![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Hand and Wrist: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Sensorimotor Changes 1 Associate Professor, Physical Therapy Department, College of Health Professions, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. 2 Associate Professor, Physical Therapy Department, College of Health Professions and Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. 3 Assistant Professor, Physical Therapy Department College of Health Professions and Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. Address correspondence to Dr Ann E. Barr, Physical Therapy Department, College of Health Professions, Temple University, 3307 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140. E-mail: aebarr/at/temple.edu See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.Abstract The purpose of this commentary is to present recent epidemiological findings regarding work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) of the hand and wrist, and to summarize experimental evidence of underlying tissue pathophysiology and sensorimotor changes in WMSDs. Sixty-five percent of the 333 800 newly reported cases of occupational illness in 2001 were attributed to repeated trauma. WMSDs of the hand and wrist are associated with the longest absences from work and are, therefore, associated with greater lost productivity and wages than those of other anatomical regions. Selected epidemiological studies of hand/wrist WMSDs published since 1998 are reviewed and summarized. Results from selected animal studies concerning underlying tissue pathophysiology in response to repetitive movement or tissue loading are reviewed and summarized. To the extent possible, corroborating evidence in human studies for various tissue pathomechanisms suggested in animal models is presented. Repetitive, hand-intensive movements, alone or in combination with other physical, nonphysical, and nonoccupational risk factors, contribute to the development of hand/wrist WMSDs. Possible pathophysiological mechanisms of tissue injury include inflammation followed by repair and/or fibrotic scarring, peripheral nerve injury, and central nervous system reorganization. Clinicians should consider all of these pathomechanisms when examining and treating patients with hand/wrist WMSDs. Keywords: carpal tunnel syndrome, hand/wrist tendinitis, inflammation, neuroplasticity, repetitive-motion injury The US Department of Labor20 defines work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) as injuries or disorders of the muscles, nerves, tendons, joints, cartilage, and spinal discs associated with exposure to risk factors in the workplace. WMSDs do not include disorders caused by slips, trips, falls, motor vehicle accidents, or similar accidents.20 Sixty-five percent of the 333 800 newly reported cases of occupational illness in 2001 were attributed to repeated trauma.21 WMSDs account for approximately one third of all lost workday illnesses.20 WMSDs of the hand and wrist are associated with the longest absences from work20 and are, therefore, associated with greater lost productivity and wages than those of other anatomical regions. Epidemiological research associates the onset and severity of hand and wrist WMSDs with the performance of repetitive and forceful hand-intensive tasks.17,81,116 These disorders are worsened by the performance of such tasks in the presence of awkward or extreme wrist and forearm postures, cold temperatures, and vibration.17,81 Workplace psychosocial factors as well as nonwork exposures also contribute to these disorders.81 Dose-response relationships between work task demands and upper extremity (UE) WMSDs are not clearly defined. For this reason, attempts to regulate workplace exposures are surrounded by controversy. Lack of clarity concerning the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of WMSDs results in rehabilitation programs that are not focused, which makes their efficacy difficult to evaluate. Physical therapists are among those health care providers who not only treat WMSDs, but also advise patients and their employers on safe work practices. It is imperative that such recommendations be based on the best evidence available concerning workplace and nonworkplace risk factors, as well as tissue effects and the behavioral indicators of underlying pathophysiology. The purpose of this commentary is to present recent epidemiological findings regarding WMSDs of the hand and wrist and to summarize experimental evidence of underlying tissue pathophysiology and sensorimotor changes in WMSDs. EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HAND AND WRIST WMSDs In 2001, service industries reported the highest proportion of WMSDs (25.8% of WMSD cases), followed by manufacturing industries (22.9% of WMSD cases). Data from the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics20 show that newly reported illnesses due to repeated trauma have represented about 4% of all injuries and illnesses since their peak number in 1993. Among the top 10 industries reporting WMSDs,20 half (ie, assemblers, construction laborers, supervisors in sales, carpenters, and cashiers) are prone to develop UE WMSDs through the use of hand tools or the performance of hand-intensive tasks. Illnesses due to repetitive motion resulted in the longest absences from work in 2001—a median of 18 days.20 Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), caused by compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel with subsequent loss of sensorimotor function along the median nerve distribution, was associated with the highest median days away from work (25 days), and injuries to the wrist in general resulted in a median of 13 days away from work.20 Of the 355 344 cases of injury or illness of the UE in 2001, 33 431 were sprains or strains of the hand, wrist, or fingers.20 There were 26 794 cases of CTS, the most frequently reported occupational neuritis. Tendinitis cases of the hand and wrist (eg, DeQuervain's tenosynovitis) or fingers (eg, trigger finger) numbered 4 896 in 2001.20 WMSDs of the hand and wrist represent a substantial burden to the US workplace. Two comprehensive reviews of the literature concerning WMSDs have been completed since 1997 with the purpose of determining causality and identifying gaps in epidemiological, experimental, and clinical research. A review undertaken by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health included over 600 epidemiological studies concerning WMSDs of the neck, UE, and low back dating from the 1970s to the mid-1990s.17 The summary of this review states that there was strong evidence for a relationship between exposure to combinations of force and repetition, or force and posture, and development of CTS. This review also provides evidence for a relationship between exposure to combinations of force and repetition, and development of hand/wrist tendinitis. There was evidence for a relationship between cumulative exposure to force, repetition or hand/wrist vibration, and CTS; and to force, repetition, or awkward postures, and hand/wrist tendinitis. There was insufficient evidence to determine the role of awkward postures in the development of CTS. Amid concerns that the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) review may have been biased in light of efforts at the time to regulate WMSDs through an Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) work rule, NIOSH charged the National Research Council (NRC) and the Institute of Medicine to conduct a second, more comprehensive review of the literature. The NRC review includes studies from the late 1970s to the late 1990s that examined tissue pathophysiology, mechanical, organizational, and psychosocial risk factors, and clinical interventions for WMSDs of the UE and low back.81 The overall conclusions from the NRC review were essentially the same as those of the NIOSH review: evidence supports associations between workplace physical and psychosocial exposures and UE WMSDs. Detailed summaries of the studies reviewed by NIOSH and the NRC will not be repeated here. The interested reader is encouraged to consult these documents and their extensive bibliographies. Both the NIOSH and NRC reviews identified gaps in the literature with the hope of guiding future research. In recent years, investigators have begun to address some of these issues. For this commentary, only epidemiological studies concerning CTS or hand/wrist disorders published since 1998 were selected to illustrate this progress, and they are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Despite some variation and even disagreement among these studies, a causal relationship is apparent between prolonged exposure to repetitive and forceful hand-intensive tasks, highly repetitive hand-intensive tasks, vibration, psychosocial stress at work, and the development of CTS or other hand/wrist WMSDs.1,40,53,66,85,97,100,109 In addition, concurrent, comorbid medical conditions or past wrist trauma increase CTS risk.9,53,66 The additional risk factors of awkward or sustained UE postures also contribute to hand/wrist tendinitis, strains, and sprains,92,97 which are the most common UE WMSDs.20,49 UE WMSDs have a higher prevalence and incidence in women, especially those who work in the service industries and who have psychosocial stress at work.40,62,66 Age alone does not appear to account for increased incidence of hand and wrist disorders in the absence of other risk factors, but aging can increase risk of WMSDs.40,53 While a substantial proportion of all WMSDs occur in the manufacturing industries nationally, they may be related to predominant nonmanufacturing industries locally, including manual labor, service industries, and office work.40,85,100 Computer users who are exposed to heavy use (more than 20 h/wk) of the mouse are at increased risk for CTS4 and other UE WMSDs,57 and increasing hours of computer work or beginning a new job with high computer use demands are associated with increased risk of WMSDs.4,57,59
While epidemiological studies enable identification of risk factors, high-risk occupations, and even, to some extent, dose-response relationships between risk factors and the prevalence and incidence of WMSDs, they can tell us nothing about the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms leading to these disorders. Furthermore, it is impractical as well as unethical to sample tissues from workers suffering from WMSDs or healthy control subjects. Therefore, studies of tissue pathophysiology must be carried out in animal models. In the next section of this review, we will summarize findings in animal models and, to the extent available, human studies that investigate the 1mechanisms of tissue injury, degeneration, and repair and associated behavioral effects in WMSDs. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF WMSDs Evidence of Musculoskeletal Injury and Inflammation in WMSDs Animal models of repetition-induced tendinopathies show paratendon inflammation and cellular proliferation, increased production of matrix components, tendon degeneration, and functional losses (Table 3). Human studies examining tendon and sheath biopsies collected from patients with chronic tendinopathies or CTS (Table 4) find marked tendon and sheath degeneration and fibrosis in combination with inflammatory or proliferative changes.8,29,47,51,88 In animal models, marked tendon injury is dependent on force, frequency, and duration of repetitive exposure (Table 3). Tendon necrosis and matrix disorganization are found only in studies utilizing intensive repetitive kicking or intensive running combined with tendon compression.10,31,101,102 Inflammatory changes are more prevalent than degenerative changes in animal models of tendinopathies and suggest that inflammatory/proliferative changes appear early, before overt signs of tissue injury.7,10,12,77,102 Discrete signs of injury may precede inflammation in tendons or their sheaths.12,52 In models of chronic repetitive motion, tendon inflammation eventually subsides and is followed by a fibrotic response that may lead to complete tissue repair if loads or repetition are sufficiently low.6,7,12,14
Progressive functional impairments develop with chronic repetitive tasks and accompany signs of tissue injury (Table 3).31,77,101,102 Neurogenic changes normally associated with pain are found in both human and animal models of tendinosis and may be another cause of behavioral decline.2,3,77 Although muscles appear to be more adaptive than tendons, chronic repetition results in inflammatory cell infiltration, myofiber splitting, and fibrotic replacement of injured myofibers in both human and animal models of WMSDs (Tables 4 and 5).12,42,103-105 Studies by Stauber et al103,104 indicate that repeated muscle strains at slow strain rates lead to tissue adaptation, but that repeated strains at fast velocities result in a variety of myopathic changes including fibrosis. Increasing the exposure and duration of repeated forced-lengthening leads to significant decreases in muscle mass and myofiber area and further increases in noncontractile tissues.105
In our model of UE WMSDs in the rat, we found evidence of injury and inflammation with performance of a high-repetition negligible-force (HRNF) reaching task (Tables 3 and 5).12,13,15 Increased immunohistochemical expression of hsp 72, an indicator of cellular distress and injury, is elicited in the lumbricals and their connective tissues.15 Macrophage infiltration is observed not only in the muscles of the entire reach forelimb, but also in those of the nonreach forelimb and the hindlimb. Macrophage infiltrates peak after 5 to 6 weeks of task performance and then decline, despite continued performance of the task,12 presumably due to the normal course for resolution of the inflammatory response. The bilateral effect may be due to use of the nonreach limb for postural support or to a cytokine-mediated systemic inflammatory response. Cytokines are proteins involved in mediating the immune response, hematopoiesis, inflammation, and bone resorption. Interleukin-1 (IL-1), for example, is a proinflammatory cytokine produced and secreted by immune cells (eg, infiltrating macrophages and neutrophils), as well as a variety of other cell types, including fibroblasts, myocytes, and synoviocytes, in response to tissue injury. The induction of IL-1 and other cytokines is orchestrated by a variety of paracrine and autocrine mechanisms. A serum increase of a proinflammatory cytokine is indicative of a chronic and/or systemic inflammatory reaction in the body.12,13 We observed that serum levels of IL-1α increase significantly in rats that have performed the HRNF task for 8 weeks.12,13 Thus, both a local (macrophage infiltration in the reach limb) and a systemic inflammatory response are occurring in response to continued performance of a high-repetition task. In contrast, serum IL-1α does not change in rats performing a low-repetition negligible-force (LRNF) task.13 We hypothesize that the net cytokine production in the LRNF group allows for the maintenance of homeostasis through the resolution of an acute inflammatory response. The level of repeated incidents of mechanical injury to the tissues in the HRNF group, on the other hand, leads to a net production of IL-1α and is indicative of a chronic and systemic inflammatory phase. The injury and inflammatory changes in our model are accompanied by motor behavior degradation.12,13,33 In HRNF animals, motor performance declines and alternative movement patterns emerge. A maladaptive raking pattern is observed in 100% of HRNF animals 2 weeks after the peak inflammatory response. This pattern is characterized by a lack of digit closure and repeated clumsy attempts to gain control of the food pellet.12 These results indicate that, although the inflammatory response subsides, motor degradation continues to progress. The effects of repeated mechanical loading and cyclic strain on bone have been studied in humans and in animal models (Tables 4 and 6). Studies of rats running on treadmills18,19,50,78 and performing repetitive jumping114 have shown that increasing the intensity of weight-bearing exercise is associated with diminishing returns in biomechanical competence, mass, and bone morphology of vertebral and limb bones. Periosteal and marrow edema as well as tibial stress fractures have been reported in runners with shin splints.51 We are only beginning to understand the mechanism(s) of pathophysiological bone responses to repetitive-reaching movements. In our rat model, periosteal bone sites of muscle and interosseous ligament attachments show evidence of pathological woven, or immature, bone formation in HRNF animals.16 These changes are greater in the distal than in the proximal forelimb bones, greater in the reach than in the nonreach limb, and greater at muscle attachments to bone than at ligament attachment sites or sites without attachments.
Based on the studies reviewed above and summarized in Tables 3 through 6, WMSDs are induced by the performance of highly repetitive tasks with or without forceful exertions. Many tissue types are involved, including tendon, muscle, loose connective tissue, and bone. Early, discrete tissue injury stimulates an acute inflammatory response that may resolve with tissue repair in the presence of low repetition and low force, or that may be followed by tissue degeneration and fibrosis leading to scarring in the presence of high-repetition and/or high force or other extrinsic risk factors (such as tendon impingement). Furthermore, inflammatory effects may be systemic, which may explain some of the nonspecific pain syndromes affecting workers with complaints of WMSDs who are frequently not taken seriously by health care providers.49 Behavioral declines in animal models coincide with the inflammatory response, but appear to persist despite tissue repair. This latter finding is consistent with WMSDs in humans and merits investigation of other causes of such persistent behavioral decline. We will now turn to evidence of peripheral nerve injury in WMSDs. Evidence of Peripheral Nerve Injury in WMSDs Most experimental work on the response of nerve to mechanical loading involves the study of acute or chronic loads, and may thus overlook the importance of repetition per se on the development of nerve lesions. Only 2 experimental studies examined this question, and they arrive at conflicting conclusions. Szabo and Sharkey108 applied fluctuating pressures to rat tibial nerve and reported that only the mean level of pressure was important in causing conduction block. In contrast, Watanabe et al117 elongated rat brachial plexus by 8% in static or cyclic loading and found that cyclic loading had more pronounced effects on grip strength, compound action potential amplitude, and integrity of the blood-nerve barrier. It is unclear whether this difference in findings is related to the type of loading (compression versus elongation) or to other factors. The mechanisms of nerve injury via compression are complex. Compression may cause mechanical disruption of nerve structures, as well as indirectly compromise function by restricting vascular perfusion. Experimental evidence suggests that several processes are involved, depending on the magnitude and duration of nerve loading. Although described separately, it is likely that several of the following phenomena affect nerve anatomy and function in repetitive-motion injury. Under localized compression, mechanical disruption of axons and myelin may occur. Dyck et al45 found that endoneurial fluid, axoplasm, and myelin were displaced away from regions of rat peroneal nerve that were acutely pressurized. At the site of compression, there was an increase in the distance between nodes of Ranvier and distortion of myelin lamellae. These observations suggest that the elevation of pressure within the carpal tunnel may cause direct mechanical disruption of saltatory conduction or interfere with normal axoplasmic transport. In the median nerves of aged guinea pigs (a species in which spontaneous nerve compression occurs)5,54 there is a similar distortion of myelin away from the carpal region, again suggesting that pressure has a direct effect on nerve function.84 Blockage of axoplasmic transport by nerve pressure has been demonstrated in several studies in rabbits.86,95,35-38 Rydevik et al95 showed that 50 mm Hg pressure applied to the vagus nerve for 2 hours was sufficient to reversibly block transport, and that the block achieved at greater pressures (200 and 400 mm Hg) persisted for 1 to 3 days following pressure release. Using a similar model, Dahlin and coworkers35-38 showed that pressures as low as 30 mm Hg could block axoplasmic transport and induce histological changes after 7 days. Dahlin et al34 also demonstrated that the transport mechanisms remained affected 14 days after compression at 200 mm Hg. Normal nerve function requires metabolic energy, both to maintain the ionic gradients across the membrane necessary for propagation of the action potential and to power axoplasmic transport. In acute studies of anoxia, axonal conduction began to fail after approximately 11 minutes.39,48 Pressures as low as 20 to 30 mm Hg reduce nerve blood flow,94 so it is likely that the pressures observed in the carpal tunnel of patients with CTS (mean, 32 mm Hg)55 may limit nerve perfusion. Motor conduction latency decreased immediately upon surgical release in patients with CTS, suggesting that pressure in the tunnel had restricted nerve perfusion prior to surgical release.46 The blood-nerve barrier is formed by the perineurial membrane and by endothelial cells in endoneurial capillaries, which are connected by tight junctions.69 This barrier, which normally limits the passage of macromolecules, is disrupted by compression,93 resulting in intraneural edema. Lundborg et al70 report that compression of rat sciatic nerve at 30 mm Hg for 2 hours resulted in increased endoneurial pressure at 1 and 24 hours after compression was released. Powell and Meyers90 found that endoneurial edema occurred within 4 hours after pressure release, and persisted for 28 days. Edema may further increase the pressure on endoneurial capillaries and restrict blood flow.98 Disruption of the blood-nerve barrier has also been described in chronic experiments in which a nerve is banded with a cuff of silastic tubing (Table 5).73,74 Nerve compression can also cause axonal demyelination and degeneration. Rydevik and Nordborg96 found evidence of demyelination 3 weeks after 2 hours of compression at 200 and 400 mm Hg in rabbit tibial nerve. Powell and Meyers90 found demyelination and Schwann cell necrosis in rat sciatic nerve 7 days after acute compression at 30 mm Hg. Demyelination has also been reported in chronic nerve-banding experiments on rats and monkeys.72,74,83 Mackinnon et al74 found degeneration after 1 month of chronic banding of rat sciatic nerves with small-diameter cuffs, and evidence of fiber regeneration after 3 months (Table 5). They did not observe fiber degeneration when larger cuffs were used. O'Brien et al83 report degeneration of fibers in rat sciatic nerve after 8 to 24 months using a large-diameter cuff. Signs of Wallerian degeneration have also been reported in the median nerves of aged guinea pigs.5,54,84 Wallerian degeneration and regeneration are generally considered to occur only in advanced stages of CTS.56,71 However, in our study of repetitive reaching, rat median nerves showed infiltrating macrophages, which remove damaged myelin,32,87 by 3 weeks of task performance and myelin degradation by 9 weeks (Table 5).33 Chronic nerve compression may also induce neural fibrosis. Nerve banding experiments have shown that moderate chronic compression leads to thickening of the epineurium and the perineurium in rats and monkeys.72-74,83 In our model of repetitive reaching, there was increased deposition of collagen in the epineurium by 8 weeks of task performance.32,33 We also observed widespread expression of connective tissue growth factor, a mediator of fibrosis, by Schwann cells and intraneural fibroblasts. In 1 animal that had performed the task for 10 weeks, there was a connective tissue nodule surrounding the nerve at the wrist. Thus, chronic nerve compression leads to fibrotic changes within and surrounding the nerve. Fibrosis may affect nerve function by directly compressing the axons, by compressing the vascular supply, or by entrapping the nerve and thus preventing normal nerve gliding.60,71 Such entrapment may lead to traction injury. Entrapped peripheral nerves are more susceptible to injury at other sites, for which the term “double crush syndrome” has been coined.61,115 This increased susceptibility, which has been confirmed experimentally,41,82 likely reflects defects in axonal transport affecting the entire length of the axon.69 Carpal tunnel pressure is elevated when the wrist is placed in flexion or extension or when performing actions such as making a fist or holding objects.55,99 It is thus likely that repetitive hand movements cause compression of the median nerve. The early development of nerve pathology in CTS is thought to involve disruption of the blood-nerve barrier following ischemia, with the resulting edema leading to fibrosis, demyelination, and in severe cases, Wallerian degeneration.56,69,71,107 Other effects of pressure on the nerve, such as distortion of myelin and axoplasm, and interference with axoplasmic transport may also play a role. Altered nerve function may explain the persistent behavioral changes in patients with WMSDs and may also contribute to reorganization of sensory and motor pathways within the central nervous system (CNS), which we discuss in the next section. Evidence of CNS Reorganization in WMSDs Neuroplasticity refers to the persistent anatomical or physiological changes in a neuron that occur during development, regeneration, experimental manipulations, or repeated activity across a synapse. There is evidence of such neural reorganization at multiple levels of the CNS following skill learning, chronic pain, peripheral inflammation, peripheral nerve injury, and performance of repetitive tasks (Tables 4 and 7).
Chronic pain, inflammation, and peripheral tissue injury result in repeated activation and/or chronic overstimulation of nociceptive afferents terminating in spinal cord dorsal horns. The sustained nociceptive afferent barrage causes a greater release of excitatory neuropeptides and amino acids from these terminals than that which occurs during acute events.44 The nociceptors become hypersensitive,76 expand their receptive fields, and increase the excitability of secondary neurons in the spinal cord. These changes contribute to the hyperalgesia associated with chronic pain and inflammation. Pathological changes in the neural input to the CNS also result in reorganization of brainstem and cortical regions (Table 4). Examination of somato-sensory-evoked responses following ulnar nerve stimulation in patients with chronic CTS shows increased amplitudes in the spinal cord, brainstem, and sensoricortical regions carrying information from the ulnar nerve ipsilateral to the median nerve lesion.110 Magnetic source imaging of the cortex of a patient with CTS revealed an invasion of areas normally representing the median nerve with areas representing ulnar and radial nerves.43 These results indicate that structural and physiological changes can occur throughout the central neuroaxis following chronic nerve compression. The CNS can be profoundly affected by the performance of repetitive hand-intensive movements. There is strong evidence that repetitive tasks alone can lead to degradation of the somatosensory cortex in monkeys,25,26,28,111 rats,91 and humans (Table 4).22,24,27 In the primate model of repetitive grasping, electrophysiological mapping of the primary somatosensory cortex (the region of the dorsal parietal cortex designated as area SI) reveals a dedifferentiation of the hand region with shifted or degraded digit-receptive fields.23-25,111 These changes are associated with movement dysfunctions. However, use of proximal muscles and variable strategies result in less SI degradation and improved motor control.111 In humans, degradation of hand representations also occurs with focal hand dystonia.22,24,27 The severity of focal hand dystonia positively correlates with the ratio of the mean amplitude to latency of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) in the SI cortex.27 Furthermore, degradation of the digit representation is not isolated to just SI, but also involves secondary somatosensory and posterior parietal cortices.22 A loss of spatial discrimination in the form of gap detection and single-touch localization has also been observed.11 Rehabilitation techniques for patients with focal hand dystonia that include sensory discriminative training have been reported to improve sensorimotor function.23,30,118 Findings of CNS reorganization associated with peripheral tissue injury and inflammation and with repetitive stereotyped movements have important implications in the rehabilitation of individuals with WMSDs. Along with scarring (fibrosis) and decreased function of peripheral nerves, somatotopic dedifferentiation of sensorimotor receptive fields probably contributes to maladaptive movement patterns and the potential for increased peripheral tissue injury due to imprecisely controlled and inefficient movements. These behavioral consequences have been observed in both animals12,13,15,23,26,28,33,111 and humans.22,24,27,43,110 Failure by health care providers to recognize such central phenomena in patients could lead to poor treatment outcomes and contribute to long-term disability and loss of income. SUMMARIZING THOUGHTS AND WORKING HYPOTHESES Hand and wrist WMSDs represent a substantial proportion of work-related illnesses and are associated with relatively high medical costs and loss of work. They are caused by the chronic performance of highly repetitive hand-intensive tasks, especially those involving high levels of force. Based on this review of the literature, we hypothesize that the performance of repetitive and/or forceful hand-intensive tasks may induce WMSDs through 3 primary pathways: (1) CNS reorganization, (2) tissue injury or compression, and (3) tissue reorganization. These pathways are depicted in the Figure
Central Nervous System Reorganization Central nervous system changes can result from the performance of highly repetitive tasks, both in the presence and the absence of chronic pain, peripheral tissue inflammation, and/or peripheral nerve compression (Figure Peripheral nerve compression and tissue inflammation can also induce central neuroplasticity (Figure While the results of the above studies could indicate the early onset of median nerve entrapment among workers with jobs requiring heavy computer use, they also may indicate alternative injury mechanisms. For example, involvement of the ulnar nerve in symptomatic individuals might indicate central reorganization due to altered peripheral nerve input.110 Hyperalgesia and preserved motor function in the presence of impaired sensation might indicate central sensitization76 or sensory cortical field expansion.24,27 Positive findings in the nondominant hand might indicate a systemic inflammatory response.12 For any of these alternatives, confirmation of a positive relationship between intensity of computer use and decreased conduction velocity of the median nerve would be diluted or absent, because the primary mechanism underlying symptoms would not necessarily include loss of peripheral nerve function. While computer use may not be a major cause of work-related CTS (an assertion still under heated debate), it may nonetheless be an important risk factor in the development of WMSDs. Tissue Injury or Compression Highly repetitive and/or forceful motions cause injury to the musculoskeletal system and peripheral nerves (Figure The tissue injury leads to localized, acute inflammatory responses (Figure Animal studies also reveal the involvement of multiple body systems in WMSDs. Work in our laboratory shows a widespread increase in phagocytic macrophages in many musculoskeletal tissues, and a circulatory distribution of inflammatory mediators as a result of performance of highly repetitive motions.12,13 Thus, inflammatory mediators may be widely distributed via the circulatory system and lead to a systemic inflammatory response to the task. Although it remains to be seen whether serum markers of inflammation are present in patients with WMSDs, one possible consequence of the circulatory distribution of inflammatory mediators in WMSDs is a widespread increased susceptibility of tissues to previously innocuous physical stress (Figure Tissue Reorganization Repetitive loading of bones, muscles, and tendons leads to adaptive remodeling of these tissues (Figure CONCLUSION Hand and wrist WMSDs represent a substantial proportion of work-related illnesses and are associated with relatively high medical costs and loss of work. Based on our review of the literature and our own work in a rat model, we have identified 3 primary pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the development of WMSDs. All of these pathways, either in isolation or in combination, may cause pain, discomfort and/or loss of function in patients with WMSDs (Figure Footnotes Sources of grant support: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Grant # AR46426 (to AEB); Foundation for Physical Therapy, New Investigator Fellowship Training Initiative Award (to AEB); National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Grant # OH03970 (to MFB). REFERENCES 1. Abbas MA, Afifi AA, Zhang ZW, Kraus JF. Meta-analysis of published studies of work-related carpal tunnel syndrome. Int J Occup Environ Health. 1998;4:160–167. [PubMed] 2. Alfredson H, Forsgren S, Thorsen K, Fahlstrom M, Johansson H, Lorentzon R. Glutamate NMDAR1 receptors localised to nerves in human Achilles tendons. Implications for treatment? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9:123–126. [PubMed] 3. Alfredson H, Ljung BO, Thorsen K, Lorentzon R. In vivo investigation of ECRB tendons with microdialysis technique--no signs of inflammation but high amounts of glutamate in tennis elbow. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:475–479. [PubMed] 4. Andersen JH, Thomsen JF, Overgaard E, et al. Computer use and carpal tunnel syndrome: a 1-year follow-up study. JAMA. 2003;289:2963–2969. [PubMed] 5. Anderson MH, Fullerton PM, Gilliatt RW, Hern JE. Changes in the forearm associated with median nerve compression at the wrist in the guinea-pig. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1970;33:70–79. [PubMed] 6. Archambault JM, Hart DA, Herzog W. Response of rabbit Achilles tendon to chronic repetitive loading. Connect Tissue Res. 2001;42:13–23. [PubMed] 7. Archambault JM, Herzog W, Hart D. Marconi Research Conference. San Francisco, CA: 1997. The effect of load history in an experimental model of tendon repetitive motion disorders. 8. Astrom M, Gentz CF, Nilsson P, Rausing A, Sjoberg S, Westlin N. Imaging in chronic achilles tendinopathy: a comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in 27 histologically verified cases. Skeletal Radiol. 1996;25:615–620. [PubMed] 9. Atcheson SG, Ward JR, Lowe W. Concurrent medical disease in work-related carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1506–1512. [PubMed] 10. Backman C, Boquist L, Friden J, Lorentzon R, Toolanen G. Chronic achilles paratenonitis with tendinosis: an experimental model in the rabbit. J Orthop Res. 1990;8:541–547. [PubMed] 11. Bara-Jimenez W, Shelton P, Hallett M. Spatial discrimination is abnormal in focal hand dystonia. Neurology. 2000;55:1869–1873. [PubMed] 12. Barbe MF, Barr AE, Gorzelany I, Amin M, Gaughan JP, Safadi FF. Chronic repetitive reaching and grasping results in decreased motor performance and widespread tissue responses in a rat model of MSD. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:167–176. [PubMed] 13. Barr AE, Amin M, Barbe MF. Dose-response relationship between reach repetition and indicators of inflammation and movement dysfunction in a rat model of work-related musculoskeletal disorder; Proceedings of the HFES 46th Annual Meeting; Baltimore, MD. 2002; Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2002. 14. Barr AE, Barbe MF. Inflammation reduces physiological tissue tolerance in the development of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14:77–85. [PubMed] 15. Barr AE, Safadi FF, Garvin RP, Popoff SN, Barbe MF. Evidence of progressive tissue pathophysiology and motor behavior degradation in a rat model of work related musculoskeletal disease; Proceedings of the IEA/HFES Congress; San Diego, CA. 2000; Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2002. 16. Barr AE, Safadi FF, Gorzelany I, Amin M, Popoff SN, Barbe MF. Repetitive, negligible force reaching in rats induces pathological overloading of upper extremity bones. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:2023–2032. [PubMed] 17. Bernard BP. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Cincinnati, OH: 1997. 18. Bourrin S, Genty C, Palle S, Gharib C, Alexandre C. Adverse effects of strenuous exercise: a densitometric and histomorphometric study in the rat. J Appl Physiol. 1994;76:1999–2005. [PubMed] 19. Bourrin S, Palle S, Pupier R, Vico L, Alexandre C. Effect of physical training on bone adaptation in three zones of the rat tibia. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;10:1745–1752. [PubMed] 20. Bureau of Labor Statistics News, United States Department of Labor. Lost-Worktime Injuries and Illnesses: Characteristics and Resulting Days Away From Work. 2001. http://www.bls.gov/iif/home.htm Available at: http://www.bls.gov/iif/home.htm. Accessed March 27, 2001. 21. Bureau of Labor Statistics News, United States Department of Labor. Workplace Injuries and Illnesses. 2001. http://www.bls.gov/iif/home.htm Available at: http://www.bls.gov/iif/home.htm. Accessed December 19, 2001. 22. Butterworth S, Francis S, Kelly E, McGlone F, Bowtell R, Sawle GV. Abnormal cortical sensory activation in dystonia: an fMRI study. Mov Disord. 2003;18:673–682. [PubMed] 23. Byl NN, McKenzie A. Treatment effectiveness for patients with a history of repetitive hand use and focal hand dystonia: a planned, prospective follow-up study. J Hand Ther. 2000;13:289–301. [PubMed] 24. Byl NN, McKenzie A, Nagarajan SS. Differences in somatosensory hand organization in a healthy flutist and a flutist with focal hand dystonia: a case report. J Hand Ther. 2000;13:302–309. [PubMed] 25. Byl NN, Merzenich MM, Cheung S, Bedenbaugh P, Nagarajan SS, Jenkins WM. A primate model for studying focal dystonia and repetitive strain injury: effects on the primary somatosensory cortex. Phys Ther. 1997;77:269–284. [PubMed] 26. Byl NN, Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM. A primate genesis model of focal dystonia and repetitive strain injury: I. Learning-induced dedifferentiation of the representation of the hand in the primary somatosensory cortex in adult monkeys. Neurology. 1996;47:508–520. [PubMed] 27. Byl NN, Nagarajan SS, Merzenich MM, Roberts T, McKenzie A. Correlation of clinical neuromusculoskeletal and central somatosensory performance: variability in controls and patients with severe and mild focal hand dystonia. Neural Plast. 2002;9:177–203. [PubMed] 28. Byl NN, Wilson F, Merzenich M, et al. Sensory dysfunction associated with repetitive strain injuries of tendinitis and focal hand dystonia: a comparative study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;23:234–244. [PubMed] 29. Campligio GL, Di Giuseppe P, Migliorini L, Cazzaniga M, Lamperti E, Romorini A. Histopathology of the flexor tendon sheaths and its relevance in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur J Plast Surg. 1999;22:230–233. 30. Candia V, Schafer T, Taub E, et al. Sensory motor retuning: a behavioral treatment for focal hand dystonia of pianists and guitarists. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1342–1348. [PubMed] 31. Carpenter JE, Flanagan CL, Thomopoulos S, Yian EH, Soslowsky LJ. The effects of overuse combined with intrinsic or extrinsic alterations in an animal model of rotator cuff tendinosis. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:801–807. [PubMed] 32. Clark BD, Al-Shatti TA, Barr AE, Amin M, Barbe MF. Performance of a high-repetition, high-force task induces carpal tunnel syndrome in rats. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34:244–253. [PubMed] 33. Clark BD, Barr AE, Safadi FF, et al. Median nerve trauma in a rat model of work-related musculoskeletal disorder. J Neurotrauma. 2003;20:681–695. [PubMed] 34. Dahlin LB, Archer DR, McLean WG. Axonal transport and morphological changes following nerve compression. An experimental study in the rabbit vagus nerve. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1993;18:106–110. 35. Dahlin LB, Danielsen N, Ehira T, Lundborg G, Rydevik B. Mechanical effects of compression of peripheral nerves. J Biomech Eng. 1986;108:120–122. [PubMed] 36. Dahlin LB, McLean WG. Effects of graded experimental compression on slow and fast axonal transport in rabbit vagus nerve. J Neurol Sci. 1986;72:19–30. [PubMed] 37. Dahlin LB, Nordborg C, Lundborg G. Morphologic changes in nerve cell bodies induced by experimental graded nerve compression. Exp Neurol. 1987;95:611–621. [PubMed] 38. Dahlin LB, Rydevik B, McLean WG, Sjostrand J. Changes in fast axonal transport during experimental nerve compression at low pressures. Exp Neurol. 1984;84:29–36. [PubMed] 39. Dahlin LB, Shyu BC, Danielsen N, Andersson SA. Effects of nerve compression or ischaemia on conduction properties of myelinated and non-myelinated nerve fibres. An experimental study in the rabbit common peroneal nerve. Acta Physiol Scand. 1989;136:97–105. [PubMed] 40. Davis L, Wellman H, Punnett L. Surveillance of work-related carpal tunnel syndrome in Massachusetts, 1992-1997: a report from the Massachusetts Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks (SENSOR). Am J Ind Med. 2001;39:58–71. [PubMed] 41. Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE. Chronic nerve compression model for the double crush hypothesis. Ann Plast Surg. 1991;26:259–264. [PubMed] 42. Dennett X, Fry HJ. Overuse syndrome: a muscle biopsy study. Lancet. 1988;1:905–908. [PubMed] 43. Druschky K, Kaltenhauser M, Hummel C, et al. Alteration of the somatosensory cortical map in peripheral mononeuropathy due to carpal tunnel syndrome. Neuroreport. 2000;11:3925–3930. [PubMed] 44. Dubner R, Ruda MA. Activity-dependent neuronal plasticity following tissue injury and inflammation. Trends Neurosci. 1992;15:96–103. [PubMed] 45. Dyck PJ, Lais AC, Giannini C, Engelstad JK. Structural alterations of nerve during cuff compression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:9828–9832. [PubMed] 46. Eversmann WW, Jr., Ritsick JA. Intraoperative changes in motor nerve conduction latency in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1978;3:77–81. 47. Fenwick SA, Curry V, Harrall RL, Hazleman BL, Hackney R, Riley GP. Expression of transforming growth factor-beta isoforms and their receptors in chronic tendinosis. J Anat. 2001;199:231–240. [PubMed] 48. Fern R, Harrison PJ. The contribution of ischaemia and deformation to the conduction block generated by compression of the cat sciatic nerve. Exp Physiol. 1994;79:583–592. [PubMed] 49. Feuerstein M, Miller VL, Burrell LM, Berger R. Occupational upper extremity disorders in the federal workforce. Prevalence, health care expenditures, and patterns of work disability. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40:546–555. [PubMed] 50. Forwood MR, Parker AW. Repetitive loading, in vivo, of the tibiae and femora of rats: effects of repeated bouts of treadmill-running. Bone Miner. 1991;13:35–46. [PubMed] 51. Fredericson M, Bergman AG, Hoffman KL, Dillingham MS. Tibial stress reaction in runners. Correlation of clinical symptoms and scintigraphy with a new magnetic resonance imaging grading system. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:472–481. [PubMed] 52. Freeland AE, Tucci MA, Barbieri RA, Angel MF, Nick TG. Biochemical evaluation of serum and flexor tenosynovium in carpal tunnel syndrome. Microsurgery. 2002;22:378–385. [PubMed] 53. Frost P, Andersen JH, Nielsen VK. Occurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome among slaughterhouse workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998;24:285–292. [PubMed] 54. Fullerton PM, Gilliatt RW. Median and ulnar neuropathy in the guinea-pig. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1967;30:393–402. [PubMed] 55. Gelberman RH, Hergenroeder PT, Hargens AR, Lundborg GN, Akeson WH. The carpal tunnel syndrome. A study of carpal canal pressures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:380–383. [PubMed] 56. Gelberman RH, Rydevik BL, Pess GM, Szabo RM, Lundborg G. Carpal tunnel syndrome. A scientific basis for clinical care. Orthop Clin North Am. 1988;19:115–124. [PubMed] 57. Gerr F, Marcus M, Ensor C, et al. A prospective study of computer users: I. Study design and incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am J Ind Med. 2002;41:221–235. [PubMed] 58. Greening J, Lynn B. Vibration sense in the upper limb in patients with repetitive strain injury and a group of at-risk office workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998;71:29–34. [PubMed] 59. Hagberg M, Tornqvist EW, Toomingas A. Self-reported reduced productivity due to musculoskeletal symptoms: associations with workplace and individual factors among white-collar computer users. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:151–162. [PubMed] 60. Hunter JM. Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, epineural fibrous fixation, and traction neuropathy. Hand Clin. 1991;7:491–504. [PubMed] 61. Hurst LC, Weissberg D, Carroll RE. The relationship of the double crush to carpal tunnel syndrome (an analysis of 1,000 cases of carpal tunnel syndrome). J Hand Surg [Br]. 1985;10:202–204. 62. Islam SS, Velilla AM, Doyle EJ, Ducatman AM. Gender differences in work-related injury/illness: analysis of workers compensation claims. Am J Ind Med. 2001;39:84–91. [PubMed] 63. Jeng OJ, Radwin RG, Rodriquez AA. Functional psychomotor deficits associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. Ergonomics. 1994;37:1055–1069. [PubMed] 64. Jensen BR, Pilegaard M, Momsen A. Vibrotactile sense and mechanical functional state of the arm and hand among computer users compared with a control group. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002;75:332–340. [PubMed] 65. Kuiper JI, Verbeek JH, Straub JP, Everts V, Frings-Dresen MH. Physical workload of student nurses and serum markers of collagen metabolism. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002;28:168–175. [PubMed] 66. Leclerc A, Landre MF, Chastang JF, Niedhammer I, Roquelaure Y. Upper-limb disorders in repetitive work. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001;27:268–278. [PubMed] 67. Ljung BO, Forsgren S, Friden J. Substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide expression at the extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle origin: implications for the etiology of tennis elbow. J Orthop Res. 1999;17:554–559. [PubMed] 68. Ljung BO, Lieber RL, Friden J. Wrist extensor muscle pathology in lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1999;24:177–183. 69. Lundborg G, Dahlin LB. Anatomy, function, and pathophysiology of peripheral nerves and nerve compression. Hand Clin. 1996;12:185–193. [PubMed] 70. Lundborg G, Myers R, Powell H. Nerve compression injury and increased endoneurial fluid pressure: a “miniature compartment syndrome” J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983;46:1119–1124. [PubMed] 71. Mackinnon SE. Pathophysiology of nerve compression. Hand Clin. 2002;18:231–241. [PubMed] 72. Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL. Evaluation of microsurgical internal neurolysis in a primate median nerve model of chronic nerve compression. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1988;13:345–351. 73. Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL. Experimental study of chronic nerve compression. Clinical implications. Hand Clin. 1986;2:639–650. [PubMed] 74. Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL, Hudson AR, Hunter DA. Chronic nerve compression--an experimental model in the rat. Ann Plast Surg. 1984;13:112–120. [PubMed] 75. Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL, Hudson AR, Hunter DA. A primate model for chronic nerve compression. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1985;1:185–195. [PubMed] 76. McCarson KE. Central and peripheral expression of neurokinin-1 and neurokinin-3 receptor and substance P-encoding messenger RNAs: peripheral regulation during formalin-induced inflammation and lack of neurokinin receptor expression in primary afferent sensory neurons. Neuroscience. 1999;93:361–370. [PubMed] 77. Messner K, Wei Y, Andersson B, Gillquist J, Rasanen T. Rat model of Achilles tendon disorder. A pilot study. Cells Tissues Organs. 1999;165:30–39. [PubMed] 78. Mosekilde L, Danielsen CC, Sogaard CH, Thorling E. The effect of long-term exercise on vertebral and femoral bone mass, dimensions, and strength--assessed in a rat model. Bone. 1994;15:293–301. [PubMed] 79. Mosley JR, Lanyon LE. Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modeling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats. Bone. 1998;23:313–318. [PubMed] 80. Nathan PA, Keniston RC, Myers LD, Meadows KD, Lockwood RS. Natural history of median nerve sensory conduction in industry: relationship to symptoms and carpal tunnel syndrome in 558 hands over 11 years. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21:711–721. [PubMed] 81. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Workplace. National Academy Press; Washington, DC: 2001. 82. Nemoto K, Matsumoto N, Tazaki K, Horiuchi Y, Uchinishi K, Mori Y. An experimental study on the “double crush” hypothesis. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1987;12:552–559. 83. O'Brien JP, Mackinnon SE, MacLean AR, Hudson AR, Dellon AL, Hunter DA. A model of chronic nerve compression in the rat. Ann Plast Surg. 1987;19:430–435. [PubMed] 84. Ochoa J, Marotte L. The nature of the nerve lesion caused by chronic entrapment in the guinea-pig. J Neurol Sci. 1973;19:491–495. [PubMed] 85. Padua L, Aprile I, Lo Monaco M, et al. Italian multicentre study of carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical-neurophysiological picture and diagnostic pathway in 461 patients and differences between the populations enrolled in the northern, central and southern centres. Italian CTS Study Group. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1999;20:309–313. [PubMed] 86. Pedowitz RA, Nordborg C, Rosenqvist AL, Rydevik BL. Nerve function and structure beneath and distal to a pneumatic tourniquet applied to rabbit hindlimbs. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1991;25:109–120. [PubMed] 87. Perry VH, Brown MC, Gordon S. The macrophage response to central and peripheral nerve injury. A possible role for macrophages in regeneration. J Exp Med. 1987;165:1218–1223. [PubMed] 88. Phalen GS. The carpal-tunnel syndrome. Clinical evaluation of 598 hands. Clin Orthop. 1972;83:29–40. [PubMed] 89. Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000;74:27–55. [PubMed] 90. Powell HC, Myers RR. Pathology of experimental nerve compression. Lab Invest. 1986;55:91–100. [PubMed] 91. Remple MS, Bruneau RM, VandenBerg PM, Goertzen C, Kleim JA. Sensitivity of cortical movement representations to motor experience: evidence that skill learning but not strength training induces cortical reorganization. Behav Brain Res. 2001;123:133–141. [PubMed] 92. Russo A, Murphy C, Lessoway V, Berkowitz J. The prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among British Columbia sonographers. Appl Ergon. 2002;33:385–393. [PubMed] 93. Rydevik B, Lundborg G. Permeability of intraneural microvessels and perineurium following acute, graded experimental nerve compression. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;11:179–187. [PubMed] 94. Rydevik B, Lundborg G, Bagge U. Effects of graded compression on intraneural blood blow. An in vivo study on rabbit tibial nerve. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1981;6:3–12. 95. Rydevik B, McLean WG, Sjostrand J, Lundborg G. Blockage of axonal transport induced by acute, graded compression of the rabbit vagus nerve. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980;43:690–698. [PubMed] 96. Rydevik B, Nordborg C. Changes in nerve function and nerve fibre structure induced by acute, graded compression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980;43:1070–1082. [PubMed] 97. Scheuerle J, Guilford AM, Habal MB. Work-related cumulative trauma disorders and interpreters for the deaf. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2000;15:429–434. [PubMed] 98. Schmelzer JD, Zochodne DW, Low PA. Ischemic and reperfusion injury of rat peripheral nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:1639–1642. [PubMed] 99. Seradge H, Jia YC, Owens W. In vivo measurement of carpal tunnel pressure in the functioning hand. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1995;20:855–859. 100. Silverstein B, Welp E, Nelson N, Kalat J. Claims incidence of work-related disorders of the upper extremities: Washington state, 1987 through 1995. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1827–1833. [PubMed] 101. Soslowsky LJ, Thomopoulos S, Esmail A, et al. Rotator cuff tendinosis in an animal model: role of extrinsic and overuse factors. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002;30:1057–1063. [PubMed] 102. Soslowsky LJ, Thomopoulos S, Tun S, et al. Neer Award 1999. Overuse activity injures the supraspinatus tendon in an animal model: a histologic and biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;9:79–84. [PubMed] 103. Stauber WT, Knack KK, Miller GR, Grimmett JG. Fibrosis and intercellular collagen connections from four weeks of muscle strains. Muscle Nerve. 1996;19:423–430. [PubMed] 104. Stauber WT, Miller GR, Grimmett JG, Knack KK. Adaptation of rat soleus muscles to 4 wk of intermittent strain. J Appl Physiol. 1994;77:58–62. [PubMed] 105. Stauber WT, Smith CA, Miller GR, Stauber FD. Recovery from 6 weeks of repeated strain injury to rat soleus muscles. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23:1819–1825. [PubMed] 106. Stevens JC, Witt JC, Smith BE, Weaver AL. The frequency of carpal tunnel syndrome in computer users at a medical facility. Neurology. 2001;56:1568–1570. [PubMed] 107. Sunderland S. The nerve lesion in the carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1976;39:615–626. [PubMed] 108. Szabo RM, Sharkey NA. Response of peripheral nerve to cyclic compression in a laboratory rat model. J Orthop Res. 1993;11:828–833. [PubMed] 109. Thomsen JF, Hansson GA, Mikkelsen S, Lauritzen M. Carpal tunnel syndrome in repetitive work: a follow-up study. Am J Ind Med. 2002;42:344–353. [PubMed] 110. Tinazzi M, Zanette G, Volpato D, et al. Neurophysiological evidence of neuroplasticity at multiple levels of the somatosensory system in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Brain. 1998;121(Pt 9):1785–1794. [PubMed] 111. Topp KS, Byl NN. Movement dysfunction following repetitive hand opening and closing: anatomical analysis in Owl monkeys. Mov Disord. 1999;14:295–306. [PubMed] 112. Tremblay F, Mireault AC, Letourneau J, Pierrat A, Bourrassa S. Tactile perception and manual dexterity in computer users. Somatosens Mot Res. 2002;19:101–108. [PubMed] 113. Turner CH, Forwood MR, Rho JY, Yoshikawa T. Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:87–97. [PubMed] 114. Umemura Y, Sogo N, Honda A. Effects of intervals between jumps or bouts on osteogenic response to loading. J Appl Physiol. 2002;93:1345–1348. [PubMed] 115. Upton AR, McComas AJ. The double crush in nerve entrapment syndromes. Lancet. 1973;2:359–362. [PubMed] 116. Viikari-Juntura E, Silverstein B. Role of physical load factors in carpal tunnel syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999;25:163–185. [PubMed] 117. Watanabe M, Yamaga M, Kato T, Ide J, Kitamura T, Takagi K. The implication of repeated versus continuous strain on nerve function in a rat forelimb model. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2001;26:663–669. 118. Zeuner KE, Bara-Jimenez W, Noguchi PS, Goldstein SR, Dambrosia JM, Hallett M. Sensory training for patients with focal hand dystonia. Ann Neurol. 2002;51:593–598. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999 Jun; 25(3):163-85.
[Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999]Int J Occup Environ Health. 1998 Jul-Sep; 4(3):160-7.
[Int J Occup Environ Health. 1998]Am J Ind Med. 2001 Jan; 39(1):58-71.
[Am J Ind Med. 2001]Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998 Aug; 24(4):285-92.
[Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998]Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001 Aug; 27(4):268-78.
[Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001]Ital J Neurol Sci. 1999 Oct; 20(5):309-13.
[Ital J Neurol Sci. 1999]Skeletal Radiol. 1996 Oct; 25(7):615-20.
[Skeletal Radiol. 1996]J Anat. 2001 Sep; 199(Pt 3):231-40.
[J Anat. 2001]Am J Sports Med. 1995 Jul-Aug; 23(4):472-81.
[Am J Sports Med. 1995]Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972 Mar-Apr; 83():29-40.
[Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972]J Orthop Res. 1990 Jul; 8(4):541-7.
[J Orthop Res. 1990]Am J Sports Med. 1998 Nov-Dec; 26(6):801-7.
[Am J Sports Med. 1998]Cells Tissues Organs. 1999; 165(1):30-9.
[Cells Tissues Organs. 1999]Ann Biomed Eng. 2002 Sep; 30(8):1057-63.
[Ann Biomed Eng. 2002]J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000 Mar-Apr; 9(2):79-84.
[J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000]Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001; 9(2):123-6.
[Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001]J Orthop Res. 2003 Jan; 21(1):167-76.
[J Orthop Res. 2003]Lancet. 1988 Apr 23; 1(8591):905-8.
[Lancet. 1988]Muscle Nerve. 1996 Apr; 19(4):423-30.
[Muscle Nerve. 1996]Muscle Nerve. 2000 Dec; 23(12):1819-25.
[Muscle Nerve. 2000]J Appl Physiol. 1994 Jul; 77(1):58-62.
[J Appl Physiol. 1994]J Orthop Res. 2003 Jan; 21(1):167-76.
[J Orthop Res. 2003]J Orthop Res. 2003 Jan; 21(1):167-76.
[J Orthop Res. 2003]J Orthop Res. 2003 Jan; 21(1):167-76.
[J Orthop Res. 2003]J Neurotrauma. 2003 Jul; 20(7):681-95.
[J Neurotrauma. 2003]J Appl Physiol. 1994 May; 76(5):1999-2005.
[J Appl Physiol. 1994]J Bone Miner Res. 1995 Nov; 10(11):1745-52.
[J Bone Miner Res. 1995]Bone Miner. 1991 Apr; 13(1):35-46.
[Bone Miner. 1991]Bone. 1994 May-Jun; 15(3):293-301.
[Bone. 1994]J Appl Physiol. 2002 Oct; 93(4):1345-8.
[J Appl Physiol. 2002]J Occup Environ Med. 1998 Jun; 40(6):546-55.
[J Occup Environ Med. 1998]J Orthop Res. 1993 Nov; 11(6):828-33.
[J Orthop Res. 1993]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec; 87(24):9828-32.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990]J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1970 Feb; 33(1):70-9.
[J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1970]J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1967 Oct; 30(5):393-402.
[J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1967]J Neurol Sci. 1973 Aug; 19(4):491-5.
[J Neurol Sci. 1973]Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1991; 25(2):109-20.
[Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1991]J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980 Aug; 43(8):690-8.
[J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980]J Biomech Eng. 1986 May; 108(2):120-2.
[J Biomech Eng. 1986]Exp Neurol. 1984 Apr; 84(1):29-36.
[Exp Neurol. 1984]Acta Physiol Scand. 1989 May; 136(1):97-105.
[Acta Physiol Scand. 1989]Exp Physiol. 1994 Jul; 79(4):583-92.
[Exp Physiol. 1994]J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981 Mar; 63(3):380-3.
[J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981]Hand Clin. 1996 May; 12(2):185-93.
[Hand Clin. 1996]Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977; 11(3):179-87.
[Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977]J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983 Dec; 46(12):1119-24.
[J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983]Lab Invest. 1986 Jul; 55(1):91-100.
[Lab Invest. 1986]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar; 86(5):1639-42.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989]J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980 Dec; 43(12):1070-82.
[J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980]Lab Invest. 1986 Jul; 55(1):91-100.
[Lab Invest. 1986]Ann Plast Surg. 1984 Aug; 13(2):112-20.
[Ann Plast Surg. 1984]Ann Plast Surg. 1987 Nov; 19(5):430-5.
[Ann Plast Surg. 1987]J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1970 Feb; 33(1):70-9.
[J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1970]Ann Plast Surg. 1984 Aug; 13(2):112-20.
[Ann Plast Surg. 1984]Ann Plast Surg. 1987 Nov; 19(5):430-5.
[Ann Plast Surg. 1987]J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 May; 34(5):244-53.
[J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004]J Neurotrauma. 2003 Jul; 20(7):681-95.
[J Neurotrauma. 2003]Hand Clin. 1991 Aug; 7(3):491-504.
[Hand Clin. 1991]J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981 Mar; 63(3):380-3.
[J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981]Orthop Clin North Am. 1988 Jan; 19(1):115-24.
[Orthop Clin North Am. 1988]Hand Clin. 1996 May; 12(2):185-93.
[Hand Clin. 1996]Hand Clin. 2002 May; 18(2):231-41.
[Hand Clin. 2002]J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1976 Jul; 39(7):615-26.
[J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1976]Trends Neurosci. 1992 Mar; 15(3):96-103.
[Trends Neurosci. 1992]Neuroscience. 1999; 93(1):361-70.
[Neuroscience. 1999]Brain. 1998 Sep; 121 ( Pt 9)():1785-94.
[Brain. 1998]Neuroreport. 2000 Nov 27; 11(17):3925-30.
[Neuroreport. 2000]Phys Ther. 1997 Mar; 77(3):269-84.
[Phys Ther. 1997]Neurology. 1996 Aug; 47(2):508-20.
[Neurology. 1996]J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996 Apr; 23(4):234-44.
[J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996]Mov Disord. 1999 Mar; 14(2):295-306.
[Mov Disord. 1999]Behav Brain Res. 2001 Sep 14; 123(2):133-41.
[Behav Brain Res. 2001]J Orthop Res. 2003 Jan; 21(1):167-76.
[J Orthop Res. 2003]J Hand Ther. 2000 Oct-Dec; 13(4):289-301.
[J Hand Ther. 2000]Neurology. 1996 Aug; 47(2):508-20.
[Neurology. 1996]J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996 Apr; 23(4):234-44.
[J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996]J Neurotrauma. 2003 Jul; 20(7):681-95.
[J Neurotrauma. 2003]Mov Disord. 1999 Mar; 14(2):295-306.
[Mov Disord. 1999]Mov Disord. 2003 Jun; 18(6):673-82.
[Mov Disord. 2003]Neural Plast. 2002; 9(3):177-203.
[Neural Plast. 2002]Neuroreport. 2000 Nov 27; 11(17):3925-30.
[Neuroreport. 2000]Brain. 1998 Sep; 121 ( Pt 9)():1785-94.
[Brain. 1998]Ergonomics. 1994 Jun; 37(6):1055-69.
[Ergonomics. 1994]Somatosens Mot Res. 2002; 19(2):101-8.
[Somatosens Mot Res. 2002]Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002 Jun; 75(5):332-40.
[Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002]Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998 Feb; 71(1):29-34.
[Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998]Brain. 1998 Sep; 121 ( Pt 9)():1785-94.
[Brain. 1998]Neuroscience. 1999; 93(1):361-70.
[Neuroscience. 1999]J Hand Ther. 2000 Oct-Dec; 13(4):302-9.
[J Hand Ther. 2000]Neural Plast. 2002; 9(3):177-203.
[Neural Plast. 2002]J Orthop Res. 2003 Jan; 21(1):167-76.
[J Orthop Res. 2003]Microsurgery. 2002; 22(8):378-85.
[Microsurgery. 2002]Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002 Jun; 28(3):168-75.
[Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002]Ann Plast Surg. 1991 Mar; 26(3):259-64.
[Ann Plast Surg. 1991]Lancet. 1973 Aug 18; 2(7825):359-62.
[Lancet. 1973]J Orthop Res. 2003 Jan; 21(1):167-76.
[J Orthop Res. 2003]J Occup Environ Med. 1998 Jun; 40(6):546-55.
[J Occup Environ Med. 1998]J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Nov; 18(11):2023-32.
[J Bone Miner Res. 2003]J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000 Mar-Apr; 9(2):79-84.
[J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000]