• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of geneticsGeneticsCurrent IssueInformation for AuthorsEditorial BoardSubscribeSubmit a Manuscript
Genetics. Apr 1999; 151(4): 1621–1631.
PMCID: PMC1460574

Beneficial mutations, hitchhiking and the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations.

Abstract

Natural selection acts in three ways on heritable variation for mutation rates. A modifier allele that increases the mutation rate is (i) disfavored due to association with deleterious mutations, but is also favored due to (ii) association with beneficial mutations and (iii) the reduced costs of lower fidelity replication. When a unique beneficial mutation arises and sweeps to fixation, genetic hitchhiking may cause a substantial change in the frequency of a modifier of mutation rate. In previous studies of the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations, this effect has been underestimated. This article models the long-term effect of a series of such hitchhiking events and determines the resulting strength of indirect selection on the modifier. This is compared to the indirect selection due to deleterious mutations, when both types of mutations are randomly scattered over a given genetic map. Relative to an asexual population, increased levels of recombination reduce the effects of beneficial mutations more rapidly than those of deleterious mutations. However, the role of beneficial mutations in determining the evolutionarily stable mutation rate may still be significant if the function describing the cost of high-fidelity replication has a shallow gradient.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (136K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • ATWOOD KC, SCHNEIDER LK, RYAN FJ. Selective mechanisms in bacteria. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1951;16:345–355. [PubMed]
  • Barton NH. Linkage and the limits to natural selection. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):821–841. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bessman MJ, Muzyczka N, Goodman MF, Schnaar RL. Studies on the biochemical basis of spontaneous mutation. II. The incorporation of a base and its analogue into DNA by wild-type, mutator and antimutator DNA polymerases. J Mol Biol. 1974 Sep 15;88(2):409–421. [PubMed]
  • Charlesworth B. The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variants. Genet Res. 1994 Jun;63(3):213–227. [PubMed]
  • Charlesworth B, Langley CH. The evolution of self-regulated transposition of transposable elements. Genetics. 1986 Feb;112(2):359–383. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dawson KJ. Evolutionarily stable mutation rates. J Theor Biol. 1998 Sep 7;194(1):143–157. [PubMed]
  • Dawson KJ. The dynamics of infinitesimally rare alleles, applied to the evolution of mutation rates and the expression of deleterious mutations. Theor Popul Biol. 1999 Feb;55(1):1–22. [PubMed]
  • Drake JW, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, Crow JF. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics. 1998 Apr;148(4):1667–1686. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Smith JM, Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed]
  • McVean GT, Hurst LD. Evidence for a selectively favourable reduction in the mutation rate of the X chromosome. Nature. 1997 Mar 27;386(6623):388–392. [PubMed]
  • MUKAI T. THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY. Genetics. 1964 Jul;50:1–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mukai T, Chigusa SI, Mettler LE, Crow JF. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 Oct;72(2):335–355. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Holsinger KE, Feldman MW. Modifiers of mutation rate: Evolutionary optimum with complete selfing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Nov;80(21):6732–6734. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nordborg M, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. The effect of recombination on background selection. Genet Res. 1996 Apr;67(2):159–174. [PubMed]
  • Holsinger KE, Feldman MW, Altenberg L. Selection for increased mutation rates with fertility differences between matings. Genetics. 1986 Apr;112(4):909–922. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nöthel H. Adaptation of Drosophila melanogaster populations to high mutation pressure: evolutionary adjustment of mutation rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Feb;84(4):1045–1049. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ishii K, Matsuda H, Iwasa Y, Sasaki A. Evolutionarily stable mutation rate in a periodically changing environment. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):163–174. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ohnishi O. Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations. Genetics. 1977 Nov;87(3):529–545. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kaplan NL, Hudson RR, Langley CH. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ohta T. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature. 1973 Nov 9;246(5428):96–98. [PubMed]
  • Keightley PD, Caballero A. Genomic mutation rates for lifetime reproductive output and lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 15;94(8):3823–3827. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ohta T, Gillespie JH. Development of Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories. Theor Popul Biol. 1996 Apr;49(2):128–142. [PubMed]
  • Kibota TT, Lynch M. Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E. coli. Nature. 1996 Jun 20;381(6584):694–696. [PubMed]
  • Paquin C, Adams J. Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations. Nature. 1983 Apr 7;302(5908):495–500. [PubMed]
  • Peck JR. A ruby in the rubbish: beneficial mutations, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Genetics. 1994 Jun;137(2):597–606. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Peck JR, Eyre-Walker A. Evolutionary genetics. The muddle about mutations. Nature. 1997 May 8;387(6629):135–136. [PubMed]
  • Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ, Lenski RE. Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli. Nature. 1997 Jun 12;387(6634):703–705. [PubMed]
  • LeClerc JE, Li B, Payne WL, Cebula TA. High mutation frequencies among Escherichia coli and Salmonella pathogens. Science. 1996 Nov 15;274(5290):1208–1211. [PubMed]
  • Taddei F, Radman M, Maynard-Smith J, Toupance B, Gouyon PH, Godelle B. Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution. Nature. 1997 Jun 12;387(6634):700–702. [PubMed]
  • Wolfe KH, Sharp PM. Mammalian gene evolution: nucleotide sequence divergence between mouse and rat. J Mol Evol. 1993 Oct;37(4):441–456. [PubMed]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Genetics Society of America

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...