pmc logo image
Logo of thijTHI JOURNAL WEBSITECurrent Issue.See also Cardiovascular Diseases Journal in PMC.SubscribeSubmissions

Formats:

Tex Heart Inst J. 2006; 33(2): 229–231.
PMCID: PMC1524676
Successful Ventricular Remodeling with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Mitral Valve Repair in a Patient with Severe Heart Failure
George V. Letsou, MD and O. H. Frazier, MD
Department of Surgery (Dr. Letsou), The University of Texas Medical School, and the Cardiopulmonary Transplant Service (Dr. Frazier), Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030
Abstract
Left ventricular remodeling is becoming a frequent treatment for severe heart failure, but its use in combination with other surgical techniques is controversial. We report a case in which left ventricular remodeling was combined with coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve repair to treat a patient with severely depressed ejection fraction, mitral insufficiency, coronary artery disease, and a recent history of myocardial infarction. Cardiac function improved after the combined treatment. This case suggests that left ventricular remodeling can be used safely and effectively in conjunction with other surgical techniques.
Key words: Cardiac surgical procedures/methods, coronary artery bypass grafting, heart failure, congestive, heart ventricles/surgery, mitral valve repair, myocardial infarction, ventricular remodeling, surgical, ventricular function, left
Surgical remodeling of the left ventricle is being performed with increasing frequency. As advocated by Dor and colleagues,1 the procedure has been used to treat patients with severe heart failure, dilated left ventricles, and dyskinetic myocardial wall segments. Despite controversy about the precise mechanisms of action, ventricular remodeling has been successful in decreasing left ventricular wall tension, improving cardiac hemodynamics, and improving the neurohormonal milieu of patients with heart failure.1
We report the case of a patient who had a severely depressed ejection fraction, mitral insufficiency, coronary artery disease, and a recent history of myocardial infarction. His cardiac function was objectively improved by concomitant ventricular remodeling, coronary artery bypass grafting, and mitral valve repair.
A 59-year-old man presented at our institution with a recent transmural myocardial infarction and previous angioplasty and stenting of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Recurrent episodes of congestive heart failure complicated by bilateral pleural effusions had been followed by moderate-to-severe mitral valve insufficiency.
Echocardiography revealed a dilated left ventricle and severely impaired global cardiac function. The anterior septum and the anterior and lateral walls of the left ventricle were akinetic. Thrombus lined the akinetic anterior wall of the left ventricle. Left ventricular filling was impaired, which was consistent with high left atrial pressures. The inferior and posterolateral walls contracted normally. The patient had moderate-to-severe mitral valve regurgitation and severe tricuspid valve regurgitation. The estimated ejection fraction was 0.20.
Cardiac catheterization revealed a hemodynamically significant lesion in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery and severe pulmonary hypertension, with pulmonary artery pressures (75/30 mmHg) that were nearly equal to systemic pressures. Nuclear stress testing with adenosine thallium revealed severe, fixed perfusion defects in the anteroseptal and apical regions.
Despite medical management with aggressive diuresis and optimal β-blocker therapy, symptoms of congestive heart failure (such as severe dyspnea and limited exercise tolerance) persisted. Surgical remodeling of the ventricle in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve repair was recommended to the patient.
After the induction of anesthesia but before the operation, transesophageal echocardiography was performed. This confirmed marked dilation of the left ventricle; left ventricular ejection fraction of approximately 0.20; akinesis of the anterior wall, apex, and septum; and severe mitral insufficiency. Of note, the transesophageal echocardiogram showed only mild tricuspid valve regurgitation.
Coronary artery bypass grafting was done through a median sternotomy. Even in light of the preoperative nuclear stress test findings that had shown an anteroseptal perfusion defect, the left anterior descending coronary artery, measuring 2.0 mm in diameter, was bypassed with a single graft—without cardiopulmonary bypass—to recruit possibly hibernating myocardium in the septal and anterior walls. The proximal graft anastomosis was performed while the aorta was partially occluded with a cross-clamp; the distal anastomosis was performed using standard off-pump stabilization techniques and a “flow-through” intracoronary cannula after completion of ventricular remodeling. Then the proximal anastomosis was performed, the aorta was cannulated, and a single venous cannula was placed in the right atrium.
Surgical ventricular remodeling and mitral valve repair were performed during cardiopulmonary bypass, without ischemic arrest or aortic occlusion. A left ventriculotomy was performed from the apex to the transitional zone of viable myocardium at the base of the posterior papillary muscle (Fig. 1figure 29FF1). The transitional zone between contracting and noncontracting myocardium was identified visually and by palpation. The mitral valve, which was clearly visible through the ventriculotomy, was repaired through the ventriculotomy using a suture annuloplasty technique to shorten the mural leaflet.2,3 An Alfieri-type stitch was placed, approximating the mid-portions of the mitral leaflets. Four centimeters of the akinetic anterior wall extending from the apex to the transitional zone were removed. The resection margins included the apex and the free lateral wall to the base of the posterior papillary muscle. Ventricular remodeling was achieved using a prosthetic low-porosity Dacron patch that was reinforced with overlying portions of the free ventricular wall by using Cooley's endoaneurysmorrhaphy technique (Fig. 2figure 29FF2). Aneurysmorrhaphy was performed with a prosthetic low-porosity woven patch secured along the margin of viable and nonviable tissue by a running 3-0 polypropylene suture reinforced with interrupted pledgeted sutures. The margins of the left ventricular wall over the site of the aneurysmorrhaphy were reapproximated linearly between 2 long Teflon felt pledgets secured with a 2-0 silicone-coated polyester (Ticron) suture (Fig. 2figure 29FF2). Before weaning the patient from bypass, a prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump was inserted percutaneously to provide counterpulsation support. This support and the administration of epinephrine at 0.01 μg/kg/min resulted in uneventful weaning.
figure 29FF1
figure 29FF1
Fig. 1 The left ventricle after ventricular resection. This view is from the anesthesiologist's position. The incision is carried up from the ventricular apex approximately 1 cm parallel to the left anterior descending coronary artery. A single suture (more ...)
figure 29FF2
figure 29FF2
Fig. 2 Completed ventricular remodeling. This view is from the anesthesiologist's position. The linear repair of the anterior left ventricle is reinforced by its placement between 2 Teflon pledgets. The patch repair underlies the linear repair.
Postoperative transesophageal echocardiography revealed a significantly diminished left ventricular volume and improved left ventricular systolic function overall. Only trace mitral valve regurgitation was seen, as characterized by a mildly increased mitral valve gradient of approximately 4 mmHg at a heart rate of 75 beats/min.
During the first 24 hours after surgery, the patient was weaned from intravenous epinephrine. Cardiac function was excellent, with a cardiac index of 2.5, a creatine kinase-MB index of 4.6, and a troponin T level of 0.817 ng/mL. No electrocardiographic changes were noted during this period. On postoperative day 2, the patient was extubated and the intra-aortic balloon pump was removed. Because of the patient's history of myocardial infarction and the presence of a wide QRS complex on the electrocardiogram, a biventricular implantable cardioverter–defibrillator was implanted on postoperative day 10. The patient's subsequent recovery was uneventful, and he was discharged from the hospital on day 12.
Postoperative echocardiography at the 3-week follow-up revealed an ejection fraction of 0.25 to 0.30. The ventricular volume was difficult to assess because of echocardiographic shadows caused by the ventricular Dacron patch. The estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (46 mmHg) was markedly decreased. Trace mitral valve regurgitation, as characterized by a persistent but minimal gradient of 5 mmHg, was still seen. Postoperative nuclear multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scanning revealed a slightly improved ejection fraction of 0.29 at 2 weeks and a markedly improved ejection fraction of 0.44 at 3 months. The patient remains in New York Heart Association functional class I more than 14 months after the operation.
Congestive heart failure and depressed left ventricular function are associated with poor survival rates. Survival may be improved and symptoms ameliorated by medical approaches (for example, with enalapril, as in the SOLVD trial4) or by surgery. Surgical approaches to congestive heart failure include transplantation, ventricular assist device implantation, standard coronary artery and valve surgery, and, more recently, ventricular remodeling. In a study at the University of Virginia,5 ventricular remodeling improved the mean ejection fraction from 0.10 to 0.30, even though ventricular remodeling and mitral valve surgery were performed concomitantly in very few cases. In the multicenter, multinational RESTORE trial,6 ventricular remodeling improved the mean ejection fraction from 0.20 to 0.50 and was associated with a mortality rate of 6%. Ventricular remodeling also appears to improve the neurohormonal milieu. Investigators at the Cleveland Clinic recently found markedly lower norepinephrine and plasma catecholamine levels and no deaths in a 15-patient cohort 1 year after ventricular remodeling.7
The present case is notable for its complexity. Yet, despite the concomitant presence of coronary artery disease, pulmonary hypertension, severe congestive heart failure, and severe mitral regurgitation, appropriate surgical management of each condition resulted in an excellent outcome overall. This combined approach is controversial, however. Similar controversy in the past has surrounded revascularization of the left anterior descending coronary artery in combination with ventricular aneurysm resection. In cases such as the one presented here, our preference has been to 1) revascularize all vessels affected by hemodynamically significant lesions, even in the face of poor nuclear stress test findings, in order to allow maximal recruitment of possibly hibernating myocardium and 2) correct concomitant mitral insufficiency surgically in order to maximize the forward output of the severely compromised left ventricle. Mitral regurgitation frequently accompanies the disordered ventricular anatomy and physiology that are associated with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Annuloplasty of the posterior annular ring can be performed through the ventricle and without cross-clamping the aorta. When this technique is combined with an Alfieri-type valvuloplasty, long-term correction of mitral regurgitation can be achieved.
In this patient, we chose to remodel the left ventricle with a patch rather than with a commercial rigid prosthesis in order to avoid the potential for mechanical disruption of the left ventricle with a resultant pseudoaneurysm. Our repair technique, which is patterned after Cooley's technique for endoaneurysmorrhaphy, provides a flexible yet secure ventricular repair that decreases left ventricular volume, optimizes ventricular anatomy, and maximizes ventricular function while minimizing operative time.8
In conclusion, this case shows that left ventricular remodeling is an important surgical treatment for heart failure that can be used successfully in conjunction with other surgical techniques.
Footnotes
Address for reprints: George V. Letsou, MD, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, 6410 Fannin, Suite #450, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail: George.V.Letsou/at/uth.tmc.edu
1. Dor V, Sabatier M, Di Donato M, Maioli M, Toso A, Montiglio F. Late hemodynamic results after left ventricular patch repair associated with coronary grafting in patients with postinfarction akinetic or dyskinetic aneurysm of the left ventricle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:1291–301. [PubMed]
2. Batista RJ, Verde J, Nery P, Bocchino L, Takeshita N, Bhayana JN, et al. Partial left ventriculectomy to treat end-stage heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:634–8. [PubMed]
3. Gradinac S, Miric M, Popovic Z, Popovic AD, Neskovic AN, Jovovic L, et al. Partial left ventriculectomy for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: early results and six-month follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1963–8. [PubMed]
4. Francis GS, Benedict C, Johnstone DE, Kirlin PC, Nicklas J, Liang CS, et al. Comparison of neuroendocrine activation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction with and without congestive heart failure. A substudy of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Circulation 1990;82:1724–9. [PubMed]
5. Maxey TS, Reece TB, Ellman PI, Kern JA, Tribble CG, Kron IL. The beating heart approach is not necessary for the Dor procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1571–5. [PubMed]
6. Buckberg GD. Ventricular restoration—a surgical approach to reverse ventricular remodeling. Heart Fail Rev 2004;9:233–9; discussion 347–51.
7. Schenk S, McCarthy PM, Starling RC, Hoercher KJ, Hail MD, Ootaki Y, et al. Neurohormonal response to left ventricular reconstruction surgery in ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:38–43. [PubMed]
8. Cooley DA. Ventricular endoaneurysmorrhaphy: a simplified repair for extensive postinfarction aneurysm. J Card Surg 1989;4:200–5. [PubMed]

See more articles cited in this paragraph
See more articles cited in this paragraph
See more articles cited in this paragraph
See more articles cited in this paragraph