Logo of geneticsGeneticsCurrent IssueInformation for AuthorsEditorial BoardSubscribeSubmit a Manuscript
Genetics. Jan 2002; 160(1): 333–342.
PMCID: PMC1461939

Genetic variation for phenotypically invariant traits detected in teosinte: implications for the evolution of novel forms.


How new discrete states of morphological traits evolve is poorly understood. One possibility is that single-gene changes underlie the evolution of new discrete character states and that evolution is dependent on the occurrence of new single-gene mutations. Another possibility is that multiple-gene changes are required to elevate an individual or population above a threshold required to produce the new character state. A prediction of the latter model is that genetic variation for the traits should exist in natural populations in the absence of phenotypic variation. To test this idea, we studied traits that are phenotypically invariant within teosinte and for which teosinte is discretely different from its near relative, maize. By employing a QTL mapping strategy to analyze the progeny of a testcross between an F(1) of two teosintes and a maize inbred line, we identified cryptic genetic variation in teosinte for traits that are invariant in teosinte. We argue that such cryptic genetic variation can contribute to the evolution of novelty when reconfigured to exceed the threshold necessary for phenotypic expression or by acting to modify or stabilize the effects of major mutations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (122K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Churchill GA, Doerge RW. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):963–971. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cubas P, Vincent C, Coen E. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature. 1999 Sep 9;401(6749):157–161. [PubMed]
  • Davis GL, McMullen MD, Baysdorfer C, Musket T, Grant D, Staebell M, Xu G, Polacco M, Koster L, Melia-Hancock S, et al. A maize map standard with sequenced core markers, grass genome reference points and 932 expressed sequence tagged sites (ESTs) in a 1736-locus map. Genetics. 1999 Jul;152(3):1137–1172. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Doebley J. Mapping the genes that made maize. Trends Genet. 1992 Sep;8(9):302–307. [PubMed]
  • Doebley J, Stec A. Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics. 1991 Sep;129(1):285–295. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Doebley J, Stec A. Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):559–570. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Doebley J, Stec A, Gustus C. teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):333–346. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • DUN RB, FRASER AS. Selection for an invariant character; vibrissa number in the house mouse. Nature. 1958 Apr 5;181(4614):1018–1019. [PubMed]
  • Luo D, Carpenter R, Vincent C, Copsey L, Coen E. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature. 1996 Oct 31;383(6603):794–799. [PubMed]
  • Polaczyk PJ, Gasperini R, Gibson G. Naturally occurring genetic variation affects Drosophila photoreceptor determination. Dev Genes Evol. 1998 Jan;207(7):462–470. [PubMed]
  • Running MP, Meyerowitz EM. Mutations in the PERIANTHIA gene of Arabidopsis specifically alter floral organ number and initiation pattern. Development. 1996 Apr;122(4):1261–1269. [PubMed]
  • Plant Arthur M. Current Frustrations in General Practice. Br Med J. 1965 Jan 09;1(5427):b122–122. [PMC free article]
  • Rutherford SL, Lindquist S. Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature. 1998 Nov 26;396(6709):336–342. [PubMed]
  • Gibson G, Wemple M, van Helden S. Potential variance affecting homeotic Ultrabithorax and Antennapedia phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1999 Mar;151(3):1081–1091. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Huether CA., Jr Exposure of natural genetic variability underlying the pentamerous corolla constancy in Linanthus androsaceus ssp. androsaceus. Genetics. 1968 Sep;60(1):123–146. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wade MJ, Johnson NA, Jones R, Siguel V, McNaughton M. Genetic variation segregating in natural populations of Tribolium castaneum affecting traits observed in hybrids with T. freemani. Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1235–1247. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE, Newberg LA, Newburg L. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics. 1987 Oct;1(2):174–181. [PubMed]
  • Wang RL, Stec A, Hey J, Lukens L, Doebley J. The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature. 1999 Mar 18;398(6724):236–239. [PubMed]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Genetics Society of America


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...