Translation Repression in Human Cells by MicroRNA-Induced Gene Silencing Requires RCK/p54

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040210

Journal List > PLoS Biol > v.4(7); Jul 2006

PLoS Biol. 2006 July; 4(7): e210.

Published online 2006 June 13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040210.

PMCID: PMC1475773

Copyright : © 2006 Chu and Rana. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Translation Repression in Human Cells by MicroRNA-Induced Gene Silencing Requires RCK/p54

Chia-ying Chu¹ and Tariq M Rana¹

1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America

James Carrington, Academic Editor

Oregon State University, United States of America

Corresponding author.

Tariq M Rana: tariq.rana/at/umassmed.edu

Received January 9, 2006; Accepted April 21, 2006.

See "Characterizing a Key Player in Micro, but Not Small, RNA Interference" , e238.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

RNA interference is triggered by double-stranded RNA that is processed into small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) by Dicer enzyme. Endogenously, RNA interference triggers are created from small noncoding RNAs called microRNAs (miRNAs). RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISC) in human cells can be programmed by exogenously introduced siRNA or endogenously expressed miRNA. siRNA-programmed RISC (siRISC) silences expression by cleaving a perfectly complementary target mRNA, whereas miRNA-induced silencing complexes (miRISC) inhibits translation by binding imperfectly matched sequences in the 3′ UTR of target mRNA. Both RISCs contain Argonaute2 (Ago2), which catalyzes target mRNA cleavage by siRISC and localizes to cytoplasmic mRNA processing bodies (P-bodies). Here, we show that RCK/p54, a DEAD box helicase, interacts with argonaute proteins, Ago1 and Ago2, in affinity-purified active siRISC or miRISC from human cells; directly interacts with Ago1 and Ago2 in vivo, facilitates formation of P-bodies, and is a general repressor of translation. Disrupting P-bodies by depleting Lsm1 did not affect RCK/p54 interactions with argonaute proteins and its function in miRNA-mediated translation repression. Depletion of RCK/p54 disrupted P-bodies and dispersed Ago2 throughout the cytoplasm but did not significantly affect siRNA-mediated RNA functions of RISC. Depleting RCK/p54 released general, miRNA-induced, and let-7-mediated translational repression. Therefore, we propose that translation repression is mediated by miRISC via RCK/p54 and its specificity is dictated by the miRNA sequence binding multiple copies of miRISC to complementary 3′ UTR sites in the target mRNA. These studies also suggest that translation suppression by miRISC does not require P-body structures, and location of miRISC to P-bodies is the consequence of translation repression.

Introduction

Small non-coding RNAs play important roles in the posttranscriptional regulation of genes that code for diverse biological functions, e.g., in most metazoan organisms from nematodes to mammals [ 1– 3]. Two classes of such small (~ 21 nucleotide [nt]) RNAs that have been extensively studied in gene silencing are short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) (reviewed in [ 4]). Currently, the best known mechanism of gene silencing is RNA interference (RNAi), an evolutionarily conserved process whereby double-stranded RNA induces the sequence-specific degradation of homologous mRNA [ 5]. Long double-stranded RNA and precursors of miRNAs are processed by Dicer enzyme, and siRNAs are assembled into an RNA-induced silencing complex called RISC. The RNAi machinery can also be programmed in cells by introducing duplexes of siRNAs that are assembled into RNA-induced silencing complexes (siRISC) containing Dicer, argonautes, and other proteins [ 6]. Although RNAi has commonly been associated with siRNAs, this process is largely mediated in plants by miRNAs [ 7, 8], and examples of miRNA-mediated RNAi have been found in mammals and viruses (reviewed in [ 6]). Growing evidence indicates that miRNAs are important in human disease, including cancers [ 9– 12]. For example, relatively low levels of let-7 miRNA up-regulate RAS protein in lung cancer cells, demonstrating a possible role of miRNA in tumorigenesis [ 13].

Both classes of small RNAs are assembled into silencing complexes that contain Dicer, argonautes, and other proteins [ 4], but they silence gene expression by two different pathways. Upon recognizing complementary mRNA, activated RISC forms an effector complex with the target mRNA [ 6]. Antisense siRNA in activated RISC serves as a guide for Argonaute2 (Ago2) [ 14– 16] to catalyze the cleavage of target mRNA at a site ~ 10 nt from the 5′ end of the siRNA [ 17]. Following cleavage, the target mRNA is degraded. Activated RISC, as a multi-turnover enzyme [ 18], is recycled to cleave additional mRNA targets.

In the case of miRNAs, they are assembled into miRNA-induced silencing complexes (miRISC) that contain Dicer, argonaute proteins, transactivation-responsive RNA-binding protein [ 19– 22], and other cellular factors [ 4]. This assembly into miRISC has been implicated in miRNA functions [ 19– 24].

Whether siRNA-mediated RNAi or miRNA-mediated inhibition of translation is triggered depends largely on the degree of complementarity between the siRNA or miRNA and its mRNA target (reviewed in [ 2, 25]). While both miRNAs and siRNAs must harbor sequences that recognize the target mRNA, miRNAs are generally not fully complementary to the mRNA target. In contrast, siRNA sequences must be completely complementary to the mRNA target cleavage site to efficiently induce cleavage through the RNAi pathway. Interestingly, miRNAs can behave like siRNAs and induce mRNA cleavage when the miRNA sequence is completely complementary to a target mRNA [ 18, 26, 27].

In human cells, the mechanism by which the endogenous miRNA and siRNA pathways are distinguished is not clearly understood. It is also unclear how miRNAs repress the translation of target mRNAs. New insights into miRNA function have recently been provided by localization of the RISC components, Ago1 and Ago2, in mRNA-processing bodies (P-bodies) [ 28– 31], which are cytoplasmic foci containing translationally repressed mRNP complexes. During cellular translational control, an mRNP complex is formed containing the translationally repressed mRNA and associated repressor proteins and lacking translation initiation factors [ 32]. These translationally repressed mRNPs accumulate in P-bodies and contain proteins that mediate the translation [ 33– 35], RNAi [ 28– 31, 36], translation suppression [ 37], and decay [ 32, 38] of cellular mRNA. P-bodies, also referred to as GW or Dcp bodies, contain GW182 proteins that have recently been reported to play a role in RNAi [ 39– 41]. Other proteins found in cytoplasmic P-bodies and implicated in mRNA processing are RCK/p54, Lsm1, Dcp1:2, and eIF4E [ 32, 33, 38]. Given that target mRNA and RISC components have been co-localized in P-bodies [ 29, 31], it is possible that P-bodies are the bona fide site for RISC-induced target cleavage or repression of translation. However, the mechanism by which target mRNA and miRISC are directed to P-bodies and how translation is repressed by miRISC is still unknown.

One P-body protein, RCK/p54, the human homolog of yeast Dhh1p, is a member of the ATP-dependent DEAD box helicase family and was originally identified as a proto-oncogene [ 42]. In human cells, RCK/p54 interacts in P-bodies with the translation initiation factor, eIF4E [ 33]. The Xenopus homolog of RCK/p54, Xp54, which interacts with eIF4E and forms RNA-dependent oligomers, represses the translation of mRNA in oocytes and eggs [ 43]. In yeast, Dhh1p interacts with the decapping and deadenylase complex and functions in translational repression [ 44]. Dhh1p has also recently been shown to stimulate translational repression by inhibiting production of the pre-initiation complex [ 45].

Here, we show that RCK/p54 interacts with argonaute proteins, Ago1 and Ago2, in affinity-purified active RISC assemblies from human cells programmed with siRNA or endogenous miRNA; directly interacts with Ago1 and Ago2 in vivo, facilitates formation of cytoplasmic P-bodies, and acts as a general repressor of translation. Depletion of RCK/p54 disrupted P-bodies and dispersed Ago2 throughout the cytoplasm. We further show that depletion of RCK/p54 did not significantly affect the RNAi function of RISC, but released general, miRNA-induced and let-7-mediated translational repression. Taken together, our results suggest that RCK/p54 is the effector molecule in miRISC that represses translation and that the specificity of this repression is dictated by the sequence of miRNA binding to complementary sites in the 3′ UTR of the target mRNA.

Results

Human Argonaute Proteins Interact with RCK/p54, a Component of P-Bodies

To investigate the mechanism of miRNA-mediated repression of mRNA translation and to determine the interactions of P-body components with the RNAi machinery, we constructed expression vectors for the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-tagged P-body proteins, Lsm1, RCK/p54, Dcp2, and eIF4E. These vectors were co-expressed in HeLa cells with Myc-tagged Ago2 and immunopurified using anti-Myc antibodies. The protein composition of isolated complexes was analyzed by immunoblot using antibodies against green fluorescent protein (GFP) or Myc. When total cell extracts (TCE) were analyzed to determine the protein expression efficiencies of the vectors used in these experiments ( Figure 1

A, TCE lane), all YFP- and Myc-tagged proteins were expressed. Analysis of immunopurified complexes revealed that Ago1, Dcp2, RCK/p54, and eIF4E formed complexes with Ago2 ( Figure 1

A, anti-Myc lane). Control experiments showed that YFP did not co-purify with Ago2 ( Figure 1

A). Interestingly, Lsm1 did not co-purify with Ago2, but localized to P-body structures in HeLa cells ( Figure 1

B).

Figure 1

Human Argonaute Proteins Interact with RCK/p54, a Component of P-Bodies

Since P-bodies contain RNA and proteins, many protein components of P-bodies are likely to be assembled on a common RNA scaffold without forming functional protein–protein interactions. To address this possibility, HeLa cells were transfected with vectors to co-express Myc-Ago2 and the YFP-tagged P-body proteins, Lsm1, RCK/p54, Dcp2, and eIF4E, subjected to RNase A digestion, and immunopurified. Analysis of immunopurified complexes showed that Ago1 and RCK/p54 interactions with Myc-Ago2 were not affected by RNase treatment, whereas the amounts of Dcp2 and eIF4E protein that co-purified with Myc-Ago2 decreased significantly ( Figure 1

A, anti-Myc lane). Control experiments analyzing Myc-Ago2 showed that equal amounts of complexes were purified ( Figure 1

A, anti-Myc lane). Taken together, these results suggest that Ago1 and RCK/p54 directly interacted with Ago2, whereas Dcp2 and eIF4E interactions with Ago2 were RNA-mediated. These results do not rule out the possibility that Ago1 and RCK/p54 interactions with Ago2 were mediated by adapter protein(s).

Cytoplasmic P-bodies contain RCK/p54, Lsm1, Dcp2, and eIF4E [ 32, 33, 38]. To confirm whether these structures also contain Ago2 as recently reported [ 28, 31], we transfected HeLa cells with expression vectors containing YFP-Ago1, CFP (cyan fluorescent protein)-Ago1, YFP-Ago2, and CFP-Ago2. Transiently expressed YFP- and CFP-tagged Ago1 and Ago2 co-localized at specific foci in cytoplasm (unpublished data). To examine the contents of these cytoplasmic foci, HeLa cells were transfected with expression vectors for YFP-Lsm1 and CFP-Ago2, or YFP-RCK/p54 and CFP-Ago2, and visualized 24 h later by confocal microscopy. As shown in Figure 1

B, CFP-Ago2 co-localized with YFP-Lsm1 and YFP-RCK/p54, two bona fide P-body proteins [ 32, 33, 38]. In addition, immunofluorescence experiments showed that endogenous Ago2 co-localized with Lsm1 in P-bodies ( Figure S1). Interestingly, over-expressing YFP-RCK/p54 increased the average number of P-bodies in every cell ( Figure 1

B, compare a and d). To confirm that the localization of Ago2 and Lsm1 to P-bodies was not the result of over-expression in transiently transfected cells, we immunostained cells with antibodies to endogenous Ago2 and Lsm1 and found that the localization of Ago2 and Lsm1 to P-bodies ( Figure S1) was similar to that in Figure 1

B. These results show that Ago2, Lsm1, and RCK/p54 are present in P-bodies.

To visualize protein–protein interactions in vivo, we used fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) as a probe. In FRET, a fluorescent donor molecule transfers energy via a nonradiative dipole–dipole interaction to an acceptor molecule [ 46]. We used a well-known donor: acceptor fluorescent-protein pair, CFP:YFP, with a Förster distance (R ₀) of 4.9 nm [ 47]. To determine whether Ago1 and Ago2 interacted in vivo with each other and with RCK/p54, we measured the FRET efficiency between the donor, CFP-Ago2, and acceptor, YFP-RCK/p54. To do so, we used a method in which the donor signal lost during FRET is restored by deliberately photobleaching the acceptor fluorophore to abolish its capacity as an energy acceptor [ 48– 50]. In cells expressing YFP-RCK/p54 and CFP-Ago2, the FRET efficiency was 21.07% ± 2.52% ( Figure 1

C and and1D).1

D). In cells expressing CFP-Ago2 and YFP-Lsm1, FRET efficiency was not significant (1.62% ± 1.11%), corroborating our immunoprecipitation results ( Figure 1

A). Furthermore, cells co-expressing YFP-RCK/p54 and CFP showed no significant FRET efficiency (1.64% ± 1.28%). Similar to the YFP-RCK/p54 and CFP-Ago2 pair, YFP-Ago1 and CFP-Ago2 showed an efficient FRET (19.61% ± 4.51%), indicating a direct interaction between Ago1 and Ago2 in vivo [ 28].

Interestingly, the FRET efficiency between Ago1 and Ago2 decreased to 12.13% ± 1.6% when we used CFP-Ago1 and YFP-Ago2, indicating that the energy transfer efficiencies were sensitive to the orientation of donor: acceptor pair in the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex. Moreover, only moderate energy transfer efficiency (6.41% ± 1.96%) was seen when YFP-RCK/p54 and CFP-Ago1 were used in FRET experiments, suggesting that this donor: acceptor pair was not as ideally oriented for an efficient energy transfer as the pair CFP-Ago1 and YFP-Ago2. Alternatively, RCK/p54-Ago1-Ago2 is assembled in an RNP complex where the donor: acceptor pair is affected by the location of the probe. Nonetheless, the efficiency of energy transfer was well above the background control (0.99%). As a control experiment, cells co-expressing YFP-Ago1 and CFP showed no significant FRET efficiency (0.99% ± 0.67%). Taken together, these results indicate that Ago1 and Ago2 directly interact in vivo with each other and with RCK/p54.

RCK/p54 Is a Component of RISC Containing the Guide Strand of siRNA

To determine whether RCK/p54 is recruited into a functional RISC complex containing argonaute proteins or its association with Ago1/Ago2 is merely due to their co-localization in P-bodies, we affinity-purified active RISCs, analyzed their protein composition, and assayed for RISC function ( Figure 2

A). siRNA duplexes targeting GFP (siGFP) were synthesized and 3′ -biotin moieties were conjugated to the 3′ -end of the guide strand. These two duplexes (unmodified siGFP and biotin-modified siGFP) were transfected into HeLa cells, and RISCs were captured by incubating cell extracts with streptavidin-conjugated magnetic beads [ 51, 52]. Beads and supernatants were analyzed for RISC function, i.e., the ability to cleave target mRNA in vitro [ 53]. RISCs primed with siGFP or biotin-modified siGFP guide strands efficiently cleaved their target mRNA ( Figure 2

B, lanes 1 and 3), but only biotin-containing RISC purified on streptavidin-magnetic beads showed cleavage activity ( Figure 2

B, lanes 2 and 4). These results show that active RISC can be programmed in human cells by biotin-containing guide strands of siRNAs and can be captured on magnetic beads for further analysis.

Figure 2

Isolation of Active Human RISC Containing RCK/p54-Ago1/Ago2

To probe the involvement of P-body proteins in this purified active RISC, its protein composition was analyzed by immunoblot using antibodies against Flag tag or endogenous Ago2, RCK/p54, eIF4E, and Lsm1. When the RNAi machinery was primed with biotin-containing siRNAs, Ago1, Ago2, and RCK/p54 were co-purified with RISC; and when the guide strand of siRNA did not contain biotin, RISC did not bind to beads ( Figure 2

C). Interestingly, eIF4E did not co-purify with RISC, indicating that the Myc-Ago2 interaction with eIF4E that occurred in P-bodies ( Figure 1

A) was RNA-dependent, and eIF4E did not directly interact with Ago2 to assemble into active RISC by the guide strand. The data also show that Lsm1 was not a RISC component, consistent with findings shown in Figure 1

A. Together, these results identify a new argonaute-interacting protein, RCK/p54, that is recruited to siRISC.

RCK/p54 Is a Component of RISC Containing miRNA

To determine the functional interactions of RCK/p54 with miRISC, we employed affinity purification of RISC and target mRNA cleavage capabilities of miRISC when the target has perfectly complementary sequences to the miRNAs. Cell extracts containing let-7 miRISC cleaved perfectly matched radiolabeled target mRNA with high efficiencies, whereas a substrate mRNA containing a mismatched sequence was not cleaved ( Figure 3

A, lanes 2 and 3). In the absence of extracts, no mRNA cleavage or degradation was detected ( Figure 3

A, lane 1). After establishing the functional assay to analyze miRISC, we next affinity-purified miRISC on magnetic beads using anti-Ago2 and anti-RCK/p54 antibodies and assessed the cleavage of perfectly matched let-7 target mRNA by the bead and supernatant phases. miRISCs purified by anti-Ago2 and anti-RCK/p54 antibodies showed efficient cleavage of let-7 target mRNA ( Figure 3

A, lanes 7 and 9). Ago2 antibodies captured most of the RISC activity on beads as compared to RCK/p54 antibodies ( Figure 3

A, lanes 6–9). Non-specific IgG did not purify miRISC activities on beads ( Figure 3

A, lanes 4 and 5). These results demonstrate that RCK/p54 is a component of functional miRISC.

Figure 3

RCK/p54 Is a Component of Human miRISC

To confirm these results, we next used an alternative approach to determine whether RCK/p54 is associated with endogenous RISC programmed by miRISC. RISCs containing miRNA were isolated from HeLa cells by affinity-capture as described in Figure 2

A, with the following modifications. To specifically capture endogenous miRISC, 2′- O-methyl (2′- O Me) inhibitors of let-7 miRNA were employed [ 54, 55]. HeLa cytoplasmic extracts expressing Myc-Ago1 and Flag-Ago2 were incubated with 3′-biotinylated- let-7–2′- O-Me inhibitor, which is complementary to the let-7 miRNA, and incubated with streptavidin-conjugated magnetic beads. As a control, cell extracts were treated with the let-7–2′- O-Me inhibitor without 3′-biotinylation. After capture, beads containing miRISCs were washed with lysis buffer and split into two aliquots to determine miRISC function and protein composition. Function was determined by assaying for in vitro cleavage of a ³²P-target mRNA that perfectly matched the let-7 sequence. The data in Figure 3

B (lanes 1 and 4) show that cell extracts containing active let-7 miRISC cleaved the perfectly matched target mRNA with high efficiencies [ 54, 55]. Incubation with let-7 inhibitors (with or without 3′-biotin) blocked the cleavage activity of let-7 miRISC in supernatant or beads ( Figure 3

B, lanes 2–3, and lanes 5–6). These results are consistent with previous reports [ 54, 55] that adding 2′- O-Me oligonucleotides complementary to let-7 abolishes target cleavage activity by let-7 in cell extracts, indicating complete hybridization of the 2′- O-Me probe. Immunoblot analysis of affinity-purified miRISC using anti-Myc, anti-Flag, anti-RCK/p54, and anti-eIF4E antibodies ( Figure 3

C) showed that Myc-Ago1, Flag-Ago2, and RCK/p54 were associated with let-7 miRISC. As observed for the active RISC programmed with siRNA, eIF4E did not associate with miRISC. These findings reveal that RCK/p54 is a novel component of endogenous RISC programmed with either siRNA or miRNA.

Depletion of RCK/p54 Disrupts P-Bodies and Ago2 Localization

To understand the function and role of RCK/p54 in the RNAi pathway, RCK/p54 was depleted in P-bodies of HeLa cells by siRNA-mediated RNAi. 24 h after transfecting cells with siRNA, real-time quantitative PCR showed that mRNA levels decreased by more than 90% and immunoblot analysis showed that RCK/p54 protein levels decreased significantly without affecting the levels of other P-body proteins including Lsm1 and Ago2 ( Figure S2). The effect of depleting RCK/p54 on localization of Ago2 was next examined by immunofluorescence analysis of HeLa cells expressing Myc-Ago2 and siRNAs against RCK/p54. As shown in Figure 4

B, B,4C,4

C, C,4F,4

F, and and4G,4

G, depleting RCK/p54 disrupted the cellular P-body structures. In these P-body-deficient cells, Ago2 proteins were diffused throughout the cytoplasm and no longer accumulated at specific foci ( Figure 4

A and and4E).4

E). This cytoplasmic redistribution of Ago2 suggests that its localization to P-bodies is driven in mammalian cells by factors such as RCK/p54.

Figure 4

Depletion of RCK/p54 Disrupts P-bodies and Disperses the Localization of Human Ago2

Depletion of Lsm1 Disrupts P-Bodies but Does Not Affect RCK/p54 and Ago2 Interactions

The interactions between the P-body proteins, RCK/p54, and argonautes raised the question whether P-body structures are required for these interactions. To address this question, we disrupted P-body structures by using RNAi against Lsm1, which is a P-body protein that does not associate with RISC as shown in Figure 1

. HeLa cells were transfected with siRNA against Lsm1, harvested at 24, 48, and 72 h post-transfection, and TCEs were analyzed by immunoblot. The results show an efficient knockdown of Lsm1 without changing the levels of RCK/p54, Ago2, and GAPDH ( Figure 5

A). We next visualized Lsm1 and Ago2 by immunofluorescence using antibodies against Lsm1 and Myc tag and found that Lsm1 and Ago2 co-localized in P-bodies ( Figure 5

B). To determine the status of P-body structures and RISC localization in cells after Lsm1 knockdown, Lsm1-depleted cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence. We found that P-body structures were drastically disrupted, Ago2 was diffused throughout the cytoplasm, and Lsm1 and Ago2 were minimally co-localized ( Figure 5

B). These results show that P-body structures were drastically disrupted and Ago2 was diffuse throughout the cytoplasm when Lsm1 was depleted by RNAi.

Figure 5

Depletion of Lsm1 Disrupts P-Bodies but Does Not Affect the Interaction between RCK/p54 and Ago2

To determine the effect of P-body disruption on Ago2 and RCK/p54 interactions, we immunopurified Myc-Ago2 and RCK/p54 after Lsm1 knockdown. HeLa cells were transfected for 48 h with Myc-Ago2 and control siRNA or siRNA against Lsm1, TCEs were prepared, and Myc-Ago2 was immunoprecipitated from an aliquot of TCE. TCEs and anti-Myc immunoprecipitation products were analyzed by immunoblot using anti-Myc, anti-RCK/p54, and anti-Lsm1 antibodies. Lsm1 siRNA treatment efficiently depleted Lsm1 protein levels without affecting Myc-Ago2 and RCK/p54 levels ( Figure 5

C). Immunoprecipitation using Myc antibodies showed that RCK/p54 interacted with Ago2 and this interaction was not significantly changed by depleting Lsm1 ( Figure 5

C). Since P-bodies were disrupted by Lsm1 depletion, these results demonstrate that Ago2 and RCK/p54 interaction does not require P-bodies.

Next, we analyzed the target mRNA cleavage activities of affinity-purified miRISC from Lsm1-depleted cell extracts. P-bodies were disrupted in HeLa cells by transfecting them with siRNA against Lsm1, and cytoplasmic extracts were prepared 48 h post-transfection. These HeLa cell extracts were incubated with magnetic protein A beads coupled with rabbit IgG, rabbit anti-Ago2, or rabbit anti-RCK/p54 antibodies to purify miRISC associated with RCK/p54 or Ago2. After immunoprecipitation, RISC activities were analyzed by incubating the supernatant (S) or bead (B) phases with 182-nt ³²P-cap-labeled let-7 substrate mRNAs having a perfectly complementary or mismatched sequence to the let-7 miRNA. Cleavage products were resolved on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels. miRISCs purified by anti-Ago2 and anti-RCK/p54 antibodies showed efficient target let-7 cleavage ( Figure 5

D, lanes 4 and 6). Ago2 antibodies captured more RISC activity on beads than RCK/p54 antibodies, as also observed in Figure 3

A (lanes 6–9). Control experiments using IgG ( Figure 5

D, lanes 1 and 2) did not show any miRISC activity purified by magnetic beads, supporting specific capture by Ago2 and RCK/p54 antibodies ( Figure 5

D, lanes 4 and 6). miRISC did not cleave a mismatched substrate RNA for let-7 ( Figure 5

D, lane 7). Despite the significant loss of P-body structures in cells treated with Lsm1 siRNA, the efficiency of let-7 target mRNA cleavage by miRISC purified by anti-RCK/p54 antibody was not significantly affected (compare Figure 3

A, lane 9 with Figure 5

D, lane 6). These results indicate that disrupting P-bodies by depleting Lsm1 did not significantly affect RCK/p54 association with miRISC.

Depletion of RCK/p54 Does Not Affect RNAi Activity In Vivo

To examine whether the P-body protein RCK/p54, also a component of RISC, is involved in siRNA-mediated gene silencing, the siRNA dose dependence of RNAi-mediated gene silencing was quantified in RCK/p54-depleted HeLa cells using a dual fluorescence reporter assay. Briefly, GFP and red fluorescent protein (RFP) were constitutively expressed in cells transfected with reporter plasmids for enhanced GFP (EGFP) and RFP, respectively. GFP expression was silenced by treating cells with a 21-nt siRNA targeting nt 238–258 of the EGFP mRNA. The fluorescence intensity ratio of target (GFP) to control (RFP) fluorophore was determined in the presence of siRNA duplexes and normalized to that observed in control-treated cells [ 52].

When HeLa cells were transfected with siRNA mismatched for CDK9 (control), the second transfection with GFP siRNA silenced GFP expression in a dose-dependent manner, i.e., GFP/RFP ratios decreased with increasing concentrations of siRNA ( Figure 6

A, gray bars). Depleting RCK/p54 before quantifying GFP silencing resulted in moderate to no significant loss of RNAi activity, i.e., GFP/RFP again decreased with increasing concentrations of siRNA ( Figure 6

A, green bars). Similarly, depleting Lsm1 ( Figure 6

A, red bars) and the decapping enzyme, Dcp2 (unpublished data), before quantifying GFP silencing in HeLa cells did not significantly decrease RNAi activity. In contrast, prior depletion of Ago2 completely abolished RNAi activity ( Figure 6

A, blue bars), as expected and consistent with previous reports [ 14– 16]. These results suggest that depleting RCK/p54, which disrupts P-bodies ( Figure 4

), did not significantly affect siRNA-mediated RNAi in vivo.

Figure 6

Depletion of RCK/p54 Has No Significant Effect on RNAi Activity In Vivo and In Vitro

Depletion of RCK/p54 Does Not Affect RISC-Mediated mRNA Cleavage In Vitro

To examine the role of RCK/p54 in RISC catalysis of mRNA processing, in vitro mRNA cleavage activity was assayed in extracts from RCK/p54-depleted HeLa cells. Cells were transfected with siRNAs against CDK9 mismatch (control), RCK/p54, Lsm1, or Ago2 and programmed 24 h later with GFP siRNA. Varying amounts of cytoplasmic extract (20–100 μg) were assayed in vitro for target mRNA cleavage activity. As shown in Figure 6

B and and6C,6

C, cleavage activity increased with increasing protein concentration of extracts from both control and RCK/p54-depleted cells, reaching a robust cleavage (37%–41%) of target mRNA at the highest protein concentration (100 μg). In consistent with in vivo results shown in Figure 6

A, Ago2 depletion abolished the target mRNA cleavage activities of RISC. These results show that RCK/p54 does not affect the slicer function of RISC in cleaving target mRNA in vitro .

RCK/p54 Represses General and miRNA-Mediated Translation

Our results thus far demonstrate that RCK/p54 is a component of human RISC ( Figures 2

and and3)3

) and enhances P-body formation ( Figure 1

). Our data also show that siRNA-mediated RNAi may not require RCK/p54 and P-body cytoplasmic structures. Since we also identified that RCK/p54 associates with miRISC, we hypothesized that RCK/p54 might function in miRNA-mediated suppression of translation. A recent and intriguing report [ 45] identified a yeast homolog of RCK/p54, Dhh1p, which activates decapping and facilitates P-body formation, as a general translation repressor. We therefore reasoned that RCK/p54 might be a general translation repressor used by the miRNA machinery to dictate translation suppression of target mRNAs. To test this hypothesis, we first determined whether RCK/p54 was a general translation repressor in human cells. To this end, RCK/p54 expression was silenced in HeLa cells and general translational activity was analyzed by [ ³⁵S]methionine incorporation ( Figure 7

A). The translational rates measured by [ ³⁵S]-labeling were significantly greater in RCK/p54-depleted cells than in control siRNA-treated cells ( Figure 7

A), indicating that RCK/p54 was a translational repressor in human cells, consistent with results in yeast and reticulocyte extracts [ 45].

Figure 7

RCK/p54 Represses General and miRNA-Mediated Translation

Since RCK/p54 is a general translational repressor and a component of human RISC, we examined the effects of depleting RCK/p54 and disrupting P-bodies on siRNA- and miRNA-mediated gene silencing. To analyze siRNA- or miRNA-mediated gene-silencing events, we chose a well-established CXCR4 mRNA reporter system [ 56], in which siRNA- or miRNA-reporter constructs harbor 1 × perfectly matched or 4 × bulged CXCR4 siRNA target sites, respectively, in the 3′ UTR of Renilla reniformis luciferase (RL) mRNA [ 56]. In this system, perfectly matched sequences are cleaved by siRISC and bulge-containing sequences are targets for translation suppression by miRISC . HeLa cells were co-transfected with siRNAs directed against P-body proteins (RCK/p54, GW182, Lsm1, and Ago2) and with siRNA or miRNA reporters in the absence or presence of 25 nM CXCR4 siRNA. At 24 h post-transfection, cells were harvested and RL activities were analyzed. RL signals were normalized to Photinus pyralis luciferase (FL) signals from cells co-transfected with pGL3 plasmid as control. Depletion of RCK/p54 released only miRNA-mediated gene suppression and had no effect on siRNA-mediated gene silencing ( Figure 7

B). Depletion of GW182, an argonaute-interacting P-body protein, released gene suppression by miRNA, consistent with previous findings [ 39– 41], and moderately released siRNA-mediated gene silencing [ 40, 41]. Ago2 depletion significantly released siRNA-mediated gene silencing and moderately released miRNA-mediated gene suppression. Knockdown of Lsm1 had no significant effect on either miRNA- or siRNA-mediated gene silencing. Taken together, these results show that RCK/p54 depletion releases miRNA-mediated translation suppression of reporter genes, but does not affect siRNA-mediated RNAi.

We next hypothesized that the expression of a specific cellular protein, known to be controlled by miRNAs, might be up-regulated in RCK/p54-depleted cells. Such a protein, human RAS, has been elegantly shown by Slack and colleagues [ 13] to be regulated by the let-7 miRNA family. To test our hypothesis, we analyzed RAS protein levels in HeLa cells under two conditions: either let-7 function was inhibited by 2′- O-Me oligonucleotides complementary to the let-7 sequence or RCK/p54 was depleted by RNAi ( Figure 7

C). For control experiments, we treated cells with a CDK9 mm siRNA and a 2′ - O-Me oligonucleotide complementary to HIV-1 TAR RNA sequence [ 53]. Total cellular protein extracts from equal numbers of cells were prepared and analyzed by immunoblot using monoclonal anti-RAS antibodies directly conjugated with HRP (see Materials and Methods). Actin protein levels were measured as a control using HRP-conjugated anti-actin primary antibody. When cells were treated with let-7 inhibitor, RAS protein levels increased, consistent with previous findings [ 13]. Strikingly, RAS protein expression in RCK/p54-depleted cells also showed a robust increase ( Figure 7

C) while RAS levels were not significantly affected when cells were treated with control siRNA or 2′- O-Me oligonucleotides. RAS mRNA levels did not differ drastically in HeLa cells after treatment with let-7 inhibitor, RCK/p54 silencing, or mock treatment ( Figure S3).

To further probe our findings of endogenous RAS regulation by RCK/p54, we co-transfected HeLa cells with RAS 3′ UTR reporter constructs and let-7 2′ - O-Me inhibitor or siRNA against RCK/p54. For control experiments, we treated cells with a CDK9 mm siRNA and a 2′ - O-Me oligonucleotide complementary to HIV-1 TAR RNA sequence [ 53]. Cells transfected with a control siRNA and let-7 inhibitor induced more firefly luciferase expression when reporter plasmids contained 3′ UTR sequences for NRAS and KRAS than for the control siRNA and a 2′- O-Me oligo control ( Figure 7

D), consistent with a recent report [ 13]. Depleting RCK/p54 by siRNA and adding a control 2′- O-Me oligo also released translation repression from both NRAS and KRAS vectors. Interestingly, combining these two approaches to release translation suppression, let-7 2′- O-Me oligo and RCK/p54 depletion, did not show additive effects to induce NRAS and KRAs expression. In all of these experiments, slightly greater firefly luciferase expression was induced from pGL3-NRAS than from KRAS vectors. These results, combined with those of Figure 7

A–C, strongly suggest that RCK/p54 is a general translation repressor that associates with RISC to regulate miRNA-mediated translation repression.

Discussion

We have identified RCK/p54 as a protein that interacts with Ago2 in affinity-purified RISC assemblies to facilitate formation of cytoplasmic P-bodies and that acts as a general translational repressor in human cells. We have shown that depletion of RCK/p54 disrupts P-bodies and disperses the cytoplasmic localization of Ago2. Furthermore, depletion of RCK/p54 did not significantly affect the RNAi function of RISC, although general, miRNA-mediated, and let-7-mediated translational repression were released. Together, our results provide significant insights into miRNA mechanisms in human cells (see below).

Several recent reports show that RISC co-localizes with P-bodies, suggesting that they could be the site where RISC degrades target mRNA or represses mRNA translation [ 28– 31]. Isolation of miRNAs on polysomes also links the suppression of protein synthesis with arrest of translation initiation or elongation [ 29]. These studies also demonstrated that human Ago1 and Ago2 co-localize in P-bodies with other cellular proteins, such as Dcp1a, Dcp2, GW182, Lsm1, and Xrn1 [ 28– 31]. A homolog of the P-body protein GW182 in Caenorhabditis elegans is the developmental timing regulator AIN-1, which also interacts with miRISCs and may target argonaute proteins to P-bodies [ 57]. To dissect and understand the relationship between RNAi function and P-bodies, we affinity-purified RISC using Myc-Ago2 and expression vectors of the YFP-tagged P-body proteins, Lsm1, RCK/p54, Dcp2, and eIF4E. Ago2 interacted with these various P-body components in ways that were RNA-dependent or RNA-independent ( Figure 1

A). Ago1 and RCK/p54 immunoprecipitated with Ago2 after RNase A treatment of HeLa cell extracts, suggesting that these proteins directly interact with Ago2. Interestingly, RCK/p54, Ago1, and Ago2 were also identified as a component of active RISC programmed with siRNA or miRNA and purified by biotin affinity to streptavidin-conjugated magnetic beads ( Figures 2

and and3).3

). We examined the P-body localization of Ago2 with Lsm1 and RCK/p54 by co-expressing YFP-tagged Lsm1 and RCK/p54 with CFP-Ago2. Interestingly, overexpressing YFP-RCK/p54 in HeLa cells increased the number of P-bodies (from ~ 8 to ~ 20 foci/cell). The number of P-bodies containing CFP-Ago2 also increased ( Figure 1

B). These results suggested a functional relationship between RCK/p54-Ago interactions and their localization to P-bodies. To visualize protein–protein interactions in vivo, we used FRET as a probe. In cells expressing YFP-RCK/p54 and CFP-Ago2, the FRET efficiency was 21.07% ± 2.52% ( Figure 1

C and and1D).1

D). We also observed an efficient FRET between YFP-Ago1 and CFP-Ago2; however, FRET between RCK/p54 and Ago1 was moderate (6.41% ± 1.96%). Since FRET is quite sensitive to the orientation of the donor: acceptor pair, it is possible that CFP and YFP in Ago1 and RCK/p54 are not suitably positioned for efficient energy transfer. Nonetheless, the FRET efficiency between Ago1 and RCK/p54 was significantly above the 0.9% background. Taken together, these results demonstrate that Ago1, Ago2, and RCK/p54 directly interact in vivo.

Where in the cell does this physical interaction between RISC and RCK/p54 take place and does it require P-body structures? To address these questions, we disrupted P-bodies in cells by depleting Lsm1 and immunopurified endogenous miRISC, and analyzed its ability to cleave a target mRNA with perfect complementarity to let-7 miRNA ( Figure 5

). We observed no significant difference in miRISC activities purified from Lsm1-depleted and non-depleted cells ( Figures 3

and and5)5

) even though the P-body structures were disrupted and the total number of P-bodies per cell had significantly decreased. These results show that RCK/p54 association with RISC does not require P-bodies and suggest that localization of RISC to P-bodies is the outcome of translation repression by miRISC.

Having established the physical interactions of RCK/p54 with RISC, we questioned the functional relevance of these interactions in the RNAi pathway and how they could facilitate RISC activity. To that end, we depleted RCK/p54 in HeLa cells and analyzed RNAi activities in vivo and in vitro ( Figure 6

). Depletion of RCK/p54 clearly disrupted the P-body structures and dispersed Ago2 localization throughout the cytoplasm ( Figure 4

). Surprisingly, depleting RCK/p54 did not significantly affect siRNA-mediated gene silencing. Similar results showing the lack of P-body involvement in RNAi have been reported in Drosophila [ 39]. In that system, depletion of the P-body proteins, GW182 or Dcp1:Dcp2 decapping complex, showed that these proteins were required for miRNA-mediated gene silencing , but RNAi efficiency was not affected, suggesting that these two gene-silencing mechanisms were independent in Drosophila [ 39]. In addition, two recent studies reported that mammalian GW182 interacts with Ago2 and plays a role in miRNA function [ 40] and in siRNA-mediated RNAi [ 41]. Interestingly, depleting GW182 disrupted cytoplasmic foci and interfered with RNAi activity [ 41]. It is possible that GW182 is directly involved in human RISC function and does not spatially require P-bodies for its function. As an alternative approach to disrupting P-bodies, we treated HeLa cells with the translation inhibitor, cycloheximide, which did not significantly affect RNAi activities in vivo and in vitro (unpublished data). Taken together, these results strongly suggest that functional siRISC is assembled before locating to P-bodies, and P-bodies are not prerequisite sites for siRNA-mediated gene silencing.

To determine the role of RCK/p54 in miRNA-mediated translation repression, we used a CXCR4 reporter system [ 56], in which siRNA- or miRNA-reporter constructs harbor 1 × perfectly matched or 4 × bulged CXCR4 siRNA target sites, respectively in the 3′ UTR of RL mRNA [ 56]. In this system, perfectly matched sequences are cleaved via siRISC and bulge-containing sequences are targets for translation suppression by miRISC. We observed that depletion of RCK/p54 released only miRNA-mediated gene suppression and had no effect on siRNA-mediated gene silencing ( Figure 7

B). Depletion of GW182, an argonaute-interacting P-body protein, released gene suppression by miRNA and moderately affected reporter constructs containing perfectly matched target sequences, consistent with previous findings [ 39– 41]. Ago2 depletion significantly released siRNA-mediated gene silencing and moderately affected reporters containing 4 × bulged sequences. Knockdown of Lsm1 had no significant effect on either miRNA- or siRNA-mediated gene silencing. These results show that RCK/p54 depletion releases miRNA-mediated translation suppression of reporter genes and that this function of RCK/p54 was not significantly affected when P-bodies were disrupted by depleting Lsm1.

To test our hypothesis that RCK/p54 mediates the translational repression of endogenous miRNA targets in P-bodies, we examined RAS protein levels in RCK/p54-depleted cells. We chose RAS because it is an endogenous target of let-7 , and 3′ UTRs of human RAS genes contain multiple complementary sites for let-7 to bind and regulate RAS expression levels [ 13]. Furthermore, let-7 inhibitors are known to enhance RAS protein expression in HeLa cells [ 13]. Depleting RCK/p54 in HeLa cells up-regulated RAS protein, and this increase in RAS levels was higher than that in general translation of control actin ( Figure 7

C), suggesting that multiple sites of let-7 miRISC binding to target 3′ UTR dictate the potency and specificity of translation suppression.

RCK/p54, the human homolog of yeast Dhh1p, is a member of the ATP-dependent DEAD box helicase family and was originally identified as a proto-oncogene [ 42]. In human cells, RCK/p54 interacts in P-bodies with the translation initiation factor, eIF4E [ 33]. The Xenopus homolog of RCK/p54, Xp54, which interacts with eIF4E and forms RNA-dependent oligomers, represses the translation of mRNA in oocytes and eggs [ 43]. In yeast, Dhh1p interacts with the decapping and deadenylase complex and functions in translational repression [ 44]. Dhh1p has recently been shown to stimulate translational repression by inhibiting production of the pre-initiation complex [ 45]. Dhh1p and RCK/p54 also inhibit the mRNA translation driven by internal ribosomal entry sites in vitro, suggesting that this protein is a general translational repressor that may not require a cap structure for its function [ 45]. However, the in vivo function of Dhh1p required translational initiation [ 45]. Translation repression by miRISC and P-body localization require the 5′-cap structure in the target mRNA [ 29, 58], which provides a unique and elegant control mechanism for translation and its regulation (reviewed in [ 59, 60]). Recently, Petersen et al. reported an intriguing study showing that miRNA represses translation after initiation by a ribosome drop-off mechanism [ 61]. Therefore, it is possible that RCK/p54 interacts with miRISC and blocks translation elongation by binding to its multiple target sites with high affinity and creates a barrier for elongating ribosomes (see below).

We therefore propose that the function of RISC assemblies in cells can be described by a model with two independent pathways, depending on whether RNAi is programmed by the guide strand of siRNA or miRNA. In the first pathway, the RISC recognizes a perfectly matched target mRNA and functions as siRISC ( Figure 8

) by cleaving its target mRNA. This target mRNA cleavage activity and rapid turnover of siRISC induce the subsequent target mRNA degradation by exonucleases and does not require P-bodies. In the second pathway, the RISC recognizes the imperfectly matched target and functions as miRISC ( Figure 8

). Multiple copies of miRISC containing RCK/p54 could initiate an oligomerization event that sequesters the whole RNP and transports it to the P-bodies. This sequestration could also explain the cooperative effects of RISC function that enhance translation repression [ 56]. Once in P-bodies, translationally repressed mRNA could stay in oligomeric structures for storage or it could form a complex with decapping enzymes and cap binding proteins that would lead to the mRNA decay pathway. In other words, the miRNA in RISC could provide the sequence specificity and RCK/p54 could be the effector molecule that shuttles the target mRNA toward the fate of storage or processing in P-bodies. Since P-bodies are not a prerequisite for RCK/p54 to assemble into RISC or to function, it is possible that miRISC blocks protein synthesis by enhancing the ribosome drop-off during elongation of translation [ 61]. We propose that miRISC localization to P-bodies is the outcome of translation repression and not a prerequisite for miRISC function. Stored mRNA in P-bodies could reenter the active translation or mRNA decay pathway depending upon cellular conditions or stimuli that are presently unknown. How long mRNA translation can be repressed in the cytoplasm and which factors trigger mRNA transport to P-bodies are exciting areas for future research.

Figure 8

A Model for Human RISC Function Involving miRNA and siRNA

Our results on the interactions between RCK/p54 and the RNAi machinery suggest an intriguing role for miRNA function in development and carcinogenesis. However, most targets of miRNA have not yet been identified. A growing body of evidence suggests that miRNAs are important in human disease, including cancers [ 9– 12]. For example, relatively low levels of let-7 miRNA up-regulate RAS protein in lung cancer cells, demonstrating a possible role of miRNA in tumorigenesis [ 13]. Two homologs of RCK/p54, Xp54 in Xenopus and Me31b in Drosophila, control the translation of maternal mRNA in oocytes [ 43, 62, 63]. Altered regulation of RCK/p54 expression levels has been implicated in the development of human colorectal tumors [ 64, 65] and in hepatitis C virus-related chronic hepatitis [ 66]. Overexpression of RCK/p54 and Dhh1p increases the number of Ago2-containing P-bodies ( Figure 1

B; [ 33, 45]), suggesting that RCK/p54 is a critical factor in controlling cellular translation. Our results have identified RCK/p54 as an essential component of miRISC-mediated translation repression and provide a functional link between miRISC and P-bodies. In the context of spatially and temporally restricted miRNA expression, this system allows for exquisite regulation of protein expression by target mRNA. Therefore, perturbations of either miRNA or RCK/p54 expression levels can have deleterious consequences for the cell. What determines the balance between active translation and repression of mRNAs targeted by miRISC, and how cells control the specificity of this repression are key directions for future investigation.

Materials and Methods

Expression vectors.

Ago1 and Ago2 expression vectors with N-terminal YFP- or CFP-epitope tags were generated by PCR amplification of Ago1 and Ago2 coding sequences from pMyc-Ago1 and pMyc-Ago2 followed by cloning into the XbaI and EcoRI sites of pEYFP-C1 and pECFP-C1 (BD Biosciences, Palo Alto, California, United States). Expression vectors were kindly provided by four laboratories: pMyc-Ago1/2 (Dr. G. Hannon); pFlag-Ago1/Ago2 (Dr. T. Tuschl); pGL3-control, pGL3-KRAS, and pGL3-NRAS (Dr. F. Slack); and pRL-TK-1P and pRL-TK-4B (Dr. P. Sharp).

Vectors for expressing YFP-tagged Lsm1, RCK/p54, eIF4E, and Dcp2 were generated through PCR amplification of their coding sequences from 293T cDNA followed by cloning into the BglII and SalI sites of pEYFP-C1 [ 67].

siRNAs.

siRNAs against GFP, human Ago2, RCK/p54, Lsm1, and CDK9 mismatch were synthesized by Dharmacon (Dharmacon, Lafayette, Colorado, United States) and 2′-OH deprotected according to the manufacturer's protocols. The sequences of siRNAs (passenger strand) for our experiments were:

GFP: 5′- GCAGCACGACUUCUU CAAGdTdT-3′; hAgo2: 5′- GCACGGAAGUCCAUCUGAAdTdT-3′

RCK/p54: 5′- GCAGAAACCCUAU GAGAUUUU-3′; CDK9mm: 5′- CCAAAGCUCU CCCCUAUAAdTdT-3′; Lsm1: 5′-GU GACAUCCU GCCACCUCACUU-3′

Cell culture and transfection.

HeLa cells were cultured in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 °C with 5% CO ₂. Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, United States) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting.

TCEs were prepared by incubating cells in lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl ₂, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.35% [v/v] Triton X-100, 1/100 [v/v] dilution in protease inhibitor cocktail) and centrifuging at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Protein concentration was determined by Dc protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, United States). To examine the RNA dependence of protein–protein interactions, TCEs (250 μg) were treated before immunoprecipitation with 0.2 μg/ul of RNase A for 20 min at room temperature. Myc-tagged proteins were precipitated by incubating overnight with polyclonal rabbit anti-Myc antibodies directly conjugated to agarose beads (Santa Cruz Biotech, California, United States). Samples were washed four times in lysis buffer and eluted by boiling for 5 min at 100 °C in SDS-PAGE sample loading buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by immunoblot. For immunoblotting, antibodies included monoclonal mouse anti-GFP (BD Biosciences), anti-eIF4E and anti-Myc (Santa Cruz Biotech), anti-Flag (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, United States); polyclonal rabbit anti-Myc (Santa Cruz Biotech), anti-DDX6 (rck/p54; Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, Texas, United States); and polyclonal chicken anti-Lsm1 (GenWay Biotech Incorporated, San Diego, California, United States).

To assess the ability of endogenous immunopurified miRISC to cleave target mRNA with perfect complementarity to let-7 miRNA, in vitro cleavage assays for let-7 miRISC were conducted. Aliquots (30 μl) of magnetic protein A beads (Dynal, Norway) were preincubated with rabbit IgG, anti-Ago2, or anti-RCK/p54 antibodies according to the manufacturer's protocol and incubated overnight at 4 °C with 500 μg HeLa cytoplasmic extracts. Beads were then washed three times with Na-phosphate buffer [pH 8.0], one time with lysis buffer, and resuspended in 30 μl of lysis buffer. Aliquots (10 μl) of these beads were used in each let-7 miRISC cleavage assay.

Live cell imaging, FRET, and immunofluorescence.

HeLa cells were cultured in 35 mm dishes with glass coverslip bottoms (MatTek Corporation, Ashland, Massachusetts, United States). Expression vectors for CFP- or YFP-tagged proteins were transfected into cells using Lipofectamine as described above. 24 h later, the live cells were monitored for CFP and YFP signals of the transiently expressed proteins. The signals were detected by a Leica (Wetzlar, Germany) confocal imaging spectrophotometer system (TCS-SP2) attached to a Leica DMIRE inverted fluorescence microscope equipped with an argon laser, two HeNe lasers, an acousto-optic tunable filter (AOTF) to attenuate individual visible laser lines, and a tunable acousto-optical beam splitter (AOBS). A 63 × 1.32 NA oil-immersion objective was employed. For FRET studies, HeLa cells co-expressing CFP- and YFP-tagged proteins were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at room temperature for 20 min and washed three times with PBS. After the final wash, cells were visualized with a Leica confocal imaging system as described above. FRET experiments were performed by an acceptor photobleaching method as described [ 48, 49, 68]. FRET efficiencies were measured and images were analyzed using Leica confocal software. For immunofluorescence studies, cells transfected with Myc-Ago2 were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at room temperature for 20 min and permeabilized with 0.25% (v/v) Triton X-100 for 5 min. Samples were washed three times with PBST (0.1% [v/v] Triton X-100 in PBS) and blocked for 30 min in PBST containing 2% (w/v) BSA. Primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in blocking solution during incubation. Secondary antibodies against rabbit IgG, mouse IgG, and chicken IgY were directly conjugated to Alexa Fluor dyes (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oregon, United States). After the final wash, samples were counterstained with Hoechst 33258 to visualize nuclei with a Leica confocal imaging system as described above.

In vitro cleavage assay for siRISC and miRISC.

HeLa cells sequentially transfected with siRNAs against P-body components and EGFP were harvested 24 h after the second transfection. Cytoplasmic extracts of HeLa cells were prepared as described above and the protein concentration was determined by Dc protein assay (Bio-Rad). Target mRNAs were prepared and in vitro cleavage by GFP-siRISC and let-7-miRISC was assayed as described [ 53].

Dual fluorescence assay.

A dual fluorescence assay was used to quantify the RNAi activity of siRNAs against GFP. To quantify RNAi effects, cell lysates were prepared from siRNA-treated cells 24 h post-transfection. Total cell lysate (150 μg in 200 μl of reporter lysis buffer) was measured using a Safire plate reader (TECAN). GFP fluorescence was detected in cell lysates by exciting at 488 nm and recording emissions from 504–514 nm. The spectrum peak at 509 nm represents the fluorescence intensity of GFP. RFP fluorescence was detected in the same cell lysates by exciting at 558 nm and recording emissions from 578–588 nm. The spectrum peak at 583 nm represents the fluorescence intensity of RFP. The fluorescence intensity ratio of target (GFP) to control (RFP) fluorophores was determined in the presence of siRNA duplexes and normalized to the emissions measured in mock-treated cells. Normalized ratios < 1.0 indicated specific RNA interference.

Incorporation of [ ³⁵S]methionine.

HeLa cells cultured in 6-well plates were transfected with siRNAs against RCK/p54 or CDK9 mismatch as a scramble control. 24 h post-transfection, cells were incubated for 1 h in culture medium lacking methionine and cysteine, and metabolically labeled by incubating in culture medium containing 100 μCi/ml Tran ³⁵S-label (MP Biomedicals, Irvine, California, United States). At 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after metabolic labeling, cells were washed twice and harvested in 300 μl M-PER buffer (Pierce, Rockford, Illinois, United States) with protease inhibitors (Sigma). For each experiment, two extra sets of siRNA-treated cells were trypsinized and counted for total cell numbers. Cell lysates (50 μl) were incubated with 10 μl of 100% TCA on ice for 30 min, and the protein precipitate was collected on GF/C filter paper (Whatman, Clifton, New Jersey, United States), washed with 5 ml of 95% ethanol and counted in scintillation fluid.

Dual luciferase assay for let-7 miRNA-mediated gene silencing.

A dual luciferase assay was used to quantify the effects of let-7- and RCK/p54-mediated gene silencing on human NRAS or KRAS 3′ UTR. HeLa cells cultured in 6-well plates were co-transfected with 0.8 μg/well Pp-luc-expressing vectors (pGL3-control, pGL3-NRAS, or pGL3-KRAS) and with 100 nM let-7-2′- O-Me inhibitor or 50 nM siRNA against RCK/p54. In all experiments, transfection efficiencies were normalized to those of cells co-transfected with the Rr-luc-expressing vector (pRL-TK; 0.1 μg/well). TCEs were prepared 48 h post-transfection and dual luciferase assays (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, United States) were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol and quantified with a Victor2 multilabel counter (Perkin Elmer). The Pp-luc/ Rr-luc signals were normalized to those from pGL3-control-transfected cells, showing let-7-regulated gene silencing of RAS 3′ UTR.

siRNA or miRNA luciferase reporter assays.

To analyze siRNA- or miRNA-mediated gene-silencing events, we chose the CXCR4 mRNA reporter system, in which siRNA- or miRNA-reporter constructs harbor 1 × perfectly matched or 4 × bulged CXCR4 siRNA target sites, respectively, in the 3′ UTR of RL mRNA [ 56]. HeLa cells transfected with siRNAs directed against P-body proteins (RCK/p54, GW182, Lsm1, Ago2) were co-transfected again with siRNA or miRNA reporters in the absence or presence of 25 nM CXCR4 siRNA. At 24 h post-transfection, cells were harvested and RL activities were analyzed. RL signals were normalized to the FL signals from cells co-transfected with pGL3 plasmid as control.

Supporting Information

Figure S1: Subcellular Localization of Endogenous Ago2 in HeLa Cells

HeLa cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence using antibodies against endogenous Ago2 (A) and Lsm1 (B), and stained with Hoechest 33258 to visualize the nucleus. The images were digitally merged to indicate co-localization of Ago2 and Lsm1 (C). Arrows point to P-bodies.

(4.2 MB TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(4.0M, tif)}

Figure S2: Specific Depletion of RCK/p54 in HeLa Cells by RNAi

(A) Specific knockdown of RCK/p54 in HeLa cells. HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM siRNA against RCK/p54, harvested at 24, 48, and 72 h post-transfection, and TCEs were prepared. Analysis by immunoblot shows the specific knockdown of RCK/p54 protein without changing the protein levels of Lsm1 or Ago2.

(B) Specific depletion of RCK/p54 mRNA after siRNA treatment. Total RNA samples (3 μg) from HeLa cells transfected with siRNA against RCK/p54 were reverse-transcribed and analyzed by quantitative PCR to quantify mRNA levels. RCK/p54 mRNA levels were normalized to GAPDH mRNA and are presented relative to mock treatment. Data are from two representative, independent experiments.

(1.7 MB TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(1.6M, tif)}

Figure S3: Let-7 Inhibition Does Not Affect RAS mRNA Levels

Total RNA samples (3 μg) from HeLa cells transfected with 100 nM of let-7 2′- O-Me oligonucleotides or 50 nM siRNA against RCK/p54 were reverse-transcribed and analyzed by quantitative PCR to quantify mRNA levels. RAS mRNA levels were normalized to GAPDH mRNA and are presented relative to mock treatment. Data are from two representative, independent experiments.

(1.5 MB TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(1.4M, tif)}

Accession Numbers

The RefSeq ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/RefSeq) accession numbers for the proteins discussed in this paper are Ago1 (NM_012199), Ago2 (NM_012154), Dcp2 (NM_152624), eIF4E (NM_001968), Lsm1 (NM_014462), and RCK/p54 (NM_004397).

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Gregory Hannon, Tom Tuschl, Frank Slack, and Phillip Sharp for kindly providing reagents. We thank Craig Mello and members of the Rana lab for helpful discussions.

Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Abbreviations


2′ - O-Me	2′ - O-Methyl

Ago1	Argonaute1

Ago2	Argonaute2

CFP	cyan fluorescent protein

EGFP	enhanced GFP

FRET	fluorescence resonance energy transfer

GFP	green fluorescent protein

GL	Photinus pyralis luciferase

miRISC	microRNA-induced silencing complex

miRNA	microRNA

nt	nucleotide

P-body	mRNA processing body

RISC	RNA-induced silencing complex

RL	Renilla reniformis luciferase

RNAi	RNA interference

RFP	red fluorescent protein

RNP	ribonucleoprotein

siGFP	siRNA targeting GFP

siRISC	RISC programmed by siRNA

siRNA	short interfering RNA

TCE	total cell extract

YFP	yellow fluorescent protein

Footnotes

Author contributions. TMR conceived and designed the experiments. CC performed the experiments. CC and TMR analyzed the data. CC and TMR wrote the paper.

Citation: Chu C, Rana TM (2006) Translation repression in human cells by microRNA-induced gene silencing requires RCK/p54. PLoS Biol 4(7): e210. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040210

Funding. This work was supported in part by institutional funds and a grant from the National Institutes of Health to TMR.

References

Wienholds E, Plasterk RH. MicroRNA function in animal development. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:5911–5922. [PubMed]
Ambros V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004;431:350–355. [PubMed]
Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. [PubMed]
Filipowicz W. RNAi: The nuts and bolts of the RISC machine. Cell. 2005;122:17–20. [PubMed]
Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, et al. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans . Nature. 1998;391:806–811. [PubMed]
Zamore PD, Haley B. Ribo-gnome: The big world of small RNAs. Science. 2005;309:1519–1524. [PubMed]
Baulcombe D. RNA silencing in plants. Nature. 2004;431:356–363. [PubMed]
Carrington JC. Small RNAs and Arabidopsis. A fast-forward look. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:565–566. [PubMed]
He L, Thomson JM, Hemann MT, Hernando-Monge E, Mu D, et al. A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene. Nature. 2005;435:828–833. [PubMed]
Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. 2005;435:834–838. [PubMed]
Poy MN, Eliasson L, Krutzfeldt J, Kuwajima S, Ma X, et al. A pancreatic islet-specific microRNA regulates insulin secretion. Nature. 2004;432:226–230. [PubMed]
Vella MC, Choi EY, Lin SY, Reinert K, Slack FJ. The C. elegans microRNA let-7 binds to imperfect let-7 complementary sites from the lin-41 3′ UTR . Genes Dev. 2004;18:132–137. [PubMed]
Johnson SM, Grosshans H, Shingara J, Byrom M, Jarvis R, et al. RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family . Cell. 2005;120:635–647. [PubMed]
Meister G, Landthaler M, Patkaniowska A, Dorsett Y, Teng G, et al. Human Argonaute2 mediates RNA cleavage targeted by miRNAs and siRNAs. Mol Cell. 2004;15:185–197. [PubMed]
Liu J, Carmell MA, Rivas FV, Marsden CG, Thomson JM, et al. Argonaute2 is the catalytic engine of mammalian RNAi. Science. 2004;305:1437–1441. [PubMed]
Song JJ, Smith SK, Hannon GJ, Joshua-Tor L. Crystal structure of Argonaute and its implications for RISC slicer activity. Science. 2004;305:1434–1437. [PubMed]
Elbashir SM, Martinez J, Patkaniowska A, Lendeckel W, Tuschl T. Functional anatomy of siRNAs for mediating efficient RNAi in Drosophila melanogaster embryo lysate . EMBO J. 2001;20:6877–6888. [PubMed]
Hutvagner G, Zamore PD. A microRNA in a multiple-turnover RNAi enzyme complex. Science. 2002;297:2056–2060. [PubMed]
Chendrimada TP, Gregory RI, Kumaraswamy E, Norman J, Cooch N, et al. TRBP recruits the Dicer complex to Ago2 for microRNA processing and gene silencing. Nature. 2005;436:740–744. [PubMed]
Forstemann K, Tomari Y, Du T, Vagin VV, Denli AM, et al. Normal microRNA maturation and germ-line stem cell maintenance requires Loquacious, a double-stranded RNA-binding domain protein. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030236. [PubMed]
Gregory RI, Chendrimada TP, Cooch N, Shiekhattar R. Human RISC couples microRNA biogenesis and posttranscriptional gene silencing. Cell. 2005;123:631–640. [PubMed]
Haase AD, Jaskiewicz L, Zhang H, Laine S, Sack R, et al. TRBP, a regulator of cellular PKR and HIV-1 virus expression, interacts with Dicer and functions in RNA silencing. EMBO Rep. 2005;6:961–967. [PubMed]
Hammond SM, Boettcher S, Caudy AA, Kobayashi R, Hannon GJ. Argonaute 2, a link between genetic and biochemical analyses of RNAi. Science. 2001;293:1146–1150. [PubMed]
Caudy AA, Myers M, Hannon GJ, Hammond SM. Fragile X-related protein and VIG associate with the RNA interference machinery. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2491–2496. [PubMed]
He L, Hannon GJ. MicroRNAs: Small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:522–531. [PubMed]
Yekta S, Shih IH, Bartel DP. MicroRNA-directed cleavage of HOXB8 mRNA. Science. 2004;304:594–596. [PubMed]
Zeng Y, Yi R, Cullen BR. MicroRNAs and small interfering RNAs can inhibit mRNA expression by similar mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:9779–9784. [PubMed]
Sen GL, Blau HM. Argonaute 2/RISC resides in sites of mammalian mRNA decay known as cytoplasmic bodies. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:633–636. [PubMed]
Pillai RS, Bhattacharyya SN, Artus CG, Zoller T, Cougot N, et al. Inhibition of translational initiation by let-7 microRNA in human cells . Science. 2005;309:1573–1576. [PubMed]
Rossi JJ. RNAi and the P-body connection. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:643–644. [PubMed]
Liu J, Valencia-Sanchez MA, Hannon GJ, Parker R. MicroRNA-dependent localization of targeted mRNAs to mammalian P-bodies. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:719–723. [PubMed]
Coller J, Parker R. Eukaryotic mRNA decapping. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:861–890. [PubMed]
Andrei MA, Ingelfinger D, Heintzmann R, Achsel T, Rivera-Pomar R, et al. A role for eIF4E and eIF4E-transporter in targeting mRNPs to mammalian processing bodies. RNA. 2005;11:717–727. [PubMed]
Ferraiuolo MA, Basak S, Dostie J, Murray EL, Schoenberg DR, et al. A role for the eIF4E-binding protein 4E-T in P-body formation and mRNA decay. J Cell Biol. 2005;170:913–924. [PubMed]
Ferraiuolo MA, Lee CS, Ler LW, Hsu JL, Costa-Mattioli M, et al. A nuclear translation-like factor eIF4AIII is recruited to the mRNA during splicing and functions in nonsense-mediated decay. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4118–4123. [PubMed]
Meister G, Landthaler M, Peters L, Chen PY, Urlaub H, et al. Identification of novel argonaute-associated proteins. Curr Biol. 2005;15:2149–2155. [PubMed]
Minshall N, Thom G, Standart N. A conserved role of a DEAD box helicase in mRNA masking. RNA. 2001;7:1728–1742. [PubMed]
Cougot N, Babajko S, Seraphin B. Cytoplasmic foci are sites of mRNA decay in human cells. J Cell Biol. 2004;165:31–40. [PubMed]
Rehwinkel J, Behm-Ansmant I, Gatfield D, Izaurralde E. A crucial role for GW182 and the DCP1:DCP2 decapping complex in miRNA-mediated gene silencing. RNA. 2005;11:1640–1647. [PubMed]
Liu J, Rivas FV, Wohlschlegel J, Yates JR, Parker R, et al. A role for the P-body component GW182 in microRNA function. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:1161–1166. [PubMed]
Jakymiw A, Lian S, Eystathioy T, Li S, Satoh M, et al. Disruption of GW bodies impairs mammalian RNA interference. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:1267–1274. [PubMed]
Akao Y, Marukawa O, Morikawa H, Nakao K, Kamei M, et al. The RCK/p54 candidate proto-oncogene product is a 54-kilodalton DEAD box protein differentially expressed in human and mouse tissues. Cancer Res. 1995;55:3444–3449. [PubMed]
Minshall N, Standart N. The active form of Xp54 RNA helicase in translational repression is an RNA-mediated oligomer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1325–1334. [PubMed]
Coller JM, Tucker M, Sheth U, Valencia-Sanchez MA, Parker R. The DEAD box helicase, Dhh1p, functions in mRNA decapping and interacts with both the decapping and deadenylase complexes. RNA. 2001;7:1717–1727. [PubMed]
Coller J, Parker R. General translational repression by activators of mRNA decapping. Cell. 2005;122:875–886. [PubMed]
Clegg RM. FRET tells us about proximities, distances, orientations, and dynamic properties. J Biotechnol. 2002;82:177–179. [PubMed]
Patterson GH, Piston DW, Barisas BG. Forster distances between green fluorescent protein pairs. Anal Biochem. 2000;284:438–440. [PubMed]
Bastiaens PI, Majoul IV, Verveer PJ, Soling HD, Jovin TM. Imaging the intracellular trafficking and state of the AB5 quaternary structure of cholera toxin. EMBO J. 1996;15:4246–4253. [PubMed]
Chiu YL, Dinesh CU, Chu CY, Ali A, Brown KM, et al. Dissecting RNA-interference pathway with small molecules. Chem Biol. 2005;12:643–648. [PubMed]
Miyawaki A, Tsien RY. Monitoring protein conformations and interactions by fluorescence resonance energy transfer between mutants of green fluorescent protein. Methods Enzymol. 2000;327:472–500. [PubMed]
Chiu YL, Rana TM. RNAi in human cells: Basic structural and functional features of small interfering RNA. Mol Cell. 2002;10:549–561. [PubMed]
Chiu YL, Rana TM. siRNA function in RNAi: A chemical modification analysis. RNA. 2003;9:1034–1048. [PubMed]
Brown KM, Chu CY, Rana TM. Target accessibility dictates the potency of human RISC. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005;12:469–470. [PubMed]
Hutvagner G, Simard MJ, Mello CC, Zamore PD. Sequence-specific inhibition of small RNA function. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:e98. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020098. [PubMed]
Meister G, Landthaler M, Dorsett Y, Tuschl T. Sequence-specific inhibition of microRNA- and siRNA-induced RNA silencing. RNA. 2004;10:544–550. [PubMed]
Doench JG, Petersen CP, Sharp PA. siRNAs can function as miRNAs. Genes Dev. 2003;17:438–442. [PubMed]
Ding L, Spencer A, Morita K, Han M. The developmental timing regulator AIN-1 interacts with miRISCs and may target the argonaute protein ALG-1 to cytoplasmic P-bodies in C. elegans . Mol Cell. 2005;19:437–447. [PubMed]
Humphreys DT, Westman BJ, Martin DI, Preiss T. MicroRNAs control translation initiation by inhibiting eukaryotic initiation factor 4E/cap and poly(A) tail function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:16961–16966. [PubMed]
Gebauer F, Hentze MW. Molecular mechanisms of translational control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5:827–835. [PubMed]
Holcik M, Sonenberg N. Translational control in stress and apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:318–327. [PubMed]
Petersen CP, Bordeleau ME, Pelletier J, Sharp PA. Short RNAs repress translation after initiation in mammalian cells. Mol Cell. 2006;21:533–542. [PubMed]
Ladomery M, Wade E, Sommerville J. Xp54, the Xenopus homologue of human RNA helicase p54, is an integral component of stored mRNP particles in oocytes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:965–973. [PubMed]
Nakamura A, Amikura R, Hanyu K, Kobayashi S. Me31B silences translation of oocyte-localizing RNAs through the formation of cytoplasmic RNP complex during Drosophila oogenesis . Development. 2001;128:3233–3242. [PubMed]
Hashimoto K, Nakagawa Y, Morikawa H, Niki M, Egashira Y, et al. Co-overexpression of DEAD box protein RCK/p54 and c-myc protein in human colorectal adenomas and the relevance of their expression in cultured cell lines. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22:1965–1970. [PubMed]
Nakagawa Y, Morikawa H, Hirata I, Shiozaki M, Matsumoto A, et al. Overexpression of RCK/p54, a DEAD box protein, in human colorectal tumours. Br J Cancer. 1999;806:914–917. [PubMed]
Miyaji K, Nakagawa Y, Matsumoto K, Yoshida H, Morikawa H, et al. Overexpression of a DEAD box/RNA helicase protein, RCK/p54, in human hepatocytes from patients with hepatitis C virus-related chronic hepatitis and its implication in hepatocellular carcinogenesis. J Viral Hepat. 2003;10:241–248. [PubMed]
Wichroski MJ, Robb GB, Rana TM. Human retroviral host restriction factors APOBEC3G and APOBEC3F localize to mRNA processing bodies. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e41. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020041. [PubMed]
Kenworthy AK, Edidin M. Distribution of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein at the apical surface of MDCK cells examined at a resolution of < 100 A using imaging fluorescence resonance energy transfer. J Cell Biol. 1998;142:69–84. [PubMed]

Formats:

PubMed articles by these authors

PubMed related articles

Recent Activity

Links

Simple NCBI Directory

Getting Started

Resources

Popular

Featured

NCBI Information