• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of geneticsGeneticsCurrent IssueInformation for AuthorsEditorial BoardSubscribeSubmit a Manuscript
Genetics. Jan 2000; 154(1): 259–272.
PMCID: PMC1460915

A reexamination of spreading of position-effect variegation in the white-roughest region of Drosophila melanogaster.

Abstract

In Drosophila, heterochromatin causes mosaic silencing of euchromatic genes brought next to it by chromosomal rearrangements. Silencing has been observed to "spread": genes closer to the heterochromatic rearrangement breakpoint are silenced more frequently than genes farther away. We have examined silencing of the white and roughest genes in the variegating rearrangements In(1)w(m4), In(1)w(mMc), and In(1)w(m51b). Eleven stocks bearing these chromosomes differ widely in the strength of silencing of white and roughest. Stock-specific differences in the relative frequencies of inactivation of white and roughest were found that map to the white-roughest region or the adjacent heterochromatin. Most stock-specific differences did not correlate with gross differences in the heterochromatic content of the rearranged chromosomes; however, two stocks, In(1)w(m51b) and In(1)w(mMc), were found to have anomalous additional heterochromatin that may act in trans to suppress variegating alleles. In comparing different stocks, the frequency of silencing of the roughest gene, which is more distant from heterochromatin, does not correlate with the frequency of silencing of the more proximal white gene on the same chromosome, in contradiction to the expectation of models of continuous linear propagation of silencing. We frequently observed rough eye tissue that is pigmented, as though an active white gene is skipped.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (299K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Goldberg ML, Paro R, Gehring WJ. Molecular cloning of the white locus region of Drosophila melanogaster using a large transposable element. EMBO J. 1982;1(1):93–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gowen JW, Gay EH. Eversporting as a Function of the Y-Chromosome in Drosophila Melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1933 Jan;19(1):122–126. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Henikoff S, Jackson JM, Talbert PB. Distance and pairing effects on the brownDominant heterochromatic element in Drosophila. Genetics. 1995 Jul;140(3):1007–1017. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hilliker AJ, Appels R. Pleiotropic effects associated with the deletion of heterochromatin surrounding rDNA on the X chromosome of Drosophila. Chromosoma. 1982;86(4):469–490. [PubMed]
  • Howe M, Dimitri P, Berloco M, Wakimoto BT. Cis-effects of heterochromatin on heterochromatic and euchromatic gene activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1995 Jul;140(3):1033–1045. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jakubczak JL, Zenni MK, Woodruff RC, Eickbush TH. Turnover of R1 (type I) and R2 (type II) retrotransposable elements in the ribosomal DNA of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 May;131(1):129–142. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Judd BH. Mutations of zeste that mediate transvection are recessive enhancers of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):245–253. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kaufmann BP. Reversion from Roughest to Wild Type in Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1942 Sep;27(5):537–549. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Levis R, Bingham PM, Rubin GM. Physical map of the white locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jan;79(2):564–568. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Appels R, Hilliker AJ. The cytogenetic boundaries of the rDNA region within heterochromatin in the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster and their relation to male meiotic pairing sites. Genet Res. 1982 Apr;39(2):149–156. [PubMed]
  • Lloyd VK, Sinclair DA, Grigliatti TA. Competition between different variegating rearrangements for limited heterochromatic factors in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1997 Apr;145(4):945–959. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Locke J, Kotarski MA, Tartof KD. Dosage-dependent modifiers of position effect variegation in Drosophila and a mass action model that explains their effect. Genetics. 1988 Sep;120(1):181–198. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cagan RL, Ready DF. Notch is required for successive cell decisions in the developing Drosophila retina. Genes Dev. 1989 Aug;3(8):1099–1112. [PubMed]
  • Clark SH, Chovnick A. Studies of normal and position-affected expression of rosy region genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1986 Nov;114(3):819–840. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Csink AK, Henikoff S. Genetic modification of heterochromatic association and nuclear organization in Drosophila. Nature. 1996 Jun 6;381(6582):529–531. [PubMed]
  • Pirrotta V, Rastelli L. White gene expression, repressive chromatin domains and homeotic gene regulation in Drosophila. Bioessays. 1994 Aug;16(8):549–556. [PubMed]
  • Dawid IB, Long EO, DiNocera PP, Pardue ML. Ribosomal insertion-like elements in Drosophila melanogaster are interspersed with mobile sequences. Cell. 1981 Aug;25(2):399–408. [PubMed]
  • Pokholkova GV, Makunin IV, Belyaeva ES, Zhimulev IF. Observations on the induction of position effect variegation of euchromatic genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):231–242. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Demerec M, Slizynska H. Mottled White 258-18 of Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1937 Nov;22(6):641–649. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dernburg AF, Broman KW, Fung JC, Marshall WF, Philips J, Agard DA, Sedat JW. Perturbation of nuclear architecture by long-distance chromosome interactions. Cell. 1996 May 31;85(5):745–759. [PubMed]
  • Ptashne M. Gene regulation by proteins acting nearby and at a distance. Nature. 1986 Aug 21;322(6081):697–701. [PubMed]
  • Ramos RG, Igloi GL, Lichte B, Baumann U, Maier D, Schneider T, Brandstätter JH, Fröhlich A, Fischbach KF. The irregular chiasm C-roughest locus of Drosophila, which affects axonal projections and programmed cell death, encodes a novel immunoglobulin-like protein. Genes Dev. 1993 Dec;7(12B):2533–2547. [PubMed]
  • Dorer DR, Henikoff S. Expansions of transgene repeats cause heterochromatin formation and gene silencing in Drosophila. Cell. 1994 Jul 1;77(7):993–1002. [PubMed]
  • Dorer DR, Henikoff S. Transgene repeat arrays interact with distant heterochromatin and cause silencing in cis and trans. Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1181–1190. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sabl JF, Henikoff S. Copy number and orientation determine the susceptibility of a gene to silencing by nearby heterochromatin in Drosophila. Genetics. 1996 Feb;142(2):447–458. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Talbert PB, LeCiel CD, Henikoff S. Modification of the Drosophila heterochromatic mutation brownDominant by linkage alterations. Genetics. 1994 Feb;136(2):559–571. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tartof KD, Hobbs C, Jones M. A structural basis for variegating position effects. Cell. 1984 Jul;37(3):869–878. [PubMed]
  • Sinclair DA, Lloyd VK, Grigliatti TA. Characterization of mutations that enhance position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet. 1989 Apr;216(2-3):328–333. [PubMed]
  • Tartof KD, Bishop C, Jones M, Hobbs CA, Locke J. Towards an understanding of position effect variegation. Dev Genet. 1989;10(3):162–176. [PubMed]
  • Wolff T, Ready DF. Cell death in normal and rough eye mutants of Drosophila. Development. 1991 Nov;113(3):825–839. [PubMed]
  • Spofford JB, DeSalle R. Nucleolus organizer-suppressed position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1991 Jun;57(3):245–255. [PubMed]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Genetics Society of America

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...