• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jmlaJournal informationSubscribeSubmissions on the Publisher web siteCurrent issue of JMLA in PMCAlso see BMLA journal in PMC
J Med Libr Assoc. Apr 2006; 94(2 Suppl): E92–E98.
PMCID: PMC1463042

Mapping the literature of nursing informatics

Johanna T. Guenther, MLS, PhD, Retired Formerly, Associate Professor and Director*

Abstract

Objective: This study was part of the Medical Library Association's Nursing and Allied Health Resources Section's project to map the nursing literature. It identified core journals in nursing informatics and the journals referenced in them and analyzed coverage of those journals in selected indexes.

Method: Five core journals were chosen and analyzed for 1996, 1997, and 1998. The references in the core journal articles were examined for type and number of formats cited during the selected time period. Bradford's Law of Scattering divided the journals into frequency zones.

Results: The time interval, 1990 to 1998, produced 71% of the references. Internet references could not be tracked by date before 1990. Twelve journals were the most productive, 119 journals were somewhat productive, and 897 journals were the least productive. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association was the most prolific core journal. The 1998 journal references were compared in CINAHL, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index, and OCLC Article First. PubMed/MEDLINE had the highest indexing score.

INTRODUCTION

Health care informatics has been defined as, “the integration of health sciences, computer science, information science, and cognitive science to assist in the management of health care information” [1]. Under health care informatics, specialties divide into smaller subgroups: medical informatics, health informatics, dental informatics, and nursing informatics. Medical informatics, a term used since the mid-1970s, refers to information technologies that concern patient care and the medical decision-making process [2]. Health informatics refers to educational technology for health care clients or the general public. Medical, dental, and nursing informatics overlap in a number of areas, for example, information retrieval, ethics, patient care, decision support systems, human-to-computer interactions, information systems, imaging, computer security, computerized patient records, and computer assisted instruction [1].

Nurses have worked in informatics roles for over twenty-five years, but the phrase “nursing informatics” was not seen in the literature until 1984. Since 1984, nursing informatics has established itself as a specialty in the nursing field. In 1985, Hannah defined nursing informatics as the “use of information technologies in relation to those functions, within the purview of nursing that are carried out by nurses when performing their duties” [3]. This definition was meant to cover all aspects of information technology, used by nurses, that related to patient care, health care administration, nursing practice, or nursing education. In 1989, Graves and Corcoran defined nursing informatics as “a combination of computer science, information science and nursing science designed to assist in the management and processing of nursing data, information and knowledge to support the practice of nursing and the delivery of nursing care” [4].

In 1994 and 1995, the American Nurses Association (ANA) published the Scope of Practice in Nursing Informatics and Nursing Informatics Standards of Practice, respectively. The 1994 pamphlet defined nursing informatics as “the specialty that integrates nursing science, computer science and information science in identifying, collecting, processing and managing data and information to support nursing practice, administration, education, research and the expansion of nursing knowledge” [5]. The 1995 pamphlet described a generalist level of practice and performance for nursing informatics that is applied to nurses qualified by experience or education to practice at that level [6]. The two pamphlets were combined into one document, Scope and Standards of Nursing Informatics, in October 2001. This publication defined nursing informatics as “a specialty that integrates nursing science, computer science and information science to manage and communicate data, knowledge and nursing practice” [7]. Rognehaugh defined nursing informatics as “the use of any computer and information technologies that support any nursing function carried out by nurses in the performance of their duties” [8]. Today, it is commonly accepted that nursing informatics means electronic information combined with nursing and any aspect of clinical practice, administration, research, or education.

A few nursing informatics courses are offered at the baccalaureate education level, but most programs and degrees are graduate and postgraduate level. Nurses with baccalaureate informatics education preparation are called informatics nurses. Those educated at the graduate level are known as informatics nurse specialists.

PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

The professional nursing organizations' special interest groups for nursing informatics are the ANA Task Force on the Scope of Practice for Nursing Informatics, the Task Force to Develop Measurement Criteria for Standards for Nursing Informatics, and the National League for Nursing (NLN) Council of Nursing Informatics. The American Organization of Nurse Executives gives the specialty priority interest but has no formal working group. The American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) sponsors the Nursing Informatics Working Group (NIWG) [9]. Information about NIWG is available on the AMIA Website, and it sponsors nrsing-l, an email discussion list for nurses practicing in the specialty. The International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) has the Special Interest Group, Nursing Informatics (IMIA SIG-NI). There is also an American Nursing Informatics Association (ANIA). The Institute for Healthcare Informatics (IHI) was formed in the fall of 2001 by Drexel University's College of Information Science and Technology, the MCP Hahnemann University's School of Medicine, and the College of Nursing and Health Professions. The institute's purpose is to create a partnership between information technology, medicine, nursing, and related health care professions [1].

CERTIFICATION AND EDUCATION

The American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) is the official certifying organization for informatics nurses. The prerequisites for certification include a baccalaureate or higher degree in nursing or a baccalaureate degree in a relevant field, an active registered nurse (RN) license in the United States, and 2 years of RN practice plus 2,000 hours of informatics nursing practice within the previous 5 years or 12 hours of academic credit in a graduate program in nursing informatics and 1,000 hours of nursing informatics practice within the previous 5 years. Thirty contact hours of continuing education within the previous 2 years are also required [10].

The education process for nursing informatics has evolved slowly and sporadically. In 1976, the first computer technology course was offered to nursing undergraduates at State University of New York at Buffalo [11]. Over the last twenty-five years, an increasing number of undergraduate and graduate nursing schools have added nursing informatics courses. Initially, many of the courses were electives in general computer literacy offered by other departments on campus. Sometimes, a course would be created and offered as part of the nursing curriculum by a nursing faculty member with computer expertise. Finally, nursing courses that applied computer skills to nursing practice were created [12]. Due to the uneven evolution of nursing informatics content, nurse educators recognized the need to establish content guidelines for newly created courses. In 1987, Ronald and Skiba wrote a nursing curriculum content guide for core competencies in computer literacy and nursing informatics [13]. A 1998 study by Carty and Rosenfeld found that fewer than one-third of the nursing schools included nursing informatics in their curricula. Only nineteen nursing schools offered a separate course in nursing informatics [14].

Even with a content guide, consensus was lacking among educators concerning what should be taught in a nursing informatics course and what core competencies could be judged by measurable outcomes. In 1998, a panel of nursing informatics experts from academia and the service sector met to develop a valid and reliable set of core nursing informatics competencies. A study to validate these nursing informatics competencies was completed in the fall of 2001 [15]. If nurse educators accept these competencies, a consensus for standardizing nursing informatics expertise may be reached.

The purpose of this study was to identify the core literature of nursing informatics and to determine which databases provided the most thorough indexing to that literature. A search of appropriate health sciences databases found that no bibliographic studies had been done to identify core material in nursing informatics.

METHODS

The study followed the common methodology described in detail in the project overview article [16]. Five journals were selected as source journals. The first choice was CIN: Computers Informatics Nursing (formerly, Computers in Nursing). It began publication in 1983 and is considered the primary journal covering the application of computer technology to contemporary nursing practice. The other four titles were selected after an extensive literature review that used the number of articles published on nursing informatics and the journal's main focus of informatics as criteria for selection. Many nursing informatics articles are published in nursing management, administration, education, and clinical journals, which is not unusual, because those areas are included in the definition of this interdisciplinary specialty. However, use of these titles as source journals would have skewed the study away from an informatics focus. They were discarded in favor of the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA), first published in 1994 and sponsored by AMIA, previously mentioned as supporting a nursing informatics subgroup. JAMIA also provides online issues.

The literature search showed that foreign nursing informatics journal articles were most often published in the International Journal of Medical Informatics (IJMI). In 1997, this journal, which focused on computing, changed its name from International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing (IJBC), published from 1970 to 1996, to IJMI. The new editors of IJMI wanted to focus on the use of computers for communication and collaboration [17]. The two titles were treated separately in this study because of that different focus. The fifth journal choice was Online Journal of Nursing Informatics (OJNI), a peer-reviewed online journal published by Penn State University. This journal began publication in 1997 and provided an easily accessible electronic format to share all facets of nursing informatics. CIN was on the “Brandon/Hill Selected List of Print Nursing Books and Journals” [18]. JAMIA was on the “Brandon/Hill Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library” [19]. These two titles, as well as IJMI, were also listed in the Web of Science, ISI's electronic database of scientific journal citations.

RESULTS

From 1996 to 1998, the full-length articles in the 5 source journals cited 7,905 references. Table 1 shows that the 3 years covered by JAMIA have the most citations in all formats, 4,290, followed by 3 years of CIN with 1,514. The 2 years of IJMI and 1 year of IJBC were equally represented at about 1,000. Two years of OJNI had 74 references. OJNI had only published 4 issues at the time of this study.

Table thumbnail
Table 1 Cited format types by source journal and frequency of citations

Journal references were the most common format. They accounted for 56% of the citations. Miscellaneous and book formats were the second-most frequent at 19% each. The miscellaneous category contained citations to informatics symposia and conference proceedings. The Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (SCAMC), the AMIA Symposium, MEDINFO, and the World Congress on Medical Informatics were the most frequently cited. These sources contain important information about nursing informatics. Internet sources (2.6%) and government documents (2.1%) were not significant sources of information.

Table 2 presents the publication dates of references by format type and time period. The 5-year interval, 1990 to 1995, had 56% of the total references. It was the most productive time period for books, journals, government documents, and miscellaneous sources. The most recent 8-year time interval, 1990 to 1998, accounted for 71% of the total references. Only 8% of the references were dated before 1980, indicating that the nursing informatics literature is new and growing. Forty-five percent of government document use was in 1990 to 1995. During that time period, the United States Congress passed the “High-Performance Computing Act of 1991-Title I: High-Performance Computing and the National Research and Educational Network,” directing the president to implement the National High-Performance Computing Program. There were no dates on 29.8% of Internet reference sources prior to 1990. A reference citation rule change allowed the tracking of more than 70% of Internet citations from 1990 forward.

Table thumbnail
Table 2 Cited format types by publication year periods

In Table 3, the list of journal references is divided into 3 equal zones based on the percent of citations disbursed. Zone 1 with the 12 most productive journals contained 33.7% of the 4,459 citations. Zone 2 with 119 somewhat productive journals contained 33.5% of the citations, and Zone 3 with the 897 least productive journals contained 32.8% of the citations. The study examined a total of 1,028 cited journals.

Table thumbnail
Table 3 Distribution by zone of cited journals and references

Table 4 lists the Zone 1 and Zone 2 journal references and the thoroughness of citation coverage of these titles by CINAHL, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index for 1998. These indexes were chosen because they indexed nursing, medicine, and science. OCLC ArticleFirst was the 4th choice because it was a general academic index. The indexing coverage scores reflected the strengths and weaknesses of indexing for nursing informatics. Zone 1 had 12 journal titles, and Zone 2 had 119. The number of citations ranged from 375 for the 1st source journal down to 5 citations for journal 131. Twelve titles in Zone 1 accounted for 1,501 of the 2,998 citations, and 119 titles in Zone 2 accounted for 1,497 citations. PubMed/ MEDLINE had the highest average index score of 3.34, Science Citation Index scored 3.30, and CINAHL scored 1.13. OCLC ArticleFirst data indicated that the database contained citations for 117 or 89% of the 131 listed titles.

Table thumbnail
Table 4 Distribution and database coverage of cited journals in Zones 1 and 2

DISCUSSION

IJMI and JAMIA contained 5,258 references, and CIN and OJNI 1,588 references. The larger production of medical informatics articles skewed the study away from nursing informatics sources. Journals were the most cited reference format. The most prolific time period was 1990 to 1998, an indication that nursing informatics is a young and growing specialty. Some titles that might be expected to be in the study, due to the interdisciplinary nature of informatics, were more heavily indexed by social science, business, or computer science than by health sciences index services.

Bradford's Law of Scattering demonstrates that 12 journals are the most important sources of information, 119 are somewhat important, and 897 are least important to researchers' quest to keep up with the literature. The 1,028 cited journals provided 4,459 references for the study.

Source journals represented among the top twelve titles include: JAMIA, IJMI, and CIN. All the source journals, except OJNI, are represented in Zone 1 or Zone 2. Nurse Educators Microworld, a historically significant title, appears in Zone 2 even though it ceased publication in 1994. It is an important resource journal for nursing informatics. Ten nursing journals are represented with ten or more citations in Zone 2.

The prolific article count in the medical journals ensures that the health sciences index, PubMed/MEDLINE, and science index, Science Citation Index, would have a higher percentage of journal indexing than the main nursing index, CINAHL. PubMed/MEDLINE has the best indexing of the journals in Zone 1 with a score of 3.92. Science Citation Index had the best indexing of journals in Zone 2 with a score of 2.99. OCLC ArticleFirst is an important database to consult for citations, because it included 88.5% of the significant journal titles listed in Table 4.

CONCLUSIONS

CINAHL is the index most nursing researchers, educators, and practitioners would logically use first. This study shows that PubMed/MEDLINE and Science Citation Index have higher citation scores than the other databases. Those indexes might be a better first choice for nurses in this field. Except for the reference citations in the two core nursing informatics journals, the total number of information sources from formats such as books, government documents, the Internet, and miscellaneous sources almost equals the number of citation sources from journals. Clinicians usually consider journals the most desirable information source due to their timeliness. Journals have made a strong showing in this study, but they may not be the best sources for nursing informatics. Journal articles about research in the specialty have only recently appeared in the literature. This recent appearance could be influenced by the nature of informatics literature. For example, descriptive, explanatory, introductory, and tutorial information topics have been the focus of much of the nursing informatics publishing in the past, and these topics are found most often in sources other than journals, such as books, government documents, proceedings, dissertations, and the Internet.

A possible reason for the equal focus on nursing informatics in other formats instead of published research findings in journals is that understanding must come before research studies can be done. Professionals' questions have been about what nursing informatics is rather than how nursing informatics is used to contain health care cost and increase the quality of health care. The Annual Symposium of Computer Applications in Medical Care, AMIA Symposium, MEDINFO, and World Congress of Medical Informatics proceedings, hidden in the miscellaneous category of Table 1, are significant information sources for researchers in the nursing informatics specialty.

Nursing informatics is a developing field of study that is highly interdisciplinary. It is strongly connected to education, business, and computer science. Journals that focus on these topics are good choices for relevant material but were not used as source journals for this study. The most direct route to information connecting nursing informatics to research in clinical practice is through medical informatics, not nursing informatics. A study more directly linked to just mapping the nursing informatics articles would make an interesting comparison for a future study.

Acknowledgments

Volunteer members of the Nursing and Allied Health Resources Section task force checked indexes that were inaccessible to this author. Margaret (Peg) Allen, AHIP, provided title authority and other assistance for journal titles in Table 4.

REFERENCES

  • Saba VK, McCormick KA. Essentials of computers for nursing: informatics for the new millennium. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2001.
  • Young KM. Informatics for health professionals. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis, 2000.
  • Hannah KJ, Guillemin EJ, and Conklin DN. eds. Nursing uses of computer and information science. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1985.
  • Graves JR, Corcoran S. The study of nursing informatics. Image J Nurs Sch. 1989.  Winter; 21(4):227–31. [PubMed]
  • American Nurses Association. The scope of practice for nursing informatics. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing, 1994. (Pub. no. NP-90). [PubMed]
  • American Nurses Association. The standards of practice for nursing informatics. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing, 1995. (Pub. no. NP-100).
  • American Nurses Association. Scope and standards of nursing informatics practice. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing, 2001. (Pub. no. NIP-21).
  • Rognehaugh R. The health information technology dictionary. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, 1999.
  • Gerdin U, Tallberg M, and Wainwright P. Nursing informatics: the impact of nursing knowledge on health care information. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press, 1997.
  • American Nurses Credentialing Center. Informatics nurse certification exam. [Web document]. The Center. [cited 27 Jun 2005]. <http://nursingworld.org/ancc/certification/certs/informatics.html>.
  • Joos I, Whitman N, Smith M, and Nelson R. Computers in small bytes: a workbook for healthcare professionals. 3rd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2000.
  • Saba VK, McCormick KA. Essentials of computers for nursing: informatics for the new millennium. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
  • Ronald JS, Skiba D. Guidelines for basic computer education in nursing. New York, NY: National League for Nursing, 1987. (Pub. no. 41-2177). [PubMed]
  • Carty B, Rosenfeld P. From computer information technology: findings from a national study of nursing education. Computers in Nursing. 1998.  Sep–Oct; 16(5):259–65. [PubMed]
  • Staggers N, Gassert CA, and Curran C. Informatics competencies for nurses at four levels of practice. J Nurs Educ. 2001.  Oct; 40(7):303–16. [PubMed]
  • Allen M, Jacobs SK, and Levy JR. Mapping the literature of nursing: 1996–2000. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006.  Apr; 94(2):206–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hasman A, Safran CA. A new name, a new scope. Int J Med Inform. 1997.  Mar; 44(1):v.
  • Hill DR, Stickell HN. Selected list of print nursing books and journals. Nurs Outlook. 2000.  Jan–Feb; 48(1):10–23. [PubMed]
  • Hill DR, Stickell HN. Brandon/Hill list of books and journals for the small medical library. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999.  Apr; 87(2 Suppl):145–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...