• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of amjphAmerican Journal of Public Health Web SiteAmerican Public Health Association Web SiteSubmissionsSubscriptionsAbout Us
Am J Public Health. 1998 September; 88(9): 1384–1387.
PMCID: PMC1509079

Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 and 1994.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The percentages of cesarean deliveries attributable to specific indications (breech, dystocia, fetal distress, and elective repeat cesarean) were computed for 1985 and 1994. METHODS: Data were derived from the 1985 and 1994 National Hospital Discharge Surveys. RESULTS: Dystocia was the leading indication for cesarean delivery in both years. In comparison with 1985, cesareans performed in 1994 that were attributable to dystocia and breech presentation increased, those attributable to fetal distress did not change significantly, and elective repeat cesareans declined. CONCLUSIONS: Studying indications for cesareans can be useful for hospitals, clinicians, and researchers in determining strategies to lower primary and repeat cesarean rates.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.3M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Taffel SM, Placek PJ, Moien M, Kosary CL. 1989 U.S. cesarean section rate steadies--VBAC rate rises to nearly one in five. Birth. 1991 Jun;18(2):73–77. [PubMed]
  • Notzon FC, Cnattingius S, Bergsjø P, Cole S, Taffel S, Irgens L, Daltveit AK. Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;170(2):495–504. [PubMed]
  • Clarke SC, Taffel SM. State variation in rates of cesarean and VBAC delivery: 1989 and 1993. Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1996 Jan-Mar;77(1):28–36. [PubMed]
  • Socol ML, Garcia PM, Peaceman AM, Dooley SL. Reducing cesarean births at a primarily private university hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;168(6 Pt 1):1748–1758. [PubMed]
  • Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Peterson HB, Martinez-Schnell B, Thompson RJ. Reducing cesarean sections at a teaching hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;163(3):1081–1088. [PubMed]
  • Lagrew DC, Jr, Morgan MA. Decreasing the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: success without mandated clinical changes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan;174(1 Pt 1):184–191. [PubMed]
  • Paul RH, Miller DA. Cesarean birth: how to reduce the rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun;172(6):1903–1911. [PubMed]
  • Gregory KD, Henry OA, Gellens AJ, Hobel CJ, Platt LD. Repeat cesareans: how many are elective? Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;84(4):574–578. [PubMed]
  • Hanley ML, Smulian JC, Lake MF, McLean DA, Vintzileos AM. Analysis of repeat cesarean delivery indications: implications of heterogeneity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;175(4 Pt 1):883–888. [PubMed]
  • Anderson GM, Lomas J. Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982. N Engl J Med. 1984 Oct 4;311(14):887–892. [PubMed]
  • Taffel SM, Placek PJ, Liss T. Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise. Am J Public Health. 1987 Aug;77(8):955–959. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Graves EJ. 1991 summary: National Hospital Discharge Survey. Adv Data. 1993 Mar 3;(227):1–12. [PubMed]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles