• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of amjphAmerican Journal of Public Health Web SiteAmerican Public Health Association Web SiteSubmissionsSubscriptionsAbout Us
Am J Public Health. 2004 October; 94(10): 1713–1716.
PMCID: PMC1448523

Education-Related Gender Differences in Health in Rural China

Jing Wu, MD, MPH, Yuanli Liu, MD, MPH, Keqin Rao, MD, MPH, Qi Sun, MPH, Juncheng Qian, MPH, and Zhu Li, MD, MPH

Abstract

We investigated gender differences in education-related health inequalities in rural China. Household interview data were obtained from 6 provinces in 1993 and 2001. Remarkable health inequalities existed and favored the higher educational groups; among women, the inequalities were greater and health inequalities increased from 1993 to 2001. Education serves as a more powerful mediating factor for health inequalities among women than among men in rural China.

The body of literature on health inequalities has increased steadily.1–6 Yet, insufficient attention has been paid to the gender differences; few studies have used morbidity data or conducted time trend analysis.7–9 Most of those studies were implemented in industrialized countries,10,11 whose health status and other socioeconomic conditions are very different from those in developing countries. For example, the traditional social roles for and discrimination against women still persist in developing countries.

Over the past several decades, China has significantly improved the education of its people. From 1990 to 2000, the illiteracy rate decreased from 15.88% to 6.72%.12 Meanwhile, China’s overall health status has improved. For example, the infant mortality rate decreased from 50.2‰ in 1990 to 32.2‰ in 2000.13 However, less well known are the situations pertaining to health inequalities in China. Although the general social status of Chinese women has improved over the years,14 little is known about the role of gender in health inequalities, especially among rural populations.

To help fill gaps in the literature, we examined gender differences in education-related health inequalities and the time trend among Chinese rural residents and studied the role of education as a mediating factor for health inequalities.

METHODS

Data

The data were from 2 household interview surveys by the Chinese Ministry of Health in 199315 and in 2001.16 Both surveys used a similar multistage stratified sampling framework and the same set of questions, with a response rate of more than 93%.

Representative samples in rural areas were studied from 3 northern provinces (Hebei, Shanxi, and Gansu) and 3 southern provinces (Hubei, Zhejiang, and Guangdong). The major demographic and social characteristics of samples from the same province were comparable across 1993 and 2001. In 1993, 10662 respondents and in 2001, 9196 respondents aged 15 years and older were included in the current study.

Variables

Individuals were ranked by their educational levels: “basic” is equivalent to less than 5 years of education; “secondary” is equivalent to 5 years; “third” is equivalent to an average of 6 to 9 years; and “highest” is equivalent to an average of 9 years or more.

Other major socioeconomic variables were defined. Current occupational status was classified in 5 groups: farmers, nonagricultural workers, housekeepers, the unemployed, and others. The income criterion was based on per capita household income and divided into quintiles.

Health status was measured by the 6-month rate of chronic diseases. Because chronic illnesses may be related to lifestyle and health care access, we also analyzed the effect of education-related differences in lifestyles (e.g., smoking rate) on education-related health equalities and health care access as reflected by foregone hospitalization.

Associational Analysis

We age-standardized 2 samples from 1993 and 2001 with China’s 1990 census data. The association between educational level and health outcome was assessed with logistic regression models, which controlled for income quintile, occupational status, and age. The adjusted odds ratio reflected the effect of education on health outcome.

We used the Relative Inequality Index, which is based on logistic regression, as the measure of health inequalities.17,18 Relative changes between 1993 and 2001 were measured by fitting logistic regression models that combined both surveys.19 In addition to age and socioeconomic variables, interaction terms of educational levels and the year of the survey were included in the models so that the odds ratio could indicate relative changes between years.

RESULTS

Results of health status by educational level are presented in Table 1 [triangle]. People with lower educational levels clearly had a greater disposition for illness. Results of the Relative Inequality Index indicated that health inequalities among women were greater, and gender differences increased in 2001. Relative changes suggested that the health dissimilarity between bottom and top educational level increased for women from 1993 to 2001.

TABLE 1
The 6-Month Rate of Chronic Diseases, by Educational Level: Rural Areas of China, 1993 and 2001

Table 2 [triangle] presents differences in lifestyles and health care use by educational level. The rate of unhealthy lifestyle, such as smoking and drinking, decreased with educational attainment. Similarly, the foregone hospitalization rate was lower in higher education groups with healthy lifestyles. In general, differences in health-related behaviors between top and bottom educational level were more significant among women in 2001 than in 1993.

TABLE 2
Differences in Lifestyles and Health Care Use, by Educational Level: Rural Areas of China, 1993 and 2001

DISCUSSION

One of the major findings from this study is that education-related health inequalities are greater among women than among men in rural China. Existing literature provides very few conclusive inferences on this issue.20–22 Generally, gender differences in health inequalities may be explained by the differences between women and men in work conditions, income, lifestyles, and use of health care services.23–25 Previous literature found that education affected health inequalities via pathways of income and occupation.6,26 The fact that the education-related health inequalities remained significant after we controlled for income and occupation effects may indicate an independent effect of education on health, especially among women. One of the possible pathways for education to affect health is through health-related behaviors.

Following the literature on health-related behaviors,6,25,27 we analyzed education-related differences in lifestyles, such as smoking, drinking, and physical exercise, and in health care use (Table 2 [triangle]). Although higher educational levels generally correlate with less frequent risky behavior (e.g., smoking, drinking), more frequent physical exercise, and higher health care use rate, the most striking finding was on the interaction of education, gender, and smoking behavior. We found that rural Chinese women had a significantly lower smoking rate than did men, consistent with other literature,28 which may be related to the fact that Chinese women are more price-sensitive than men, quite contrary to the findings from the United States and other countries.29,30 Moreover, the gender difference could stem from broader differences in willingness to incur health risks.31

On the basis of our analysis, especially on smoking behavior, we speculate that one of the possible reasons for the observed larger education-related health inequalities among women might be the stronger educational effect on healthy behaviors among women than among men. In the Chinese cultural context, especially in rural China, differential social roles and constraints still exist in women and men, a fact that might help modify the effect of education on healthy behaviors. For example, cessation rates, or interest in quitting smoking, are very low among Chinese men. According to the National Prevalence Study, only 2.3% of the respondents were former smokers, and only 9.4% of the current smokers were at some stage of trying to quit.29 The recalcitrance of men to the notion of quitting has a cultural underpinning. For instance, gift giving among relatives, friends, and business partners is an important part of Chinese tradition. With some regional exceptions, cigarettes and liquor remain the 2 most popular gift items.

Because of data limitations, our results are indicative, not conclusive. Uncertainties remain in the causality of the education-related health inequalities and gender differences. It would be interesting for future studies not only to test the reproducibility of our results but also to examine pathways through which education helps women to modify their health determinants. Nonetheless, given the inherent values of education for women, as reflected in the Millennium Development Goals32 pertaining to education and gender equality, our results seem to highlight the instrumental values of improving education for women to reduce health inequalities and improve population health.

Acknowledgments

The Rockefeller Foundation funded the 2001 China Health Surveillance Survey, which constituted part of the data source for this study.

We appreciate the able assistance and useful comments from Rongwei Ye and Chunyu Li of Peking University.

Note. The authors are responsible for the contents of this brief.

Human Participant Protection
No protocol approval was needed for this study.

Notes

Contributors
J. Wu and Y. Liu conceived the study and supervised all aspects of its implementation. Q. Sun and J. Qian assisted with the study and completed the analyses. K. Rao and Z. Li synthesized analyses and led the writing of the brief. All authors helped to conceptualize ideas, interpret findings, and review drafts of the brief.

Peer Reviewed

References

1. Gwatkin DR. Health inequalities and the health of the poor: what do we know? What can we do? Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78:3–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Borrell C, Regidor E, Arias LC, et al. Inequalities in mortality according to educational level in two large Southern European cities. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28: 58–63. [PubMed]
3. Gakidou EE, Murray CJ, Frenk J. Defining and measuring health inequality: an approach based on the distribution of health expectancy. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78:42–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Sundquist J, Johansson SE. Self reported poor health and low educational level predictors for mortality: a population based follow-up study of 39,156 people in Sweden. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997;51: 35–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Kalediene R, Petrauskiene J. Inequalities in life expectancy in Lithuania by level of education. Scand J Public Health. 2000;28:4–9. [PubMed]
6. Vega J, Hollstein RD, Delgado I, et al. Chile: socioeconomic differentials and mortality in a middle-income nation. In: Evans T, Whitehead M, Diderichsen F, Bhuiya A, Wirth M, eds. Challenging Inequities in Health: From Ethics to Action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001:123–137.
7. Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE, Cavelaars A, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in Western Europe. Lancet. 1997;349:1655–1659. [PubMed]
8. Aiach P, Curtis S. Social inequalities in self-reported morbidity: interpretation and comparison of data from Britain and France. Soc Sci Med. 1990;31:267–274. [PubMed]
9. Silventoinen K, Lahelma E. Health inequalities by education and age in four Nordic countries, 1986 and 1994. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56: 253–258. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Okojie CEE. Gender inequalities of health in the Third World. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39:1237–1247. [PubMed]
11. Vlassoff C. Gender inequalities in health in the Third World: uncharted ground. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39: 1249–1259. [PubMed]
12. China Population Statistical Yearbook 2000. Beijing, China: China Statistics Press; 2001.
13. China’s Health Statistics Yearbook of 2000. Beijing, China: Ministry of Health; 2001.
14. Yu MY, Sarri R. Women’s health status and gender inequality in China. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45: 1885–1898. [PubMed]
15. Research on National Health Services—An Analysis Report of the National Health Services Survey in 1993. Beijing, China: Ministry of Health; 1994.
16. Survey Project and Guidance Manual of China Health Surveillance System. Beijing, China: Ministry of Health; 2001.
17. Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP. Measuring Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization; 1994
18. Kunst AE, Geurts JJ, van den Berg J. International variation in socioeconomic inequalities in self reported health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995;49:117–123. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Anitua C, Esnaola S. Changes in social inequalities in health in the Basque Country. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:437–443. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Havvi-Mannila E. Inequalities in health and gender. Soc Sci Med. 1986;22:141–149. [PubMed]
21. Hraba J, Lorenz F, Lee G, Pechacova Z. Gender differences in health: evidence from The Czech Republic. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43:1443–1451. [PubMed]
22. Koskinen S, Martelin T. Why are socioeconomic mortality differences smaller among women than among men? Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1385–1396. [PubMed]
23. Stronks K, van de Mheen H, van den Bos J, Mackenbach JP. Smaller socioeconomic inequalities in health among women: the role of employment status. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24:559–568. [PubMed]
24. Matthews S, Manor O, Power C. Social inequalities in health: are there gender differences? Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:49–60. [PubMed]
25. Denton M, Walters V. Gender differences in structural and behavioral determinants of health: an analysis of the social production of health. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1221–1235. [PubMed]
26. Muller A. Education, income inequality, and mortality: a multiple regression analysis. BMJ. 2002;324: 23–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Power C, Matthews S, Manor O. Inequalities in self-rated health: explanations from different stages of life. Lancet. 1998;351:1009–1014. [PubMed]
28. Pomerleau CS, Berman BA, Gritz ER, et al. Why women smoke. In: Watson RR, ed. Drug and Alcohol Abuse Reviews. Volume 5: Additive Behavior in Women. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc; 1994:39–70.
29. Yang G, Fan L, Tan J, et al. Smoking in China: findings of the 1996 National Prevalence Survey. JAMA. 1999;282:1247–1253. [PubMed]
30. Chaloupka FJ. Men, Women and Addiction: The Case of Cigarette Smoking. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research; 1990. Working Paper No. w3267. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w3267.pdf.
31. Hersch J. Smoking, seat belts, and other risky consumer decisions: differences by gender and race. Managerial Decis Econ. 1996;17:471–481.
32. United Nations Millennium Declaration. September 18, 2000. Available at: http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.pdf. Accessed August 16. 2004.

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...