![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2006, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The locus control region is required for association of the murine β-globin locus with engaged transcription factories during erythroid maturation 1 Division of Basic Sciences, 2 Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, Washington 98109, USA; 3 Department of Pediatrics, 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA 5Corresponding author. E-MAIL markg/at/fhcrc.org; FAX (206) 667-5894. Received February 13, 2006; Accepted March 21, 2006. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract We have examined the relationship between nuclear localization and transcriptional activity of the endogenous murine β-globin locus during erythroid differentiation. Murine fetal liver cells were separated into distinct erythroid maturation stages by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and the nuclear position of the locus was determined at each stage. We find that the β-globin locus progressively moves away from the nuclear periphery with increasing maturation. Contrary to the prevailing notion that the nuclear periphery is a repressive compartment in mammalian cells, βmajor-globin expression begins at the nuclear periphery prior to relocalization. However, relocation of the locus to the nuclear interior with maturation is accompanied by an increase in βmajor-globin transcription. The distribution of nuclear polymerase II (Pol II) foci also changes with erythroid differentiation: Transcription factories decrease in number and contract toward the nuclear interior. Moreover, both efficient relocalization of the β-globin locus from the periphery and its association with hyperphosphorylated Pol II transcription factories require the locus control region (LCR). These results suggest that the LCR-dependent association of the β-globin locus with transcriptionally engaged Pol II foci provides the driving force for relocalization of the locus toward the nuclear interior during erythroid maturation. Keywords: β-globin locus, nuclear organization, nuclear periphery, erythroid differentiation, RNA polymerase II, fluorescence in situ hybridization The eukaryotic nucleus is structurally and functionally compartmentalized. Chromatin is subdivided into compacted and repressive domains (heterochromatin) or relatively decondensed domains that are enriched with genes that are active or poised for expression (euchromatin). Similarly, local accumulations of specific proteins mark nuclear subcompartments and form a number of functionally distinct nuclear bodies. The dynamic organization of the nucleus may provide an essential level of gene regulation in multicellular eukaryotes during tissue-specific differentiation when subsets of genes are transcriptionally activated and others stably silenced. For example, in developing B and T cells, the transcription factor Ikaros recruits genes destined for silencing to pericentromeric heterochromatin (PCH) through direct binding of the target genes and heterochromatic repeats (Brown et al. 1997, 1999; Cobb et al. 2000). Euchromatic sequences that become integrated or relocated to PCH similarly become silenced following this association (Csink and Henikoff 1996; Francastel et al. 1999). In mammalian systems, the nuclear periphery has also been regarded as a repressive compartment where silenced genes are sequestered. For example, the CFTR gene and its nearest neighbors associate with the periphery in a tissue-specific fashion when inactive and relocate away from the periphery when active (Zink et al. 2004). The immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) locus is located at the nuclear periphery in lymphoid progenitors prior to its activation (Kosak et al. 2002). During B-cell development, as the locus becomes transcriptionally active and undergoes rearrangement, it is relocated to the nuclear interior (Kosak et al. 2002). In addition, the nuclear periphery preferentially harbors gene-poor chromosomes, as has been demonstrated in human nuclei, possibly reflecting an overall lower level of transcriptional activity from these domains (Croft et al. 1999; Boyle et al. 2001). Gene localization with respect to chromosome territories (CTs; the most densely staining regions of interphase chromosomes) has also been correlated with different activation states. For example, during robust transcriptional activity, several multigene loci extend in loops from their CTs, whereas they remain associated with their CTs when inactive (Volpi et al. 2000; Williams et al. 2002). In the case of the Hoxb locus, extrusion from the CT appears to be developmentally regulated and is limited to the stage-specific active gene (Chambeyron and Bickmore 2004; Chambeyron et al. 2005). In contrast, CT looping of the β-globin locus can also reflect a poised state prior to transcriptional activation or even repression if the chromatin loop extends to a repressive compartment (Ragoczy et al. 2003). The molecular mechanisms leading to differentiation- or activation-state-specific subnuclear localization of genes remain to be elucidated. Similarly, it is not understood whether regulatory elements directly contribute to localization or what the sequence requirements might be. We have sorted murine fetal liver cells into distinct erythroid maturation stages and examined the nuclear position and expression state of the β-globin locus during cellular differentiation. We find that the locus is relocated away from the nuclear periphery and PCH with progressive maturation. Importantly, significant expression of the α- and βmajor-globin genes begins prior to the most dramatic shift in positioning, suggesting that relocation may be a result of, rather than requirement for, transcriptional activity. In support of this possibility, the internalization of the β-globin locus during erythroid maturation is accompanied by a redistribution of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) foci. In differentiated cells, Pol II foci decrease in abundance and become more restricted to the nuclear interior, which may drive the relocation of the β-globin locus. Furthermore, in the absence of the locus control region (LCR), which is required for high-level expression of the β-globin genes, the locus does not efficiently relocate to the nuclear interior and fails to colocalize consistently with foci of engaged (highly phosphorylated) Pol II. Thus, the LCR increases the locus’ affinity for, or ability to nucleate, active transcription factories, resulting in activated transcription and nuclear relocalization. Results Separation of fetal liver cells into distinct erythroid maturation stages The characterization of changes in nuclear organization during murine erythropoiesis requires the separation of erythroid cells into distinct maturation stages. While spleen or marrow has been used for isolating primary erythroid cells in distinct maturational compartments (Socolovsky et al. 2001), we have used day-13.5 post-conception (dpc) fetal liver as a source of material, as it is at least 90% erythroid (Trimborn et al. 1999). Fresh fetal liver cells were stained with a monoclonal antibody to the surface marker c-kit (CD117) and monoclonal antibodies ERY-1 (Bacon and Sytkowski 1987) and Ter-119, a lineage-specific antibody staining all erythroid cells after the CFU-E stage. While CD117 marks the most immature hematopoietic cells and is not erythroid specific, the morphology and gene expression profile of the vast majority of CD117+ cells in fetal liver is consistent with the erythroid lineage (M.A. Bender, unpubl.). The erythroid-specific ERY-1 was used as an intermediate maturation marker (Bacon and Sytkowski 1987), since its surface expression begins prior to the loss of CD117 staining, permitting the isolation of immature definitive erythroid cells. Furthermore, ERY-1 expression precedes the emergence of TER-119 during maturation, but while TER-119 expression is maintained, ERY-1 levels eventually fall. Figure Figure1A1A
The β-globin locus relocates away from the nuclear periphery and PCH during erythroid maturation In mammalian cells, the nuclear periphery and PCH are considered to be repressive nuclear compartments. To assess the position of the β-globin gene locus relative to these compartments during erythroid differentiation, we analyzed, sorted, and formaldehyde-fixed cell populations by DNA FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) with β-globin and γ-satellite probes. The latter marks all murine pericentromeres. As shown in Figure Figure2A,2A
Similarly, we observed a relocation of the β-globin locus away from PCH in maturing erythroid cells (Fig. (Fig.2C).2C Nuclear position is gene and cell type specific To address the possibility that genes are nonspecifically relocated to the nuclear interior in terminally differentiating erythroid cells, we compared the positions of the β-globin and the IgH loci in sorted fetal liver cells. FISH analysis with an IgH-specific probe revealed that, similar to the β-globin genes, many of the IgH loci (33.3%) are peripheral in immature erythroid cells (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A
The position of the IgH locus in fetal liver erythroid cells contrasts with its behavior in B cells. As reported previously, the IgH locus is relocated to the nuclear center during B-cell development (Kosak et al. 2002). We isolated B220+ B cells from mouse spleens (predominantly resting mature B lymphocytes) and confirmed the internal position of the IgH locus (Fig. (Fig.3B);3B The LCR is required for the relocation of the β-globin locus to the nuclear interior in mature erythroid cells Deletion of the LCR from the native β-globin locus results in a 25- to 100-fold reduction in β-like globin gene expression throughout development (Bender et al. 2000). One possible mechanism by which the LCR regulates gene activity might be to direct the β-globin locus toward a transcriptionally favorable nuclear environment. To assess the potential contribution of the LCR to nuclear positioning of the β-globin locus, we isolated fetal liver cells from mice in which the LCR was deleted from its native position in both β-globin alleles by homologous recombination (Bender et al. 2000). The nuclear positions of the ΔLCR alleles and the wild-type β-globin loci were compared in each of the four erythroid maturation stages. Figure Figure44
The deletion of the LCR also affected the position of the β-globin locus with respect to PCH with progressing differentiation (data not shown). In the most immature cell population, the mutant allele associated with PCH to a similar extent as the wild type (13% vs.10%). However, at stage 4, 9% of ΔLCR loci remain in contact with PCH, whereas only 2% of wild-type loci contact PCH at this stage (see above). This failure to completely dissociate from PCH underscores the potential role of the β-globin LCR in positioning the β-globin locus in an increasingly erythroid cell environment. Relocation of the β-globin locus coincides with changes in RNA Pol II distribution during erythroid maturation The nuclear position of certain gene loci has been linked to their transcriptional status (Francastel et al. 1999; Brown et al. 2001; Schubeler et al. 2001; Chambeyron and Bickmore 2004; Zink et al. 2004). In erythroid cells, where globin genes are highly expressed, the β-globin locus has been shown to consistently colocalize with nuclear staining of RNA Pol II (Osborne et al. 2004). Consequently, it is possible that our observed relocation of the β-globin locus may result from a change in the nuclear organization of the transcriptional machinery during terminal erythroid differentiation. To address this possibility, we analyzed the nuclear distribution of Pol II at successive erythroid maturation stages. Indirect immunostaining shows Pol II exists in freely diffusible form and in distinct foci (transcription factories) that are the sites of the majority of RNA synthesis and contain multiple transcription factors (Grande et al. 1997). These transcription factories are attached to the underlying nucleoskeleton and show very little mobility and may thus represent one facet of nuclear architecture (Kimura et al. 1999). We performed immunostaining experiments on sorted immature and fully differentiated nucleated erythroid fetal liver cells using an antibody recognizing both hyperphosphorylated and nonphosphorylated Pol II (for review, see Dahmus 1996). In the immature c-kit-positive population (stage 1), Pol II is distributed over hundreds of foci closely packed throughout the nucleoplasm with the exclusion of PCH, nucleoli, and most of the immediate nuclear periphery (Fig. 5a–c
Next we examined the location of the wild-type β-globin locus relative to Pol II in immature and mature erythroid cells by ImmunoFISH. In the immature cell fraction, we found only limited direct overlap between the β-globin and Pol II signals. In particular, many of the peripheral β-globin loci remain just beyond the volume occupied by most Pol II foci (Fig. (Fig.5g).5g Only the wild-type β-globin locus consistently colocalizes with engaged Pol II Although both the wild-type and ΔLCR β-globin loci frequently colocalize with Pol II in mature erythroid cells, transcription from the ΔLCR allele is much lower than wild-type levels (Bender et al. 2000). This suggests that the ΔLCR allele may not be contacting functionally equivalent Pol II foci. By extension, not all of the labeled Pol II foci may be actively transcribing (Kimura et al. 1999). Therefore, using an antibody directed specifically against the C-terminal domain (CTD) of Pol II phosphorylated at Ser 5 (Pol II-S5-P), we determined the association of both alleles with only the hyperphosphorylated form of Pol II, which represents the engaged population of the enzyme and true transcription factories, in erythroid cells. Immunostaining of cells at stage 4 revealed that Pol II hyperphosphorylated at the CTD marks a subpopulation of Pol II foci Fig. Fig.6A).6A
Globin gene expression increases with erythroid maturation Next we determined the expression status of the globin genes in the isolated erythroid maturation stages. We used primary transcript RNA FISH with labeled oligonucleotides directed against α-globin and βmajor-globin introns to assess globin transcriptional activity at the single allele level. The combined detection of α- and β-globin transcripts also permitted us to compare the temporal expression patterns of the two gene loci. As shown in Figure Figure7A,7A
In the ΔLCR cells, the expression pattern of α-globin was very similar to wild-type fetal liver (Fig. (Fig.7A),7A Transcriptional activity of the β-globin locus does not depend on an internal nuclear position The above localization experiments could not determine whether the relocation of the β-globin locus during erythroid differentiation is a cause or consequence of transcriptional activity or whether the LCR directly contributes to the process. However, our RNA FISH data reveal an apparent disconnect between transcriptional activity and nuclear localization: Primary transcript foci become visible (stage 2) before significant relocation of the β-globin locus from the peripheral shell (stages 3 and 4). To locate the transcriptionally active loci, we performed RNA/DNA FISH experiments to determine position and expression status concomitantly. We included a lamin B stain to accurately assess peripheral location in 3D. Contrary to expectation, we find that expressing loci are frequently located at the nuclear periphery, especially in the more immature erythroid cells (Fig. (Fig.7B,7B Discussion Recent work from a number of laboratories has revealed that the interphase nucleus is organized nonrandomly and in a tissue-specific manner (for reviews, see Cremer and Cremer 2001; Kosak and Groudine 2004; Parada et al. 2004). Erythropoiesis represents a well-characterized example of differentiation marked by increasingly restrictive gene expression (Bruno et al. 2004), nuclear compaction, progressive heterochromatinization, and eventual enucleation. We have examined the spatial organization associated with the activation of the β-globin locus during erythropoiesis. Nuclear position and expression of the β-globin locus On the basis of differential expression of three surface markers, we isolated murine fetal liver cells from four stages of erythroid maturation and characterized these cells with respect to morphology, β-globin locus position, and β-globin gene expression (Figs. (Figs.1,1 Both a peripheral position or proximity to PCH has been correlated with transcriptional repression during differentiation (Brown et al. 1997; Brown et al. 1999; Francastel et al. 1999; Su et al. 2004). For example, we demonstrated that up to 60% of β-globin loci colocalized with PCH in undifferentiated murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells in which the β-globin genes are transcriptionally inactive, but only 8% of β-globin alleles contacted PCH after induction of differentiation (Francastel et al. 2001). In contrast, the β-globin locus infrequently colocalizes with PCH in primary fetal liver cells, even in immature cells prior to transcriptional activation. Instead, the locus is often at the nuclear periphery. This discrepancy may reflect a biological difference between the nuclear organization of transformed cell lines and primary cells and/or differences revealed by the current 3D and former 2D analyses. Regardless, the bias of the β-globin locus for the nuclear periphery rather than PCH when inactive in immature fetal liver (i.e., stages 1 and 2) and ES cells might reflect functional differences between these two repressive compartments. In fact, several reports suggest that any particular silenced gene associates either with PCH or the periphery, but rarely both (Skok et al. 2001; Kosak et al. 2002; Zink et al. 2004; Williams et al. 2006). PCH consists of constitutive heterochromatin that replicates late in S phase, is marked by high levels of trimethyl-H3K9 (Dimitrova and Gilbert 1999; Wu et al. 2005), and represents a compartment for stable epigenetic gene repression (as observed in T- and B-cell differentiation) (Brown et al. 1997, 1999; Su et al. 2004). In contrast, the bulk of the chromatin at the nuclear periphery replicates in mid-S phase and is enriched in dimethyl-H3K9, consistent with facultative heterochromatin (Wu et al. 2005). Furthermore, experiments by Hutchison and Weintraub (1985) demonstrated that, unlike PCH, the nuclear periphery is enriched in DNase I-sensitive chromatin, suggesting the presence of poised or active genes. As such, the periphery may harbor gene loci that are silent but responsive to developmental cues to become activated or repressed. In ES cells, in which the globin locus is peripheral, differentiation along the hematopoietic and then erythroid lineages is one possible fate. Therefore, the locus may be competent for activation in the nuclear periphery of ES cells, while in immature fetal liver cells it is poised to activate the globin genes. This is in contrast to activated T cells where the β-globin locus is stably silenced by recruitment to PCH (Brown et al. 2001). We find that the β-globin locus associates with PCH only at a very low frequency in splenic B cells. However, most of these B cells are in a quiescent state, and recruitment of heritably silenced genes to PCH only occurs in cycling but not resting lymphoid cells (Brown et al. 1997, 1999). One striking finding is that robust β-globin expression (commencing at stage 2) precedes the most dramatic relocation of the β-globin locus away from the nuclear periphery (stages 3 and 4). In fact, many β-globin loci that associate with strong transcription foci colocalize with the nuclear lamina. Thus, our results provide further evidence that robust transcription is possible in the immediate vicinity of the nuclear periphery in mammalian systems, and that the relocation of the β-globin locus to the nuclear interior is more likely a consequence of transcription rather than the basis for transcription. Although the nuclear periphery has been described traditionally as a repressive compartment and repository for gene-poor chromosome regions (Gottschling et al. 1990; Gotta and Gasser 1996; Andrulis et al. 1998, 2002; Laroche et al. 1998; Croft et al. 1999; Galy et al. 2000; Boyle et al. 2001), several recent studies in yeast have demonstrated that repressive and activating domains can coexist at the periphery. A genome-wide analysis revealed that a subset of highly active genes (e.g., induced GAL genes) associate with the nuclear export machinery and are relocated to the periphery (Casolari et al. 2004). In addition, the majority of α-factor-induced genes, involving loci from multiple chromosomes, associate with components of the nuclear envelope upon activation, suggesting a global nuclear reorganization (Casolari et al. 2005). INO1, a nucleoplasmic gene locus when repressed, relocates to the periphery when activated by the unfolded protein response (Brickner and Walter 2004). Furthermore, Ishii et al. (2002) demonstrated that genes can be tethered to the periphery and still be transcriptionally active when protected by boundary activities conferred by components of the nuclear transport machinery. More recently, Schmid et al. (2006) reported that a transient association of genes with the nuclear pore basket may represent an integral part of the activation process for many genes. In mammalian systems, the periphery is largely considered to be a transcriptionally inactive compartment, particularly in undifferentiated or progenitor cells (Imai et al. 1997; Croft et al. 1999; Boyle et al. 2001; Kosak et al. 2002; Zhou et al. 2002; Zink et al. 2004; Williams et al. 2006). Moreover, movement away from the periphery has in several instances been correlated with transcriptional activity. For example, in a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell clone, a lacO array relocates away from the periphery when targeted by VP16 and induced to express a reporter gene (Tumbar and Belmont 2001). Rudolph and colleagues (Zink et al. 2004) showed that genes adjacent to CFTR independently adopt tissue-specific positions relative to the nuclear periphery that reflect their individual transcriptional state with interior location correlating with activity. The Mash1 locus is positioned at the periphery when repressed in ES cells but is relocated to the interior when it becomes transcriptionally active during neuronal differentiation (Williams et al. 2006). However, Fisher’s group (Hewitt et al. 2004) has also shown that the mammalian nuclear periphery is not universally repressive, as the IFNγ gene remains peripheral in developing T-helper cells (as well as B cells and fibroblasts) even when transcriptionally active. It is tempting to invoke the gene gating hypothesis, first proposed by Blobel (1985), to explain the significant number of β-globin loci we observe expressing at the nuclear periphery (e.g., >60% of active loci at stage 2 are in contact with the nuclear lamina). Placement of active genes in the proximity of nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) would ensure the rapid export of mature transcripts from the nucleoplasm and thus promote efficient downstream processing. This proximity could be particularly advantageous during the earliest bursts of β-globin gene expression, when it may be imperative to quickly reach a threshold of β-globin protein synthesis to balance α-globin levels. In fact, as assayed by ImmunoFISH, peripheral loci also colocalize with foci of NPC components (data not shown). While this observation is in accord with the gene gating model, NPCs are embedded within the lamina and are present at high density in the erythroid cells. Thus, at this resolution, it is not possible to distinguish association of the β-globin locus with the lamina versus with NPCs. Furthermore, the fraction of transcriptionally active β-globin loci at the periphery decreases with erythroid maturation and higher frequency of expression. This result is more consistent with a model of stochastic initiation of globin gene activation (de Krom et al. 2002), where a fraction of loci may be triggered while still at the periphery and subsequently relocate to the interior. On the other hand, the β-globin locus may not need to be near the nuclear periphery in the more mature erythroblasts with their high levels of globin transcripts and steady flow of newly synthesized RNA to the cytoplasm. It is possible that the shift in location of the β-globin locus is a consequence of general nuclear reorganization during erythroid differentiation. With the progression of an increasingly restricted tissue-specific expression program, numerous genes must be positioned in transcriptionally competent environments, while others are stably silenced. Colocalization of the β-globin locus with active Pol II factories would explain the relocation, since the Pol II distribution changes with maturation. While transcription factories fill the nucleoplasm in early progenitors, their abundance diminishes with differentiation, and they become concentrated in ridges in the nuclear interior. This change is accompanied by a decrease in the number of active genes in the terminally differentiating cells (Bruno et al. 2004) and an increase in facultative heterochromatin that renders whole chromatin domains inaccessible to the transcriptional machinery. Particularly in late erythroblasts, the number of transcription factories is likely to be lower than the number of genes that need to be expressed, suggesting that the Pol II foci are hubs of transcriptional activity, each shared by several genes (Iborra et al. 1996; Osborne et al. 2004; Chakalova et al. 2005). Evidence suggests that the transcription factories are firmly attached to the underlying nucleoskeleton and thus rather immobile (which does not preclude dynamic protein exchange within or between foci) (Kimura et al. 1999). Our own results are consistent with the hypothesis that once transcriptionally engaged, the β-globin locus remains associated with or in the immediate vicinity of a factory, which would gradually pull it toward the nuclear interior as cells differentiate. Genetic analysis of globin gene positioning We previously showed that the human β-globin LCR is required for a high incidence of looping of the locus away from its CT (Ragoczy et al. 2003). Our current results demonstrate that the murine β-globin LCR is necessary for efficient relocation of the locus from the periphery toward the nuclear interior. Our results suggest that the LCR-dependent relocation from the periphery follows, rather than precedes, robust globin gene activation. We also observed that the ΔLCR allele contacts Pol II foci at a frequency similar to the wild-type allele in vivo. This result is consistent with our previous demonstration by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) that the ΔLCR and wild-type alleles similarly associate with Pol II and other components of the preinitiation complex (Sawado et al. 2003). The LCR is therefore not required for association of the locus with transcription factories. However, we demonstrate that association with Pol II foci is required, but not sufficient, for transcription. All active wild-type and ΔLCR loci are associated with Pol II foci, but only a small fraction of ΔLCR loci exhibit primary transcript signals. Our ChIP results revealed that the wild-type allele is much more highly associated with the engaged form of Pol II (hyperphosphorylated at the CTD [S5-P]) than is the ΔLCR allele (Sawado et al. 2003). By ImmunoFISH, we now find that the wild type, but not the ΔLCR allele, associates consistently with foci of Pol II S5-P in the most mature erythroid cells. Consequently, the LCR might either nucleate foci of active transcription factories or enhance the affinity of the locus for such foci. We cannot distinguish between these two possibilities. Nevertheless, association with hyperphosphorylated Pol II is insufficient to ensure transcription, since only ~10% of ΔLCR alleles are transcriptionally active, yet ~30% of loci colocalize with strong foci of engaged Pol II. The LCR therefore most likely contributes to the recruitment of additional erythroid-specific transcription factors to assemble fully competent transcription factories at the β-globin locus. Materials and methods Cells and cell sorting Undifferentiated ES cells (AK7) were maintained in Dubelco’s modified media supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). CD45 (B220+) B cells were isolated from adult wild-type murine spleens by two rounds of positive AutoMACS selection and immediately fixed onto polylysine-coated microscope slides. Fetal liver cells were obtained from dpc-13.5 wild-type and homozygous ΔLCR mouse embryos. Livers were disrupted in PBS and cells were fluorescently labeled with an APC-conjugated antibody against CD-117 (c-kit; Pharmingen), PE-conjugated Ter-119 (Pharmingen), and antibody ERY-1 (Bacon and Sytkowski 1987), which was followed by a FITC-conjugated anti-rat polyclonal antiserum (Pharmingen). Cells were then separated into the CD117+/ERY-1−/Ter-119− (stage 1), CD117+/ERY-1+/Ter-119− (stage 2), CD117−/ERY-1+/Ter-119+ (stage 3), and CD117−/ERY-1−/Ter-119+ (stage 4) stages on a Vantage FACS sorter. Following separation, the cells were incubated for 1 h at 37°C in erythroid progenitor culture media (Carotta et al. 2004) prior to fixation onto microscope slides. DNA, RNA FISH, and ImmunoFISH DNA and RNA FISH were performed essentially as described (Wijgerde et al. 1995; Croft et al. 1999). For details on modifications to the protocols, probes, and antibodies used for ImmunoFISH, see the Supplemental Material. Image Analysis Image stacks (Z sections spaced 0.25 μm apart) were captured on a Zeiss Axiovert 100 TV microscope equipped with a cooled CCD camera and subsequently deconvolved using Deltavision SoftWorx software (Applied Precision). For 2D distance measurements, the image stacks were projected onto a single plane and analyzed in Photoshop CS (Adobe). The shortest 2D distance from the centers of signal intensity of a FISH spot (gene locus) to the nuclear periphery (defined by a sharp drop in DAPI stain) was measured in pixels. Measurements were standardized to nuclear size by dividing each distance by the average radius of its nucleus. Seventy to 140 nuclei for each cell type/maturation stage were scored. Experiments were performed up to three times to ensure consistency and until statistical significance was achieved. Statistical differences between observation groups were determined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To assess the position of the β-globin locus relative to PCH or protein staining (Pol II, lamin B), colocalization or contact of the locus’ FISH signal with the relevant compartment was analyzed in 3D by reconstruction of the nuclear volume using Softworx (Applied Precision) and Imaris (Bitplane) software. In RNA FISH experiments the presence of hybridization signals for α- and β-globin was determined in 2D projections of the Z stacks. Acknowledgments We thank Arthur Sytkowski for the generous gift of the ERY-1 antibody, David Scalzo for discussions on and assistance with statistical analyses, and Barbara Trask, Steven Henikoff, Tomoyuki Sawado, and Steven Kosak for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by American Society of Hematology Scholar and Cooley’s Anemia Foundation Awards (to M.A.B.) and NIH Grants DK 44746 and HL57620 (to M.G.). Footnotes Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org. Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1419506 References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Cell. 1997 Dec 12; 91(6):845-54.
[Cell. 1997]Mol Cell. 1999 Feb; 3(2):207-17.
[Mol Cell. 1999]Genes Dev. 2000 Sep 1; 14(17):2146-60.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Nature. 1996 Jun 6; 381(6582):529-31.
[Nature. 1996]Cell. 1999 Oct 29; 99(3):259-69.
[Cell. 1999]J Cell Sci. 2000 May; 113 ( Pt 9)():1565-76.
[J Cell Sci. 2000]Exp Cell Res. 2002 Jan 15; 272(2):163-75.
[Exp Cell Res. 2002]Genes Dev. 2004 May 15; 18(10):1119-30.
[Genes Dev. 2004]Development. 2005 May; 132(9):2215-23.
[Development. 2005]Chromosome Res. 2003; 11(5):513-25.
[Chromosome Res. 2003]Blood. 2001 Dec 1; 98(12):3261-73.
[Blood. 2001]Genes Dev. 1999 Jan 1; 13(1):112-24.
[Genes Dev. 1999]Blood. 1987 Jan; 69(1):103-8.
[Blood. 1987]Science. 2002 Apr 5; 296(5565):158-62.
[Science. 2002]Science. 2002 Apr 5; 296(5565):158-62.
[Science. 2002]Mol Cell. 2000 Feb; 5(2):387-93.
[Mol Cell. 2000]Cell. 1999 Oct 29; 99(3):259-69.
[Cell. 1999]Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Jun; 3(6):602-6.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25; 98(20):11432-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Genes Dev. 2004 May 15; 18(10):1119-30.
[Genes Dev. 2004]J Cell Biol. 2004 Sep 13; 166(6):815-25.
[J Cell Biol. 2004]J Cell Sci. 1997 Aug; 110 ( Pt 15)():1781-91.
[J Cell Sci. 1997]Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Aug; 19(8):5383-92.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1999]J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 9; 271(32):19009-12.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]Genes Dev. 2003 Apr 15; 17(8):1009-18.
[Genes Dev. 2003]Mol Cell. 2000 Feb; 5(2):387-93.
[Mol Cell. 2000]Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Aug; 19(8):5383-92.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1999]Mol Cell. 2002 Jun; 9(6):1319-26.
[Mol Cell. 2002]Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Jun; 3(6):602-6.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2001]Cell. 2002 May 31; 109(5):551-62.
[Cell. 2002]PLoS Biol. 2004 Nov; 2(11):e342.
[PLoS Biol. 2004]Cell. 2004 May 14; 117(4):427-39.
[Cell. 2004]Genes Dev. 2005 May 15; 19(10):1188-98.
[Genes Dev. 2005]Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Apr; 2(4):292-301.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2001]Genes Dev. 2004 Jun 15; 18(12):1371-84.
[Genes Dev. 2004]Genome Biol. 2004; 5(7):R44.
[Genome Biol. 2004]Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Jan; 24(2):741-56.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2004]Science. 2002 Apr 5; 296(5565):158-62.
[Science. 2002]J Cell Biol. 2004 Sep 13; 166(6):815-25.
[J Cell Biol. 2004]Cell. 1997 Dec 12; 91(6):845-54.
[Cell. 1997]Mol Cell. 1999 Feb; 3(2):207-17.
[Mol Cell. 1999]Cell. 1999 Oct 29; 99(3):259-69.
[Cell. 1999]Nat Genet. 2004 May; 36(5):502-6.
[Nat Genet. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Oct 9; 98(21):12120-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Cell. 1990 Nov 16; 63(4):751-62.
[Cell. 1990]Experientia. 1996 Dec 15; 52(12):1136-47.
[Experientia. 1996]Nature. 1998 Aug 6; 394(6693):592-5.
[Nature. 1998]Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Dec; 22(23):8292-301.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2002]Curr Biol. 1998 May 21; 8(11):653-6.
[Curr Biol. 1998]Mol Biol Cell. 1997 Dec; 8(12):2407-19.
[Mol Biol Cell. 1997]J Cell Biol. 1999 Jun 14; 145(6):1119-31.
[J Cell Biol. 1999]Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Feb 1; 10(3):211-9.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2001]Science. 2002 Apr 5; 296(5565):158-62.
[Science. 2002]Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Jul; 22(13):4876-89.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2002]Mol Cell. 2000 Feb; 5(2):387-93.
[Mol Cell. 2000]Mol Cell. 2002 Jun; 9(6):1319-26.
[Mol Cell. 2002]Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Jan; 24(2):741-56.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2004]J Cell Sci. 1996 Jun; 109 ( Pt 6)():1427-36.
[J Cell Sci. 1996]Nat Genet. 2004 Oct; 36(10):1065-71.
[Nat Genet. 2004]Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Sep; 6(9):669-77.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2005]Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Aug; 19(8):5383-92.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1999]Chromosome Res. 2003; 11(5):513-25.
[Chromosome Res. 2003]Genes Dev. 2003 Apr 15; 17(8):1009-18.
[Genes Dev. 2003]Blood. 1987 Jan; 69(1):103-8.
[Blood. 1987]Blood. 2004 Sep 15; 104(6):1873-80.
[Blood. 2004]Nature. 1995 Sep 21; 377(6546):209-13.
[Nature. 1995]J Cell Biol. 1999 Jun 14; 145(6):1119-31.
[J Cell Biol. 1999]