 |  |
Formats: |
||||
Copyright © 2003 BioMed Central Ltd Expression profiling of plant development Giovanni Mele1 and Sarah Hake  11Plant Gene Expression Center, USDA-ARS, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94710, USA Correspondence: Sarah Hake. E-mail: maizesh@nature.berkeley.edu Corresponding author.Sarah Hake: maizesh/at/nature.berkeley.edu Abstract Microarrays have been used to study the response of plants to many signals, including light, hormones and transcription factors. The results in each case can give an overall view of the global response to the signal or identify direct targets of the signal, and can reveal new links between different signaling pathways. Gene expression is central to the regulatory mechanisms that cells use to respond to internal and external stimuli. Although the final activity of a particular gene is determined by the encoded protein, measurements of RNA levels have proven to be valuable in identifying the molecular changes that occur in cells. The availability of complete genome sequences and large sets of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) has triggered development of efficient methods of RNA detection that allow large-scale analysis of genetic variation and profiling of many genes. These technologies are based on sequence, amplified fragments or hybridization. Microarray technology, on which this article focuses, is hybridization-based and permits large-scale and genome-wide analysis of gene expression from multiple samples. There are two fundamentally different microarray technologies: cDNA microarrays, which consist of a collection of amplified cDNA fragments spotted or printed on a solid surface, and oligonucleotide microarrays, such as the widely-used GeneChips produced by Affymetrix [1], in which gene-specific oligonucleotides are synthesized directly onto a glass surface by photolithography. The most common current application of microarrays is gene-expression analysis, helping to assign new functions to known genes and identify putative functions for unknown genes on the basis of the similarity of their expression profiles to those of known genes. Microarray technology has been widely used to understand the roles of regulators of plant development, such as light, hormones, and transcription factors. Responses to light Light is one of the most important environmental signals regulating the growth and developmental programs of plants, and the global response of the genome to light has been studied in Arabidopsis [2]. The ability of plants to respond to light is achieved through a network of photoreceptors, which convert the light signal into changes in gene expression. In Arabidopsis, two classes of photoreceptors are known: the red/far-red receptors, phytochromes A to E; and the blue-light receptors, CRY1, CRY2 and NPH1. The phytochromes are the best characterized of the photoreceptors [3]. The diverse responses to light depend on interactions between the phytochromes and the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors such as PIF3 [4,5]. Genome-wide gene-expression profiles of signal transduction in Arabidopsis development in response to light [2] suggest that the process involves changes in the expression of up to 30% of the genes in the genome. This massive change is probably the result of activation of a transcriptional cascade [6]. The large number of genes involved in light signal transduction reveals the complexity of the genomic response to one of the most important developmental regulators. Hormone responses Brassinosteroids comprise a well-studied class of hormones essential for plant growth and development. Microarray analysis comparing the brassinosteroid-deficient mutant det2 with wild-type Arabidopsis [7] revealed not only a tight connection between the response to brassinosteroids and the regulation of cell-wall organization but also a possible connection between the responses to brassinosteroids and to light. Although the interaction between the hormone-signaling and the light-signaling pathways has been studied extensively [8,9], the molecular mechanisms that connect the pathways remain unclear. Global expression analysis of the det2 mutant [7] demonstrated that brassinosteroids down-regulate the helix-loop-helix transcription factor PIF3, which is known to function at the beginning of the light-signaling pathway. PIF3 is localized in the nucleus and interacts with active phytochromes [5,10,11]. In addition, the expression of a large number of early auxin-inducible genes was altered in det2 mutants, showing that there is a marked overlap between the brassinosteroid and auxin-signaling pathways. In conclusion, the study of det2 and wild-type responses to signals [7] provides a global view of the effect of brassinosteroids on plants, demonstrating a connection between the brassinosteroid and auxin-signaling pathways and suggesting that brassinosteroids could modulate light signaling through PIF3 to affect plant development. The hormone auxin has profound effects on plant development; it governs cell division, expansion and differentiation. But the molecular mechanisms underlying these processes are still largely unknown. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of auxin responses, several studies have described the global effects on gene expression induced by auxin [12,13]. The shy gene is a member of the auxin-induced Aux/IAA family and has a central role in the auxin-signaling pathway [2]. Studies on wild-type and shy2 mutant Arabidopsis seedlings treated with auxin for 6 hours [12] identified a set of auxin-regulated genes and provided a global picture of the changes in gene expression in the shy2 mutant. Other studies on the response to auxin [13] have focused on the early changes in gene expression induced by the hormone. After 15 minutes of auxin treatment, microarray analysis revealed only 30 genes that were differentially expressed compared with untreated plants; among these were a large number of transcription factors of several types, suggesting that auxin signals are mediated by a diverse set of transcriptional regulators [13]. Studies of transcription factors Microarrays have also been used to identify genes specific to reproductive organs and to discover new genes involved in floral development [14,15]. Endo and colleagues [15] identified groups of genes with similar behavior during anther and pistil development in Lotus japonicus. Although most of the genes detected were known to be involved in floral development, some potentially novel floral-development genes were also identified. In addition, it was possible to identify genes involved in the early and late events of anther and pistil development from their patterns of expression. Genetic and molecular studies of floral homeotic mutants, in which one type of floral organ is transformed into another, have led to the identification of several genes that specify floral organ identity. These genes act in a combinatorial manner in overlapping domains to regulate the specification of organ identity in the flower. The analysis of changes in gene expression induced by two Arabidopsis genes encoding homeotic transcription factors involved in floral development, APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), confirmed the complexity of the processes of stamen and petal formation [15]. Only a small number of transcription factors were recovered in this experiment, suggesting that AP3 and PI act quite directly in regulating the basic cellular functions required for morphogenesis. Our group has applied microarray technology to understanding the changes in gene expression induced by transcription factors that are expressed in apical meristems, the multipotent tissues that give rise to shoots, leaves and other plant organs. Members of the KNOX family of transcription factors have important roles in plant development; they affect meristem maintenance and cell differentiation [16]. Our oligonucleotide microarray study comparing wild-type Arabidopsis plants with those lacking the BREVIPEDECELLUS (BP) gene - one of the seven Arabidopsis KNOX genes - revealed changes in gene expression of a relatively small number of genes, a large proportion of which are involved in the lignin biosynthetic pathway (G.M., N. Ori, Y. Sato and S.H., unpublished work). The possible link between BP and lignin synthesis was confirmed by the discovery of premature lignin deposition in bp mutants and decreased lignin in plants overexpressing transgenic BP. This study demonstrates how microarray analysis of gene-expression profiles permits the identification of a transcription factor's influence on metabolic pathways. In conclusion, microarray technology provides a powerful tool for functional genomics and is being widely used to shed light on global changes in gene expression. By clustering genes according to their expression profile, it is possible to assign functions to genes with unknown function and at the same time to assign new functions to known genes. As increasing numbers of microarray experiments are completed, the collections of data retrieved from different analyses will contribute to the resolution of the complex relationships between the numerous signaling pathways that operate in plant growth and development. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||
Plant Cell. 2001 Dec; 13(12):2589-607.
[Plant Cell. 2001]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2002 Apr; 14(2):180-8.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2002]Cell. 1998 Nov 25; 95(5):657-67.
[Cell. 1998]Nature. 1999 Aug 19; 400(6746):781-4.
[Nature. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 31; 98(16):9437-42.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Plant Physiol. 2002 Nov; 130(3):1319-34.
[Plant Physiol. 2002]Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997; 13():203-29.
[Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997]Nature. 1999 Aug 19; 400(6746):781-4.
[Nature. 1999]Genes Dev. 2000 Sep 15; 14(18):2377-91.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Nov 21; 97(24):13419-24.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]Plant Cell. 2002 Feb; 14(2):301-19.
[Plant Cell. 2002]Plant J. 2002 Dec; 32(6):1011-22.
[Plant J. 2002]Plant Cell. 2001 Dec; 13(12):2589-607.
[Plant Cell. 2001]Plant J. 2002 Dec; 32(6):1011-22.
[Plant J. 2002]FEBS Lett. 2002 Mar 13; 514(2-3):229-37.
[FEBS Lett. 2002]Plant Cell. 2003 Jan; 15(1):207-22.
[Plant Cell. 2003]Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Jan; 42(1):151-66.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2000]