![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2005, Can Fam Physician Acneiform facial eruptions A problem for young women Correspondence to: Dr M.J. Cheung, Dermatology Resident, Division of Dermatology, 2-104 Clinical Sciences Bldg, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3; telephone (780) 407-1555; fax (780) 407-3003; e-mail melody/at/ualberta.ca See "Skimming the surface" on page 477.Abstract OBJECTIVE To summarize clinical recognition and current management strategies for four
types of acneiform facial eruptions common in young women: acne vulgaris,
rosacea, folliculitis, and perioral dermatitis. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE Many randomized controlled trials (level I evidence) have studied treatments
for acne vulgaris over the years. Treatment recommendations for rosacea,
folliculitis, and perioral dermatitis are based predominantly on comparison
and open-label studies (level II evidence) as well as expert opinion and
consensus statements (level III evidence). MAIN MESSAGE Young women with acneiform facial eruptions often present in primary care.
Differentiating between morphologically similar conditions is often
difficult. Accurate diagnosis is important because treatment approaches are
different for each disease. CONCLUSION Careful visual assessment with an appreciation for subtle morphologic
differences and associated clinical factors will help with diagnosis of
these common acneiform facial eruptions and lead to appropriate
management. Résumé OBJECTIF Faire le point sur le diagnostic clinique et les modalités thérapeutiques
actuelles de quatre types d’éruptions faciales acnéiformes chez la femme
jeune: l’acné vulgaire, l’acné rosacée, la folliculite et la dermatite
périorale. QUALITÉ DES PREUVES Le traitement de l’acné vulgaire a fait l’objet de plusieurs essais
randomisés ces dernières années. Les recommandations pour le traitement de
l’acné rosacée, de la folliculite et de la dermatite périorale reposent
surtout sur des essais comparatifs ou ouverts (preuves de niveau II), mais
aussi sur des opinions d’experts et des déclarations de consensus (preuves
de niveau III). PRINCIPAL MESSAGE Les femmes jeunes consultent fréquemment les établissements de soins
primaires pour des éruptions faciales acnéiformes. Il est souvent difficile
de distinguer des conditions morphologiquement semblables. Il importe
toutefois de poser un diagnostic précis car les modalités thérapeutiques
diffèrent d’une maladie à l’autre. CONCLUSION Le diagnostic et le traitement des éruptions faciales communes sont plus
faciles si l’on fait une évaluation visuelle attentive et si on tient compte
des différences morphologiques subtiles et des facteurs cliniques
associés.
Acneiform eruptions, such as acne vulgaris, rosacea, folliculitis, and perioral
dermatitis, are routinely encountered in primary care. Acne vulgaris alone affects up to
80% of adolescents and continues to affect 40% to 50% of adult women.1 An estimated 13 million Americans are affected by
rosacea.2 These conditions often have
psychosocial sequelae.3 These four eruptions are challenging to diagnose because they all resemble acne. This
article describes these eruptions, highlighting the salient distinguishing
characteristics, and summarizes current management recommendations from the medical
literature. Quality of evidence PubMed was searched from January 1966 to December 2003 using the names of each of the
acneiform conditions combined with “treatment.” Several randomized controlled trials
(level I evidence) on treatment of acne vulgaris were found, but there was little
level I evidence for treating the other conditions. Recommendations for treating
these conditions are based mainly on comparison or open-label studies (level II
evidence) and expert opinion and consensus guidelines (level III evidence). Acne vulgaris Acne vulgaris is a disease of the sebaceous follicles that primarily affects
adolescents but not uncommonly persists through the third decade and beyond,
particularly in women. Pathogenesis is multifactorial and involves an interplay
between abnormal follicular keratinization or desquamation, excessive sebum
production, proliferation of follicular Propionibacterium acnes,
and hormonal factors. Diagnosis is often clear, and laboratory investigations are unnecessary, except where
signs and symptoms suggest hyperandrogenism.4,5 Acne is characterized by a
variety of lesions that indicate varying degrees of disease severity. Mild or noninflammatory acne is characterized by comedones. Closed comedones appear
as pale white, slightly elevated, dome-shaped, 1- to 2-mm papules with no clinically
visible follicular orifice (Figure 1
Before commencing therapy and in the interest of establishing a therapeutic alliance,
it is important to explain to patients the causes of acne and the rationale for
therapy as well as the expected duration of therapy (weeks to months). The
literature suggests that therapy be based on the severity or the predominant
morphologic variant of disease. Mild comedonal acne should be treated with topical antimicrobials,1,6-8 such as benzoyl peroxide (available in
2.5/5/10% cream, gel, or wash) or topical comedolytics,1,6-8 such as tretinoin (available in 0.025/0.05/0.1% cream,
0.01/0.025% gel, and 0.05% liquid) (Table 1,9-24). Benzoyl peroxide is preferred for patients with inflammation8; tretinoin is effective for cases with a
predominance of comedones. The recently developed topical retinoid, adapalene, is
only marginally more effective than tretinoin, but is better tolerated.7 Choice of treatment depends largely on
patients’ tolerance and preference.6 Gels and
creams with water bases are less drying than gels in alcohol or glycol bases.
Exfoliants, such as salicylic acid, remain an option for acne treatment, but are
ineffective for deep comedones and can be irritating.1
Papular and pustular acne can be treated with topical or oral antibiotics (Table 1,9-24). Both topical erythromycin (available as solution, gel, or pledgets) and
clindamycin (available as solution, gel, lotion, or pledgets) are reported to be
equally effective.9,25 Topical erythromycin is considered safest during
pregnancy.1 Combination topical products, such as Clindoxyl (clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide)
and Benzamycin (benzoyl peroxide and erythromycin), have recently come on the market
and are quite useful.6 Tetracycline (1000 mg/d
in two or four divided doses), because of its effectiveness and low cost, is the
first-choice oral antibiotic followed by minocycline (50 to 100 mg/d) or doxycycline
(100 mg/d). These drugs are often prescribed, along with topical retinoids,
combination products, or antimicrobials, to improve efficacy and prevent resistance
from developing. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is best reserved for severe,
recalcitrant cases.1 Other oral antibiotics
mentioned in the literature include erythromycin, clindamycin, ampicillin, and
amoxicillin in no particular order. Most of these drugs should be used for at least
2 months before they are deemed ineffective.6 Cases of treatment-resistant, nodulocystic, or scarring acne should be referred to a
dermatologist for isotretinoin treatment, steroid injection, or hormone therapy
(Table 1,9-24). Isotretinoin is notorious for its drying side effects and
teratogenicity, but is a very effective medication with a response rate as high as
90%.1 It is administered at 0.5 to 1.0
mg/kg daily and titrated to obtain an optimal and early response with minimal side
effects. Average duration of therapy is 4 months; a second course might be
necessary. Triamcinolone acetonide intralesional injections are feasible for sparser
nodulocystic lesions, but care must be taken to avoid steroid atrophy. Finally, for
women unresponsive to conventional therapy, hormonal therapy (biphasic or triphasic
contraceptive pills or spironolactone, which has strong antiandrogenic activity) is
recommended in conjunction with topical treatment.1,8 Rosacea Rosacea is a chronic vascular acneiform facial disorder that affects primarily 20- to
60-year-old people of northern and eastern European descent. Although the condition
is equally prevalent in men and women, it is usually more severe in men and can
progress to tissue hyperplasia. Pathogenesis remains unknown, although many factors
including bacteria, Demodex mites, vasomotor and connective tissue
dysfunction, and topical corticosteroids have been implicated. Rosacea is characterized by a triad of symmetrical erythema, papules and pustules,
and telangiectasia on the cheeks, forehead, and nose (Figures 2
Begin treatment by discussing potential triggers and how to avoid them. Concomitant
topical metronidazole and oral tetracycline are recommended as first-line therapy
for early-stage rosacea27,28 (Table 2,29-33). This combination lowers the potential for relapse once the oral
medication is withdrawn.27,28 Oral minocycline (100 to 200 mg/d) is
considered an acceptable alternative.28
Doxycycline, clindamycin, erythromycin, clarithromycin, ampicillin, and
metronidazole have also been shown to be effective (Table 2,29-33). Oral therapy should be prolonged in those with ocular symptoms,
although some sources recommend deferring oral antibiotics until there are ocular
complaints.34
There is no significant difference in efficacy between twice-daily treatment with
0.75% topical metronidazole and once-daily treatment with 1.0% metronidazole.27 Topical sulfacetamide is an alternative if
metronidazole is not tolerated or if patients want concealment (sulfacetamide is
available in a flesh-coloured preparation) (Table 2,29-33). Oral tetracycline is usually started at 1000 mg/d, tapered, and finally
discontinued. Various sources recommend various tapering protocols and duration of
therapy. Some recommend tapering to 500 mg/d over 6 weeks followed by a slow
maintenance taper to 250 mg/d over 3 months if patients respond; otherwise, a 6-week
course of full-dose tetracycline should be repeated.2 Others recommend therapy at full dose until clearance or for 12 weeks’
duration.28 Recently, topical retinoid
and vitamin C preparations have been shown to have a beneficial effect29,32
(Table 2,29-33). For recalcitrant rosacea, a 4- to 5-month course of oral isotretinoin at either low
dose (10 mg/d) or the dose used for acne vulgaris has been shown to reduce
symptoms.35 Patients with rosacea with
fibrotic changes should be referred to a cosmetic surgeon. Folliculitis Folliculitis is an inflammation of the hair follicle as a result of mechanical trauma
(eg, shaving, friction), irritation (certain topical agents, such as oils), or
infection. Mechanical trauma, occlusion, and immunocompromise predispose patients to
infection. The usual infectious organism is Staphylococcus aureus,
although Gram-negative folliculitis can result from prolonged use of antibiotics for
acne. Pityrosporum, a saprophytic yeast, has also been implicated. Diagnosis is clinical. There is usually an abrupt eruption of small, well
circumscribed, globular, dome-shaped, often monomorphic pustules in clusters on
hair-bearing areas of the body and face (Figure 4
Initially, potassium hydroxide testing of the hair and any surrounding scale should
be considered to exclude Pityrosporum. Otherwise, an identifying
culture should always be taken before initiating therapy.34 In confirmed cases, topical therapy with econazole cream,
selenium sulfide shampoo, or 50% propylene glycol36 has been recommended for a duration of 3 to 4 weeks (Table 3,37-41). Subsequent additional intermittent maintenance doses once to twice a
week42 have been found helpful for
avoiding recurrence, which is common in folliculitis. Oral antifungals (fluconazole,
ketoconazole, or itraconanzole) have been deemed effective when used for 10 to 14
days43 (Table 3,37-41). One clinical trial demonstrated the superiority of combined topical and
oral therapy as compared with either alone.37
Topical therapy for superficial S aureus includes erythromycin,
clindamycin, mupirocin, or benzoyl peroxide44
(Table 3,37-41). Oral antistaphylococcal antibiotics (first-generation cephalosporins,
penicillinase-resistant penicillins, macrolides, or fluoroquinolones) are indicated
for extensive disease or for the deep involvement of sycosis44 (Table 3,37-41). Treatment is continued until lesions completely resolve.45 Gram-negative folliculitis can be treated as
severe acne with isotretinoin at a dose of 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg daily for 4 to 5
months46 (Table 3,37-41). Alternatives are ampicillin at 250 mg or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
at 600 mg four times daily, but response to antibiotic treatment is slow, and
relapse is common. Perioral dermatitis Perioral dermatitis is an acneiform eruption of unknown etiology, although many
contributing factors have been implicated: fluorinated topical corticosteroids,
subclinical irritant contact dermatitis, and overmoisturization of skin. Women are
affected more than men.47 Clinically, the condition appears as an eruption of discrete, symmetrical pinpoint
papules and pustules in clusters periorally (on the chin or nasolabial folds, but
not on the vermilion border of the lips) that might have an erythematous base
(Figure 5
Despite an unclear etiology, treatment is simple and effective. Perioral dematitis
resolves with tetracycline (250 mg two to three times daily for several weeks)48 or erythromycin49 (Table 4,50,51). Topical antibiotics are less well tolerated and less effective, but
remain an option for those who cannot take systemic antibiotics.27 Topical fluorinated corticosteroids should
be discontinued. Gradually weaker topical corticosteroids for weaning and prevention
of rebound eruptions have been used either as monotherapy or as additional agents to
topical metronidazole and oral erythromycin.52
Conclusion Acneiform facial eruptions are common in young women. Differential diagnosis of the
four conditions discussed above should be kept in mind when assessing patients.
Although there is some overlap in how these conditions present, careful attention to
distribution of lesions, morphology, and exacerbating factors can lead to accurate
diagnosis and optimal therapy. Acknowledgments We thank Dr Thomas G. Salopek and Dr Benjamin Barankin for supplying some figures for
this article. Biography
Footnotes Competing interests: None declared References 1. Nguyen QH, Kim YA, Schwartz RA. Management of acne vulgaris. Am Fam Physician. 1994;50(1):89–96. [PubMed] 2. Cuevas T. Identifying and treating rosacea. Nurse Pract. 2001;26(6):13. 13-5,19-23. [PubMed] 3. Gupta MA. Psychosocial aspects of common skin diseases. Can Fam Physician. 2002;48:660. 660-5 (Eng), 668-70 (Fr). [PubMed] 4. Jabbour SA. Cutaneous manifestations of endocrine disorders: a guide for
dermatologists. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(5):315–331. [PubMed] 5. Tourniaire J, Pugeat M. Strategic approach of hyperandrogenism in women. Horm Res. 1983;18(1-3):125–134. [PubMed] 6. Taylor MB. Treatment of acne vulgaris: guidelines for primary care
physicians. Postgrad Med. 1991;89(8):40–47. [PubMed] 7. Cunliffe WJ. Management of adult acne and acne variants. J Cutan Med Surg. 1998;2(Suppl 3):7–13. [PubMed] 8. Burdon-Jones D. New approaches to acne. Aust Fam Physician. 1992;21(11):1615–1622. [PubMed] 9. Shalita AR, Smith EB, Bauer E. Topical erythromycin versus clindamycin therapy for acne. A
multicenter, double-blind comparison. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120:351–355. [PubMed] 10. Hughes BR, Norris JF, Cunliffe WJ. A double-blind evaluation of topical isotretinoin 0.05%, benzoyl
peroxide gel 5% and placebo in patients with acne. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1992;17(3):165–168. [PubMed] 11. Nyirady J, Grossman RM, Nighland M, Berger RS, Jorizzo JL, Kim YH, et al. A comparative trial of two retinoids commonly used in the
treatment of acne vulgaris. J Dermatol Treat. 2001;12(3):149–157. 12. Pochi PE, Bagatell FK, Ellis CN, Stoughton RB, Whitmore CG, Saatjian GD, et al. Erythromycin 2 percent gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Cutis. 1988;41(2):132–136. [PubMed] 13. Kuhlman DS, Callen JP. A comparison of clindamycin phosphate 1 percent topical lotion
and placebo in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Cutis. 1986;38(3):203–206. [PubMed] 14. Lookingbill DP, Chalker DK, Lindholm JS, Katz HI, Kempers SE, Huerter CJ, et al. Treatment of acne with a combination clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide
gel compared with clindamycin gel, benzoyl peroxide gel and vehicle gel:
combined results of two double-blind investigations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37(4):590–595. [PubMed] 15. Chalker DK, Shalita A, Smith JG, Jr, Swann RW. A double-blind study of the effectiveness of a 3% erythromycin
and 5% benzoyl peroxide combination in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983;9(6):933–936. [PubMed] 16. Gammon WR, Meyer C, Lantis S, Shenefelt P, Reizner G, Cripps DJ. Comparative efficacy of oral erythromycin versus oral
tetracycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris. A double-blind study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986;14(2 Pt 1):183–186. [PubMed] 17. Cullen SI, Cohan RH. Minocycline therapy in acne vulgaris. Cutis. 1976;17(6):1208. 1208-10,1214. [PubMed] 18. Parsad D, Pandhi R, Nagpal R, Negi KS. Azithromycin monthly pulse vs daily doxycycline in the treatment
of acne vulgaris. J Dermatol. 2001;28(1):1–4. [PubMed] 19. Panzer JD, Poche W, Meek TJ, Derbes VJ, Atkinson W. Acne treatment: a comparative efficacy trial of clindamycin and
tetracycline. Cutis. 1977;19(1):109–111. [PubMed] 20. Cunliffe WJ, Meynadier J, Alirezai M, George SA, Coutts I, Roseeuw DI, et al. Is combined oral and topical therapy better than oral therapy
alone in patients with moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris? A
comparison of the efficacy and safety of lymecycline plus adapalene gel 0.
1%, versus lymecycline plus gel vehicle. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49(3 Suppl):218–226. 21. Levine RM, Rasmussen JE. Intralesional corticosteroids in the treatment of nodulocystic
acne. Arch Dermatol. 1983;119:480–481. [PubMed] 22. Peck GL, Olsen TG, Butkus D, Pandya M, Arnaud-Battandier J, Gross EG, et al. Isotretinoin versus placebo in the treatment of cystic acne. A
randomized double-blind study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982;6(4 Pt 2 Suppl):735–745. [PubMed] 23. Rosen MP, Breitkopf DM, Nagamani M. A randomized controlled trial of second- versus third-generation
oral contraceptives in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(5):1158–1160. [PubMed] 24. Hatwal A, Bhatt RP, Agrawal JK, Singh G, Bajpai HS. Spironolactone and cimetidine in treatment of acne. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh). 1988;8(1):84–87. [PubMed] 25. Schachner L, Pestana A, Kittles C. A clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of a topical
erythromycin-zinc formulation with a topical clindamycin formulation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22(3):489–495. [PubMed] 26. Zug KA, Palay DA, Rock B. Dermatologic diagnosis and treatment of itchy red eyelids. Surv Ophthalmol. 1996;40(4):293–306. [PubMed] 27. Zuber TJ. Rosacea. Dermatology. 2000;27(2):309–318. 28. Cohen AF, Tiemstra JD. Diagnosis and treatment of rosacea. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15(3):214–217. [PubMed] 29. Carlin RB, Carlin CS. Topical vitamin C preparation reduces erythema of rosacea. Cosmetic Dermatol. 2001;2:35–38. 30. Dahl MV, Katz HI, Krueger GG, Millikan LE, Odom RB, Parker F, et al. Topical metronidazole maintains remissions of rosacea. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:679–683. [PubMed] 31. Wilkin JK, DeWitt S. Treatment of rosacea: topical clindamycin versus oral
tetracycline. Int J Dermatol. 1993;32(1):65–67. [PubMed] 32. Vienne MP, Ochando N, Borrel MT, Gall Y, Lauze C, Dupuy P. Retinaldehyde alleviates rosacea. Dermatology. 1999;199(Suppl 1):53–56. [PubMed] 33. Hoting E, Paul E, Plewig G. Treatment of rosacea with isotretinoin. Int J Dermatol. 1986;25(10):660–663. [PubMed] 34. Mengesha YM, Bennett ML. Pustular skin disorders: diagnosis and treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3(6):389–400. [PubMed] 35. Erdogan FG, Yurtsever P, Aksoy D, Eskioglu F. Efficacy of low-dose isotretinoin in patients with
treatment-resistant rosacea. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:884–885. [PubMed] 36. Back O, Faergemann J, Hornqvist R. Pityrosporum folliculitis: a common disease of the young and
middle-aged. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;12(1 Pt 1):56–61. [PubMed] 37. Abdel-Razek M, Fadaly G, Abdel-Raheim M, al-Morsy F. Pityrosporum (Malassezia) folliculitis in Saudi
Arabia—diagnosis and therapeutic trials. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1995;20(5):406–409. [PubMed] 38. Parsad D, Saini R, Negi KS. Short-term treatment of pityrosporum folliculitis: a double blind
placebo-controlled study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 1998;11(2):188–190. [PubMed] 39. Bork K, Brauers J, Kresken M. Efficacy and safety of 2% mupirocin ointment in the treatment of
primary and secondary skin infections—an open multicentre trial. Br J Clin Pract. 1989;43(8):284–288. [PubMed] 40. Tassler H. Comparative efficacy and safety of oral fleroxacin and
amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium in skin and soft tissue infections. Am J Med. 1993;94(3A):159–165. 41. Plewig G, Nikolowski J, Wolff HH. Action of isotretinoin in acne rosacea and Gram-negative
folliculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982;6(4 Pt 2 Suppl):766–785. [PubMed] 42. Faergemann J. Pityrosporum infections. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;31(3 Pt 2):18–20. 43. Aly R, Berger T. Common superficial fungal infections in patients with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(Suppl 2):128–132. 44. Stulberg DL, Penrod MA, Blatny RA. Common bacterial skin infections. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66(1):119–124. [PubMed] 45. Berger TG. Treatment of bacterial, fungal, and parasitic infections in the
HIV-infected host. Semin Dermatol. 1993;12(4):296–300. [PubMed] 46. Boni R, Nehroff B. Treatment of Gram-negative folliculitis in patients with acne. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(4):273–276. [PubMed] 47. Hogan DJ. Perioral dermatitis. Curr Prob Dermatol. 1995;22:98–104. 48. Wilkinson DS, Kirton V, Wilkinson JD. Perioral dermatitis. A 12-year review. Br J Dermatol. 1979;101(3):245–257. [PubMed] 49. Coskey RJ. Perioral dermatitis. Cutis. 1984;34(1):55. 55-6,58. [PubMed] 50. Miller WS. Tetracycline in the treatment of perioral dermatitis. N C Med J. 1971;32(11):471–472. [PubMed] 51. Veien NK, Munkvad JM, Nielsen AO, Niordson AM, Stahl D, Thormann J. Topical metronidazole in the treatment of perioral dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;24(2 Pt 1):258–260. [PubMed] 52. Bikowski JB. Topical therapy for perioral dermatitis. Cutis. 1983;31(6):678–682. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Am Fam Physician. 1994 Jul; 50(1):89-96, 99-100.
[Am Fam Physician. 1994]Nurse Pract. 2001 Jun; 26(6):13-5, 19-23; quiz 24-5.
[Nurse Pract. 2001]Can Fam Physician. 2002 Apr; 48():660-2, 668-70.
[Can Fam Physician. 2002]Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003; 4(5):315-31.
[Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003]Horm Res. 1983; 18(1-3):125-34.
[Horm Res. 1983]Am Fam Physician. 1994 Jul; 50(1):89-96, 99-100.
[Am Fam Physician. 1994]Postgrad Med. 1991 Jun; 89(8):40-2, 45-7.
[Postgrad Med. 1991]Aust Fam Physician. 1992 Nov; 21(11):1615-22.
[Aust Fam Physician. 1992]Arch Dermatol. 1984 Mar; 120(3):351-5.
[Arch Dermatol. 1984]Acta Derm Venereol. 1988; 68(1):84-7.
[Acta Derm Venereol. 1988]Arch Dermatol. 1984 Mar; 120(3):351-5.
[Arch Dermatol. 1984]Acta Derm Venereol. 1988; 68(1):84-7.
[Acta Derm Venereol. 1988]J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990 Mar; 22(3):489-95.
[J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990]Am Fam Physician. 1994 Jul; 50(1):89-96, 99-100.
[Am Fam Physician. 1994]Postgrad Med. 1991 Jun; 89(8):40-2, 45-7.
[Postgrad Med. 1991]Am Fam Physician. 1994 Jul; 50(1):89-96, 99-100.
[Am Fam Physician. 1994]Arch Dermatol. 1984 Mar; 120(3):351-5.
[Arch Dermatol. 1984]Acta Derm Venereol. 1988; 68(1):84-7.
[Acta Derm Venereol. 1988]Am Fam Physician. 1994 Jul; 50(1):89-96, 99-100.
[Am Fam Physician. 1994]Aust Fam Physician. 1992 Nov; 21(11):1615-22.
[Aust Fam Physician. 1992]Surv Ophthalmol. 1996 Jan-Feb; 40(4):293-306.
[Surv Ophthalmol. 1996]J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002 May-Jun; 15(3):214-7.
[J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002]Int J Dermatol. 1986 Dec; 25(10):660-3.
[Int J Dermatol. 1986]Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002; 3(6):389-400.
[Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002]Int J Dermatol. 1986 Dec; 25(10):660-3.
[Int J Dermatol. 1986]Nurse Pract. 2001 Jun; 26(6):13-5, 19-23; quiz 24-5.
[Nurse Pract. 2001]J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002 May-Jun; 15(3):214-7.
[J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002]Dermatology. 1999; 199 Suppl 1():53-6.
[Dermatology. 1999]Arch Dermatol. 1998 Jul; 134(7):884-5.
[Arch Dermatol. 1998]Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002; 3(6):389-400.
[Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002]J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985 Jan; 12(1 Pt 1):56-61.
[J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985]Clin Exp Dermatol. 1995 Sep; 20(5):406-9.
[Clin Exp Dermatol. 1995]J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982 Apr; 6(4 Pt 2 Suppl):766-85.
[J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982]Am Fam Physician. 2002 Jul 1; 66(1):119-24.
[Am Fam Physician. 2002]Clin Exp Dermatol. 1995 Sep; 20(5):406-9.
[Clin Exp Dermatol. 1995]J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982 Apr; 6(4 Pt 2 Suppl):766-85.
[J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982]Semin Dermatol. 1993 Dec; 12(4):296-300.
[Semin Dermatol. 1993]Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003; 4(4):273-6.
[Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003]Br J Dermatol. 1979 Sep; 101(3):245-57.
[Br J Dermatol. 1979]Cutis. 1984 Jul; 34(1):55-6, 58.
[Cutis. 1984]N C Med J. 1971 Nov; 32(11):471-2.
[N C Med J. 1971]J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991 Feb; 24(2 Pt 1):258-60.
[J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991]Cutis. 1983 Jun; 31(6):678-82.
[Cutis. 1983]