• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jcmPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJCM ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
J Clin Microbiol. Feb 2003; 41(2): 880–882.
PMCID: PMC149707

Value of Indirect Hemagglutination and Coagglutination Tests for Serotyping Haemophilus parasuis

Abstract

An indirect hemagglutination test (IHA) and a coagglutination test (CA) were evaluated using saline, boiled, and autoclaved extracts for serotyping Haemophilus parasuis. CA showed several cross-reactions, whereas IHA gave rise to specific reactions, with minor exceptions. IHA was further compared with the immunodiffusion test (the “gold standard”) for the serotyping of 67 field isolates. As a conclusion, IHA is recommended as a useful method for sensitive and specific serotyping of H. parasuis.

Haemophilus parasuis, a small pleomorphic gram-negative rod of the family Pasteurellaceae, is the causative agent of Glässer's disease, which has historically been considered a sporadic, stress-associated disease of young pigs (19). However, since the establishment of specific-pathogen-free herds, increased spread of the disease and increased mortality rates have been described for the swine industry worldwide (20).

Although some other methods have been used for the serotyping of H. parasuis (5, 12), the Kielstein-Rapp-Gabrielson scheme (based on heat-stable cell antigens tested by agar gel precipitation) is now the internationally recognized test (1, 6, 14). At present, 15 serovars have been proposed, with most recent serotyping studies reporting the existence of nontypeable isolates, which seems to indicate the possibility of a larger number of serovars (6, 14). It is essential to know which are the most prevalent serovars in a given area to effectively control Glässer's disease, because the vaccine immunity confers a reduced cross-protection among serovars (7). In addition, several molecular methods (restriction endonuclease fingerprinting [19], multilocus enzyme electrophoresis [2], enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-PCR [13], and outer-membrane-protein profiling [17]) have also been developed for typing H. parasuis.

Coagglutination (CA) and indirect hemagglutination (IHA) are accessible tests at any diagnostic laboratory, and they have been proven to be reliable and suitable for serotyping clinical isolates of a variety of gram-positive and gram-negative organisms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of these two tests in comparisons of different antigens as screening procedures for serotyping H. parasuis.

Reference strains representing serotypes 1 through 15 of H. parasuis (H409, H410, H411, H412, H413, H780, H643, H494, H553, H555, H465, H425, H793, H792, and H790) were used. The production of antisera in rabbits has already been described elsewhere (6). Antisera were absorbed with an equal volume of a mixture of 10% of whole cells of the 14 heterologous serovars (bacterial suspensions from an 18-h culture on chocolate agar), as described previously (8).

For the preparation of antigens for CA and IHA, the overnight growth from chocolate agar was washed off in 0.15 M NaCl. The suspension was adjusted to a 10% cell concentration and was divided into three parts. The first part was left overnight at room temperature, the second part was boiled for 1 h, and the third portion was autoclaved (121°C for 2 h). All three preparations were then centrifuged at 8,000 × g for 10 min. The clear supernatants which were pipetted off the first, second, and third preparations are referred to in this work as saline extract, boiled extract, and autoclaved extract, respectively.

Details of the preparation of CA reagent (antibodies bound to Staphylococcus aureus strain Cowan 1 [NCTC 8530]) and details of the test procedure have been described previously (10). For the IHA test, fresh sheep red blood cells (SRBC) were sensitized as described previously (4, 9). The IHA test was performed with a microtiter system as reported by Mittal et al. (9).

Concerning CA test results, saline extracts gave strong positive reactions with all the homologous reagents. However, several cross-reactions appeared, especially for serovars 10, 13, 14, and 15, some of which were of the same intensity as that seen with the homologous reagent. Cross-reactions appeared for all tests except when serovars 1 and 7 were tested. The use of boiled extracts decreased the amount of cross-reactions, but even so, they were observed for serovars 2 to 4, 6, and 10 to 15. These findings indicate that the heat-labile nature of some of the cross-reacting antigens but not of others was detected by CA testing. Finally, autoclaved extracts did not give rise to positive reactions with any of the homologous or heterologous reagents. CA is a simple, specific, and sensitive test (10); however, given the large amount of cross-reactions detected in this study, use of this test cannot be recommended for serotyping H. parasuis. These results clearly contrast with those reported for other members of the Pasteurellaceae (e.g., Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Mannheimia haemolytica, and Pasteurella multocida), for which CA testing proved to be useful for detecting type-specific antigens (3, 10, 11, 16, 18).

When saline extracts were used as antigens in IHA, specific reactions were demonstrated for all serovars, with the exception of those resulting in a small number of cross-reactions (Table (Table1).1). As the homologous antibody titers observed in these cross-reactions were always higher than the heterologous ones and the cross-reactions were one way only, neither type of result led to confusion. Using boiled extracts, serovars 1, 3 to 9, 12, 14, and 15 did not show any cross-reactions, whereas the remaining serovars exhibited one-way cross-reactions (Table (Table1).1). Anyway, we were able to differentiate between homologous and heterologous reactions, again with the help of the antibody titers. The fact that the cross-reactions detected when using saline extracts were also present after boiling indicates the heat-stable nature of the cross-reacting antigens. The autoclaved extracts showed the lowest antigenic activity, and they did not reveal any antibody activity for serovars 2, 3, 7, and 10 to 14. Some new one-way cross-reactions were observed with these extracts (Table (Table1).1). The dilution of antisera allowed us to differentiate again between homologous and heterologous reactions.

TABLE 1.
IHA test results with various soluble antigens and rabbit hyperimmune sera produced against whole-cell antigens

Investigators using other serological tests for H. parasuis have reported the presence of specific, thermostable, soluble antigens of a polysaccharide nature associated with the cell capsule or outer membrane (5, 6, 14). Surface polysaccharides from gram-negative bacteria adsorb naturally to SRBC (22); for this reason, these antigens are very suitable for IHA. In light of the results obtained, use of the IHA test with any of the saline or boiled extracts appears to be a good choice for serotyping H. parasuis. Our study also confirmed that the heat-stable antigens adsorbed on the SRBC are serovar specific. However, strong heat treatments are not necessary, because the antigen preparations consisting of supernatants obtained from unheated cells are equally serovar specific. This observation seems to suggest that not only deeper but also surface antigens are involved in the specificity of H. parasuis serovars, a finding already reported for A. pleuropneumoniae (9). Even stronger heat treatments, such as autoclaving, are not useful (despite the fact that autoclaved extracts are the antigens of choice in the immunodiffusion test [ID] [12, 14]), probably because heating at 121°C for 2 h is capable of modifying the thermostable antigens in a such manner as to eliminate their adsorption to SRBC in some serovars and decrease it in others.

To validate the usefulness of the IHA test, a total of 67 H. parasuis field isolates recovered in Spain between 1998 and 2002 were further tested using saline extracts (the extract showing maximum specificity), and results were compared to those of the ID using autoclaved extracts (6, 14). All of the isolates that were serotyped by ID were also correctly typed by the proposed IHA test, with the exception of one isolate of serovar 2 (Table (Table2).2). Of the 25 isolates that were considered nontypeable by ID, 80% were typed with IHA while 5 isolates remained nontypeable. Slight cross-reactions, none of which led to confusion when selecting the correct serovar, were shown by only three isolates (Table (Table22).

TABLE 2.
Results of serotyping of 67 H. parasuis field isolates by ID and the proposed IHA test

A total of 91% of the isolates were serotyped with IHA versus the almost 63% that were serotyped with ID, thus suggesting that the former test is a more sensitive procedure for serotyping H. parasuis. The presence of five isolates nontypeable by both IHA and ID, a finding reported at higher levels in other investigations in which the isolates were serotyped only by ID (14, 15, 21), confirms the antigenic heterogeneity of H. parasuis and suggests the existence of additional serovars. Other possible topics for speculation include that of the low polysaccharide content in these isolates, the main type-specific antigen involved in IHA.

Although the reliability of the classical typing methods is strongly dependent on the characteristics of the serovar-specific antisera used, the sensitivity and specificity revealed by the proposed IHA test recommend its use as an additional method for reliable serotyping of H. parasuis.

Acknowledgments

We thank P. Kielstein for providing us with the H. parasuis reference strains.

REFERENCES

1. Blackall, P. J., V. J. Rapp-Gabrielson, and D. J. Hampson. 1996. Serological characterisation of Haemophilus parasuis isolates from Australian pigs. Aust. Vet. J. 73:93-95. [PubMed]
2. Blackall, P. J., D. J. Trott, V. Rapp-Gabrielson, and D. J. Hampson. 1997. Analysis of Haemophilus parasuis by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Vet. Microbiol. 56:125-134. [PubMed]
3. Fodor, L., Z. Pénzes, and J. Varga. 1996. Coagglutination test for serotyping Pasteurella haemolytica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:393-397. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Gutiérrez, C. B., R. I. Tascón, J. A. Vázquez, and E. F. Rodríguez Ferri. 1991. Cross-reactivity between Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotypes comparing different antigens and serological tests. Res. Vet. Sci. 50:308-310. [PubMed]
5. Kielstein, P., H. Rosner, and W. Müller. 1991. Typing of heat-stable soluble Haemophilus parasuis antigen by means of agar gel precipitation and the dot-blot procedure. J. Vet. Med. Ser. B 38:315-320. [PubMed]
6. Kielstein, P., and V. J. Rapp-Gabrielson. 1992. Designation of 15 serovars of Haemophilus parasuis on the basis of immunodiffusion using heat-stable antigen extracts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:862-865. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Miniats, O. P., N. L. Smart, and S. Rosendal. 1991. Cross protection among Haemophilus parasuis strains in immunized gnotobiotic pigs. Can. J. Vet. Res. 55:37-41. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Mittal, K. R., R. Higgins, and S. Larivière. 1982. Evaluation of slide agglutination and ring precipitation tests for capsular serotyping of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 15:1019-1023. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Mittal, K. R., R. Higgins, and S. Larivière. 1983. Determination of antigenic specificity and relationship among Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae serotypes by an indirect hemagglutination test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 17:787-790. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Mittal, K. R., R. Higgins, and S. Larivière. 1983. Identification and serotyping of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae by coagglutination test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 18:1351-1354. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Molnar, E., and L. Molnar. 1994. The value of different serological tests in serotyping of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae strains. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 41:247-253. [PubMed]
12. Morozumi, T., and J. Nicolet. 1986. Some antigenic properties of Haemophilus parasuis and a proposal for serological classification. J. Clin. Microbiol. 23:1022-1025. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Rafiee, M., M. Bara, C. P. Stephens, and P. J. Blackall. 2000. Application of ERIC-PCR for the comparison of isolates of Haemophilus parasuis. Aust. Vet. J. 78:846-849. [PubMed]
14. Rafiee, M., and P. J. Blackall. 2000. Establishment, validation and use of the Kielstein-Rapp-Gabrielson serotyping scheme for Haemophilus parasuis. Aust. Vet. J. 78:172-174. [PubMed]
15. Rapp-Gabrielson, V. J., and D. A. Gabrielson. 1992. Prevalence of Haemophilus parasuis serovars among isolates from swine. Am. J. Vet. Res. 53:659-664. [PubMed]
16. Rimler, R. B. 1978. Coagglutination test for identification of Pasteurella multocida associated with hemorrhagic septicemia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 8:214-218. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Ruiz, A., S. Oliveira, M. Torremorell, and C. Pijoan. 2001. Outer membrane proteins and DNA profiles in strains of Haemophilus parasuis recovered from systemic and respiratory sites. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1757-1762. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Skollova, Z., and M. Gois. 1987. Detection of strains of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae using the coagglutination test. Vet. Med. (Prague) 32:469-477. [PubMed]
19. Smart, N. L., O. P. Miniats, and J. I. MacInnes. 1988. Analysis of Haemophilus parasuis isolates from southern Ontario swine by restriction endonuclease fingerprinting. Can. J. Vet. Res. 52:319-324. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Smart, N. L., O. P. Miniats, S. Rosendal, and R. Friendship. 1989. Glasser's disease and prevalence of subclinical infection with Haemophilus parasuis in swine in southern Ontario. Can. Vet. J. 30:339-343. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Rubies, X., P. Kielstein, L. Costa, P. Riera, C. Artigas, and E. Espuña. 1999. Prevalence of Haemophilus parasuis serovars isolated in Spain from 1993 to 1997. Vet. Microbiol. 66:245-248. [PubMed]
22. Tizard, I. 1992. Veterinary immunology, 4th ed. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, Pa.

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...