• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of envhperEnvironmental Health PerspectivesBrowse ArticlesAbout EHPGeneral InformationAuthorsMediaProgramsPartnerships
Environ Health Perspect. Nov 1997; 105(11): 1228–1232.
PMCID: PMC1470335
Research Article

Have sperm densities declined? A reanalysis of global trend data.

Abstract

In 1992 a worldwide decline in sperm density was reported; this was quickly followed by numerous critiques and editorials. Because of the public health importance of this finding, a detailed reanalysis of data from 61 studies was warranted to resolve these issues. Multiple linear regression models (controlling for abstinence time, age, percent proven fertility, specimen collection method, study goal and location) were used to examine regional differences and the interaction between region (United States, Europe, and non-Western countries) and year. Nonlinear models and residual confounding were also examined in these data. Using a linear model (adjusted R2 = 0. 80), means and slopes differed significantly across regions (p = 0. 02). Mean sperm densities were highest in Europe and lowest in non-Western countries. A decline in sperm density was seen in the United States (studies from 1938-1988; slope = -1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.90--1.10) and Europe (1971-1990; slope = -3.13; CI, -4.96- -1.30), but not in non-Western countries (1978-1989; slope = 1.56; CI, -1.00-4.12). Results from nonlinear models (quadratic and spline) were similar. Thus, further analysis of these studies supports a significant decline in sperm density in the United States and Europe. Confounding and selection bias are unlikely to account for these results. However, some intraregional differences were as large as mean decline in sperm density between 1938 and 1990, and recent reports from Europe and the United States further support large interarea differences in sperm density. Identifying the cause(s) of these regional and temporal differences, whether environmental or other, is clearly warranted.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.9M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Images in this article

Click on the image to see a larger version.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. BMJ. 1992 Sep 12;305(6854):609–613. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Olsen GW, Bodner KM, Ramlow JM, Ross CE, Lipshultz LI. Have sperm counts been reduced 50 percent in 50 years? A statistical model revisited. Fertil Steril. 1995 Apr;63(4):887–893. [PubMed]
  • Brake A, Krause W. Decreasing quality of semen. BMJ. 1992 Dec 12;305(6867):1498–1498. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lerchl A, Nieschlag E. Decreasing sperm counts? A critical (re)view. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1996;104(4):301–307. [PubMed]
  • Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE. Sperm decline--real or artifact? Fertil Steril. 1996 Feb;65(2):450–453. [PubMed]
  • Sturde HC, Glowania HJ, Böhm K. Vergleichende Ejaculatuntersuchungen bei Männern aus sterilen und fertilen Ehen. Arch Dermatol Forsch. 1971;241(4):426–437. [PubMed]
  • Santomauro AG, Sciarra JJ, Varma AO. A clinical investigation of the role of the semen analysis and postcoital test in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril. 1972 Apr;23(4):245–251. [PubMed]
  • Magnus O, Tollefsrud A, Abyholm T, Purvis K. Effects of varying the abstinence period in the same individuals on sperm quality. Arch Androl. 1991 May-Jun;26(3):199–203. [PubMed]
  • MACLEOD J, GOLD RZ. The male factor in fertility and infertility. V. Effect of continence on semen quality. Fertil Steril. 1952 Jul-Aug;3(4):297–315. [PubMed]
  • Bendvold E. Semen quality in Norwegian men over a 20-year period. Int J Fertil. 1989 Nov-Dec;34(6):401–404. [PubMed]
  • James WH. Secular trend in reported sperm counts. Andrologia. 1980 Jul-Aug;12(4):381–388. [PubMed]
  • Auger J, Kunstmann JM, Czyglik F, Jouannet P. Decline in semen quality among fertile men in Paris during the past 20 years. N Engl J Med. 1995 Feb 2;332(5):281–285. [PubMed]
  • Schwartz D, Mayaux MJ, Spira A, Moscato ML, Jouannet P, Czyglik F, David G. Study of a group of 484 fertile men. Part II: relation between age (20-59) and semen characteristics. Int J Androl. 1981 Aug;4(4):450–465. [PubMed]
  • Nieschlag E, Lammers U, Freischem CW, Langer K, Wickings EJ. Reproductive functions in young fathers and grandfathers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1982 Oct;55(4):676–681. [PubMed]
  • Johnson L. Spermatogenesis and aging in the human. J Androl. 1986 Nov-Dec;7(6):331–354. [PubMed]
  • Zavos PM, Goodpasture JC. Clinical improvements of specific seminal deficiencies via intercourse with a seminal collection device versus masturbation. Fertil Steril. 1989 Jan;51(1):190–193. [PubMed]
  • David G, Jouannet P, Martin-Boyce A, Spira A, Schwartz D. Sperm counts in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril. 1979 Apr;31(4):453–455. [PubMed]
  • Nelson CM, Bunge RG. Semen analysis: evidence for changing parameters of male fertility potential. Fertil Steril. 1974 Jun;25(6):503–507. [PubMed]
  • Fisch H, Goluboff ET. Geographic variations in sperm counts: a potential cause of bias in studies of semen quality. Fertil Steril. 1996 May;65(5):1044–1046. [PubMed]
  • Paulsen CA, Berman NG, Wang C. Data from men in greater Seattle area reveals no downward trend in semen quality: further evidence that deterioration of semen quality is not geographically uniform. Fertil Steril. 1996 May;65(5):1015–1020. [PubMed]
  • Fisch H, Goluboff ET, Olson JH, Feldshuh J, Broder SJ, Barad DH. Semen analyses in 1,283 men from the United States over a 25-year period: no decline in quality. Fertil Steril. 1996 May;65(5):1009–1014. [PubMed]
  • Bromwich P, Cohen J, Stewart I, Walker A. Decline in sperm counts: an artefact of changed reference range of "normal"? BMJ. 1994 Jul 2;309(6946):19–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • MACLEOD J, GOLD RZ. The male factor in fertility and infertility. II. Spermatozoon counts in 1000 men of known fertility and in 1000 cases of infertile marriage. J Urol. 1951 Sep;66(3):436–449. [PubMed]
  • Forti G, Serio M. Male infertility: is its rising incidence due to better methods of detection or an increasing frequency? Hum Reprod. 1993 Aug;8(8):1153–1154. [PubMed]
  • Brotherton J, Barnard G. Estimation of number, mean size and size distribution of human spermatozoa in oligospermia using a Coulter counter. J Reprod Fertil. 1974 Oct;40(2):341–357. [PubMed]
  • Cooper TG, Neuwinger J, Bahrs S, Nieschlag E. Internal quality control of semen analysis. Fertil Steril. 1992 Jul;58(1):172–178. [PubMed]
  • GOLD RZ, MACLEOD J. The male factor in fertility and infertility. VIII. A study of variation in semen quality. Fertil Steril. 1956 Sep-Oct;7(5):387–410. [PubMed]
  • Schrader SM, Turner TW, Breitenstein MJ, Simon SD. Longitudinal study of semen quality of unexposed workers. I. Study overview. Reprod Toxicol. 1988;2(3-4):183–190. [PubMed]
  • Mallidis C, Howard EJ, Baker HW. Variation of semen quality in normal men. Int J Androl. 1991 Apr;14(2):99–107. [PubMed]
  • Farrow S. Falling sperm quality: fact or fiction? BMJ. 1994 Jul 2;309(6946):1–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Irvine S, Cawood E, Richardson D, MacDonald E, Aitken J. Evidence of deteriorating semen quality in the United Kingdom: birth cohort study in 577 men in Scotland over 11 years. BMJ. 1996 Feb 24;312(7029):467–471. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Murature DA, Tang SY, Steinhardt G, Dougherty RC. Phthalate esters and semen quality parameters. Biomed Environ Mass Spectrom. 1987 Aug;14(8):473–477. [PubMed]
  • DAVIDSON HA. Male subfertility; interim report of 3,182 cases. Br Med J. 1949 Dec 10;2(4640):1328–1332. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bostofte E, Serup J, Rebbe H. Has the fertility of Danish men declined through the years in terms of semen quality? A comparison of semen qualities between 1952 and 1972. Int J Fertil. 1983;28(2):91–95. [PubMed]
  • Osser S, Liedholm P, Ranstam J. Depressed semen quality: a study over two decades. Arch Androl. 1984;12(1):113–116. [PubMed]
  • Bendvold E, Gottlieb C, Bygdeman M, Eneroth P. Depressed semen quality in Swedish men from barren couples: a study over three decades. Arch Androl. 1991 May-Jun;26(3):189–194. [PubMed]
  • de Mouzon J, Thonneau P, Spira A, Multigner L. Declining sperm count. Semen quality has declined among men born in France since 1950. BMJ. 1996 Jul 6;313(7048):43–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bujan L, Mansat A, Pontonnier F, Mieusset R. Time series analysis of sperm concentration in fertile men in Toulouse, France between 1977 and 1992. BMJ. 1996 Feb 24;312(7029):471–472. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Van Waeleghem K, De Clercq N, Vermeulen L, Schoonjans F, Comhaire F. Deterioration of sperm quality in young healthy Belgian men. Hum Reprod. 1996 Feb;11(2):325–329. [PubMed]
  • Wittmaack FM, Shapiro SS. Longitudinal study of semen quality in Wisconsin men over one decade. Wis Med J. 1992 Aug;91(8):477–479. [PubMed]
  • Ginsburg J, Okolo S, Prelevic G, Hardiman P. Residence in the London area and sperm density. Lancet. 1994 Jan 22;343(8891):230–230. [PubMed]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Science

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...