Logo of genbioBioMed CentralBiomed Central Web Sitesearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleGenome BiologyJournal Front Page
Genome Biol. 2003; 4(5): 402.
Published online 2003 Apr 28. doi:  10.1186/gb-2003-4-5-402
PMCID: PMC156585

Beyond 100 genomes

Short abstract

By the end of 2002, we witnessed the landmark submission of the 100th complete genome sequence in the databases. An overview of these genomes reveals certain interesting trends and provides valuable insights into possible future developments.

Since the publication of the first entire genome sequence seven years ago [1], a multitude of other genomes have been - or are in the process of being - sequenced [2]. By the end of 2002, we witnessed the landmark submission of the 100th complete genome sequence in the databases [3]. There are now 106 complete genomes in the public domain, thanks to advances in sequencing technology and sustained funding. An overview, and in particular the rank ordering, of these genomes reveals certain interesting trends and provides valuable insights into possible future developments.

First, the contribution of genome sequencing projects in terms of actual protein sequence entries has been staggering. There are 433,238 protein sequences derived exclusively from entire genomes [4] (Figure (Figure1),1), out of a total of a million protein sequences known to date. In contrast, there are only 101,602 entries in Swiss-Prot (release 40), underlining the significant effort that is required for high-quality annotation [5]. The growth of protein sequence data coming from entire genomes is expected to reach over 1 million entries in two years' time (Figure (Figure1).1). Given that approximately 40% of genes in any organism cannot be assigned a specific functional role [6], this suggests that in just a few years hundreds of thousands of sequences will be uncharacterized. While the large-scale characterization of protein function obtained from high-throughput experimental techniques [7] will alleviate some of the above problems, it is clear that to capitalize on the information explosion in genome biology, more research should also be devoted to the development of intelligent automated genome-annotation systems that are able to predict functional properties of protein sequences [8].

Figure 1
Cumulative number of protein sequence entries (y-axis) in completed genomes (CoGenT, in blue) and Swiss-Prot (in red) as a function of time (x-axis).

Second, in addition to the well-defined collection of 106 completed and published genomes, there are another 544 ongoing projects, covering a large number of taxa. Yet, the known taxa of Bacteria and Archaea are far better represented among the completed genome projects compared to the Eukarya (Figure (Figure2).2). Using comparative genomics we have already obtained a glimpse of the bewildering biological diversity of the prokaryotic world [9]. Very soon, a similar trend might emerge for the Eukarya: 208 out of the 544 ongoing genome projects are dedicated to eukaryotic species. However, many eukaryotic taxa are still not represented (Figure (Figure2).2). A better sampling of phylogenetic diversity might be required, to fully explore the genomes of eukaryotic cells.

Figure 2
Phylogenetic distribution of genome sequencing projects. Archaea and Bacteria are shown to the phylum level and Eukarya to their first taxonomic branching, with the exception of Metazoa and Fungi. The numbers in parentheses represent the number of completed, ...

Third, over time, both the range of sequenced genome sizes and the selection of species on the basis of their social impact has expanded [10] (Figure (Figure3).3). Sequenced genome sizes range from 0.5 to 300 Megabases (Mb), with the exception of the human and mouse genomes, which span 2,900 and 2,500 Mb respectively (and together constitute almost 90% of the data in the 106 available DNA sequences). Although species of medical and academic interest were initially the main targets of genome projects, there has been a recent trend to sequence genomes from species with impact on agriculture, environmental sciences or industrial processes. In addition, a growing number of genomes are being sequenced in order to provide a better perspective for the structure and function of evolutionarily related genes and genomes through comparative analysis.

Figure 3
Representation of completed genome sequences over time (x-axis) and size (y-axis, in Mb, logarithmic scale) labeled according to their social impact. Genomes from Archaea (squares), Bacteria (circles) and Eukarya (triangles) are colored according to their ...

Thus, 10 years after the computational analysis of the first eukaryotic chromosome [11] and seven years after an exhaustive analysis of the first complete genome [1,12], genomic science has become a stand-alone discipline, and genome sequencing and computational analysis have become mutually dependent, intertwined in a fascinating interplay. Not so long ago it would have been unthinkable that from a set of DNA fragments, it would be possible to assemble a single genome, find the genes, translate them into proteins, identify their potential functional roles and ultimately integrate all this structural and functional information into complex biochemical networks [13]. Although there are still significant challenges, these technologies, along with scientific advances, have now come of age and are expected to have a growing impact on various aspects of human welfare.


  • Fleischmann RD, Adams MD, White O, Clayton RA, Kirkness EF, Kerlavage AR, Bult CJ, Tomb JF, Dougherty BA, Merrick JM, et al. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science. 1995;269:496–512. [PubMed]
  • Nelson KE, Paulsen IT, Heidelberg JF, Fraser CM. Status of genome projects for nonpathogenic bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18:1049–1054. doi: 10.1038/80235. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Akman L, Yamashita A, Wataname HOK, Shiba T, Hattori M, Aksoy S. Genome sequence of the endocellular obligate symbiont of tsetse flies, Wigglesworthia glossinidia. Nat Genet. 2002;32:402–407. doi: 10.1038/ng986. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Complete Genome Tracking Database. http://maine.ebi.ac.uk:8000/services/cogent
  • Bairoch A, Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:45–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Iliopoulos I, Tsoka S, Andrade MA, Janssen P, Audit B, Tramontano A, Valencia A, Leroy C, Sander C, Ouzounis CA. Genome sequences and great expectations. Genome Biol. 2000;2:interactions0001.1–0001.3. doi: 10.1186/gb-2000-2-1-interactions0001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Martzen MR, McCraith SM, Spinelli SL, Torres FM, Fields S, Grayhack EJ, Phizicky EM. A biochemical genomics approach for identifying genes by the activity of their products. Science. 1999;286:1153–1155. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5442.1153. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Andrade MA, Brown NP, Leroy C, Hoersch S, de Daruvar A, Reich C, Franchini A, Tamames J, Valencia A, Ouzounis C, Sander C. Automated genome sequence analysis and annotation. Bioinformatics. 1999;15:391–412. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.5.391. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Torsvik V, Ovreas L, Thingstad TF. Prokaryotic diversity - magnitude, dynamics, and controlling factors. Science. 2002;296:1064–1066. doi: 10.1126/science.1071698. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Doolittle RF. Biodiversity: microbial genomes multiply. Nature. 2002;416:697–700. doi: 10.1038/416697a. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bork P, Ouzounis C, Sander C, Scharf M, Schneider R, Sonnhammer E. What's in a genome? Nature. 1992;358:287. [PubMed]
  • Casari G, Andrade MA, Bork P, Boyle J, Daruvar A, Ouzounis C, Schneider R, Tamames J, Valencia A, Sander C. Challenging times for bioinformatics. Nature. 1995;376:647–648. [PubMed]
  • Eisenberg D, Marcotte EM, Xenarios I, Yeates TO. Protein function in the post-genomic era. Nature. 2000;405:823–826. doi: 10.1038/35015694. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bernal A, Ear U, Kyrpides N. Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD): a monitor of genome projects world-wide. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:126–127. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.1.126. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Genome Biology are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central
PubReader format: click here to try


Save items

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem chemical substance records that cite the current articles. These references are taken from those provided on submitted PubChem chemical substance records.

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...