models in active smokers; a cigarette equivalent is 0.2 based on a comparison of log-linear trends in RR with number of cigarettes smoked per day in active smokers and in spouses of nonsmokers.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.2M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Moolgavkar SH, Dewanji A, Venzon DJ. A stochastic two-stage model for cancer risk assessment. I. The hazard function and the probability of tumor. Risk Anal. 1988 Sep;8(3):383–392. [PubMed]
  • Puntoni R, Toninelli F, Zhankui L, Bonassi S. Mathematical modelling in risk/exposure assessment of tobacco related lung cancer. Carcinogenesis. 1995 Jul;16(7):1465–1471. [PubMed]
  • Saracci R, Riboli E. Passive smoking and lung cancer: current evidence and ongoing studies at the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Mutat Res. 1989 Feb;222(2):117–127. [PubMed]
  • Hackshaw AK, Law MR, Wald NJ. The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke. BMJ. 1997 Oct 18;315(7114):980–988. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wells AJ. Lung cancer from passive smoking at work. Am J Public Health. 1998 Jul;88(7):1025–1029. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Galbraith RF. A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. Stat Med. 1988 Aug;7(8):889–894. [PubMed]
  • Biggerstaff BJ, Tweedie RL, Mengersen KL. Passive smoking in the workplace: classical and Bayesian meta-analyses. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1994;66(4):269–277. [PubMed]
  • LeVois ME, Layard MW. Inconsistency between workplace and spousal studies of environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1994 Jun;19(3):309–316. [PubMed]
  • Tweedie RL, Mengersen KL. Meta-analytic approaches to dose-response relationships, with application in studies of lung cancer and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Stat Med. 14(5-7):545–569. [PubMed]
  • Chappell WR, Gratt LB. A graphical method for pooling epidemiological studies. Am J Public Health. 1996 May;86(5):748–750. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Doll R, Peto R. Cigarette smoking and bronchial carcinoma: dose and time relationships among regular smokers and lifelong non-smokers. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1978 Dec;32(4):303–313. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Day NE, Brown CC. Multistage models and primary prevention of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980 Apr;64(4):977–989. [PubMed]
  • Darby SC, Pike MC. Lung cancer and passive smoking: predicted effects from a mathematical model for cigarette smoking and lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 1988 Dec;58(6):825–831. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Brown CC, Chu KC. Use of multistage models to infer stage affected by carcinogenic exposure: example of lung cancer and cigarette smoking. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40 (Suppl 2):171S–179S. [PubMed]
  • Moolgavkar SH, Dewanji A, Luebeck G. Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: reanalysis of the British doctors' data. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Mar 15;81(6):415–420. [PubMed]
  • Whittemore AS. Effect of cigarette smoking in epidemiological studies of lung cancer. Stat Med. 1988 Jan-Feb;7(1-2):223–238. [PubMed]
  • Moolgavkar SH, Luebeck EG, Krewski D, Zielinski JM. Radon, cigarette smoke, and lung cancer: a re-analysis of the Colorado Plateau uranium miners' data. Epidemiology. 1993 May;4(3):204–217. [PubMed]
  • Hammond EC, Seidman H. Smoking and cancer in the United States. Prev Med. 1980 Mar;9(2):169–174. [PubMed]
  • Doll R, Peto R. Mortality in relation to smoking: 20 years' observations on male British doctors. Br Med J. 1976 Dec 25;2(6051):1525–1536. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rogot E, Murray JL. Smoking and causes of death among U.S. veterans: 16 years of observation. Public Health Rep. 1980 May-Jun;95(3):213–222. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lubin JH, Blot WJ, Berrino F, Flamant R, Gillis CR, Kunze M, Schmahl D, Visco G. Patterns of lung cancer risk according to type of cigarette smoked. Int J Cancer. 1984 May 15;33(5):569–576. [PubMed]
  • Joly OG, Lubin JH, Caraballoso M. Dark tobacco and lung cancer in Cuba. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983 Jun;70(6):1033–1039. [PubMed]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Science

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links