![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||
Copyright © 2001, The National Academy of Sciences Neurobiology Multiple neural correlates of detection in the human brain Departments of *Neurology and Neurological Surgery, ‡Radiology, and §Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110 †To whom reprint requests should be addressed at:
Department of Neurology, Washington University, Box 8111, 660 South
Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110. E-mail: gordon/at/npg.wustl.edu. Edited by Marcus E. Raichle, Washington University School of
Medicine, St. Louis, MO, and approved November 3, 2000 Received August 10, 2000. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract We used event-related functional MRI to examine the neural
consequences of detecting the presence or absence of a stimulus.
Subjects detected a brief interval of coherent motion embedded in
dynamic noise that was presented throughout a test period. Several
brain regions, including V1/V2, middle temporal complex (MT+), left
intraparietal cortex, and the frontal eye field, were activated at the
onset of the dynamic noise, irrespective of whether a coherent motion
target was presented early or late in the test period, or not at all.
These regions, many of which were motion sensitive, were likely
involved in searching for and detecting the target. The blood
oxygenation level-dependent signal in these regions was higher in
trials in which a target was detected than in trials in which it was
missed or not presented, indicating that these regions were modulated
by detection. Moreover, the blood oxygenation leveldependent signal in
these regions decayed quickly once a target was detected, even though
the dynamic noise continued to be displayed, indicating that they were
shut down after detection. Therefore, detection-related modulations
occurred in the same regions that accumulate target information over
time, in agreement with current psychological and neural models of
detection. Many other regions, however, including areas in prefrontal
cortex and anterior cingulate, were not involved in searching for a
target. In these regions, activation began early in the test period
when an early target was detected but began late in the test period
when a late target was detected or when a response was correctly
withheld in the absence of a motion target. The signal in these regions
was therefore triggered by a discrete event during the test interval
that was related to presence–absence detection. |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||