pmc logo image
Logo of envhperEHP WebsiteAbout EHPPublicationsNews By TopicAuthorsSubscribePressEmail AlertsSearch EHP

Formats:

Environ Health Perspect. 1995 April; 103(Suppl 3): 13–29.
PMCID: PMC1519013
Research Article
Estimating exposure and dose to characterize health risks: the role of human tissue monitoring in exposure assessment.
K Sexton, M A Callahan, and E F Bryan
School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
Abstract
Exposure assessment is an integral part of health risk characterization. Exposure assessments typically address three critical aspects of exposure: the number of people exposed to the environmental toxicant, at specific concentrations, for the time period of interest; the resulting dose; and the relative contribution of important sources and pathways to exposure/dose. Because historically both "point-of-contact" measurements and information about dose and related pharmacokinetic processes have been lacking, exposure assessments have had to rely on construction of "scenarios" to estimate exposure and dose. This could change, however, as advances in development of biologic markers of exposure and dose make it possible to measure and interpret toxicant concentrations in accessible human tissues. The increasing availability of "biomarkers," coupled with improvements in pharmacokinetic understanding, present opportunities to estimate ("reconstruct") exposure from measurements of dose and knowledge of intake and uptake parameters. Human tissue monitoring, however, is not a substitute for more traditional methods of measuring exposure, but rather a complementary approach. A combination of exposure measurements and dose measurements provides the most credible scientific basis for exposure assessment.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (3.8M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Sexton K, Olden K, Johnson BL. "Environmental justice": the central role of research in establishing a credible scientific foundation for informed decision making. Toxicol Ind Health. 1993 Sep–Oct;9(5):685–727. [PubMed]
  • Hawkins NC. Conservatism in maximally exposed individual (MEI) predictive exposure assessments: a first-cut analysis. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1991 Oct;14(2):107–117. [PubMed]
  • Hawkins NC, Jayjock MA, Lynch J. A rationale and framework for establishing the quality of human exposure assessments. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1992 Jan;53(1):34–41. [PubMed]
  • Graham J, Walker KD, Berry M, Bryan EF, Callahan MA, Fan A, Finley B, Lynch J, McKone T, Ozkaynak H, et al. Role of exposure databases in risk assessment. Arch Environ Health. 1992 Nov–Dec;47(6):408–420. [PubMed]
  • Sexton K, Selevan SG, Wagener DK, Lybarger JA. Estimating human exposures to environmental pollutants: availability and utility of existing databases. Arch Environ Health. 1992 Nov–Dec;47(6):398–407. [PubMed]
  • Whitmyre GK, Driver JH, Ginevan ME, Tardiff RG, Baker SR. Human exposure assessment. I: Understanding the uncertainties. Toxicol Ind Health. 1992 Sep–Oct;8(5):297–320. [PubMed]
  • Whitmyre GK, Driver JH, Ginevan ME, Tardiff RG, Baker SR. Human exposure assessment. II: Quantifying and reducing the uncertainties. Toxicol Ind Health. 1992 Sep–Oct;8(5):321–342. [PubMed]
  • Wallace L. A decade of studies of human exposure: what have we learned? Risk Anal. 1993 Apr;13(2):135–139. [PubMed]
  • Burke T, Anderson H, Beach N, Colome S, Drew RT, Firestone M, Hauchman FS, Miller TO, Wagener DK, Zeise L, et al. Role of exposure databases in risk management. Arch Environ Health. 1992 Nov–Dec;47(6):421–429. [PubMed]
  • Goldman LR, Gomez M, Greenfield S, Hall L, Hulka BS, Kaye WE, Lybarger JA, McKenzie DH, Murphy RS, Wellington DG, et al. Use of exposure databases for status and trends analysis. Arch Environ Health. 1992 Nov–Dec;47(6):430–438. [PubMed]
  • Matanoski G, Selevan SG, Akland G, Bornschein RL, Dockery D, Edmonds L, Greife A, Mehlman M, Shaw GM, Elliott E. Role of exposure databases in epidemiology. Arch Environ Health. 1992 Nov–Dec;47(6):439–446. [PubMed]
  • McKone TE. Human exposure to chemicals from multiple media and through multiple pathways: research overview and comments. Risk Anal. 1991 Mar;11(1):5–10. [PubMed]
  • McKone TE, Daniels JI. Estimating human exposure through multiple pathways from air, water, and soil. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1991 Feb;13(1):36–61. [PubMed]
  • Sexton K. The role of scientific research in risk assessment and risk management decisions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992 Jun;106(6):635–641. [PubMed]
  • Hattis DB. The promise of molecular epidemiology for quantitative risk assessment. Risk Anal. 1986 Jun;6(2):181–193. [PubMed]
  • Stevens DK, Bull RJ, Nauman CH, Blancato JN. Decision model for biomarkers of exposure. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1991 Dec;14(3):286–296. [PubMed]
  • Fowle JR, 3rd, Sexton K. EPA priorities for biologic markers research in environmental health. Environ Health Perspect. 1992 Nov;98:235–241. [PubMed]
  • Schulte PA. A conceptual framework for the validation and use of biologic markers. Environ Res. 1989 Apr;48(2):129–144. [PubMed]
  • Wallace L, Nelson W, Ziegenfus R, Pellizzari E, Michael L, Whitmore R, Zelon H, Hartwell T, Perritt R, Westerdahl D. The Los Angeles TEAM Study: personal exposures, indoor-outdoor air concentrations, and breath concentrations of 25 volatile organic compounds. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1991 Apr;1(2):157–192. [PubMed]