• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of geneticsGeneticsCurrent IssueInformation for AuthorsEditorial BoardSubscribeSubmit a Manuscript
Genetics. Jan 2001; 157(1): 399–411.
PMCID: PMC1461489

RNA sequence evolution with secondary structure constraints: comparison of substitution rate models using maximum-likelihood methods.


We test models for the evolution of helical regions of RNA sequences, where the base pairing constraint leads to correlated compensatory substitutions occurring on either side of the pair. These models are of three types: 6-state models include only the four Watson-Crick pairs plus GU and UG; 7-state models include a single mismatch state that combines all of the 10 possible mismatches; 16-state models treat all mismatch states separately. We analyzed a set of eubacterial ribosomal RNA sequences with a well-established phylogenetic tree structure. For each model, the maximum-likelihood values of the parameters were obtained. The models were compared using the Akaike information criterion, the likelihood-ratio test, and Cox's test. With a high significance level, models that permit a nonzero rate of double substitutions performed better than those that assume zero double substitution rate. Some models assume symmetry between GC and CG, between AU and UA, and between GU and UG. Models that relaxed this symmetry assumption performed slightly better, but the tests did not all agree on the significance level. The most general time-reversible model significantly outperformed any of the simplifications. We consider the relative merits of all these models for molecular phylogenetics.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (271K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17(6):368–376. [PubMed]
  • Gautheret D, Konings D, Gutell RR. G.U base pairing motifs in ribosomal RNA. RNA. 1995 Oct;1(8):807–814. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Goldman N. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J Mol Evol. 1993 Feb;36(2):182–198. [PubMed]
  • Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 1985;22(2):160–174. [PubMed]
  • Higgs PG. Compensatory neutral mutations and the evolution of RNA. Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):91–101. [PubMed]
  • Kirby DA, Muse SV, Stephan W. Maintenance of pre-mRNA secondary structure by epistatic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Sep 26;92(20):9047–9051. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Jr, Vecchi MP. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science. 1983 May 13;220(4598):671–680. [PubMed]
  • Knudsen B, Hein J. RNA secondary structure prediction using stochastic context-free grammars and evolutionary history. Bioinformatics. 1999 Jun;15(6):446–454. [PubMed]
  • Li WH, Gu X. Estimating evolutionary distances between DNA sequences. Methods Enzymol. 1996;266:449–459. [PubMed]
  • Maidak BL, Cole JR, Parker CT, Jr, Garrity GM, Larsen N, Li B, Lilburn TG, McCaughey MJ, Olsen GJ, Overbeek R, et al. A new version of the RDP (Ribosomal Database Project). Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jan 1;27(1):171–173. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Muse SV. Evolutionary analyses of DNA sequences subject to constraints of secondary structure. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1429–1439. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Olsen GJ, Woese CR. Ribosomal RNA: a key to phylogeny. FASEB J. 1993 Jan;7(1):113–123. [PubMed]
  • Otsuka J, Nakano T, Terai G. A theoretical study on the nucleotide changes under a definite functional constraint of forming stable base-pairs in the stem regions of ribosomal RNAs; its application to the phylogeny of eukaryotes. J Theor Biol. 1997 Jan 21;184(2):171–186. [PubMed]
  • Otsuka J, Terai G, Nakano T. Phylogeny of organisms investigated by the base-pair changes in the stem regions of small and large ribosomal subunit RNAs. J Mol Evol. 1999 Feb;48(2):218–235. [PubMed]
  • Rousset F, Pélandakis M, Solignac M. Evolution of compensatory substitutions through G.U intermediate state in Drosophila rRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 15;88(22):10032–10036. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rzhetsky A. Estimating substitution rates in ribosomal RNA genes. Genetics. 1995 Oct;141(2):771–783. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schöniger M, von Haeseler A. A stochastic model for the evolution of autocorrelated DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1994 Sep;3(3):240–247. [PubMed]
  • Stephan W. The rate of compensatory evolution. Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):419–426. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Waddell PJ, Steel MA. General time-reversible distances with unequal rates across sites: mixing gamma and inverse Gaussian distributions with invariant sites. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1997 Dec;8(3):398–414. [PubMed]
  • Wheeler WC, Honeycutt RL. Paired sequence difference in ribosomal RNAs: evolutionary and phylogenetic implications. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Jan;5(1):90–96. [PubMed]
  • Tillier ER, Collins RA. High apparent rate of simultaneous compensatory base-pair substitutions in ribosomal RNA. Genetics. 1998 Apr;148(4):1993–2002. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Van de Peer Y, Caers A, De Rijk P, De Wachter R. Database on the structure of small ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 Jan 1;26(1):179–182. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Vawter L, Brown WM. Rates and patterns of base change in the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):597–608. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Genetics Society of America


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...