![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2005, Genetics Society of America Transient Receptor Potential-Like Channels Are Essential for Calcium Signaling and Fluid Transport in a Drosophila Epithelium *IBLS Division of Molecular Genetics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G11 6NU, United Kingdom †Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DY, United Kingdom 1These authors contributed equally to this work. 2Corresponding author: Division of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Anderson Complex, University of Glasgow, 56 Dumbarton Rd., Glasgow G11 6NU, United Kingdom. E-mail: s.a.davies/at/bio.gla.ac.uk Communicating editor: A. J. Lopez Received August 18, 2004; Accepted December 9, 2004. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Calcium signaling is an important mediator of neuropeptide-stimulated fluid transport by Drosophila Malpighian (renal) tubules. We demonstrate the first epithelial role, in vivo, for members of the TRP family of calcium channels. RT-PCR revealed expression of trp, trpl, and trpγ in tubules. Use of antipeptide polyclonal antibodies for TRP, TRPL, and TRPγ showed expression of all three channels in type 1 (principal) cells in the tubule main segment. Neuropeptide (CAP2b)-stimulated fluid transport rates were significantly reduced in tubules from the trpl302 mutant and the trpl;trp double mutant, trpl302;trp343. However, a trp null, trp343, had no impact on stimulated fluid transport. Measurement of cytosolic calcium concentrations ([Ca2+]i) in tubule principal cells using an aequorin transgene in trp and trpl mutants showed a reduction in calcium responses in trpl302. Western blotting of tubule preparations from trp and trpl mutants revealed a correlation between TRPL levels and CAP2b-stimulated fluid transport and calcium signaling. Rescue of trpl302 with a trpl transgene under heat-shock control resulted in a stimulated fluid transport phenotype that was indistinguishable from wild-type tubules. Furthermore, restoration of normal stimulated rates of fluid transport by rescue of trpl302 was not compromised by introduction of the trp null, trp343. Thus, in an epithelial context, TRPL is sufficient for wild-type responses. Finally, a scaffolding component of the TRPL/TRP-signaling complex, INAD, is not expressed in tubules, suggesting that inaD is not essential for TRPL/TRP function in Drosophila tubules. CALCIUM signaling plays a crucial role in physiological processes (Berridge 1997). While calcium influx is particularly important to calcium-signaling mechanisms in excitable cells, both calcium release from intracellular stores and calcium influx are important in nonexcitable, secretory cells (Shuttleworth 1997; Petersen et al. 1999). Calcium entry in these cells is typically mediated by phospholipase C (PLC)-dependent mechanisms, which include the major route of store-operated calcium influx. Consequently, the identity of plasma membrane channels (“store-operated” channels) involved in this process has been extensively researched. Such store-operated channels have remained elusive, but potential candidates have included the family of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. The trp gene was first identified in Drosophila photoreceptors (Montell et al. 1985) and subsequently found to encode a calcium-permeable channel (Hardie and Minke 1992). Two other genes encoding proteins with homology to the TRP protein, trpl (trp-like; Phillips et al. 1992) and trpγ (trp-gamma; Xu et al. 2000), have since also been identified in Drosophila, with trpl being involved in phototransduction. Around 20 mammalian TRP proteins have been identified (Clapham et al. 2001), falling into at least three subfamilies. Those most closely related to the Drosophila TRPs are all believed to be activated downstream of PLC and may include the elusive store-operated calcium channels activated by depletion of internal calcium stores by inositol 1,4,5 trisphosphate (InsP3; Clapham et al. 2001). In Drosophila photoreceptors, TRP represents a highly calcium-selective cation channel (PCa:PNa > 100), while trpl encodes a nonselective cation channel with moderate calcium permeability (PCa:PNa, 4:1). The light-sensitive current is completely abolished in trpl:trp double mutants lacking both TRP and transient receptor potential-like (TRPL; Niemeyer et al. 1996; Reuss et al. 1997). The newly identified third member of this family, TRPγ, may form heteromultimers with TRPL (Xu et al. 2000). Both TRP and TRPL are activated downstream of PLC but the precise mechanism of activation of any of these channels, or indeed their vertebrate counterparts, remains controversial. Neither TRP nor TRPL appears to require InsP3 or the InsP3 receptor for activation (Acharya et al. 1997; Hardie and Raghu 1998; Raghu et al. 2000a), raising the possibility that diacylglycerol, its downstream metabolites (polyunsaturated fatty acids), or reduction in phosphatidylinositol 4,5, bisphosphate levels may be involved (Chyb et al. 1999; Raghu et al. 2000b; Hardie and Raghu 2001). In Drosophila photoreceptors, response to light is dependent on the close interaction of TRP and TRP-related channels with other signaling proteins (rhodopsin, phospholipase C, protein kinase C, and calmodulin) mediated through the scaffolding protein INAD (inactivation no-afterpotential D; Shieh et al. 1997; Adamski et al. 1998; van Huizen et al. 1998). Recent work has shown that INAD is required for correct localization of TRP-containing supramolecular complexes in the eye (Chevesich et al. 1997; Xu et al. 1998; Li and Montell 2000). As much of the focus of in vivo studies of TRP and TRPL function have been in photoreceptors, the role of TRP and TRPL-like channels in nonvisual systems is poorly understood. The Drosophila Malpighian tubule is a tractable genetic model for fluid-secreting epithelia in which cell-specific signaling events can be linked to physiological function (Dow and Davies 2003). Using GAL4-directed aequorin transgene expression to specific tubule cell subtypes, it has been possible to show that stimulation of fluid transport by neuropeptides of the capa family (capa-1, capa-2, and cardioacceleratory peptide 2b, CAP2b) occurs as a result of a rise in cytosolic calcium concentrations ([Ca2+]i) (Rosay et al. 1997; Kean et al. 2002). Capa-induced calcium signaling and fluid transport is reduced in severe alleles of IP3R, suggesting that release of calcium from intracellular stores occurs upon capa peptide stimulation (Pollock et al. 2003). However, a major role of extracellular calcium is also implicated in capa action: CAP2b-elicited calcium and secretion responses are sensitive to reductions in extracellular calcium (Rosay et al. 1997) and to L-type/cyclic-nucleotide gated calcium channel blockers (MacPherson et al. 2001; Broderick et al. 2003). To further define the contribution of plasma membrane calcium channels to calcium-signaling events and fluid transport in vivo, we have investigated the role of the TRP channel family in this epithelial context. We show that TRP, TRPL, and TRPγ are expressed in tubule principal cells. In contrast to the visual system, functional TRPL is required for calcium signaling and epithelial fluid transport; INAD, an essential component of the TRP complex in eye, is not required for epithelial function. MATERIALS AND METHODS Drosophila stocks: Drosophila were maintained on a 12 hr light:12 hr dark cycle on standard cornmeal-yeast-agar medium at 25°. Wild-type flies used were Oregon-R. trp alleles used in this study were trp hypomorph trp301 (Pak 1979; Reuss et al. 1997) and trp null trp343 (Scott et al. 1997). The trp343 line was a kind gift of W. Pak, Purdue University. trpl alleles used were trpl302 (Niemeyer et al. 1996) and the double mutant trpl302;trp343 (Scott et al. 1997). To rescue trpl302, a transgenic line containing the trpl transgene under heat-shock control, cntrpl[hstrpl]; trp34/TM6B (Niemeyer et al. 1996), a kind gift of C. S. Zuker, University of California at San Diego, was used to generate cntrpl[hstrpl];TM2/TM6B flies (maintained at 18° to minimize “leaky” expression), which were heat-shocked at 37° before use. This line was also used to generate cntrpl[hstrpl];trp343 for this study. To produce flies in which tubule calcium measurements could be made using the calcium reporter aequorin (Rosay et al. 1997), it was necessary to place trp and trpl mutations in an aequorin background under control of a hsGAL4 promoter (Broderick et al. 2003), as shown in Figure A1 Verification of aequorin expression was achieved at the final stages of the crossing procedure by measuring total light output in dissected, intact tubules after lysis in Triton/CaCl2 as described below. For tubule dissections, flies were cooled on ice and then decapitated prior to isolation of whole tubules. Materials: Coelenterazine was purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR) and dissolved in ethanol before use. Schneider's medium (GIBCO) was obtained from Invitrogen (San Diego). The neuropeptide CAP2b (ELYAFPRV-amide) was synthesized by Research Genetics, now Invitrogen. Fluorescein-labeled anti-rabbit secondary antibody was obtained from Vector Labs (Burlingame, CA). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis). Polyclonal rabbit anti-TRP, -TRPL, and -TRPγ antibodies were synthesized by Genosphere Biotechnologies (Paris) to the following peptides: TRP, KALGSRLDYDLMMAEE; TRPL, ENSGMDVSSANKKER; and TRPγ, PAAEAGVQHNPAQLV. Reverse-transcriptase PCR: Twenty tubules were dissected, and poly(A)+ RNA was extracted (Dynal mRNA direct kit) and reverse transcribed with Superscript Plus (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) as described previously (Dow et al. 1994b). One microliter of the reverse transcription reaction, corresponding to cDNAs derived from one tubule (~160 cells), was used as a template for polymerase chain reaction containing the relevant gene-specific primer pairs based on the following published sequences: trp, GenBank M21306 (Montell and Rubin 1989); trpl, GenBank M88185 (Phillips et al. 1992); trpγ, GenBank AJ277967 (Xu et al. 2000); and inaD, GenBank U15803 (Shieh and Niemeyer 1995). Primers were designed to bracket introns, and PCR reactions were carried out on genomic DNA and cDNA prepared from Drosophila heads in all experiments. RT-PCR for trp: Forward primers to region 4361–4382 (5′-AGAATACTTTCGCCTCCGATCC-3′) and backward primers to region 4900–4921 (5′-CCTGGTTTCTTGTCATCCGTTG-3′) were expected to generate a product of 467 bp using cDNA templates. RT-PCR for trpl: Forward primers to region 2991–3014 (5′-GCTACTCAACCAAATCAGTGCTGAG-3′) and backward primers to region 3470–3490 (5′-TGGCAATGGAGCTAATGTCGG-3) were expected to generate a product of 500 bp using cDNA templates. RT-PCR for trpγ: Forward primers to region 3213–3234 (5′-AGTCGGAAACGTGAGCAAAATG-3′) and backward primers to region 3734–3757 (5′-TGGAGTTCACTGACGTATTGGATG-3′) were expected to generate a product of 545 bp using cDNA templates. Cycle conditions were as follows: 94° (1 min), 30 cycles of 94° (30 sec), 57° (30 sec), 72° (2 min), and 72° (5 min), with annealing temperature for trp at 52°. RT-PCR for inaD: Forward primers to region 1094–1115 (5′-CGTCAAGCCCATCAAAAAGTTC-3′) and backward primers to region 1610–1590 (5′-CGTGACATGGTTGTTCTTGCC-3′) were expected to generate a product of 517 bp using cDNA templates. PCR was carried out under several different cycle conditions as follows: 94° (1 min), 30 cycles of 94° (30 sec), 45°–55° (30 sec), 72° (2 min), and 72° (5 min) for up to 40 cycles. The PCR products obtained were cloned using PCRII.1 vector (Invitrogen). Cloned plasmids were purified (QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA) and sequenced to confirm their identity. Immunocytochemistry: Localization of TRP, TRPL, and TRPγ in intact tubules using rabbit polyclonal antibodies was performed with the Zenon direct labeling kit, using an amended protocol based on one previously described for tubules (MacPherson et al. 2001). Briefly, intact tubules were placed on poly-l-lysine-treated slides in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and fixed in 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde for 30 min. Samples were then washed extensively for 3 × 15 min in PBS before permeabilisation with 0.3% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 min. Tubules were then incubated overnight in PBS/0.5% (w/v) Sigma cold fraction V bovine serum albumin/0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100 (PAT). Five microliters of Zenon rabbit IgG labeleling reagent (Molecular Probes) was added to 20 μl each of anti-TRP, -TRPL and -TRPγ antibody solution; these mixtures were diluted in PAT in a 1:100 ratio and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. The mixtures were applied to appropriate tubule samples (as described in Figure 2
Transport (fluid secretion) assays: Malpighian tubules were isolated into 10-μl drops of 1:1 mixture of Schneider's medium and Drosophila saline (in millimolar per liter: NaCl, 117.5; KCl, 20; CaCl2, 2; MgCl2, 8.5; NaHCO3, 10.2; NaH2PO4, 4.3; HEPES, 15; glucose 20) under liquid paraffin, and fluid secretion rates measured as detailed (Dow et al. 1994a) under the different conditions described in the text. For maximum stimulation, 10−7 m CAP2b was added as solution in assay medium at 30 min. Measurements of intracellular calcium concentration [Ca2+]i: For each assay, 20–40 tubules from 4- to 14-day-old adults were dissected in Schneider's medium 4 hr after heat shock (37° for 30 min for 3 days). Tubules were pooled in 160 μl of the same buffer containing the apoaequorin cofactor, coelenterazine (2.5 μm final concentration); reconstitution of aequorin occurred upon incubation in the dark for 4–6 hr (Rosay et al. 1997). Bioluminescence recordings were made using a luminometer (LB9507, Berthold Wallac); recordings were made every 0.1 sec for each tube. Each tube of 20 tubules was used for a single data point: after recording [Ca2+]i levels, tissues were disrupted in 350 μl lysis solution [1% (v/v) Triton X-100/100 mm CaCl2], causing discharge of the remaining aequorin and allowing estimation of the total amount of aequorin in the sample. Calibration of the aequorin system and calculation of calcium concentrations were performed as previously described (Rosay et al. 1997). Mock injections with Schneider's medium were applied to all samples prior to treatment with neuropeptide. [Ca2+]i values for each data set were calculated as described in the figure legends. Western blot analysis: Western blots using anti-TRP antibody (1:500 dilution), anti-TRPL antibody (1:500 dilution), and anti-TRPγ antibody (1:500 dilution) were performed according to standard protocols of the BioRad Mini-Protean blotting system. Protein samples were prepared from tubules from each line (described under Drosophila stocks) homogenized in ice-cold SMART buffer (Xu et al. 1997) of 0.2% dodecyl-maltoside, 2.7 mm KCl, 10 mm Na2HPO4, 1.8 mm KH2PO4, 500 mm NaCl, 5 mm EDTA, 5 mm EGTA, 5 mm MgCl2, 2 μg/ml aprotinin, 10 μg/ml leupeptin, 0.1 mm PMSF, 10 mm NAPPi, 50 mm NaF, and 1 mm GTP (pH 7.5) and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min to remove debris. Thirty micrograms of protein was run on 4–15% precast gels (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA). Immunolabeling was visualized using Amersham ECL secondary antibody at 1:8000 dilution. Uniformity of loading was assessed on blots by Ponceau S staining. Band densities were quantified by ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/docs/menus/analyze.html) using the gel analysis macro of the ImageJ package after background correction. Statistics: Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Where appropriate, the significance of differences between data points was analyzed using Student's t-test for unpaired samples with P < 0.05 as the critical level. RESULTS trp, trpl, and trpγ are expressed in tubules: Results from RT-PCR using head and tubule cDNA template (Figure 1
Expression of TRP, TRPL, and TRPγ in tubule principal cells: Immunolocalization of TRP, TRPL, and TRPγ in intact tubules demonstrates that these calcium channels are expressed in the principal cells of the tubule main segment (Figure 2, A, C, and E Interestingly, while TRPL was clearly expressed only in the main segment, TRP and TRPγ seem to be expressed in the transitional segment also. The tubule transitional segment is associated with calcium transport (Dube et al. 2000b); localization of TRP and TRPγ to this region may suggest a role for these channels in transepithelial calcium transport. However, only the main segment of the tubule is fluid secreting (O'Donnell and Maddrell 1995); given the identical localization of all three channels in this region, it is likely that the TRP family channels are directly involved with calcium-signaling mechanisms that regulate fluid transport. CAP2b-stimulated fluid transport is sensitive to mutations in trpl: Given the localization of TRP and TRP-related channels in the fluid-transporting region of the tubule, the impact of mutations in genes encoding these channels on fluid transport was assessed using available mutants. Figure 3
The intracellular [Ca2+]i rise induced by CAP2b is significantly altered by a mutation in trpl: As fluid transport in the tubule is stimulated by increases of intracellular calcium, resting and hormone-stimulated cytosolic calcium levels were measured in intact tubules from trp and trpl alleles. The use of hsGAL4-directed aequorin transgene expression allows the measurement of [Ca2+]i in both principal and stellate cells in all regions of the tubule. However, specificity of the response is provided by a neuropeptide ligand: capa peptides, including CAP2, have been shown to raise [Ca2+]i levels only in principal cells of the main, fluid-secreting segment of the tubule (Rosay et al. 1997; Kean et al. 2002). In all mutants tested, basal [Ca2+]i levels were similar to control tubules (Figure 4A
In wild-type tubules, the CAP2b response, representing calcium influx (Rosay et al. 1997), is biphasic and composed of a primary, rapid peak followed by a slow secondary rise as shown in Figure 4A In the trp null, trp343, the CAP2b-induced [Ca2+]i response is unchanged compared to wild type. However, the trp hypomorph, trp301, shows a potentiated primary peak (Figure 4, A By contrast, trpl302 tubules (Figure 4, A Epithelial phenotypes of trp and trpl alleles are dependent on TRPL: Western analysis of tubule preparations from trp and trpl alleles was performed to determine TRP, TRPL, and TRPγ levels and to see, for example, if there were any effects of trp alleles on TRPL or TRPγ expression (Figure 5
TRP: Results in Figure 5A TRPL: Tubule TRPL levels are significantly reduced in the trp hypomorph, trp301 (Figure 5B In the trpl302, TRPL levels are very low; a faint band was detectable in tubule preparations (see also Figure 6B
TRPγ: Levels of TRPγ in the tubule are not compromised in any of the trp or trpl alleles tested (Figure 5C Taken together, the data here suggest that in the tubule TRPL channels may constitute major regulators of CAP2b-induced calcium signaling and transport. A trpl transgene rescues the fluid transport phenotype in trpl302: The data shown in the previous figures suggest that tubules require TRPL for function. Figure 6 inaD is not expressed in tubules: INAD is an essential scaffolding component of the TRP-signaling complex in photoreceptors (Li and Montell 2000). Given that TRP-TRPL complexes may be operational in the tubule, we investigated expression of established components of the TRP-signaling complex (Montell 1998) in the tubule. RT-PCR using primers directed against published sequences for other TRP-complex-associated signaling proteins, inaC (Schaeffer et al. 1989) and norpA (Bloomquist et al. 1988), were performed. Sequencing of PCR products verifies that both these genes are expressed in tubules (data not shown). Furthermore, norpA has recently been shown to play a role in epithelial transport (Pollock et al. 2003), confirming a role outside phototransduction. Tubules also express protein kinase C and phospholipase C genes not associated with photoreceptors, namely, pkc53e (Rosenthal et al. 1987) and plc21 (Shortridge et al. 1991; data not shown). Therefore, while tubules are expected to express those genes not associated with excitable cells, some genes previously associated only with phototransduction or CNS function are also expressed in these transporting epithelia. Surprisingly, then, data from RT-PCR experiments for inaD using a head/tubule cDNA template (Figure 7
These results are supported by expression data obtained by microarray analysis of the adult tubule (Wang et al. 2004), where inaD is shown to be depleted in the tubule compared to the rest of the fly (inaD in tubules, 9.1 ± 3; inaD in the rest of the fly, 63.0 ± 5.5; data expressed as Affymetrix signal ±SEM; N = 5 separate biological replicates). The lack of inaD expression therefore suggests that although many of the components of the TRP-signaling complex may have widespread expression, INAD is tissue specific. DISCUSSION Until recently, organotypic roles for TRP, TRPL, and TRPγ channels have been demonstrated only in photoreceptor function in Drosophila, with an additional role for TRP in olfactory adaptation (Stortkuhl et al. 1999). However, given the wide tissue expression of vertebrate TRP channels (Harteneck et al. 2000), it seemed possible that these channels also contribute to diverse physiological processes. Expression of trp, trpl, and trpγ in tubules and localization of these gene products to principal cells containing the electrogenic vacuolar H+-ATPase (Dow 1999) suggest a role for these calcium channels in fluid transport (Figures 1 Using available trp and trpl mutants, we have investigated direct roles for TRP and TRPL channels in neuropeptide-induced calcium signaling and fluid transport. Evidence for a role of TRPL in tubule function is provided by the observations that both CAP2b-stimulated fluid transport and calcium responses are severely reduced by a trpl mutation while two protein null alleles of trp (trp301 and trp343), which result in severe eye phenotypes, had little or no effect on tubule function. Comparison of data obtained for fluid transport (Figure 3B The importance of TRPL in tubule function is confirmed by rescue of the trpl302 with a trpl transgene, which restores stimulated fluid transport levels to those of wild type. Introduction of the trp null (trp343) into the trpl rescue line does not impact on the rescued transport phenotype by these tubules. Previous work has shown that loss of either the primary or the secondary calcium signal in tubules is associated with reduction of fluid transport. Mutations in IP3R (Pollock et al. 2003), pharmacological blockade of L-type/cyclic nucleotide gated channels (MacPherson et al. 2001; Broderick et al. 2003), and reduction of external calcium (Rosay et al. 1997) is sufficient to reduce or abolish calcium signaling, with associated loss in fluid transport. Therefore, it is likely that rescue of trpl302 results in restoration of the wild-type calcium signal and fluid transport. We suggest that possible TRP-TRPL heteromultimers (Xu et al. 1997) may mediate fluid secretion in wild-type tubules, but that in the absence of TRP protein (as in trp301, trp343), TRPL homomultimers (or TRPL-TRPγ) can also support tubule function. TRP and TRPL have been shown to act as separate channels in wild-type light-activated currents (Reuss et al. 1997), suggesting the existence of homomultimers. A role for functional TRPL-TRPL complexes is further supported by work in trp301 photoreceptors, which suggested that TRPL-TRPL homomultimers can account for the measured current (Hardie et al. 1997). Given the estimated 10-fold increase in TRP compared to TRPL channels in photoreceptors, with TRP forming the major conductance component via probable TRP-TRP homomultimers, it follows that increased severity of the trp phenotype compared to that of trpl will be observed (Leung et al. 2000; Montell 2001). This may explain the very different trp mutant phenotypes observed between photoreceptors and tubules. TRPL has also been proposed to stabilize TRP in a heteromultimeric complex (Leung et al. 2000). This could explain why the absence of TRPL, in spite of wild-type levels of TRP (in trpl302), results in a severe epithelial phenotype. In summary, data presented here suggest that in tubules TRPL plays a singular role in modulating calcium signaling and fluid transport. It is also possible that a third channel, encoded by trpγ, contributes to the tubule phenotype. As TRPγ has been shown to interact with TRPL (Xu et al. 2000), and TRPγ is expressed at wild-type levels in all trp and trpl alleles tested (Figure 5C The TRP-signaling complex is localized and assembled by the scaffolding protein, INAD, in photoreceptors (Li and Montell 2000). If TRP is also organized into signaling complexes in tubules, the scaffolding proteins involved in complex assembly must differ from those of photoreceptors in that inaD is not detectably expressed. Recent work has demonstrated that TRPL is not a component of the INAD complex (Paulsen et al. 2000). If TRPL, as opposed to TRP, is indeed the major regulator of calcium signaling and fluid transport in tubules, INAD may not be required in this tissue. Which, then, are possible candidates for TRP complex scaffolding proteins in tubule principal cells? Drosophila is known to contain at least 86 PDZ (post-synaptic density protein-95, discs large, ZO-1)-containing proteins, the majority of which are encoded by novel genes (SMART database, EMBL). Known PDZ-containing proteins in vertebrate renal epithelia include the sodium/hydrogen exchanger regulatory factor, NHERF. Intriguingly, NHERF has been shown to assemble TRP4 and phospholipase C (Tang et al. 2000). We have verified expression of the Drosophila NHERF gene sip1 (Spradling et al. 1999) in tubules; however, reporter gene expression of a P-element insertion in NHERF (Sip106373) shows expression of this gene only in tubule type II (stellate) cells (data not shown). As such, Drosophila NHERF is unlikely to be a scaffolding partner for TRP and TRP-related proteins in tubules, given that these proteins are located only in principal cells. Several genes encoding scaffolding proteins have been implicated in epithelial development in Drosophila, for example, arc, Bazooka, and scribbled. Bazooka has been shown to colocalize apically with atypical protein kinase C (Wodarz et al. 2000). Both Baz and aPKC are expressed in adult tubules (data not shown); as PKC function is important in signaling associated with TRP function, Baz may encode a potential candidate for TRP complex scaffolding proteins in tubules. We have demonstrated a novel role for trp, trpl, and trpγ in transporting epithelia and provided the first demonstration of an organotypic role for members of the Drosophila TRP family outside the eye. The availability of the complete Drosophila genome, together with the molecular genetic tools in tubule work, allow a comprehensive dissection of the role of calcium channels in transporting epithelia. As such, this may allow inferences to be drawn regarding calcium homeostasis and calcium signaling in vertebrate renal function. Acknowledgments We are very grateful to W. L. Pak, Purdue University, for the kind gift of trp343, and C. S. Zuker and R. Hardy, University of California at San Diego, for trpl rescue lines and for helpful advice. In the early stages of this work, we received aliquots of anti-TRPL and anti-TRP antibodies as kind gifts from C. Montell, Johns Hopkins Medical School, and C. S. Zuker. We are very grateful for these reagents. This work was supported by the United Kingdom Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council in the form of grants (S.D., J.A.T.D., R.C.H.), committee studentships (M.R.M., T.D.S.), and a David Phillips Fellowship (S.D.); the Wellcome Trust (J.A.T.D., R.C.H.); and the UK Medical Research Council (R.C.H.) APPENDIX
References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
J Exp Biol. 1997 Jan; 200(Pt 2):315-9.
[J Exp Biol. 1997]J Exp Biol. 1997 Jan; 200(Pt 2):303-14.
[J Exp Biol. 1997]Bioessays. 1999 Oct; 21(10):851-60.
[Bioessays. 1999]Science. 1985 Nov 29; 230(4729):1040-3.
[Science. 1985]Neuron. 1992 Apr; 8(4):643-51.
[Neuron. 1992]Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Jun; 2(6):387-96.
[Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001]Cell. 1996 May 31; 85(5):651-9.
[Cell. 1996]Neuron. 1997 Dec; 19(6):1249-59.
[Neuron. 1997]Neuron. 2000 Jun; 26(3):647-57.
[Neuron. 2000]Neuron. 1997 Jun; 18(6):881-7.
[Neuron. 1997]Cell Calcium. 1998 Sep; 24(3):153-63.
[Cell Calcium. 1998]Mol Cell Neurosci. 2000 May; 15(5):429-45.
[Mol Cell Neurosci. 2000]Nature. 1999 Jan 21; 397(6716):255-9.
[Nature. 1999]Neuron. 2000 Apr; 26(1):169-79.
[Neuron. 2000]Physiol Rev. 2003 Jul; 83(3):687-729.
[Physiol Rev. 2003]J Cell Sci. 1997 Aug; 110 ( Pt 15)():1683-92.
[J Cell Sci. 1997]Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002 May; 282(5):R1297-307.
[Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002]J Exp Biol. 2003 Mar; 206(Pt 5):901-11.
[J Exp Biol. 2003]Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001 Feb; 280(2):C394-407.
[Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001]Neuron. 1997 Dec; 19(6):1249-59.
[Neuron. 1997]Cell. 1997 Oct 31; 91(3):375-83.
[Cell. 1997]Cell. 1996 May 31; 85(5):651-9.
[Cell. 1996]J Cell Sci. 1997 Aug; 110 ( Pt 15)():1683-92.
[J Cell Sci. 1997]Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003 Nov; 285(5):C1207-18.
[Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003]Am J Physiol. 1994 May; 266(5 Pt 2):R1716-9.
[Am J Physiol. 1994]Neuron. 1989 Apr; 2(4):1313-23.
[Neuron. 1989]Neuron. 1992 Apr; 8(4):631-42.
[Neuron. 1992]Neuron. 2000 Jun; 26(3):647-57.
[Neuron. 2000]Neuron. 1995 Jan; 14(1):201-10.
[Neuron. 1995]Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001 Feb; 280(2):C394-407.
[Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001]J Exp Biol. 1994 Dec; 197():421-8.
[J Exp Biol. 1994]J Cell Sci. 1997 Aug; 110 ( Pt 15)():1683-92.
[J Cell Sci. 1997]Cell. 1997 Jun 27; 89(7):1155-64.
[Cell. 1997]J Insect Physiol. 2000 Nov 1; 46(11):1449-1460.
[J Insect Physiol. 2000]J Exp Biol. 1995 Aug; 198(Pt 8):1647-53.
[J Exp Biol. 1995]Neuron. 1997 Dec; 19(6):1249-59.
[Neuron. 1997]J Cell Sci. 1997 Aug; 110 ( Pt 15)():1683-92.
[J Cell Sci. 1997]Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002 May; 282(5):R1297-307.
[Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002]J Cell Sci. 1997 Aug; 110 ( Pt 15)():1683-92.
[J Cell Sci. 1997]Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002 May; 282(5):R1297-307.
[Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002]Cell. 1996 May 31; 85(5):651-9.
[Cell. 1996]J Cell Biol. 2000 Sep 18; 150(6):1411-22.
[J Cell Biol. 2000]Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998 Jun; 8(3):389-97.
[Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998]Cell. 1989 May 5; 57(3):403-12.
[Cell. 1989]Cell. 1988 Aug 26; 54(5):723-33.
[Cell. 1988]J Exp Biol. 2003 Mar; 206(Pt 5):901-11.
[J Exp Biol. 2003]Genome Biol. 2004; 5(9):R69.
[Genome Biol. 2004]J Neurosci. 1999 Jun 15; 19(12):4839-46.
[J Neurosci. 1999]Trends Neurosci. 2000 Apr; 23(4):159-66.
[Trends Neurosci. 2000]J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1999 Feb; 31(1):75-83.
[J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1999]J Insect Physiol. 2000 Nov 1; 46(11):1449-1460.
[J Insect Physiol. 2000]Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2000 May; 44(1):27-39.
[Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2000]Cell. 1996 May 31; 85(5):651-9.
[Cell. 1996]Bioinformatics. 2003 Jul 22; 19(11):1371-80.
[Bioinformatics. 2003]Genes Dev. 1998 Apr 1; 12(7):956-67.
[Genes Dev. 1998]EMBO Rep. 2001 Jul; 2(7):593-7.
[EMBO Rep. 2001]Development. 1997 Apr; 124(7):1405-17.
[Development. 1997]J Exp Biol. 2003 Mar; 206(Pt 5):901-11.
[J Exp Biol. 2003]Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001 Feb; 280(2):C394-407.
[Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001]Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003 Nov; 285(5):C1207-18.
[Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003]J Cell Sci. 1997 Aug; 110 ( Pt 15)():1683-92.
[J Cell Sci. 1997]Cell. 1997 Jun 27; 89(7):1155-64.
[Cell. 1997]Neuron. 1997 Dec; 19(6):1249-59.
[Neuron. 1997]Cell Calcium. 1997 Jun; 21(6):431-40.
[Cell Calcium. 1997]J Neurosci. 2000 Sep 15; 20(18):6797-803.
[J Neurosci. 2000]Neuron. 2001 Apr; 30(1):3-5.
[Neuron. 2001]Neuron. 2000 Jun; 26(3):647-57.
[Neuron. 2000]J Cell Biol. 2000 Sep 18; 150(6):1411-22.
[J Cell Biol. 2000]Pflugers Arch. 2000; 439(3 Suppl):R181-3.
[Pflugers Arch. 2000]J Biol Chem. 2000 Dec 1; 275(48):37559-64.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Genetics. 1999 Sep; 153(1):135-77.
[Genetics. 1999]J Cell Biol. 2000 Sep 18; 150(6):1361-74.
[J Cell Biol. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 13; 94(10):5207-12.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]J Exp Biol. 2003 Mar; 206(Pt 5):901-11.
[J Exp Biol. 2003]Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003 Nov; 285(5):C1207-18.
[Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003]Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003 Nov; 285(5):C1207-18.
[Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003]